Rafael Devers

Boston Red Sox
Pos: 3B | Hand: L
Status: Active
player props
FPTS 2 4 6 8 11 13 15 17 19 21 SAL $4.8K $4.8K $4.9K $4.9K $5K $5.1K $5.1K $5.2K $5.2K $5.3K
  • FPTS: 7
  • FPTS: 16
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 21
  • FPTS: 5
  • FPTS: 3
  • FPTS: 2
  • FPTS: 12
  • FPTS: 5
  • FPTS: 7
  • FPTS: 5
  • FPTS: 14
  • FPTS: 21
  • FPTS: 16
  • FPTS: 14
  • FPTS: 20
  • SAL: $5K
  • SAL: $5.1K
  • SAL: $5.2K
  • SAL: $5.3K
  • SAL: $5.1K
  • SAL: $5K
  • SAL: $4.9K
  • SAL: $4.7K
  • SAL: $5K
  • SAL: $5K
  • SAL: $5K
  • SAL: $5K
  • SAL: $4.9K
  • SAL: $5K
  • SAL: $4.9K
  • SAL: $5K
05/04 05/04 05/05 05/07 05/08 05/10 05/11 05/12 05/13 05/14 05/15 05/16 05/18 05/18 05/19
Date Opp DKSAL FDSAL DKFPTS FDFPTS sf ab slg h so hbp gidp 1b babip 2b pa 3b sb hr xbh r obp rbi iso bb ops ibb
2024-05-19 @ STL $5K $3.6K 20 28.4 0 3 1.33 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 2 1 1 1.83 0
2024-05-18 @ STL $4.9K $3.5K 14 18.7 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 1 0.75 0 1.25 0
2024-05-17 @ STL $5K $3.4K 16 22.2 0 5 0.8 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.2 2 0.6 0 1 0
2024-05-16 vs. TB $4.9K $3.4K 21 27.9 0 4 1.25 2 2 0 0 1 1 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.6 1 0.75 1 1.85 0
2024-05-15 vs. TB $5K $3.4K 14 18.7 0 4 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 1 0.75 0 1.25 0
2024-05-14 vs. TB $5K $3.5K 5 6.2 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2024-05-13 vs. TB $5K $3.5K 7 9.2 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2024-05-12 vs. WSH $5K $3.5K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 2 0 0 0 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2024-05-11 vs. WSH $4.7K $3.4K 12 16 0 4 0.75 2 2 0 0 1 1 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 2 0.25 0 1.25 0
2024-05-10 vs. WSH $4.9K $3.4K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2024-05-08 @ ATL $5K $3.4K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2024-05-07 @ ATL $5.1K $3.6K 5 6 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 1
2024-05-05 @ MIN $5.3K $3.6K 21 28.4 0 5 1 2 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.4 2 0.6 0 1.4 0
2024-05-04 @ MIN $5.2K $3.4K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-05-03 @ MIN $5.1K $3.2K 16 22 0 3 1.33 2 1 0 0 0 1 2 4 0 0 0 2 0 0.75 2 0.67 1 2.08 0
2024-05-02 vs. SF $5K $3.2K 7 9.2 0 3 0.33 1 2 1 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 0 0.83 0
2024-05-01 vs. SF $5K $3.2K 9 12.5 0 3 0.67 1 0 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 1 0.33 1 1.17 0
2024-04-30 vs. SF $5.1K $3.2K 7 9 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 1 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 0 0 2 0.93 0
2024-04-28 vs. CHC $9.4K $3.3K 14 18.4 0 3 0.67 2 0 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0.8 0 0 2 1.47 1
2024-04-27 vs. CHC $5.1K $3.3K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2024-04-26 vs. CHC $4.9K $3.1K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 1 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2024-04-25 @ CLE $5K $3.2K 11 12.2 0 5 0.6 3 1 0 0 3 0.75 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.6 0 0 0 1.2 0
2024-04-24 @ CLE $9.4K $3.2K 28 37.4 0 4 1.75 3 1 0 0 1 1 1 5 0 0 1 2 2 0.8 2 1 1 2.55 0
2024-04-23 @ CLE $9.4K $3.2K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-17 vs. CLE $5.1K $3.2K 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-16 vs. CLE $5.1K $3.2K 13 19 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.75 2 0.5 2 1.75 0
2024-04-15 vs. CLE $9.4K $3.2K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2024-04-14 vs. LAA $5.1K $3.2K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-10 vs. BAL $5.2K $3.3K 6 9.2 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 2 0.5 0
2024-04-09 vs. BAL $5.7K $3.4K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-07 @ LAA $5.2K $3.5K 16 21.7 0 3 1.33 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 1.83 0
2024-04-06 @ LAA $5.3K $3.5K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2024-04-05 @ LAA $5.4K $3.6K 6 9 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 0 0 2 0.6 0
2024-04-03 @ OAK $5.5K $3.7K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 1 0 0.25 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2024-04-02 @ OAK $5.4K $3.7K 5 6.2 0 6 0.17 1 1 0 1 1 0.2 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 0.17 0 0 0 0.33 0
2024-04-01 @ OAK $5.4K $3.6K 6 9.2 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 2 0.4 0
2024-03-31 @ SEA $5.4K $3.6K 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2024-03-28 @ SEA $5.5K $3.6K 21 28.2 0 5 1.2 2 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 5 0 0 1 2 1 0.4 2 0.8 0 1.6 0
2024-03-26 @ TEX -- -- 14 18.7 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 1 1.5 0 2.5 0
2024-03-25 @ TEX -- -- 3 3 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.67 0
2024-03-24 vs. ATL $4.5K -- 8 9.2 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0
2024-03-23 vs. MIN -- -- 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2024-03-23 @ PIT -- -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-03-21 vs. BAL $4.5K -- 5 6 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2024-03-19 vs. TB $4.5K -- 8 9.5 0 4 0.5 2 2 0 0 2 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 1 0 0 1 0
2024-03-17 vs. NYY -- -- 21 28.4 0 4 1.25 2 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 2 0.75 0 1.75 0
2024-03-15 vs. MIN $4.5K -- 19 25.2 0 4 1.25 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 2 0.75 0 1.75 0
2024-03-12 vs. STL $4.5K -- 5 6.2 0 3 0.33 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 0 0 0.67 0
2024-03-10 vs. TB $4.5K -- 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-03-09 @ TB -- -- 4 6.2 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 0 1 0.33 0
2024-03-07 vs. ATL $4.5K -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-03-05 vs. TB $4.5K -- 5 6 0 3 0.67 1 1 0 0 0 0.5 1 3 0 0 0 1 0 0.33 0 0.33 0 1 0
2024-03-03 vs. TOR $4.5K -- 2 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.5 0
2024-03-02 vs. WSH -- -- 10 12.5 0 3 1 2 0 0 0 1 0.67 1 3 0 0 0 1 0 0.67 1 0.33 0 1.67 0
2024-02-29 vs. DET $4.5K -- 19 24.9 0 3 1.67 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 3 0 0 1 1 2 0.67 1 1 0 2.33 0
2024-02-26 vs. PHI $4.5K -- 4 6.2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 0 1 0.33 0
2024-02-25 vs. MIN -- -- 20 28.7 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 1 0.67 3 1.5 1 2.67 0
