Jake Cave

Philadelphia Phillies
Pos: OF | Hand: L
Status: Active
player props
FPTS 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 SAL $450 $900 $1.4K $1.8K $2.3K $2.7K $3.2K $3.6K $4.1K $4.5K
  • FPTS: 2
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 4
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 3
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 4
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 5
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 0
  • SAL: $2.5K
  • SAL: $2.7K
  • SAL: $2.6K
  • SAL: $2.7K
  • SAL: $2.7K
  • SAL: $2.7K
  • SAL: $2.7K
  • SAL: $2.7K
  • SAL: $2.6K
  • SAL: $2.6K
  • SAL: $2.6K
  • SAL: $2.7K
  • SAL: $2.5K
  • SAL: $4.2K
  • SAL: --
  • SAL: $4.5K
09/24 09/27 09/28 09/30 09/30 10/01 10/05 10/11 10/17 10/18 10/21 10/23 10/25 02/25 02/27
Date Opp Salary gp pa ab h hbp 1b 2b 3b hr r rbi bb ibb so sb sf xbh gidp obp slg iso babip ops
2024-02-27 @ MIN $4.5K 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-02-25 vs. NYY -- 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-10-25 vs. ARI $4.2K 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-10-23 vs. ARI $2.5K 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-10-21 @ ARI $2.7K 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-10-18 vs. ARI $2.6K 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 1 3
2023-10-17 vs. ARI $2.6K 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-10-11 vs. ATL $2.6K 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-10-05 vs. MIA $2.7K 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-10-01 @ NYM $2.7K 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25
2023-09-30 @ NYM $2.7K 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-30 @ NYM $2.7K 1 4 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 0.33 0.5
2023-09-28 vs. PIT $2.7K 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-27 vs. PIT $2.6K 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25
2023-09-24 vs. NYM $2.7K 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-20 @ ATL $2.5K 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25
2023-09-17 @ STL $2.6K 1 2 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 0 1 1
2023-09-11 vs. ATL $2.6K 1 4 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0.25 0.75 0.5 0.5 1
2023-09-11 vs. ATL $4.2K 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.33
2023-09-09 vs. MIA $2.6K 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.33
2023-09-06 @ SD $2.6K 1 5 5 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.2 0.2 0 0.33 0.4
2023-09-06 @ SD $2.5K 1 3 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.33 0.33 0 0.5 0.67
2023-09-04 @ SD $2.7K 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-02 @ MIL $2.6K 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-02 @ MIL $2.6K 1 3 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.33 0.33 0 1 0.67
2023-08-30 vs. LAA $2.6K 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-29 vs. LAA $2.6K 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-28 vs. LAA $2.6K 1 2 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 0 1 1
2023-08-26 vs. STL $2.5K 1 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0.5
2023-08-25 vs. STL $2.5K 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-23 vs. SF $2.4K 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-22 vs. SF $2.5K 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-21 vs. SF $2.2K 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-20 @ WSH $3.6K 1 4 4 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 1 0.75 0 1.25
2023-08-19 @ WSH $2.1K 1 5 4 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0.4 1 0.75 0 1.4
2023-08-18 @ WSH $2.2K 1 4 4 3 0 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0.75 1.25 0.5 0.75 2
2023-08-16 @ TOR $2.1K 1 4 3 2 0 1 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0.5 1.67 1 0.5 2.17
2023-08-15 @ TOR $2K 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-13 vs. MIN $2.2K 1 4 4 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 0 0.5 1
2023-08-12 vs. MIN $3.4K 1 4 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 0.33 0.5
2023-08-11 vs. MIN $2.2K 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-10 vs. WSH $2.2K 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0.5
2023-08-08 vs. WSH $2.1K 1 4 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 0.33 0.5
2023-08-08 vs. WSH $2.1K 1 4 4 2 0 1 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0.5 1.25 0.75 0.5 1.75
2023-08-05 vs. KC $4.4K 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-03 @ MIA $3.4K 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-01 @ MIA $3.2K 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-31 @ MIA $3.6K 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-29 @ PIT $2.4K 1 2 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1.5
2023-07-28 @ PIT $2.3K 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-26 vs. BAL $2.1K 1 4 4 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0.5 0.75 0.25 0.67 1.25
2023-07-24 vs. BAL $3.4K 1 3 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.33 0.33 0 0.5 0.67
2023-07-23 @ CLE $2.4K 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-22 @ CLE $2.4K 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-21 @ CLE $2.4K 1 4 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.33 0 0.5 0.83
2023-07-18 vs. MIL $4.4K 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-15 vs. SD $2.4K 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-14 vs. SD $3.6K 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-07 @ MIA $2.1K 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-06-30 vs. WSH $2.4K 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-06-13 @ ARI $2.4K 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-06-10 vs. LAD $2.4K 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-06-05 vs. DET $2.4K 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-24 vs. ARI $2.4K 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-13 @ COL $2.4K 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-02 @ LAD $2.3K 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-29 @ HOU $2.4K 1 4 4 3 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0.75 1.25 0.5 1 2
2023-04-26 vs. SEA $2.6K 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-25 vs. SEA $2.4K 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 2
2023-04-21 vs. COL $2.6K 1 3 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.33 0.33 0 0.5 0.67
2023-04-20 vs. COL $2.7K 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25
2023-04-19 @ CHW $2.8K 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-18 @ CHW -- 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-18 @ CHW $2.6K 1 5 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0.4 0.25 0 0.33 0.65
2023-04-16 @ CIN $2.5K 1 6 6 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.33 0.5 0.17 0.33 0.83
2023-04-15 @ CIN $2.7K 1 4 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0.25 0 0.25 0.5
2023-04-14 @ CIN $807 1 5 5 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0.2 0 0.2 0.4
