Mallex Smith

Seattle Mariners
Pos: OF | Hand: L
Status: Inactive
player props
FPTS 1 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 12 13 SAL $3.5K $3.5K $3.6K $3.7K $3.8K $3.8K $3.9K $4K $4K $4.1K
  • FPTS: 8
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 2
  • FPTS: 9
  • FPTS: 5
  • FPTS: 6
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 5
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 3
  • FPTS: 13
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 3
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 0
  • SAL: $4.1K
  • SAL: $4K
  • SAL: $3.7K
  • SAL: $3.7K
  • SAL: $3.6K
  • SAL: $3.8K
  • SAL: $4K
  • SAL: $3.7K
  • SAL: $3.6K
  • SAL: $3.8K
  • SAL: $3.7K
  • SAL: $3.5K
  • SAL: $3.8K
  • SAL: $3.9K
  • SAL: $3.4K
  • SAL: $3.6K
09/29 07/25 07/25 07/26 07/29 07/31 08/02 08/04 08/06 08/06 08/08 08/09 08/13 08/15 08/15
Date Opp DKSAL FDSAL DKFPTS FDFPTS sf ab slg h so hbp gidp 1b babip 2b pa 3b sb hr xbh r obp rbi iso bb ops ibb
2020-08-15 @ HOU $3.6K $2.2K 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-08-14 @ HOU $3.4K $2.2K 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-08-12 @ TEX $3.9K $2.2K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2020-08-08 vs. COL $3.8K $2.3K 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-08-07 vs. COL $3.5K $2.3K 13 15.5 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0.5 1 0 0 1 0
2020-08-06 vs. LAA $3.7K $4.5K 3 3 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.67 0
2020-08-05 vs. LAA $3.8K $2.3K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-08-03 vs. OAK $3.6K $2.3K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 2 0 0 0 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2020-08-02 vs. OAK $3.7K $2.3K 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-07-30 @ LAA $4K $2.3K 6 9.2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 2 0.5 0
2020-07-28 @ LAA $3.8K $2.3K 5 6 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-07-26 @ HOU $3.6K $2.5K 9 12.7 0 5 0.4 1 1 0 0 0 0.25 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.2 1 0.2 0 0.6 0
2020-07-25 @ HOU $3.7K $2.5K 2 3.5 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
2020-07-24 @ HOU $3.7K $2.5K 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-09-29 vs. OAK $4K $2.8K 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-09-28 vs. OAK $4.1K $2.8K 8 9 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.67 0
2019-09-27 vs. OAK $4K $2.8K 5 6.2 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0
2019-09-26 vs. OAK $4K $2.7K 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-09-24 vs. HOU $3.7K $2.6K 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-09-22 @ BAL $4.4K $2.9K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-09-21 @ BAL $4.4K $2.9K 7 9.2 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-09-19 @ PIT $4.4K $3K 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-09-17 @ PIT $4.3K $3.3K 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2019-09-15 vs. CWS $4.6K $3.2K 12 16 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 1 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 2 0 1 1.1 0
2019-09-14 vs. CWS $4.3K $3.3K 10 12 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2019-09-13 vs. CWS $4.4K $3.2K 15 18.2 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 3 0 2 0 0 1 0.33 0 0 0 0.67 0
2019-09-11 vs. CIN $3.9K $2.9K 9 12.2 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 0 0 0.33 0
2019-09-10 vs. CIN $4K $3K 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-09-07 @ HOU $3.8K $3K 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-09-06 @ HOU -- -- 9 12.2 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2019-09-05 @ HOU -- -- 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-09-03 @ CHC -- -- 2 3 0 4 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.2 0
2019-09-02 @ CHC -- -- 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2019-09-01 @ TEX -- -- 14 18.6 0 5 0.4 2 0 1 0 2 0.4 0 6 0 0 0 0 3 0.5 0 0 0 0.9 0
2019-08-31 @ TEX -- -- 11 12 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2019-08-30 @ TEX -- -- 25 30.9 0 5 1 3 0 0 0 2 0.6 0 5 1 1 0 1 2 0.6 1 0.4 0 1.6 0
2019-08-29 @ TEX -- -- 17 21.2 0 3 0.67 2 1 0 0 2 1 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0.8 0 0 2 1.47 0
2019-08-27 vs. NYY -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-08-26 vs. NYY -- -- 14 18.7 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 1 1.5 0 2.5 0
2019-08-25 vs. TOR -- -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-08-24 vs. TOR -- -- 6 9.2 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 2 0.4 0
2019-08-23 vs. TOR -- -- 17 21.2 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 1 1 0.33 0 5 0 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2019-08-21 @ TB -- -- 12 16 0 5 0.6 1 1 0 0 0 0.25 0 5 1 0 0 1 0 0.2 2 0.4 0 0.8 0