2023-10-01 @ BAL $4.9K $3.5K 9 12.5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0.5 1 0 1 0.5 0
2023-09-30 @ BAL $5K $3.5K 6 6 0 5 0.4 2 1 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 0 0.8 0
2023-09-29 @ BAL $4.9K $3.5K 2 3.5 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
2023-09-28 @ BAL $5.1K $3.7K 5 6 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2023-09-26 vs. TB $5K $3.9K 0 0 0 5 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-24 vs. CHW $5.2K $4.1K 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-23 vs. CHW $5.2K $4.1K 2 3 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-09-22 vs. CHW $5.2K $4.1K 8 9.2 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2023-09-20 @ TEX $5.2K $4.1K 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-19 @ TEX $5.2K $4K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-09-18 @ TEX $5.3K $4K 15 18.2 0 3 0.67 2 1 0 0 2 1 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0.75 0 0 1 1.42 1
2023-09-17 @ TOR $5.2K $3.9K 23 30.7 0 2 2.5 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1.5 2 3.5 0
2023-09-16 @ TOR $5.3K $3.9K 20 28.2 0 4 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 6 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 2 0.75 2 1.5 2
2023-09-15 @ TOR $5.4K $3.9K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-14 vs. NYY $5.6K -- 24 30.7 0 3 2 3 0 1 0 2 1 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 0
2023-09-14 vs. NYY $5.6K $3.8K 7 9.2 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2023-09-12 vs. NYY $5.5K -- 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1
2023-09-12 vs. NYY $5.5K $3.8K 14 18.7 0 4 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 1 0.75 0 1.25 0
2023-09-10 vs. BAL $5.5K $3.9K 11 15.9 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0.4 1 0 1 0.65 0
2023-09-09 vs. BAL $5.6K $3.9K 20 24.9 0 6 0.83 4 0 0 0 3 0.67 1 6 0 0 0 1 2 0.67 1 0.17 0 1.5 0
2023-09-08 vs. BAL $5.6K $3.9K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-06 @ TB $5.6K $3.9K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2023-09-05 @ TB $5.8K $3.8K 8 9 0 6 0.5 2 2 0 0 1 0.5 1 6 0 0 0 1 0 0.33 0 0.17 0 0.83 0
2023-09-04 @ TB $5.6K $3.7K 13 18.4 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 2 0.4 0 0 2 0.4 0
2023-09-03 @ KC $5.8K $3.7K 10 12.5 0 5 0.6 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.4 1 0.2 0 1 0
2023-09-02 @ KC $5.7K $3.7K 16 21.9 0 5 0.8 2 1 0 0 0 0.5 2 5 0 0 0 2 2 0.4 1 0.4 0 1.2 0
2023-09-01 @ KC $5.6K $3.8K 3 3 0 3 0.33 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.67 0
2023-08-30 vs. HOU $5.7K $3.8K 2 3.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
2023-08-29 vs. HOU $5.7K $3.8K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-08-28 vs. HOU $5.6K $3.8K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-26 vs. LAD $5.6K $3.8K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 0
2023-08-25 vs. LAD $5.6K $3.8K 10 12.2 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.6 0 0 1 1.1 0
2023-08-24 @ HOU $5.4K $3.8K 18 25.7 0 5 0.4 2 0 1 0 2 0.4 0 7 0 0 0 0 1 0.57 3 0 1 0.97 0
2023-08-23 @ HOU $5.6K $3.8K 2 3.2 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-22 @ HOU $5.5K $3.8K 9 12.2 0 4 0.5 1 2 0 0 0 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.4 0 0.25 1 0.9 0
2023-08-21 @ HOU $5.7K $3.7K 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 1 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2023-08-20 @ NYY $5.5K $3.5K 28 37.1 0 4 1.75 3 0 0 0 1 0.67 1 5 0 0 1 2 3 0.8 1 1 1 2.55 1
2023-08-19 @ NYY $5.6K $3.4K 20 24.7 0 5 1.2 3 0 0 1 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.6 1 0.6 0 1.8 0
2023-08-18 @ NYY $5.3K $3.5K 19 25.4 0 4 0.75 3 1 0 0 3 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0.8 2 0 1 1.55 0
2023-08-17 @ WSH $5.7K $3.5K 16 22.2 0 5 0.8 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.2 2 0.6 0 1 0
2023-08-16 @ WSH $5.3K $3.5K 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-08-15 @ WSH $5.3K $3.5K 6 9.2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 2 0.5 0
2023-08-12 vs. DET $5.2K $3.6K 8 9 0 3 0.67 2 0 0 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.75 0 0 1 1.42 0
2023-08-11 vs. DET $5.2K $3.6K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-08-10 vs. KC $5.2K $3.6K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2023-08-09 vs. KC $5.2K $3.5K 4 6.2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 0 1 0.33 0
2023-08-08 vs. KC $5.2K $3.5K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-07 vs. KC $5.2K $3.4K 7 9.2 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2023-08-06 vs. TOR $5.1K $3.3K 5 6 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 0 0.5 0 1.5 0
2023-08-05 vs. TOR $5K $3.3K 23 31.7 0 3 1.67 2 0 1 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.75 3 1 0 2.42 0
2023-08-04 vs. TOR $5.1K $3.5K 4 6 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.5 0
2023-08-02 @ SEA $4.9K $3.5K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-08-01 @ SEA $5K $3.6K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-07-31 @ SEA $5K $3.8K 9 9 0 4 0.75 3 1 0 0 3 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.75 0 0 0 1.5 0
2023-07-30 @ SF $5K $4K 7 9 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.4 0 0.25 1 0.9 1
2023-07-29 @ SF $5K $3.9K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-28 @ SF $5K $3.9K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-26 vs. ATL $5K $3.9K 14 18.7 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 1 0.75 0 1.25 0
2023-07-25 vs. ATL $4.9K $3.9K 10 12.7 0 5 0.4 2 1 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 1 0 0 0.8 0
2023-07-23 vs. NYM $9.8K $3.9K 19 24.7 0 3 1.67 2 1 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.75 1 1 1 2.42 0
2023-07-22 vs. NYM $4.7K $3.9K 7 9.2 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2023-07-21 vs. NYM -- -- 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-19 @ OAK $4.8K $3.9K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-16 @ CHC $5K $3.8K 21 27.9 0 4 1.5 2 1 0 0 0 0.5 1 4 0 0 1 2 2 0.5 1 1 0 2 0
2023-07-15 @ CHC $4.8K $3.8K 7 9.2 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2023-07-14 @ CHC $5.4K $3.8K 31 40.4 0 5 1.8 3 2 0 0 1 1 0 5 0 0 2 2 2 0.6 2 1.2 0 2.4 0
2023-07-09 vs. OAK $5.3K $3.8K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-08 vs. OAK $4.9K $3.8K 9 12.5 0 3 0.67 1 1 1 0 0 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 1 0.33 0 1.17 0