2023-04-13 @ CIN $2.7K 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-12 vs. MIA $2.6K 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-11 vs. MIA $807 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-10 vs. MIA $807 1 5 5 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0.4 1.2 0.8 0.25 1.6
2023-04-09 vs. CIN $2.7K 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 0 0 0.33
2023-04-08 vs. CIN $2.5K 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-07 vs. CIN $2.8K 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.33
2023-04-05 @ NYY $2.4K 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.33
2023-04-04 @ NYY $2.4K 1 4 4 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 0 0.67 1
2023-04-03 @ NYY $2.4K 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-01 @ TEX $2.5K 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25
2023-03-30 @ TEX -- 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-03-28 vs. TOR -- 1 2 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 2
2023-03-26 @ BAL -- 1 3 3 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.67 0.67 0 1 1.33
2023-03-24 @ TOR -- 1 4 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 0.33 0.5
2023-03-23 vs. DET -- 1 3 3 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.67 0.67 0 1 1.33
2023-03-21 @ PIT -- 1 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0.33 1.33 1 0 1.67
2023-03-20 vs. BAL -- 1 3 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.67 0.5 0 0.5 1.17
2023-03-19 vs. BOS -- 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-03-18 @ ATL -- 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-03-17 @ TOR -- 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-03-17 @ PHI -- 1 4 4 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.75 0.75 0 0.75 1.5
2023-03-15 @ NYY -- 1 4 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 1 0.5
2023-03-12 vs. TOR -- 1 3 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 2
2023-03-11 @ NYY -- 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-03-09 vs. BAL -- 1 3 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 2
2023-03-06 @ BAL -- 1 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.33 1.33 1 0 1.67
2023-03-04 vs. PIT -- 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-03-02 @ BOS -- 1 3 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0.67 0.5 0 0.5 1.17
2023-03-01 @ MIN -- 1 3 3 2 0 1 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.67 1.67 1 0.5 2.33
2023-02-27 @ PIT -- 1 3 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.33 0.33 0 1 0.67
2023-02-25 vs. NYY -- 1 3 3 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.67 0.67 0 1 1.33
2022-10-05 @ CHW $2.5K 1 5 4 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 0.4 0.5 0.25 0.5 0.9
2022-10-05 @ CHW $2.6K 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-10-04 @ CHW $2.5K 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-10-02 @ DET $4.2K 1 4 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.33 0 0.5 0.83
2022-10-01 @ DET $2.2K 1 3 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.67 0.5 0 0.5 1.17
2022-09-30 @ DET $2.2K 1 5 5 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0.2 0.2 0 0.25 0.4
2022-09-29 vs. CHW $2.2K 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-09-28 vs. CHW $2.2K 1 4 3 3 0 1 2 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1.67 0.67 1 2.67
2022-09-27 vs. CHW $2.1K 1 4 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 0.33 0.5
2022-09-25 vs. LAA $2.3K 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-09-24 vs. LAA $2.2K 1 4 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0.75 0.5 0.25 1
2022-09-24 vs. LAA $2.2K 1 4 4 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.5 0.5 0 0.67 1
2022-09-22 @ KC $2.3K 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-09-22 @ KC $2.3K 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-09-21 @ KC $2.3K 1 4 4 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0.5 0.75 0.25 0.67 1.25
2022-09-19 @ CLE $2.5K 1 4 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 0.5 0.5
2022-09-18 @ CLE $2K 1 4 4 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 1 0.75 0 1.25
2022-09-17 @ CLE $2K 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-09-17 @ CLE $2K 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-09-16 @ CLE $2K 1 4 4 2 0 1 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0.5 1.25 0.75 1 1.75
2022-09-15 vs. KC $2K 1 3 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.33 0.33 0 0.5 0.67
2022-09-14 vs. KC $2K 1 4 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 0.25 0.5
2022-09-13 vs. KC $2K 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-09-11 vs. CLE $2K 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-09-10 vs. CLE $2K 1 4 4 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0.25 0.5 0.25 0.33 0.75
2022-09-10 vs. CLE $2K 1 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-09-08 @ NYY $2K 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-09-07 @ NYY $2K 1 4 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.33 0 1 0.83
2022-09-07 @ NYY $2K 1 5 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0.25 0 0.25 0.65
2022-09-05 @ NYY $2K 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25
2022-09-04 @ CHW $2K 1 2 2 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 1 3
2022-09-03 @ CHW $2K 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.33
2022-09-03 @ CHW $2.1K 1 4 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 0.33 0.5
2022-08-31 vs. BOS $2.1K 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-30 vs. BOS $2K 1 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 1.33 1 0 1.83
2022-08-29 vs. BOS $2K 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-28 vs. SF $2K 1 4 4 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0.5 1.5 1 0.33 2
2022-08-27 vs. SF $2K 1 2 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 2
2022-08-27 vs. SF $2K 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-25 @ HOU $2K 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-24 @ HOU $2K 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-22 vs. TEX $2K 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-21 vs. TEX $2K 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-20 vs. TEX $2K 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-15 vs. KC $2K 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-14 @ LAA $2K 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-14 @ LAA $2K 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-11 @ LAD $2K 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25
2022-08-07 vs. TOR $2K 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-06 vs. TOR $2K 1 4 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0.75 0.5 0.25 1
2022-08-06 vs. TOR $2K 1 5 5 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.2 0.2 0 0.25 0.4
2022-08-04 vs. TOR $2.1K 1 4 4 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 1 0.75 0 1.25
2022-08-03 vs. DET $2K 1 3 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.33 0.33 0 0.5 0.67
2022-08-02 vs. DET $2.2K 1 4 3 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.75 1 0.33 0.67 1.75

