• ColtsPacersFan1

    The late slate of games on FD tonite involved boston celtics. Jae Crowder was ruled out 30 minutes after 830 lock. Boston Portland game begins @ 1030. The ownership % on Jae Crowder is 31%. Compared to 45% for Harrison Barnes and 60% for Gordon Hayward. Based on pricing Jae Crowder would be owned at approximately 50% give or take.

    Moe Harkless also in late game has ownership of 46%. Moreso than Harrison Barnes. These numbers had to be altered in some fashion. No way could Jae Crowders family issue been known before lock. Harkless 99% even with privy to his starting position for the evening would not be owned more than Jae Crowder.

    Does anyone else believe these numbers would have to have been altered after LOCK. This is issue where FD’s integrity has to be questioned. Not sure if anyone at all gives a darn about this in NY but I am going to find out. If gaming commission exists this is once specific incident that needs to reviewed.

    Any suggestions on relevant contact information would be appreciated. Thank you.

  • Razzle11

    So when its a two game slate and one game has an O/U 25ish points below the other, we shouldn’t roster ANYBODY from that low O/U game? Realize somebody has to put up points in the game, its not going to end up 0-0 with one team holding the ball for 48 minutes.

    I will go back to my point, when you say Crowder is 6500 and Barnes is 6400, who are you going to take? I am taking Barnes every single day. Now add in other information, Crowder laid a terrible dud the night before in a very good match-up, Barnes had taken 38! shots combined in his previous 2 against Utah. (yes, Dirk played in 1 of the 2). It’s already been pointed out the big gap in usage %.

    Also, is Vegas 100% always dead on with O/U projections? No, they aren’ last night’s game at the end of the 4th was 7 points over their projected total.

    Talk about roster construction? Well, there were basically 1 of 2 ways to view the SF position last night on FD, get yourself the punt play of Harkless at his price or make sure to get Hayward at his top level price (in that same game you are complaining about the O/U in). (why aren’t you complaining about the 60% ownership of him?) I’ve already commented on game stacking and how Crowder was basically the 4th guy from Boston that I assumed most people would have been interested in, 3rd at best. Barnes, with the price corrections of Curry and Ferrell, would be the top option from Dallas. Thats a pretty big difference right there.

  • Razzle11

    @ColtsPacersFan1 said...

    n terms of Mavs to play tonite I cant imagine a 100$ differeence between Barnes and Crowder translates to 15% ownership difference. To each his own. But common sense per Vegas suggests Crowder would be at minimum equal to Barnes in ownership.

    But DFS player common sense says at the price point, Barnes is far better a DFS option that Crowder

  • X Unread Thread
  • X Thread with New Replies*
  • *Jumps to your first unread reply

Subforum Index is the home of the daily fantasy sports community. Our content, rankings, member blogs, promotions and forum discussion all cater to the players that like to create a new fantasy team every day of the week.

If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, crisis counseling and referral services can be accessed by calling 1-800-GAMBLER (1-800-426-2537) (IL). Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER (NJ/WV/PA/MI), 1-800-9-WITH-IT (IN), 1-800-522-4700 (CO), 1-800-BETS OFF (IA), 1-888-532-3500 (VA) or call/text TN REDLINE 1-800-889-9789 (TN).