NFL FORUM

Comments

  • AVivier

    Thursday, 9/5
    8:20 PM EST : Green Bay ( 3.5 ) at Chicago ( -3.5 ) —- T: 46

    Sunday, 9/8
    1:00 PM EST : Atlanta ( 4.5 ) at Minnesota ( -4.5 ) —- T: 47
    1:00 PM EST : LA Rams ( -3 ) at Carolina ( 3 ) —- T: 51
    1:00 PM EST : Buffalo ( 3.5 ) at NY Jets ( -3.5 ) —- T: 38.5
    1:00 PM EST : Kansas City ( -4 ) at Jacksonville ( 4 ) —- T: 52.5
    1:00 PM EST : Tennessee ( 5.5 ) at Cleveland ( -5.5 ) —- T: 45.5
    1:00 PM EST : Washington ( 9 ) at Philadelphia ( -9 ) —- T: 46.5
    1:00 PM EST : Baltimore ( -4 ) at Miami ( 4 ) —- T: 37
    4:05 PM EST : Cincinnati ( 8.5 ) at Seattle ( -8.5 ) —- T: 43.5
    4:05 PM EST : Indianapolis ( 3 ) at LA Chargers ( -3 ) —- T: 47.5
    4:25 PM EST : NY Giants ( 7.5 ) at Dallas ( -7.5 ) —- T: 46.5
    4:25 PM EST : San Francisco ( (Pick) ) at Tampa Bay ( (Pick) ) —- T: 49
    4:25 PM EST : Detroit ( -2.5 ) at Arizona ( 2.5 ) —- T: 47
    8:20 PM EST : Pittsburgh ( 6 ) at New England ( -6 ) —- T: 51.5

    Monday, 9/9
    7:10 PM EST : Houston ( 7 ) at New Orleans ( -7 ) —- T: 53.5
    10:20 PM EST : Denver ( 2.5 ) at Oakland ( -2.5 ) —- T: 43

    Admin Note: The mod team is working to keep these daily threads more on topic – NFL strategy talk for this weeks games. Post referring to last weeks games will be moved to last weeks NFL thread. Any off topic posts or posts containing full lineups will be deleted..

  • monarch

    @mike42 said...

    CMC not in the top 5? I would guess with all the value he would get chalky.

    He did have quite a bit of ownership earlier in the week. I remember a broadcast questioning the amount of ownership he was garnering. More than Zeke and Barkley I believe

  • HoodsFromTheWood

    @timusbr said...

    I have been gambling on sports for 50 years. They didnt have computers back then. what was a spreadsheet then. Paying for advice was usually in the form of a tout sheet. quick and easy.

    Lol back in the late 70’s (19 not 18 Squid) My brother and I had an apt and every Sunday morning during football season we’d have 6-8 buddies come over a few hours before kickoff to pick/pool our bets together for the day. Never forget ’79. For 9 weeks in a row, we missed the first 2 cause word of mouth traveled a lot slower than the internet, but for 9 weeks in a row the payphone would ring at 11:00am in the Circus bar and a guy would say 1 word. Chiefs, next week another team. Hit 9 straight weeks and then just stopped. Now that’s a tout. And it was free. Ahhhhh the good ole days

  • thatkid500

    @monarch said...

    Redskins could be interesting now that Jordan Reed looks less likely to play. They should be chasing and two target hogs (Crowder, Reed) from last season won’t be out there in the event that Reed sits.

    The only interesting play is the Philly D

  • monarch

    @thatkid500 said...

    The only interesting play is the Philly D

    Chris Thompson is 3500 and the Redskins could be without AP and Jordan Reed and trailing against a team that funneled targets to the running back last season.

  • HoodsFromTheWood

    @monarch said...

    Chris Thompson is 3500 and the Redskins could be without AP and Jordan Reed and trailing against a team that funneled targets to the running back last season.

    I read where AP might be a healthy scratch. Hard to see them play with just Guice, Thompson and Sept 1 pickup Smallwood

  • monarch

    Anyone looking at player props. Some interesting stuff. Godwin is set for just 4.5/59 per my bookie. Thielen is 6.5/77.5

  • js5734

    Leveon bell projected for 15-20 touches – I’d take the over there and say if the jets want to win he gets 25

  • squidkill

    @monarch said...

    Anyone looking at player props. Some interesting stuff. Godwin is set for just 4.5/59 per my bookie. Thielen is 6.5/77.5

    Same guy from 1979?

  • squidkill

    @timusbr said...

    I love the talk on pay sites and free stuff. If we had a good discussion on this topic it would illuminate to why people pay and for what they pay for.

    I have been gambling on sports for 50 years. They didnt have computers back then. what was a spreadsheet then. Paying for advice was usually in the form of a tout sheet. quick and easy. They say go with XXX.

    Today, you got thousands of data groups you can change and rearrange, You can wager on 1 players performance in 1 of 16 games. Collecting data, formatting the data can be exhaustive and time consuming. So, if someone wants to spend a few bucks to use someone elses format and breakdown of data. Its only logical. The problem I found is that nobody ever formats the data the way I want to see it. To use a pay site is to adjust to the paysite rather than have the data adjust to me. Which brings me to my pet peeve. LU builders. I dont get it, good luck to all that use them. Its taking someone elses handicapping and plugging it into your LU. Its a Lotto quick pick. If it was an RG LU builder, you pray the Noto is spot on that week with his lower salary projections (well most people generally pick the big names themselves).