2023-07-07 vs. OAK $4.9K $3.7K 11 15.7 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0.25 1 0 1 0.25 1
2023-07-06 vs. TEX $4.9K $3.7K 16 22.2 0 4 0.75 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.6 2 0.25 1 1.35 0
2023-07-05 vs. TEX $4.9K $3.7K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-04 vs. TEX $4.8K $3.7K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-07-02 @ TOR $4.9K $3.7K 22 28 0 3 1 3 0 0 0 3 1 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 2 2 0
2023-07-01 @ TOR $5K $3.9K 28 37.9 0 5 1.4 3 1 0 0 1 0.67 1 5 0 0 1 2 2 0.6 3 0.8 0 2 0
2023-06-30 @ TOR $5.1K $3.9K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-06-29 vs. MIA $9.4K $3.8K 5 6 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2023-06-28 vs. MIA $5.2K $3.8K 19 24.9 0 4 1.25 2 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 1 0.75 0 1.75 0
2023-06-27 vs. MIA $5.4K $3.8K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-06-25 @ CHW $5.5K $3.8K 4 6 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 2 0.5 0
2023-06-24 @ CHW $5.8K $3.9K 14 18.4 0 3 0.67 2 0 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0.8 0 0 2 1.47 0
2023-06-23 @ CHW $5.7K $3.9K 16 22.2 0 4 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 2 0.75 0 1.25 0
2023-06-22 @ MIN $5.6K $4K 3 3 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.67 0
2023-06-21 @ MIN $5.9K $4K 7 9.5 0 5 0.4 1 3 0 0 0 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.2 1 0.2 0 0.6 0
2023-06-20 @ MIN $5.8K $3.9K 4 6.2 0 4 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.2 0
2023-06-19 @ MIN $5.7K $3.9K 2 3 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2023-06-18 vs. NYY $9.6K $9.5K 7 9.2 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2023-06-18 vs. NYY $9.6K $3.9K 9 12.5 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 1 0 2 0.93 0
2023-06-16 vs. NYY $5.8K $3.6K 4 6.2 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2023-06-13 vs. COL $5.6K $3.7K 34 47.4 0 4 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 2 2 0.6 4 1.5 1 2.6 1
2023-06-12 vs. COL $5.8K $3.7K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-06-11 @ NYY $9.2K $3.7K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-06-10 @ NYY $5.7K $3.6K 14 18.7 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 1 0.75 0 1.25 0
2023-06-09 @ NYY $5.4K $3.5K 21 27.9 0 4 1.5 2 0 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 1 2 2 0.5 1 1 0 2 0
2023-06-08 @ CLE $5.2K $3.6K 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-06-07 @ CLE $5.4K $3.6K 8 9.5 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 1 0 0 1 0
2023-06-06 @ CLE $5.2K $3.7K 4 6.2 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2023-06-05 vs. TB $9K $3.7K 6 6 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 1 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2023-06-04 vs. TB $5.7K $3.6K 2 3.5 1 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
2023-06-03 vs. TB $9.2K -- 6 9 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 0 0 2 0.6 0
2023-06-03 vs. TB $5.8K $3.7K 4 6.2 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2023-06-01 vs. CIN $5.8K $3.4K 16 21.7 0 3 1.33 2 1 0 0 0 1 2 4 0 0 0 2 1 0.75 1 0.67 1 2.08 0
2023-05-31 vs. CIN $6.1K $3.4K 9 12.5 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.4 1 0.25 1 0.9 0
2023-05-30 vs. CIN $6.1K $3.5K 12 16.2 0 5 0.4 2 1 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 2 0 0 0.8 0
2023-05-28 @ ARI $6K $3.5K 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-24 @ LAA $5.9K $3.7K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-05-23 @ LAA $5.7K $3.9K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-22 @ LAA $5.9K $3.9K 3 3 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.67 0
2023-05-21 @ SD $5.5K $3.9K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-20 @ SD $5.5K $3.7K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-19 @ SD $5.6K $3.7K 32 44.4 0 4 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 2 2 0.5 4 1.5 0 2.5 0
2023-05-17 vs. SEA $5.5K $3.7K 16 22.4 0 5 0.6 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 2 0.4 2 0.2 0 1 0
2023-05-16 vs. SEA $5.8K $3.8K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-15 vs. SEA $5.4K $3.8K 10 12.5 0 4 0.75 2 0 0 1 1 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 1 0.25 0 1.25 0
2023-05-14 vs. STL $9.6K $3.9K 8 9.5 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 1 0 0 1 0
2023-05-13 vs. STL $5.8K $3.9K 5 6.5 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 0 0 0.5 0
2023-05-12 vs. STL $5.4K $3.9K 7 9.5 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.75 0
2023-05-10 @ ATL $5.8K $4.1K 3 3 0 2 0.5 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2023-05-09 @ ATL $5.8K $4.1K 2 3 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-05-07 @ PHI $5.6K $4.1K 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-06 @ PHI $5.8K $4.1K 17 22.2 0 5 0.8 3 1 0 0 2 0.75 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.6 2 0.2 0 1.4 0
2023-05-05 @ PHI $5.7K $4K 7 9.5 0 3 0.33 1 2 1 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 1 0 0 0.83 0
2023-05-04 vs. TOR $9K $4K 28 38.2 0 5 1.4 3 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 5 0 0 1 2 1 0.6 4 0.8 0 2 0
2023-05-03 vs. TOR $5.9K $4.1K 5 6.2 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2023-05-02 vs. TOR $5.9K $4.1K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-01 vs. TOR $6.2K $4.3K 5 6 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 1 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2023-04-30 vs. CLE $6.1K $4.3K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-04-29 vs. CLE $6.2K $4.3K 21 28.7 0 5 1 2 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.4 3 0.6 0 1.4 0
2023-04-28 vs. CLE $6.2K $4.2K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-04-26 @ BAL $6.1K $4.2K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-25 @ BAL $5.7K $4.3K 4 6.5 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 1 0 1 0.2 0
2023-04-24 @ BAL $5.8K $4.3K 16 22.2 0 4 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 2 0.75 0 1.25 0
2023-04-23 @ MIL $6K $4.2K 6 9.7 1 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 1 0 1 0.2 1
2023-04-22 @ MIL $6K $4.5K 21 28.2 0 4 1.5 2 1 0 0 0 0.5 1 4 0 0 1 2 1 0.5 2 1 0 2 0
2023-04-21 @ MIL $6K $4.4K 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-20 vs. MIN $5.6K $4.4K 9 12.7 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.75 0