2019-08-20 @ TB -- -- 5 6 0 5 0.4 1 1 0 0 0 0.25 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.2 0 0.2 0 0.6 0
2019-08-19 @ TB -- -- 2 3.2 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-08-18 @ TOR -- -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-08-16 @ TOR -- -- 5 6.5 0 4 0.25 1 3 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 0 0 0.5 0
2019-08-15 @ DET -- -- 25 30.7 0 4 0.75 3 1 1 0 3 1 0 5 0 2 0 0 1 0.8 1 0 0 1.55 0
2019-08-14 @ DET -- -- 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2019-08-13 @ DET -- -- 17 21.7 0 5 0.6 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 1 5 0 1 0 1 1 0.4 1 0.2 0 1 0
2019-08-11 vs. TB -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-08-10 vs. TB -- -- 17 21.2 0 3 1.67 2 0 0 0 0 0.67 1 4 1 0 0 2 1 0.75 0 1 1 2.42 0
2019-08-09 vs. TB -- -- 4 6.2 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2019-08-07 vs. SD -- -- 15 18.2 0 4 0.75 2 1 0 0 1 0.67 1 4 0 1 0 1 1 0.5 0 0.25 0 1.25 0
2019-08-06 vs. SD -- -- 5 6.2 0 5 0.2 1 3 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2019-08-04 @ HOU -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-08-03 @ HOU -- -- 7 9 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2019-08-02 @ HOU -- -- 2 3 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2019-07-31 @ TEX -- -- 5 6.5 0 5 0.2 1 0 0 1 1 0.2 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 1 0 0 0.4 0
2019-07-30 @ TEX -- -- 15 18.2 0 6 0.17 1 2 0 0 1 0.25 0 6 0 2 0 0 1 0.17 0 0 0 0.33 0
2019-07-28 vs. DET -- -- 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 2 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2019-07-27 vs. DET -- -- 8 9.2 0 5 0.4 2 2 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 0 0.8 0
2019-07-26 vs. DET -- -- 10 12.5 0 4 0.5 2 1 1 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 1 0 0 1.1 0
2019-07-25 vs. DET -- -- 2 3 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2019-07-24 vs. TEX -- -- 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 3 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2019-07-23 vs. TEX -- -- 5 6.2 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2019-07-22 vs. TEX -- -- 7 10 0 5 0.2 1 2 0 1 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 2 0 0 0.4 0
2019-07-21 vs. LAA -- -- 11 15.7 0 4 0.5 1 2 0 0 0 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.4 1 0.25 1 0.9 0
2019-07-20 vs. LAA -- -- 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 0
2019-07-19 vs. LAA -- -- 12 15.2 0 2 0.5 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 0.67 0 0 1 1.17 0
2019-07-17 @ OAK -- -- 13 15 0 4 0.75 2 1 0 0 1 0.67 1 4 0 1 0 1 0 0.5 0 0.25 0 1.25 0
2019-07-16 @ OAK -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-07-14 @ LAA -- -- 8 9 0 5 0.6 1 3 0 0 0 0.5 0 5 1 0 0 1 0 0.2 0 0.4 0 0.8 0
2019-07-13 @ LAA -- -- 24 30.2 0 2 1.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 4 1 2 0 1 1 0.75 0 1 2 2.25 0
2019-07-12 @ LAA -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-07-07 vs. OAK -- -- 6 6 0 5 0.4 2 0 0 0 2 0.4 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 0 0.8 0
2019-07-06 vs. OAK -- -- 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2019-07-05 vs. OAK -- -- 10 12.2 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2019-07-04 vs. STL -- -- 10 12.2 0 4 0.75 2 1 0 0 1 0.67 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 0 0.25 0 1.25 0
2019-07-03 vs. STL -- -- 10 12 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2019-07-02 vs. STL -- -- 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 2 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2019-06-30 @ HOU -- -- 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2019-06-29 @ HOU -- -- 5 6 0 5 0.4 1 0 0 0 0 0.2 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.2 0 0.2 0 0.6 0
2019-06-28 @ HOU -- -- 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 0
2019-06-27 @ MIL -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-06-26 @ MIL -- -- 15 18.4 0 5 0.8 2 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 5 1 0 0 1 2 0.4 0 0.4 0 1.2 0
2019-06-25 @ MIL -- -- 9 12.2 0 5 0.4 1 2 0 0 0 0.33 1 6 0 0 0 1 1 0.33 0 0.2 1 0.73 0
2019-06-23 vs. BAL -- -- 12 15.7 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.6 1 0 1 1.1 0
2019-06-22 vs. BAL -- -- 7 9.5 0 5 0.4 1 3 0 0 0 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.2 1 0.2 0 0.6 0
2019-06-21 vs. BAL -- -- 35 46.3 0 3 1.33 3 0 0 0 2 1 1 5 0 2 0 1 4 1 1 0.33 2 2.33 0
2019-06-20 vs. BAL -- -- 5 6.2 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2019-06-19 vs. KC -- -- 11 15.4 0 4 0.5 1 1 1 0 0 0.33 1 5 0 0 0 1 2 0.4 0 0.25 0 0.9 0
2019-06-18 vs. KC -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-06-17 vs. KC -- -- 7 9 0 4 0.5 1 1 1 0 0 0.33 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.4 0 0.25 0 0.9 0
2019-06-16 @ OAK -- -- 19 25.2 0 5 1 2 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.4 2 0.6 0 1.4 0