    If you dont have time and need to play DFS or sportsbook, paying for a site is logical. Am I the only person who bought a site, surfed everthing the site had to offer as a new member, then by the end of the membership used 5% of the total content.

    Grandpa? Is it really you?

  • HoodsFromTheWood

    @squidkill said...

    Same guy from 1979?

    LOL you stink at quoting

  • HoodsFromTheWood

    @squidkill said...

    Grandpa? Is it really you?

    So let me get this straight, theDKexperience is your son, Moneywhatever is your dad, Tim is your Grandpa and your uncle is your aunt.

  • Logan7777

    @mike42 said...

    Can say the same thing about every TE on the slate. He’s probably 1k under priced but ownership reflects that.

    All TEs are a crap shoot. One week kaboom, the next week a bomb. Take your chances and hope it’s the kaboom week.

  • 33BeRad

    @mike42 said...

    CMC not in the top 5? I would guess with all the value he would get chalky.

    I would guess him, Barkley and Cook are the top 3.

  • JTAx33

    I don’t see Barkley carrying higher ownership than Chubb this week on DK

  • 33BeRad

    @Ap1216 said...

    No one interested in breida or jordan howard i think those are the two best plays in that range

    I’m interested in Breida. If that game doesn’t shootout and he does good he can gain an edge cuz that will be a popular stacked game. I have Breida with SF defense in hopes that Winston gets sacked a bunch and has a few picks. He still could in a shootout and Breida can still do good in a shootout.

  • timusbr

    @JTAx33 said...

    Robert Tonyan scoring 3.80 didn’t move the needle very much.

    yep but you could also say he was worth 19pts per 1000 (lol taking showdown price). but he saves salary and wasnt a 0.

  • mike42

    @JTAx33 said...

    I don’t see Barkley carrying higher ownership than Chubb this week on DK

    Barkley shouldn’t be that highly owned. I’m guessing COOK, FOurnette, carson, CMC, Ekeler, Chubb, Barkley and K. Johnson in about that order. Ingram/ Freeman somewhere at the back end too. I’m sure I’m off somewhere but those first 4 (Cook-CMC) should be the real chalky ones.

  • timusbr

    @Hoods From The Wood said...

    So let me get this straight, theDKexperience is your son, Moneywhatever is your dad, Tim is your Grandpa and your uncle is your aunt.

    He was born on a summer night. We were at the restaurant eating our appetizers, when it was time…At the Hospital they asked for a name and I could only think of the Fried Calamari. So we named him Squid.

  • winnerchickendinner

    Anyone talk about brandin cooks? Yes it is alot of mouths to feed on that offense but Carolina ranked 27th in dvoa last year on deep passes. With a middling pass rush unless Gerald McCoy brings some more along with the first round lb they brought in I could see a huge day for him.

  • squidkill

    @Hoods From The Wood said...

    So let me get this straight, theDKexperience is your son, Moneywhatever is your dad, Tim is your Grandpa and your uncle is your aunt.

    Tim has to be 75. God bless his old ass

  • squidkill

    @mike42 said...

    Barkley shouldn’t be that highly owned. I’m guessing COOK, FOurnette, carson, CMC, Ekeler, Chubb, Barkley and K. Johnson in about that order. Ingram/ Freeman somewhere at the back end too. I’m sure I’m off somewhere but those first 4 (Cook-CMC) should be the real chalky ones.

    Think I’m passing on CMC and Bark in cash.

  • Luctyl99

    @winnerchickendinner said...

    Anyone talk about brandin cooks? Yes it is alot of mouths to feed on that offense but Carolina ranked 27th in dvoa last year on deep passes. With a middling pass rush unless Gerald McCoy brings some more along with the first round lb they brought in I could see a huge day for him.

    The way I view it as I would rather just play Gurley, who will be decently low owned, at only 600 more than any of the receivers (fanduel)

  • JTAx33

    @squidkill said...

    Think I’m passing on CMC and Bark in cash.

    Bold

    Edit: Read this incorrectly, thought you said you were playing both

  • monarch

    WR in the flex and a fade of Cook/Chubb is a path to a different GPP roster construction that I like.

  • WilliamPU2003

    @squidkill said...

    Think I’m passing on CMC and Bark in cash.

    who dat in your avator

  • X Unread Thread
  • X Thread with New Replies*
  • *Jumps to your first unread reply

Subforum Index

RotoGrinders.com is the home of the daily fantasy sports community. Our content, rankings, member blogs, promotions and forum discussion all cater to the players that like to create a new fantasy team every day of the week.

If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, crisis counseling and referral services can be accessed by calling 1-800-GAMBLER (1-800-426-2537) (IL). Gambling problem? Call 1-800-Gambler (NJ/WV/PA), 1-800-9-WITH-IT (IN), 1-800-522-4700 (CO) or 1-800-BETS OFF (IA). 21+. NJ/PA/WV/IN/IA/CO/IL only.