Jake Cave Daily Fantasy News, Rankings, Projections

Yankees have highest implied total (currently 5.47) out of four teams today

WeatherEdge is projecting a decrease in home runs, and to a lesser degree a decrease in total runs for this matchup between the Twins and Yanks in New York. Still, the game currently has a healthy 9.5 O/U, two runs higher than Rays @ Astros game.

The Yankees will face off versus right-handed Randy Dobnak, who was called up late in the year for the Twins and provided a solid 1.59 ERA / 2.90 FIP / 3.77 SIERA with a 1.13 WHIP and 15.3% K-BB over 28 and 1/3 innings between the bullpen and rotation. Though it’s a small sample, Dobnak has been more effective vs. lefties (.261 xwOBA allowed in 59 PA) than righties (.316 xwOBA allowed in 59 PA). Once Dobnak is done, the Yankees will face a Twins bullpen that has the 3rd best SIERA (3.24) over the past month. Gary Sanchez (.381 xwOBA vs. RHP this year), Aaron Judge (.380), Gio Urshela (.365), DJ LeMahieu (.364), Giancarlo Stanton (.362), Edwin Encarnacion (.356), Gleyber Torres (.327), Brett Gardner (.312) and Didi Gregorius (.286) make up all nine options in the Yanks’ projected order. Stanton and Judge have been the Yankees hottest hitters over the past 2 weeks with xwOBAs over .440, while Gregorius and Torres have been cold, each having an xwOBA below .200.