2023-04-19 vs. MIN $5.9K $4.4K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-18 vs. MIN $6K $4.4K 12 15.5 0 4 0.75 2 1 0 0 1 0.67 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.6 1 0.25 1 1.35 0
2023-04-17 vs. LAA $9.6K $4.4K 10 12.5 0 5 0.6 2 0 0 0 1 0.4 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.4 1 0.2 0 1 0
2023-04-16 vs. LAA $6.3K $4.2K 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-15 vs. LAA $6.3K $4.2K 16 22.2 0 5 0.8 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.2 2 0.6 0 1 0
2023-04-14 vs. LAA $6.3K $4.2K 18 24.9 0 3 1.33 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 1 1 1 1.83 0
2023-04-13 @ TB $6.3K $4.2K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-12 @ TB $6.3K $4.3K 18 25.7 0 4 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 3 0.75 0 1.25 0
2023-04-11 @ TB $42 $4.5K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-04-10 @ TB $42 $4.5K 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-09 @ DET $6.1K $4.2K 5 6 0 4 0.25 1 1 1 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 0 0.65 0
2023-04-08 @ DET $6K $4.1K 34 47.9 0 4 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 2 2 0.5 5 1.5 0 2.5 0
2023-04-06 @ DET $6K $4.1K 23 31.4 0 4 1.5 2 1 0 0 0 0.5 1 4 0 0 1 2 2 0.5 2 1 0 2 0
2023-04-05 vs. PIT $6.1K $4.1K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-04 vs. PIT $5.9K $4K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-03 vs. PIT $5.9K $4K 16 21.7 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.4 1 0.75 1 1.4 1
2023-04-02 vs. BAL $5.9K $3.9K 8 9.2 0 5 0.4 2 2 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 0 0.8 0
2023-04-01 vs. BAL $5.8K $3.9K 13 15.2 0 5 0.8 3 1 0 0 2 0.75 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.6 0 0.2 0 1.4 0
2023-03-30 vs. BAL -- -- 14 18.9 0 5 0.6 2 2 0 0 1 0.67 1 5 0 0 0 1 2 0.4 1 0.2 0 1 0
2023-03-28 vs. ATL -- -- 5 6.2 0 2 0.5 1 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2023-03-27 @ ATL -- -- 2 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.5 0
2023-03-26 vs. MIN -- -- 17 21.7 0 3 1.67 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 3 0 0 1 1 1 0.67 1 1 0 2.33 0
2023-03-24 vs. ATL -- -- 9 12.2 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.4 0 0.25 1 0.9 0
2023-03-22 vs. MIN -- -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-03-20 vs. PIT -- -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-03-19 @ PHI -- -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-03-18 vs. BAL -- -- 10 12.7 0 4 0.5 2 2 0 0 2 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 0 0 1 0
2023-03-06 vs. DET -- -- 7 9.2 0 2 0.5 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0.67 0 0 1 1.17 0
2023-03-04 vs. HOU -- -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-03-02 vs. PHI -- -- 10 13 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 2 0 0 1 0
2023-02-27 vs. MIN -- -- 3 3 0 2 0.5 1 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2023-02-26 vs. TB -- -- 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-10-05 vs. TB $6K $3.8K 5 6.2 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 0 0 0.67 0
2022-10-04 vs. TB $6.2K $3.7K 4 6.2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 0 1 0.33 0
2022-10-03 vs. TB $6.2K $3.7K 15 18.7 1 3 1.33 3 0 0 0 2 0.75 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.75 1 0.33 0 2.08 0
2022-10-01 @ TOR $6.2K $3.7K 6 6 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2022-09-30 @ TOR $5.6K $3.9K 4 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.67 0 0 2 0.67 0
2022-09-29 vs. BAL $5.9K $4K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-09-28 vs. BAL $5.5K $3.8K 9 12.2 0 3 0.67 1 0 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 0 0.33 1 1.17 0
2022-09-27 vs. BAL $5.5K $3.8K 12 16 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 1 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 2 0 1 1.1 1
2022-09-26 vs. BAL $5.8K $3.8K 13 15.5 0 5 0.8 3 0 0 1 2 0.6 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.6 1 0.2 0 1.4 0
2022-09-24 @ NYY $9.6K $3.7K 7 9.2 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2022-09-23 @ NYY $5.7K $3.8K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2022-09-22 @ NYY $5.4K $3.9K 2 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2022-09-21 @ CIN $5.7K $3.9K 8 9.2 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2022-09-20 @ CIN $5.4K $3.9K 18 25.2 0 4 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.4 2 0.75 1 1.4 0
2022-09-18 vs. KC $5.5K $3.9K 20 25.5 0 6 0.83 4 1 0 0 3 0.8 1 6 0 0 0 1 0 0.67 3 0.17 0 1.5 0
2022-09-17 vs. KC $5.3K $3.9K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-09-16 vs. KC $5.2K $3.9K 5 6 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2022-09-14 vs. NYY $5.3K $3.9K 7 9.5 0 4 0.5 1 2 0 0 0 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.75 0
2022-09-13 vs. NYY $5.3K $3.8K 9 12.2 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2022-09-11 @ BAL $5.5K $3.8K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 1 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-09-10 @ BAL $10K $3.9K 28 38.7 0 5 1.2 3 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.6 5 0.6 0 1.8 0
2022-09-09 @ BAL $5.5K $3.9K 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2022-09-06 @ TB $5.9K $4K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-09-05 @ TB $6K $4K 9 12.5 0 2 0.5 1 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.75 1 0 2 1.25 1
2022-09-04 vs. TEX $5.8K $4K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-09-03 vs. TEX $6.1K $4K 14 19.2 0 4 0.75 2 1 0 0 1 0.67 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 2 0.25 0 1.25 0
2022-09-02 vs. TEX $5.8K $3.9K 18 24.9 0 2 1.5 2 0 0 0 1 1 1 4 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 0.5 2 2.5 0
2022-09-01 vs. TEX $5.9K $3.7K 20 28.9 0 5 0.8 2 2 0 0 0 0.67 2 5 0 0 0 2 2 0.4 3 0.4 0 1.2 0
2022-08-31 @ MIN $5.9K $3.8K 0 0 0 5 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-30 @ MIN $6K $3.8K 4 6.5 1 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 0 1 0.25 0
2022-08-29 @ MIN $5.8K $3.9K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-28 vs. TB $6.1K $3.9K 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-27 vs. TB $6.1K $3.8K 2 3.2 0 4 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-25 vs. TOR $6.1K $3.8K 10 12.5 0 5 0.6 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.4 1 0.2 0 1 0
2022-08-24 vs. TOR $5.9K $3.7K 5 6 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 1
2022-08-23 vs. TOR $6K $3.7K 13 15.5 0 4 0.75 3 1 1 0 3 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.8 1 0 0 1.55 0
