The Evolution of DFS

This will be the most unpopular blog post in the history of RotoGrinders. However, truth does not change due to popularity. 90% of you are going to read this and shake your head. No, no, no, no, no will be the only words running through your head. Some of you will even not be able to finish reading and scroll to the bottom to post comments on why this blog is so, so wrong. Some of you will post comments suggesting what can be done to stop the inevitable evolution of DFS. Some of you will read this and understand that this beautiful bubble we have enjoyed for a time has burst and become down about it. Finally, some of you will see the logic and reasoning and change to adapt.

Denial, Anger, Bargaining, Depression, Acceptance. The 5 stages of grief.

If something grows, it must change and evolve. Those that adapt to the changes and evolve along with the environment will flourish. Numerous books have been written about this concept, especially in the business world with Who Moved My Cheese?, The Toyota Way, and The Machine That Changed the World.

If something does not change and evolve, it cannot grow. It will stagnate. It will fall behind as others grow. The evolution of DFS has been mostly uncontroversial. The potential DFS has had is continuing to be realized without having to rock any boats. That is, until scripting.

The issue with Scripting was dealt with in the Big Two’s TOS agreements. Scripting was strictly forbidden. As we have found out, this was a rule that most followed, but not all. This rule also was unenforceable by and large. Any rule or law that can’t be enforced becomes a suggestion. The Big Two had to decide, legalize what was forbidden or fight a losing war.
So, they took drastic approaches. FanDuel decided it will continue to fight against it for the most part. DraftKings decided to allow it for the most part. The majority of DFSers, myself included, don’t have coding skills. The majority do not have the volume to need to worry about scripting. Yet, some of the majority see a definite advantage to the larger volume players being allowed to use bots and scripting.

Evolution has happened. DraftKings decided the time was right to allow scripting as another tool for members to use. FanDuel decided to avoid changing with the environment. The fact is, scripters are still going to script on FanDuel. They will challenge FanDuel to enforce their rule and while I am rooting for FanDuel, I believe it will fail miserably.

The low volume player who is paying attention to the scripting issue will run to FanDuel as they will feel a sense of false security. Some of the scripters will actually not chance being caught by FanDuel as they flee to DraftKings. The coming evolution will be DraftKings will see ever larger Multi entry GPPS while FanDuel’s will continue to shrink. At that point, FanDuel will be at the “Who Moved My Cheese” moment. Allow Scripting or continue to cling to the old failed set-up.

The new player on the block in Yahoo! is trying to eliminate that need by limiting the amount of multiple entries one can have. This is a fine strategy that will draw even more players from FanDuel, but the size of the tournaments can never surpass FanDuel’s which can never surpass DraftKings. Yahoo!’s evolutionary decision will be raise the limit on multi-entry or continue to be a bit player in a growing industry.

The final issue is the lack of realistic expectations of the average DFS player. The average DFS player would consider him/herself in the top quartile, overestimating their skill set by 100%. The average DFS player looks at the evolution going on and complains. They despise change. They love to be comfortable. This is part of why they remain average. The average DFS player sees multi-entry tournaments taken down time and time again by Professionals with large bankrolls to fund large numbers of entries and complains they cannot win. They don’t realize that even if their false assumption was right and they were a top 25% player entering an 80,000 entry tournament every single day, they should win that tournament about once every 27 years. 2 Entries a day? 13.5 years. 3 Entries a day? 9 Years. 10 entries a day? 2 and a half years.

The issue is not whether scripts should be allowed. I hate the idea myself. If I had the power to make using scripts punishable by death, I’d do it. I’m ok with 8,300 entry tournaments rather than 83,000. It’s the idea of binking that big one that draws so many to begin with. You literally can turn $0.25 into $1,000,000 by winning a satellite and then winning a tournament. If you are an average player, you can enter a shot at $1,000,000 for $20 and probably lose a $3 average every time you do it. However, you only have to be right one single time.

The final evolution that I believe will happen to this scripting stuff is FanDuel will see what is going on and as DraftKing’s prize pools increase while FanDuel decreases, FanDuel will resort to having a place where people can fill in their projections and then make the lineups for them from that and as people edit their projections, those lineups will be edited. DFS will evolve into a prognostication contest. People using the likes of RotoGrinders Projections and other projection sites will find they have a ton of overlap in their lineups. However, when FanDuel does take this drastic measure it will be either too late to save itself from the disaster it created or it will force DraftKings to do the same, which then gives FanDuel no advantages and already being a leg behind the competition.

As for Yahoo!, if they stick to their guns and continue to limit Multi-entries, they will continue to build their niche market. Not having near the size of prizes as DraftKings, those who do not script, those who do not play heavy volumes, those who play DFS to make a buck and for entertainment value, they will be content with Yahoo. The question is whether Yahoo will be content to be a bit player.

I for one will be hiring a programmer at a hefty cost to build a script to use on DraftKings. I will not be using a script on FanDuel and quit there when it becomes obvious they cannot enforce their rules. I will be joining Yahoo and enjoying that even more than any other site solely because those lineups were crafted by me instead of generated lineups from a spreadsheet and a script. A true test of skill rather than a contest of who has the best set of numbers on a spreadsheet.