The Twins will matchup with Masahiro Tanaka and currently have a 4.07 implied total which feels a bit low given how stacked this Twins lineup is. Tanaka posted a middling 4.45 ERA / 4.27 FIP / 4.29 xFIP this year, and a similar 4.32 ERA / 3.97 FIP / 4.20 xFIP over the past 30 days. By xwOBA, Tanaka has been mostly platoon neutral over the past 3 years. When Tanaka is chased from the game, the Twins will face a Yanks bullpen that has an 8th best 3.68 SIERA over the past 30 days. Nelson Cruz (.405 xwOBA vs. RHP this year), Jason Castro (.386), Jorge Polanco (.355), Jake Cave (.355), Miguel Sano (.350), Luis Arraez (.342), Max Kepler (.340), Eddie Rosario (.326) and Marwin Gonzalez (.313) are all options in the Twins projected order. Cave, Cruz and Sano all have an xwOBA over .425 over the past 2 weeks. Luis Arraez is the only aforementioned name with an xwOBA below .320 over the past 2 weeks. Jake Cave stands out as a very nice value on both major sites, especially given his recent success.

Max Kepler scratched Wednesday; Jake Cave replaces

Kepler has been scratched from the Minnesota Twins original confirmed lineup and will not start in Wednesday’s matchup against the Chicago White Sox due to a presently unspecified reason. He’ll be replaced in the lineup by Jake Cave, who will now play center field and slot into the ninth spot in the order, which bumps C.J.Cron, Ehire Adrianza, and Jonathan Schoop up to sixth, seventh, and eighth, respectively. However, the remainder of the Twins lineup will stay intact offensively as they face off against left-hander Ross Detwiler on the road this evening.

Edwin Jackson owns an 8.46 ERA and .408 xwOBA allowed this year

Still somehow in a Major League rotation, Edwin Jackson is by far the most obvious pitcher to target on this slate. Jackson has been absolutely crushed to the tune of an 8.46 ERA and 7.58 FIP this year with a 3.02 HR/9 and 45% hard contact rate. Per Statcast, he’s allowed a .408 xwOBA, 91 MPH aEV and 13.3% barrel rate. The Twins should make quick work of Jackson and get plenty of plate appearances vs. a Tigers bullpen that has a 4.81 xFIP over the past 30 days. Nelson Cruz (.417 xwOBA vs. RHP this year), Miguel Sano (.362), Jorge Polanco (.353), Luis Arraez (.347), Jake Cave (.343), Max Kepler (.343), Marwin Gonzalez (.312) and Mitch Garver (.312) are all in play tonight vs. Detroit. Marwin Gonzalez continues to be a value of Draftkings, projected to hit 4th at just $4.1k surrounded by hitters that cost $5k +. Luis Arraez is another value option at just $4.3k but will likely hit lower in the order. Jake Cave is just $3.3k and projected to bat last, but could still make for a great play given that the Twins should bat through the lineup early and often tonight. Currently the Twins have a healthy 6.64 implied total vs. Jackson and the Tigers. They will have very high ownership across all contests.

Value bat moves up in the order

The Twins have accumulated another top of the board implied run line (4.78) in a home park that is a positive run environment, but with cooler temperatures tonight. Lucas Giolito did look like he was starting to pitch towards his potential for a short while, but has now allowed at least three runs in each of his last four starts. LHBs now have a .356 wOBA against him this year. The problem is that the Twins have very little to attack him with. Jorge Polanco (136 wRC+, .148 ISO vs RHP) is one option, but beware his xwOBA is 47 points below his actual against RHP this year. Jake Cave (122 wRC+, .215 ISO) is the really interesting name and he gets a lineup boost to the three hole in the second game of this double-header. He costs a very reasonable $4K on DraftKings.

