NFL FORUM

Comments

  • bhdevault

    • Lead Moderator

    • Blogger of the Month

    Saturday, 1/11
    4:35 PM EST : Minnesota ( 6.5 ) at San Francisco ( -6.5 ) —- T: 45
    8:15 PM EST : Tennessee ( 8 ) at Baltimore ( -8 ) —- T: 47

    Sunday, 1//12
    3:05 PM EST : Houston ( 10 ) at Kansas City ( -10 ) —- T: 49
    6:40 PM EST : Seattle ( 4 ) at Green Bay ( -4 ) —- T: 46

    Admin Note: The mod team is working to keep these daily threads more on topic – NFL strategy talk for this weeks games. Post referring to last weeks games will be moved to last weeks NFL thread. Any off topic posts, troll posts or posts containing full lineups will be deleted. While the use of GIF’s are acceptable, content must be posted along with them.

  • squidkill

    @BIF

    solo mission today bud- Ma and them got Bingo

  • keephustlincuz

    @BIF said...

    Is Mom coming with you ? Everyone would rather meet her and your aunt that is now your uncle

    That would be a sight to see. Table for 10…..

    Squid, Ma and all 8 Aunts.

  • mike42

    @Falconsfly said...

    Mike..what are you thinking the must plays for cash are on FD. The more I tinker, the more it looks like GPP. I have Damien and sanders in mine as of now. Thanks!

    Damien seems like a lock but the price on FD makes it at least something you have to think about. The price on Cook on FD makes him interesting too given he should not be cheaper than A. Jones. I think you pay up for D. Adams in cash because NUK and Hill have so many other options for O on their teams and he’s got a plus matchup and the closest thing to a sure 10 plus tgts on the slate.

    Deebo>Sanders in cash, I like sanders better for GPP’s. Not even sure most realize that Sanders is dominating air yards Vs a secondary that struggles more down the field than anywhere else. I think Kelce>Kittle for cash too. Just a better a much better matchup and Hous lost it’s S before last game but Buf didn’t use Knox for most of the year. Having Kelce and Damien should be a nice hedge in cash for the highest total on the board. After that, IDK. Everyone will be mixing on S. Watkins, M. Brown and Lazard to complete their cash LU’s and you can make a case for all of them even though busting is the most likely scenario for each. It feels like Lazard might be the safest but IDK.

  • odanny

    @mike42 said...

    So groins are more bothered by lateral movement, not so much vertical. I’m wondering if his role this weekend will be mostly go routes. Maybe they use him on passing downs. Because of that blurb, his ownership will probably be 10-15% which isn’t really an edge and might be worth a shot.

    I think the bigger injury is Ingram. There are so many routes to Gus getting more touches and only one where he doesn’t; if Ingram is fine. If they blow them out, Gus should see extra work earlier than usual. If Ingram is really limited, Gus could get 1/2 the work or even all the work with Ingram just active in case of an emergency and we figure this out on the first drive. Also, if Ingram gets injured early and Gus is the guy the rest of the way. Gus is just a good GPP play under most scenarios.

    Gus could have a monster day, he ran for 132 yards against a Steelers D in a must win game. Why even risk Ingram when this team should not be seriously challenged in a divisional game, with the AFC Championship looming next week? I’m on the Gus bus.

  • mike42

    @BIF said...

    Feels like a Kendrick Bourne week – Minny D is down a man in CB Mackenzie Alexander

    I feel like Williams, Mostert and A Jones will be my core RBs with a little Cook mixed in – my favorite RB is Jackson but DK making me use him at QB 🙄

    Kelce should have a mismatch as does Andrews – wish I had about 54K to use for salary

    Greetings all from the beach

    I just got on Bourne about an hour ago. Apparently, getting sun is overrated. Stop talking to us, enjoy the weather. That’s what I did when I was there.

  • keephustlincuz

    @mike42 said...

    I think the bigger injury is Ingram. There are so many routes to Gus getting more touches and only one where he doesn’t; if Ingram is fine.

    Mike…

    How much of the Balt offense do you think I get by playing Lamar, gus and Andrews? 80-85%

  • mike42

    @jstelzer said...