2019-06-15 @ OAK -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-06-14 @ OAK -- -- 16 22.2 0 5 0.8 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.2 2 0.6 0 1 0
2019-06-13 @ MIN -- -- 5 6.2 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2019-06-12 @ MIN -- -- 20 24.2 0 6 0.83 3 1 0 0 1 0.6 2 6 0 1 0 2 1 0.5 0 0.33 0 1.33 0
2019-06-11 @ MIN -- -- 17 21.4 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 1 0 0 2 0.6 0 0 1 1.1 0
2019-06-09 @ LAA -- -- 5 6 0 4 0.25 1 2 1 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 0 0.65 0
2019-06-08 @ LAA -- -- 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 1 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2019-06-07 @ LAA -- -- 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 3 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2019-06-06 vs. HOU -- -- 12 15.5 0 6 0.17 1 1 0 0 1 0.2 0 7 0 1 0 0 0 0.29 1 0 1 0.45 0
2019-06-05 vs. HOU -- -- 21 28.9 0 5 0.8 3 0 0 0 2 0.6 1 5 0 0 0 1 2 0.6 3 0.2 0 1.4 0
2019-06-04 vs. HOU -- -- 10 12.2 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 0 0 0.67 0
2019-06-03 vs. HOU -- -- 16 21.7 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.4 1 0.75 1 1.4 0
2019-06-02 vs. LAA -- -- 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 1 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2019-06-01 vs. LAA -- -- 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2019-05-31 vs. LAA -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-05-30 vs. LAA -- -- 7 9 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2019-05-29 vs. TEX -- -- 24 31.2 0 4 1 2 1 0 0 1 0.67 0 5 1 1 0 1 1 0.6 2 0.5 1 1.6 0
2019-05-28 vs. TEX -- -- 15 19 0 5 0.8 3 1 0 0 2 0.75 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.6 2 0.2 0 1.4 0
2019-05-27 vs. TEX -- -- 34 42.9 0 3 0.67 2 0 0 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 4 0 0 2 0.75 1 0 1 1.42 0
2019-05-24 @ OAK -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-05-22 @ TEX -- -- 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-05-20 @ TEX -- -- 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 3 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2019-05-19 vs. MIN -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-05-18 vs. MIN -- -- 8 9.2 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2019-05-17 vs. MIN -- -- 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2019-05-16 vs. MIN -- -- 14 18.7 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 1 0.75 0 1.25 0
2019-04-28 vs. TEX -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-04-27 vs. TEX -- -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-04-26 vs. TEX -- -- 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-04-25 vs. TEX -- -- 4 6.2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 1 0.5 0
2019-04-24 @ SD -- -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-04-23 @ SD -- -- 9 12.2 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2019-04-21 @ LAA -- -- 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2019-04-20 @ LAA -- -- 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-04-19 @ LAA -- -- 0 0 0 5 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-04-18 @ LAA -- -- 3 3 0 6 0.17 1 2 0 0 1 0.25 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0.17 0 0 0 0.33 0
2019-04-17 vs. CLE -- -- 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 2 0 0 0 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2019-04-16 vs. CLE -- -- 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2019-04-15 vs. CLE -- -- 4 6 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 2 0.4 0
2019-04-14 vs. HOU -- -- 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-04-13 vs. HOU -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-04-12 vs. HOU -- -- 15 18.4 0 5 0.4 2 1 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 1 0 0 2 0.4 0 0 0 0.8 0
2019-04-11 @ KC -- -- 10 12.2 0 5 0.6 1 2 0 0 0 0.33 0 5 1 0 0 1 1 0.2 0 0.4 0 0.8 0
2019-04-10 @ KC -- -- 19 25.2 0 4 0.5 2 1 1 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0.6 2 0 0 1.1 0
2019-04-09 @ KC -- -- 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-04-07 @ CWS -- -- 20 24.4 0 5 0.4 2 1 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 2 0 0 2 0.4 0 0 0 0.8 0
2019-04-06 @ CWS -- -- 6 9.2 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 2 0.4 0
2019-04-05 @ CWS -- -- 6 9.2 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 2 0.4 0
2019-04-02 vs. LAA -- -- 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2019-04-01 vs. LAA -- -- 15 18.2 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0.6 0 0 1 1.1 0
2019-03-31 vs. BOS -- -- 7 9.7 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 1 0 0 0.4 0
2019-03-29 vs. BOS -- -- 23 31.2 1 3 1.33 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 1 1 1 0.4 2 1 1 1.73 0
2019-03-28 vs. BOS -- -- 10 12.2 0 5 0.6 1 2 0 0 0 0.33 0 5 1 0 0 1 1 0.2 0 0.4 0 0.8 0