My Lock-And-Loaded Value Bat

With the amount of hard hits and fly balls that Jordan Zimmermann allows, I will have Cave in all my lineups (I typically play 1-3 lineups). I like to target Cave against pitchers that don't strike a lot of people out and tend to throw more pitches in the zone. Zimmermann fits the build for both of those with a 20.2% strikeout rate and a 6% walk rate against lefties this season. He's allowing a .226 ISO with a 35% hard-hit rate against left-handed hitters. Meanwhile, Cave has a .216 ISO with a .503 CXwOBA and a 37.4% hard-hit rate against righties in 2018.

Where Home Runs Come From

Jordan Zimmermann has one of the most predictable skill sets in baseball. He throws strikes, and he allows hard hit fly balls. Hard hit fly balls are what turns into home runs, and we've seen loads of those from Zimmermann in the second half, with a 2.68 HR/9 and multiple homers allowed in seven of his last 11 starts. Eddie Rosario has slowed down late in the season, but his salary has come down with it, and he still leads the Twins with 19 HR against right-handed pitching. Over the past month, Jake Cave has taken over as the top power bat for Minnesota with seven home runs and a .275 ISO in his last 27 games. You can add Max Kepler or Robbie Grossman to the list for a cheap outfield with plenty of upside tonight.

Move up the lineup for a pair of value bats

Jorge Lopez has allowed two runs over his last 15 innings, going eight innings against the Twins in his last start. He struck out just four and the Twins have a healthy 4.78 implied run line for the rematch. Lopez has decent minor league numbers, but is not much of a prospect. The more interesting thing here is the middle of the Minnesota batting order. Just two batters in the order are above a 100 wRC+ and .200 ISO vs RHP this season. They are Jake Cave (124 wRC+, .226 ISO) and Willians Astudillo (126 wRC+, .276 ISO), who generally bat lower in the order, but tonight they bat third and sixth, each costing less than $4K on DraftKing and around $2.5K on FanDuel.

Don't Be Fooled By His Last Start

Jorge Lopez has been good in his last two starts and somehow came within three outs of a perfect game against this same Twins team in his last outing, but I wouldn't expect lightning to strike twice. This is still a pitcher with a 17% strikeout rate and 11% walk rate for the year who is allowing hard contact over 43% of the time. He also threw 110 pitches in that last start, and that was the first time he was allowed to eclipse 100 pitches all season. I wonder how he will bounce back for this outing. I'll happily grab some speculative Twins stacks in GPPs tonight. It starts with Eddie Rosario given his strong splits against RHP, and from there it will just be about grabbing exposure to reasonable prices and batting order spots. Polanco and Cave seem like the most logical point per dollar options to add to your stacks.

Well projected, but not a very deep lineup

Heath Fillmyer has three quality starts among his last six, but has also allowed at least four runs in each of his other three. He has just a 14.1 K% with an 88.3 mph aEV, but has kept the ball on the ground around 50% of the time against batters from either side of the plate. Yet, he has a sizable platoon split with RHBs (.380 wOBA) well above LHBs (.288 wOBA), though xwOBA does raise that latter mark 43 points. The Twins offer a lineup that has Robbie Grossman (84 wRC+, .098 ISO vs RHP) batting cleanup, yet oddsmakers grace them with the third highest implied run line on the board (4.81). Jorge Polanco (130 wRC+, .132 ISO), Eddie Rosario (125 wRC+, .218 ISO) and Jake Cave (117 wRC+, .213 ISO) are the only above average hitters against RHP in the Minnesota lineup.

Better recently, but LHBs still crush him

The Twins have an enormous 5.32 run line against Lucas Giolito that's second highest on the board tonight. Giolito has struck out 20 of his last 77 batters and has just a .326 xwOBA over the last month, but going by his full season numbers, LHBs have thrashed him for a .374 wOBA with an xwOBA 32 points higher, while RHBs have been about league average against him (.324). Some attention has to be paid to the top LHB in this lineup, Eddie Rosario (138 wRC+, .264 ISO vs RHP last calendar year). Joe Mauer (102 wRC+, .112 ISO) has a 221 wRC+ and 58.8 Hard% over the last week. Jake Cave (106 wRC+, .174 ISO) costs just $3.2K on DraftKings and a full $1K less on FanDuel.