    How are D.Williams or Mostert not good cash plays? Both are the lead backs in what may or may not be a committee (depending on how much Shady is used). Samuels and Sanders are the 1 & 2 WRs against some pretty weak corners considering the others playing this weekend.

    D. Williams is a lock in cash. The problem with Moskert is limited touches, bad matchup and I’m wondering if Shanahan doesn’t use Coleman more since he’s the only vet in the bunch. I heard him speak about his RB’s this week and he made it sound like a split backfield more than the Moskert show. Some coaches go more Vets in the playoffs but we have no track recored here, just guessing and reading between the lines. Moskert I think is more GPP than cash. No ppr points really either.

  • mike42

    @keephustlincuz said...

    Mike…

    How much of the Balt offense do you think I get by playing Lamar, gus and Andrews? 80-85%

    IDK, but I’m goiing to have a couple LU’s with those 3 and bringing it back with AJ Brown.

    Per Tannehill— Balt does a lot of zero blitzes so that should afford us a lot of opportunities to get 1 on 1 coverage and be one tackle away from a big play. I think we got a lot of guys (No, just 1) that are good at such things.

    I don’t hate even using Henry in the game stacks just because they won’t stop giving it to him very easily.

    The quote is not exact but it is exactly the point he was making without question. AJ Brown is a better play than the field thinks he is.

  • PaperStacking92

    Don’t sleep on Khalif Raymond dude could cut loose for a bomb tonight

  • mike42

    @squidkill said...

    @BIF

    solo mission today bud- Ma and them got Bingo

    About J. Williams. !- He always looks better after rest 2. GB installed a new turf that has had some issues this year with being really slippery. His body type would be better suited for such conditions than A. Jones and Frenchie always talks about how much he likes his third down blocking. He should see 30% or so of the snaps and who knows with that backfield when both are active.

  • mike42

    @PaperStacking92 said...

    Don’t sleep on Khalif Raymond dude could cut loose for a bomb tonight

    Not making the cut for 99% if the field so good luck with that. Maybe that’s the type of play Tannehill was talking about in my post. Not sure 1-49-1 will be a slate breaker.

  • realphipps

    I have zero Damien Williams. GPP only.

    Seems like KC has a lot of avenues to success through the air. Andy Reid has been saving Shady, a good receiver out of the backfield.

    Williams will get usage, though I don’t see nearly as many touches for him as others do.

  • DC2380

    Mike and BIF -how do you guys feel about Nuke this week

  • kdsdawg

    seems Carroll is going all in on Lynch this week

    Homer could be in line for a reduced role in Sunday’s divisional-round matchup with the Packers after coach Pete Carroll said he anticipates featuring Marshawn Lynch more heavily in the Seahawks’ game plan, Brady Henderson of ESPN.com reports. “He’s going to play more this week,” Carroll said of Lynch. “He’s ready to, and he’s had enough time with us. He feels confident about what he’s doing and the plan.

  • Falconsfly

    @mike42 said...

    Damien seems like a lock but the price on FD makes it at least something you have to think about. The price on Cook on FD makes him interesting too given he should not be cheaper than A. Jones. I think you pay up for D. Adams in cash because NUK and Hill have so many other options for O on their teams and he’s got a plus matchup and the closest thing to a sure 10 plus tgts on the slate.

    Deebo>Sanders in cash, I like sanders better for GPP’s. Not even sure most realize that Sanders is dominating air yards Vs a secondary that struggles more down the field than anywhere else. I think Kelce>Kittle for cash too. Just a better a much better matchup and Hous lost it’s S before last game but Buf didn’t use Knox for most of the year. Having Kelce and Damien should be a nice hedge in cash for the highest total on the board. After that, IDK. Everyone will be mixing on S. Watkins, M. Brown and Lazard to complete their cash LU’s and you can make a case for all of them even though busting is the most likely scenario for each. It feels like Lazard might be the safest but IDK.

    Love the insight. Thanks!

  • monarch

    @realphipps said...

    I have zero Damien Williams. GPP only.

    Seems like KC has a lot of avenues to success through the air. Andy Reid has been saving Shady, a good receiver out of the backfield.

    Williams will get usage, though I don’t see nearly as many touches for him as others do.