Mallex Smith Daily Fantasy News, Rankings, Projections

Taking Advance of an Awful Pitcher

The Mariners are not an elite offense, but every offense has a chance to have an elite night when they are facing Edwin Jackson. Yes, this is the same Edwin Jackson that has now pitched for more than half the league and owns an ERA over nine and a 6.19 xFIP this season. He is allowing hard contact over 42% of the time. It's a joke that he has a rotation spot at this point. Fire up the Mariners with confidence here. Vogelbach is the prime upside target for his power against RHP, while Mallex Smith offers plenty of upside with his speed. This lineup is stackable from top to bottom.

Mariners are an intriguing stack option vs. Bassitt tonight

It’s not as easy as usual finding pitchers to stack against on the night slate, as there are a number of good pitchers throwing tonight and not a ton of matchups that stand out. One lineup to consider stacking is the Mariners, who have still managed to swing the bat decently well (106 wRC+ over last 30 days) despite trading a few of their best bats. Though Chris Bassitt has a 3.80 ERA, his estimators indicate regression as he owns a 4.81 xFIP and 4.75 SIERA. Bassitt has also really struggled of late; he’s posted a 4.50 ERA, 5.24 xFIP and 5.29 SIERA with an 8.6% K-BB over the past 30 days. Daniel Vogelbach (.407 xwOBA vs. RHP this year), Domingo Santana (.367), JP Crawford (.343), Mac Williamson (.331), Kyle Seager (.320), Omar Narvaez (.307) and Mallex Smith (.280) are all options tonight vs. Bassitt. Smith started the year a bit slow but has slightly improved with a .303 xwOBA over the past month; he projects to leadoff tonight. All Mariners bats are available at an affordable $4.4k or less on Draftkings tonight, on Fanduel they will be priced $3.7k and lower. The Mariners have a 4.41 implied total for this matchup.

Ready to Thrive in the Leadoff Spot

Mallex Smith has moved to the leadoff spot for the Mariners over the last few games, and the early returns are encouraging. He has reached base nine times over the last three games, and he has stolen four bases in those contests. He's always been an aggressive player, and I like him as an affordable DFS option at his current price, as long as he remains in that leadoff spot. The Mariners have a solid matchup tonight against a weak portion of the Angels' pitching staff, and Smith will be a core value for me if he continues to lead off.

Highest Flyball Rate on the Slate

Felix Pena has the highest flyball rate on the slate tonight (min 10 IP) with a 50% rate in 2019. Given the recent talk of balls being juiced, it seems advantageous to target flyball pitchers, especially flyball pitchers that are bad. In addition to his FB rate, Pena has a 5.67 xFIP and 41.2% hard contact rate compared to a 0% soft contact rate on the year. Pena gets the start vs. Seattle tonight, whose offense has hit RHP well: Dan Vogelbach (.436 xwOBA vs. RHP this year), Edwin Encarnacion (.353), Ryon Healy (.327) and Jay Bruce (.321) are all potential options tonight. Mitch Haniger (.279) has not seen much success yet this year but has a career .356 wOBA vs. RHP. Mallex Smith (.264 xwOBA vs. RHP this year) is always a threat for a steal and should see his usual leadoff spot. Seattle has a 4.41 implied total vs. Pena and the Angels.