2022-08-21 @ BAL $11K $3.8K 5 6.2 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-08-20 @ BAL $5.8K $4K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-08-19 @ BAL $5.6K $4.1K 2 3.2 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-18 @ PIT $5.5K $4.2K 2 3.5 1 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
2022-08-17 @ PIT $5.5K $4.2K 7 9 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.4 0 0.25 1 0.9 1
2022-08-16 @ PIT $5.6K $4.2K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2022-08-14 vs. NYY $9.6K $4.2K 19 25.2 0 4 1.25 2 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 2 0.75 0 1.75 0
2022-08-13 vs. NYY $5.7K $4K 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-12 vs. NYY $5.6K $4K 7 9 0 3 0.67 1 0 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 0 0.33 1 1.17 0
2022-08-11 vs. BAL $5.7K $4K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-10 vs. ATL $5.7K $4K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-08-09 vs. ATL $6.2K $4.1K 2 3 0 4 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 1
2022-08-07 @ KC $5.9K $4.2K 14 18.7 0 5 0.8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.2 1 0.6 0 1 0
2022-08-06 @ KC $5.2K $4.1K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-05 @ KC $5.2K $4.1K 2 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2022-08-04 @ KC $5.2K $4.1K 9 13 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 2 0 1 0.83 0
2022-08-03 @ HOU $5.4K $4.1K 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-02 @ HOU $5.4K $4.1K 21 28.2 0 4 1.5 2 1 0 0 0 0.5 1 4 0 0 1 2 1 0.5 2 1 0 2 0
2022-07-22 vs. TOR $5.2K $4.3K 5 6 0 3 0.67 1 1 0 0 0 0.5 1 3 0 0 0 1 0 0.33 0 0.33 0 1 0
2022-07-17 @ NYY $5.2K $4.2K 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-07-16 @ NYY $5.1K $4.3K 14 18.7 0 3 1.33 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 1 0.33 1 1 0 1.67 0
2022-07-15 @ NYY $5.3K $4.4K 18 25.2 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.4 2 0.75 1 1.4 1
2022-07-14 @ TB $5.1K $4.4K 17 21.7 0 4 1.25 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 1 0.75 0 1.75 0
2022-07-13 @ TB $5K $4.3K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2022-07-12 @ TB $5.3K $4K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-07-08 vs. NYY $5.5K $4K 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-07-07 vs. NYY $5.5K $3.8K 36 50.9 0 3 2.67 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 2 2 0.75 5 2 1 3.42 0
2022-07-04 vs. TB $5.7K $4K 10 12.7 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 0 0 1 0
2022-07-03 @ CHC $5.4K $4K 6 6 0 6 0.33 2 2 0 0 2 0.5 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.67 0
2022-07-02 @ CHC $5.5K $3.9K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 2 0 1 0 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2022-07-01 @ CHC $5.6K $4K 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2022-06-29 @ TOR $5.8K $4.1K 4 6.2 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2022-06-28 @ TOR $6.1K $4K 5 6 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2022-06-27 @ TOR $5.9K $4K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2022-06-26 @ CLE $6.2K $4.1K 15 18.7 0 5 0.6 3 0 0 0 3 0.6 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 0.67 1 0 1 1.27 1
2022-06-25 @ CLE $16.2K $9K 5 6 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 1
2022-06-24 @ CLE $6.2K $4.1K 21 27.7 0 4 1.5 2 1 1 0 0 0.5 1 5 0 0 1 2 1 0.6 1 1 0 2.1 0
2022-06-21 vs. DET $5.5K $4.2K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-06-20 vs. DET $5.7K $4.4K 9 12.5 0 3 0.67 1 2 0 0 0 1 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 1 0.33 1 1.17 0
2022-06-19 vs. STL $5.6K $4.5K 7 9 0 2 0.5 1 0 1 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.75 0 0 1 1.25 0
2022-06-18 vs. STL $5.7K $4.5K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-06-17 vs. STL $5.9K $4.5K 17 22 0 3 0.67 2 0 1 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0.75 2 0 0 1.42 0
2022-06-16 vs. OAK $5.8K $4.2K 8 12.2 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.6 0 0 2 0.6 1
2022-06-15 vs. OAK $5.8K $4.2K 24 34.6 0 3 1.33 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 3 0.6 2 1 2 1.93 0
2022-06-14 vs. OAK $5.5K $4.1K 20 28.9 0 5 0.8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.2 3 0.6 0 1 0
2022-06-12 @ SEA $5.4K $4.2K 18 25.2 0 3 1.33 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 2 1 0 1.83 0
2022-06-11 @ SEA $5.4K $4.2K 20 28.4 0 3 1.33 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 2 1 1 1.83 0
2022-06-10 @ SEA $5.6K $4.3K 7 9.2 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2022-06-09 @ LAA $5.8K $4.1K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-06-07 @ LAA $5.3K $4K 12 15.2 0 4 0.75 2 0 0 1 1 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.6 0 0.25 1 1.35 0
2022-06-06 @ LAA $5.3K $4K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-06-05 @ OAK $5.2K $4K 23 31.4 0 3 1.67 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 1 1 2 0.75 2 1 1 2.42 0
2022-06-04 @ OAK $5.9K $4K 7 10 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 2 0 0 0.5 0
2022-06-01 vs. CIN $5.9K $4.1K 7 9.2 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2022-05-31 vs. CIN $5.9K $4.2K 8 9 0 4 0.75 2 1 0 1 1 0.67 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 0 0.25 0 1.25 0
2022-05-30 vs. BAL $6K $4.2K 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-05-29 vs. BAL $6.1K $4.2K 18 24.9 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.4 1 0.75 1 1.4 0
2022-05-28 vs. BAL $15.9K -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-05-28 vs. BAL $15.9K $4.2K 14 15 0 5 1 4 1 0 0 3 1 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.8 0 0.2 0 1.8 0
2022-05-27 vs. BAL $5.8K $4.2K 17 21.6 0 5 0.8 3 0 0 0 2 0.6 1 5 0 0 0 1 3 0.6 0 0.2 0 1.4 0
2022-05-26 @ CWS $5.9K $4.4K 18 24.6 0 5 0.8 2 2 0 0 0 0.67 2 6 0 0 0 2 3 0.5 0 0.4 1 1.3 0
2022-05-25 @ CWS $5.7K $4.3K 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 2 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2022-05-24 @ CWS $5.9K $4.2K 19 24.9 0 5 1 2 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.4 1 0.6 0 1.4 0
2022-05-22 vs. SEA $5.9K $4.1K 7 9.2 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 1
2022-05-21 vs. SEA $5.8K $4.2K 33 43.9 0 4 2.25 3 1 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 2 2 2 0.75 3 1.5 0 3 0
2022-05-20 vs. SEA $5.6K $4.2K 5 6 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Rafael Devers Daily Fantasy News, Rankings, Projections