    I’m on board with that. Romeo Crennell has been around the block a bit. I think it’s a lower scoring game than the public would have it and KC will move the ball by committee….any of their twelve playmakers on offense but not concentrated. A great spot for Harrison Butker in showdown.

  • Jase32

    Showdown is tough for Ten/Bal

    Cannot use LJ or Henry as C at all. And I cannot even play both LJ and Henry in one LU without having to chance lower valued TE like that one on the Titans (not Firkster).

    So I have one LU each with the Bmore side of LJ and Andrews at C and the Ten side with Henry and Brown at C. Those allow me to get Davis at least. I have another where I have LJ, Henry, Brown but have to use the other Brown instead of Andrews. With two punt plays.

  • monarch

    @Jase32 said...

    Showdown is tough for Ten/Bal

    Cannot use LJ or Henry as C at all. And I cannot even play both LJ and Henry in one LU without having to chance lower valued TE like that one on the Titans (not Firkster).

    So I have one LU each with the Bmore side of LJ and Andrews at C and the Ten side with Henry and Brown at C. Those allow me to get Davis at least. I have another where I have LJ, Henry, Brown but have to use the other Brown instead of Andrews. With two punt plays.

    Why cant you use Lamar Jackson as captain? Captains win showdowns

  • PaperStacking92

    @mike42 said...

    Not making the cut for 99% if the field so good luck with that. Maybe that’s the type of play Tannehill was talking about in my post. Not sure 1-49-1 will be a slate breaker.

    For 3k that’s solid especially on a 4 game slate and Showdown. Opens up a lot for a lu as well. He might even do better than your projected stat. He’s also gonna return punts Tonight. Lotta upside for a free player. On a 4 gamer not a lot of room to get cute

    Paul Kuharsky PaulKuharskyNFL 22h "(player-popup #kalif-raymond)Kalif Raymond":/players/kalif-raymond-35608 will be the #Titans punt returner Saturday night with DariusJennings_ handling kicks.

  • antzilla810

    FD sat slate. Henry, Edwards,Rudolph or Cook, Edward’s, Mostert/Diggs?

  • feekdogg

    @mike42 said...

    I just got on Bourne about an hour ago. Apparently, getting sun is overrated. Stop talking to us, enjoy the weather. That’s what I did when I was there.

    I assume Bourne is primarily the Niners slot guy. Last week, Andrew Sendejo (normally a safety) played nickel for the Vikings. Kearse is out too, so if anyone else goes down in the secondary, the Vikings are down to Marcus Sherels and some guy they just brought in on Thursday.

  • HoodsFromTheWood

    @squidkill said...

    I’m headed down to Twin River Sportsbook today for the games………. anyone in the area head on down-

    Lol good luck. I’m heading over to visit a couple of the Grandkids and read them a book on sports, almost the same thing. Be back In The Wood for kick-off, Burgers and bers

  • mike42

    What do you guys think the most common roster construction will be on DK? Paying up for 1 WR or 2?

  • mike42

    @DC2380 said...

    Mike and BIF -how do you guys feel about Nuke this week

    If his POWN is right (12%), go way over on principal alone. He’s going to slip under the covers and I just noticed how low his POWN is. It makes sense, nobody wants to pay up for him and the only place they will is with Watson so playing him naked isn’t the worse idea. YOu have to do some LU’s with just 1-2 players from this game and no QB’s because not many will.

  • squidkill

    Common Construction I thought was gonna be 2 Tight Ends with 1 in the flex.

  • X Unread Thread
  • X Thread with New Replies*
  • *Jumps to your first unread reply

Subforum Index

RotoGrinders.com is the home of the daily fantasy sports community. Our content, rankings, member blogs, promotions and forum discussion all cater to the players that like to create a new fantasy team every day of the week.

If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, crisis counseling and referral services can be accessed by calling 1-800-GAMBLER (1-800-426-2537) (IL). Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER (NJ/WV/PA/MI), 1-800-9-WITH-IT (IN), 1-800-522-4700 (CO), 1-800-BETS OFF (IA), 1-888-532-3500 (VA) or call/text TN REDLINE 1-800-889-9789 (TN).