Mitch Haniger (illness) scratched Wednesday; Mallex Smith replaces

Haniger has been scratched from the Seattle Mariners original confirmed lineup and will not start in Wednesday’s matchup against the Cleveland Indians due to an illness. He’ll be replaced in the lineup by Mallex Smith, who will now play center field and slot directly into Haniger’s vacated leadoff spot in the order. However, the remainder of the Mariners lineup will stay intact offensively as they face off against right-hander Carlos Carrasco at home this evening.

Red hot offense (146 wRC+ last seven days) makes next stop in Toronto

The red hot Rays (team 146 wRC+ last seven days) make their next stop in Toronto tonight, where they'll be met by Sam Gaviglio, who's been smoked by LHBs this year (.365 wOBA, 38 Hard%). Tampa Bay will attack him with seven from that side, led by Ji-Man Choi (149 wRC+, .266 ISO vs RHP this year). Brandon Lowe (129 wRC+, .215 ISO) has flashed some power as well. Joey Wendle (116 wRC+, .135 ISO) and Mallex Smith (117 wRC+, .119 ISO) are above average bats from that side as well.

The Price Difference Is Insane

It always seems like there is one guy on FanDuel that is way underpriced. Mallex Smith is $4,800 on DraftKings and priced as the 13th overall outfielder, but he's $3,100 on FanDuel and priced as the 47th overall outfielder. That's a huge difference from one site to the other, and I plan on taking advantage of it today. He's 13 for his last 43 at the plate and he have five stolen bases over the last ten games. Gallardo struggles against righties and lefties, and he doesn't do a great job holding on runners. This is an excellent spot to attack the Tampa Rays, and I have them as my top overall stack on this slate.

Quality pitcher with an exploitable weakness

Shane Bieber (19.9 K-BB%) has some impressive peripherals, but he's unable to handle LHBs (.395 wOBA, 51.5 Hard%, 33.6 GB%). It's not that players should look to stack Rays against him, but they do have a few potent bats from that side. The hottest of them all (266 wRC+ last seven days) has been Ji-Man Choi (153 wRC+, .265 ISO vs RHP this year), who costs $4K or less on either site in the third spot. Mallex Smith (120 wRC+, .127 ISO) has little power and a higher cost, but a great lineup spot at the top or the order. Brandon Lowe (134 wRC+, .210 ISO) costs just $2.6K on FanDuel.

Affordable lineup with high implied run line

Rays bats would appear to have some value tonight. Especially if considering paying up for Gerrit Cole. Jorge Lopez was a reliever at both AAA and the majors for Milwaukee before being included in the Moustakas trade. The Royals are attempting to convert him into a starter, something his scouting reports don't necessarily believe will be successful. His first start for the Royals did not go smoothly (4.2 IP – 6 ER – 1 HR – 2 BB – 3 K against Toronto). The Rays have a 4.64 implied run line that's well behind the top four teams, but still a top five mark tonight. The Kansas City bullpen, a major weakness for most the season, has improved to something near the middle of the pack over the last month (4.38 FIP, 12.3 K-BB%). While Lopez has a 90 point reverse split in his wOBA in work for the Brewers plus his start for the Royals this year, xwOBA closes the gap, but still increases both numbers above .375. Each of the first six batters in the lineup for the Rays is above a 100 wRC+ vs RHP over the last calendar year. Jake Bauers (112 wRC+, .214 ISO), Ji-Man Choi (122 wRC+, .239 ISO) and Tommy Pham (119 wRC+, .196 ISO) are the ones above a .140 ISO among that group. Only Mallex Smith (112 wRC+, .124 ISO) is above $4K on DraftKings with no Tampa Bay bat even reaching $3K on FanDuel.

A Fine Value at the Top of the Order

Most people ignore the Rays these days, but I want to at least mention Mallex Smith. He has quietly been rock solid for the Rays of late, and he has found himself regularly back in the leadoff spot. He is now hitting over .300 for the year with a wOBA of .349, and he gets to face an average RHP in Hector Velasquez today. There’s speed upside here, and Smith has been taking very good at bats lately. He’s a fine value on this slate as a one-off bat.