Rafael Devers scratched Friday.

Rafael Devers scratched Friday.

Rafael Devers scratched Sunday

Rafael Devers scratched Sunday.

The Stack That Projects to Smash the Slate Nearly as Often as the Braves

With just four teams exceeding four and a half implied runs and the Braves atop the board (5.11), they are projected to be the most popular team on the board and the only stack currently with a double digit ownership projection, though by a larger margin, nearly 50% more than any other stack on DraftKings. The Braves also smash the slate most often in early simulations (projections are fluid and updated throughout the day), but not all that more often the Red Sox, though Kyle Bradish did strike out 10 Astros last time out and is a prospect with some upside. Fenway is a more positive run environment than Washington (where Altanta will face Paolo Espino) though. Boston also projects as the top value stack on FanDuel, currently with more than twice the value of any other FD stack. The Red Sox slightly trail the A’s as the top projected value stack on DraftKings. For an in depth look at some stacks who may rate as well as or better than the Braves tonight, check out Tuesday’s PlateIQ Live Blog.

This Offense Projects to Smash the Slate Nearly Twice as Often as Any Other Team

The Red Sox are the top offense on the board at 5.17 implied runs, but not too far above the Cardinals (4.97). Current stacking projections (which are fluid and updated throughout the day) do suggest they’ll be the most popular stack, though by a wider margin on FanDuel, where they nearly double up the stack projecting to be the second most popular (Astros). The Red Sox may not separate themselves much from the rest of the board in terms of team run totals, but simulations project them to smash the slate almost twice as often as any other team, at a rate nearing 20%. A cheap Detroit lineup that has been league average (98 wRC+) against LHP doubles up the projected value of any other stack on DraftKings tonight, though several teams are just below 10% on FanDuel. The Red Sox do project as one of the top rated stacks tonight, but to find out who projects right there with them, check out today’s PlateIQ Live Blog.