Someone moved my cheese. I didn’t sit and cry about it being gone. I searched and I found new cheese. I strongly suggest everyone does the same rather than mourn over what will forever be known as the golden days of DFS.

About the Author

Comments

  • gaelicgirl

    Thanks for your thoughts, Yukerboy. You say, “The low volume player who is paying attention to the scripting issue will run to FanDuel as they will feel a sense of false security.” But maybe they will run to FanDuel in search of a more level playing field. DraftKings seems content to serve as maxdalury’s personal retirement fund, as long as they get their cut. Maybe FanDuel will actually gain market share as more low volume players realize they don’t have a chance of winning on DraftKings. Who in their right mind would waste $20 on one entry in the $500K Sweet Spot when they can see that maxdalury has already spent $12,160 on 608 entries? Even if you did manage to “be right one single time,” duplicate entries by the multiple entry scripters would probably drastically reduce your share of the prize money. No, thank you.
    At least FanDuel makes an effort to give the low volume players a chance to win some decent prizes, by providing some reasonable single entry GPPs. DraftKings’ single entry GPPs are a joke. Entering all of FanDuel’s single entry GPPs, you have a chance to win $3,100 on $41 worth of entry fees. At DraftKings you have a chance to win only $895 for $45 worth of entry fees.
    I’m really glad I signed up to RotoGrinders…otherwise, I might never have known about these scripting issues. I’m so done with DraftKings.

  • Yukerboy

    • Blogger of the Month

    “You say, “The low volume player who is paying attention to the scripting issue will run to FanDuel as they will feel a sense of false security.” But maybe they will run to FanDuel in search of a more level playing field.”

    Same thing. They will feel FanDuel offers a more level playing field because of their scripting policy. My point is that it will still have Scripters ignoring the TOS and they will be unable to prevent that.

    As for the single entry GPPs, I agree with you. FanDuel is well ahead in that regard and they will only grow as the low volume player heads there from DK. However, when the players realize that FanDuel cannot enforce their TOS, then they will move to Yahoo where Scripters have no incentive to play.

  • bigfink

    I don’t think it is fair to judge yahoo until football season comes around.

  • Syko

    @bigfink said...

    I don’t think it is fair to judge yahoo until football season comes around.

    They weren’t forced to rush out a half-baked baseball product.

  • edav6618

    Where do you go to find these script writers?

  • edav6618

    This really sucks lol. I got out of stocks because I felt that was corrupted now to find out that DFS smh what a bummer.

  • Yukerboy

    • Blogger of the Month

    @bigfink said...

    I don’t think it is fair to judge yahoo until football season comes around.

    It’s not a judgment on the quality of their product, but their policy as it stands. Limiting the number of entries will draw down the potential top prizes, but prevent scripting. This is where I will enjoy DFS the most.

  • Yukerboy

    • Blogger of the Month

    @edav6618 said...

    Where do you go to find these script writers?

    Tons of freelance sites out there.

  • gaelicgirl

    @Yukerboy said...

    However, when the players realize that FanDuel cannot enforce their TOS, then they will move to Yahoo where Scripters have no incentive to play.

    Or they might choose Door #3: Stick to small slate tournaments with small player pools and small prizes. Not enough meat there to draw the sharks and not enough entries to make scripting an advantage.
    Yesterday my single entries crashed and burned, so I went down to my last $22 on FD to play $120 on the Late Night GPPs. Yeah, I know…don’t chase your losses! But I always do that, because I’m stubborn and hate to lose.
    I decided to have a beer and go with my gut instead of studying. My “strategy” was simply to avoid what I thought would be the popular picks and go contrarian.
    I entered the $10 Line Drive six times, and the $5 Rally 12 times. My plan was to take Heston, Gibson, and Buehrle, but I ran out of time and ended up with six of Heston and six of Gibson. Then I mixed stacks of Giants, Twins, and Blue Jays hitters, and took Vogt, Martin, and Iannetta for catchers. I completely faded the D’backs/Marlins game, because I didn’t like either pitcher and figured the D’backs would be highly owned against Latos.
    Long story short (too late!), I ended up cashing with 2nd place in the Line Drive twice with duplicate lineups for $175 each and 8th place in the Rally four times with duplicate lineups for $91.25 each.
    Heston 17.33
    Iannetta 10.75
    Smoak 1
    Travis 1.5
    Donaldson 4.25
    Crawford 10.75
    Pence 7.5
    Bautista 5
    Hunter -1
    Now my bankroll is healed…sometimes it’s better to be lucky than good, no?

  • X Unread Thread
  • X Thread with New Replies*
  • *Jumps to your first unread reply

New to DFS?

Be sure to click through our links and use our exclusive promo codes to receive the industry's best sign-up bonuses, including free access to our premium content.

RotoGrinders.com is the home of the daily fantasy sports community. Our content, rankings, member blogs, promotions and forum discussion all cater to the players that like to create a new fantasy team every day of the week.

If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, crisis counseling and referral services can be accessed by calling 1-800-GAMBLER (1-800-426-2537) (IL). Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER (NJ/WV/PA/MI), 1-800-9-WITH-IT (IN), 1-800-522-4700 (CO), 1-800-BETS OFF (IA), 1-888-532-3500 (VA) or call/text TN REDLINE 1-800-889-9789 (TN).