Two Offenses Separate From Rest of the Board

With more pitcher friendly weather on the Wednesday night slate, the Dodgers separate themselves from the rest of the board by more than half a run with a 5.68 implied run line. The Red Sox are second at a 5.04 team total and themselves isolated by nearly half a run in both directions on a 16 team slate. PlateIQ projections are very much in agreement with sports books tonight because while Aaron Judge (167 wRC+, .298 ISO vs LHP since 2021) is the absolute top projected hitter on the board against Reid Detmers (RHBs .322 wOBA, .342 xwOBA career), the Dodgers and Red Sox are the only team with multiple top 10 projected bats tonight.

As a matter of fact, three of the top six projected hitters from either site are the top third of the Dodger projected lineup. Mookie Betts (132 wRC+, .218 ISO vs LHP since LY), Freddie Freeman (103 wRC+, .170 ISO) and Trea Turner (201 wRC+, .320 ISO) hit both left and right-handed pitchers well, though Jose Quintana has over a 100 point split (RHBs .356 wOBA, .369 xwOBA). With a mere 11.1 K-BB%, the majority of Quintana’s value has come from a contact profile that includes an 86 mph EV and 4.5 HR/FB, the latter being unsustainable, though even his FIP (3.22) is more than a run above his 2.15 ERA (five of 16 runs unearned). All additional estimators are above four. Will Smith (93 wRC+, .182 ISO) is also a top projected bat as well.

Hunter Greene throws 100 miles per hour with a 27.6% strikeout rate. That’s good. The bad? Literally everything else. He’s walked 11.8% of the batters he’s faced, kept only 28.7% of his contact on the ground, 23.4% of his fly balls have left the yard and 12.3% of his contact has been barreled. He’s allowed multiple home runs in four of his nine starts, though 40% of his barrels (six) came in a single start. The good news is that the contact profile will likely settle down at some point, but for now, he doesn’t own an estimator below four. Greene has a large reverse split so far (RHBs.428 wOBA, .382 xwOBA), though LHBs have had success too (.317 wOBA, .330 xwOBA). Like the Dodgers, the top half of the Boston lineup hits pitchers from either side well. Rafael Devers (152 wRC+, .341 ISO), J.D. Martinez (135 wRC+, .246 ISO) and Xander Bogaerts (135 wRC+, .220 ISO) are all top projected bats.

PlateIQ Projections in Strong Agreement with Sports Books Concerning Top Offenses

A 13 game Friday night slate finds two offenses separated from the rest of the, well above a five run team total. The Red Sox easily top the board at 5.71 implied runs at home against Kyle Bradish, while the Dodgers aren’t too far behind (5.48) in Arizona against old friend Madison Bumgarner. There’s a sizable gap until the Braves (4.85) at home against Trevor Rogers and then the Nations and Rockies (4.75 each) facing each other in Washington with Austin Gomer and Aaron Sanchez on the mound. Plate IQ projections are strongly in line with the sports books. Three of the top four projected bats on either site in terms of raw point totals wear Boston uniforms. Rafael Devers (161 wRC+, .333 ISO vs RHP since 2021) and J.D. Martinez (149 wRC+, .244 ISO) are the top two projected bats on both DraftKings and FanDuel. Xander Bogaerts (137 wRC+, .198 ISO) is not far behind with Trevor Story (89 wRC+, .184 ISO), who has a 145 wRC+ over the last 30 days, just outside the top 10. Kyle Bradish has struck out 22 of his last 68 batters (11.7 SwStr%) against some pretty competent offenses (Cardinals, Yankees, Rays). A 17.5 K-BB% through five starts helps counter an awful contact profile so far (92.5 mph EV, 11.1% Barrels/BBE). And even with four of his five starts at home with the other one in St Louis, six of his eight barrels have left the yard. While no estimators are anywhere near his 5.74 ERA, contact inclusive ones (xERA, FIP) are the only ones above four. It seems the poor contact profile is expected to continue in a tough park. Bradish has exhibited a pretty extreme reverse split in a small sample. LHBs own a .209 wOBA and .252 xwOBA against him, while RHBs are well above .400 in both aspects.

Not to be outdone, the Dodgers also place three batters among the top 10 projections, though a bit lower than those top Boston bats. Ironically, Madison Bumgarner allowed his most runs in a start (four) in the same game where he recorded his most strikeouts (seven) last time out. Yet, that result doesn’t even begin to close the still two run gap between his 2.76 ERA and most of his estimators. To be fair, he’s allowed just eight barrels (6.1%) with six leaving the yard, but even his FIP (4.63) and xERA (3.63) are well above his actual results with just an 8.1 K-BB%. The Diamondbacks certainly understand that his ERA is living on borrowed time because he’s only produced one Quality Start, not going much beyond five innings in most of his starts, despite the run prevention. The Arizona bullpen is nothing to fear though. They own a FIP and xFIP above four over the last 30 days. Bumgarner has a smaller, but still noticeable standard split. RHBs own a .316 wOBA and .325 xwOBA against him since last season with LHBs a bit below .300. PlateIQ projections still favor the top three Dodgers in the projected order, but actually in reverse order with Trea Turner (187 wRC+, .277 ISO against LHP since LY) projected a bit ahead of Freddie Freeman (119 wRC+, .172 ISO) and Mookie Betts (134 wRC+, .216 ISO).

Could a Top Projected Stack Be a Top Leverage Spot Too?

Although there are currently three teams bunched closely atop the board right around five implied runs without any other team eclipsing four and a half, Yankee stacks project to be quite a bit more popular than any other team tonight. Perhaps the surprise here is seeing Texas stacks currently projected for double digit ownership, facing Javier Cristian in his first start. Remember, these numbers are fluid and can change throughout the day though. Early simulations currently see the three AL East teams (Yankees, Red Sox, Blue Jays) all “smashing” the slate between nine and 11 percent of the time. Boston (4.12) the only one of those teams with a run total below four and a half. In terms of Value, Baltimore stacks project for the most of it by an overwhelming margin on DraftKings, while Texas has a slight edge over Detroit on FanDuel. The Rangers are the only one of those teams not facing a top pitcher tonight.

We don’t usually find an offense with a top Smash% projection and top Leverage ratio, but that does happen to be the case early on this afternoon, as the Red Sox project to both perform well and be low owned. Perhaps part of that is their team 77 wRC+ vs RHP this year, but Ross Stripling has had his own problems. He has kept the ball on the ground (54.5%) with lots of weak contact (83.6 mph), but he’s also been quite lucky that none of his three barrels (9.1%) has left the yard. He’s also only struck out five of 42 batters, while walking four. Stripling has been held below 65 pitches in each of his starts and the Toronto bullpen has been quite good though (3.08 SIERA). However, since last season, batters from either side of the plate own an xwOBA above .330 against Stripling. Alex Verdugo, Xander Bogaerts, Rafael Devers and J.D. Martinez all have a wRC+ above 130 and ISO above .180 against RHP since last season.

LHBs .349 wOBA vs Pitcher In Potential Top Leverage Spot

On just a five game DraftKings slate, early ownership projections suggest that the top two projected offenses, the Twins and Blue Jays, are likely to be immensely popular, to no surprise. The Royals (vs Chris Paddack), Diamondbacks (at Washington & Erick Fedde) and Mariners (vs Dane Dunning) also break double digit stack ownership projections. Arizona is the only real surprise here. Perhaps this is because Ketel Marte (106 wRC+ vs RHP since 2021) is the only projected starter above $4K on DK. Despite Fedde’s recent improvements into at least a competent back end arm, batters from either side of the plate still eclipse a .320 wOBA and xwOBA against him since last season. With five additional games on FanDuel, no team overwhelms ownership projections with the Blue Jays and Twins the only ones in double digits.

The surprise is in the Smash% colum today. True, there are just five games on DraftKings, but the Royals smashed the slate in 11.9% of simulations, more than any team except the Blue Jays. Keep in mind that these numbers can change throughout the day, but this is iinteresting, since they carry just a modest 4.28 implied run line. On FanDuel, the Yankees (4.23 implied runs) are the only team to break into a double digit Smash% in Detroit, against Eduardo Rodriguez, who has really struggled early. RHBs have a .337 wOBA, but just .291 xwOBA against him since last season. The Twins are the overwhelming top projected Value on DraftKings and also currently slightly ahead of Oakland for the top spot on FanDuel.

If you are looking for something that is going to hit more often than not, the rest of this may not be for you, but if you are hoping to find the best way to differentiate from most of the player pool and potentially win a GPP, then Leverage is what you’re looking for. We can easily see that the Twins are the obvious negative Leverage situation against Daniel Lynch on DK. The highest combined Leverage is in New York against the top two priced pitchers on the slate, Carlos Rodon and Chris Bassitt and then Texas against the third highest priced pitcher, Logan Gilbert. This makes sense because people generally won’t attack the top pitchers, especially if they’re going to have them in many of their lineups. An interesting spot pops up in Boston though. Jose Berrios has really struggled through two starts (5 Ks & BBs, 3 HRs, 25% Barrels/BBE, 94.5 mph EV). He’s thrown three pitches at least 30 times this season and none have a wOBA or xwOBA below .485. Additionally, LHBs own a .349 wOBA (.348 xwOBA) against him since last year. Rafael Devers (150 wRC+, .330 ISO vs RHP since 2021) is already the top overall projected bat on the board (PlateIQ), but make sure to include Alex Verdugo (142 wRC+, .194 ISO) in stacks as well.

On FanDuel, the early top Leverage projection belongs to the Cardinals in Miami. Sandy Alcantara has just nine strikeouts to six walks through two starts (48 BF), while St Louis has a 108 wRC+ both over the last seven days and against RHP so far this year. This is certainly a tough spot in a pitcher’s park (otherwise more people would be expected to be on it), but LHBs do own a league average .310 xwOBA against Alcantara since last season. Unfortunately, the Cardinals are predominantly right-handed, but Dylan Carlson (99 wRC+, .162 ISO) and Corey Dickerson (102 wRC+, .137 ISO) both cost less than $3K, while their top RHBs like Tyler O’Neill have smashed RHP (136 wRC+, .254 ISO).

This Pitcher Has Made Improvements, But Still Struggles Against LHBs

Casey Mize has shown some improvements this year, more in his contact profile with more than half of it on the ground (51.4%) than in the strikeout department (19.4%). He also has one of the widest splits on the board, favoring left-handed batters (.346 wOBA, .368 xwOBA). The Red Sox have been struggling and the lineup only projects two above average LHBs for them, but Rafael Devers (159 wRC+, .353 ISO vs RHP this season) may be one of the top bats on the board and while Alex Verdugo has been struggling (70 wRC+ last 30 days), his numbers against RHP (142 wRC+, .204 ISO) are still strong enough to make him a potentially the top value in this lineup for less than $4K on DraftKings or $3K on FanDuel. The Red Sox currently have an implied run line just below five runs, so oddsmakers are expecting somebody else to step up as well, but make sure to include these two LHBs in any Boston stacks.

Alex Cobb has been one of the hardest hit pitchers in the league (91.1 mph EV)

Alex Cobb has been one of the hardest hit pitchers in the league with a 91.1 mph EV (10.7% Barrels/BBE) despite keeping 52.7% of his contact on the ground. Furthermore, while a full quarter of his fly balls have left the yard, that still only represents eight of his 15 Barrels. And we haven’t even mentioned the 17% strikeout rate. So while his 4.76 ERA is in line with his 4.66 SIERA and even well above a 4.24 DRA, a 5.10 FIP and 7.03 xERA (includes contact profile via Statcast) see things much differently. At 5.34 implied runs, the Red Sox are expected to be one of the top offenses on the main slate. Everyone in the lineup is above a 95 wRC+ with at least a .160 ISO vs RHP since 2019, while batters from either side of the plate are above a .360 wOBA and xwOBA in 57.2 innings against Cobb since last year. Only two batters in the projected Boston lineup are below a 120 wRC+ over the last 30 days. Rafael Devers (151 wRC+, .285 ISO vs RHP since last season) has caught fire with a 165 wRC+ over the last month and now has a lineup leading 92.5 mph EV for the season. He may be one of the top bats on the board tonight. For nearly $1K less on FanDuel, Alex Verdugo (123 wRC+, .203 ISO) may be one of the best values.