Robbie Grossman

Texas Rangers
Pos: OF | Hand: S
Status: Inactive
player props
FPTS 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 SAL $3.1K $3.3K $3.5K $3.7K $3.9K $4K $4.2K $4.4K $4.6K $4.8K
  • FPTS: 3
  • FPTS: 4
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 4
  • FPTS: 2
  • FPTS: 2
  • FPTS: 3
  • FPTS: 2
  • FPTS: 3
  • FPTS: 5
  • FPTS: 2
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 0
  • SAL: $3.3K
  • SAL: $3.4K
  • SAL: $3.1K
  • SAL: $3.2K
  • SAL: $3.1K
  • SAL: $3.3K
  • SAL: $3.2K
  • SAL: $3.2K
  • SAL: $3.1K
  • SAL: $3K
  • SAL: $2.9K
  • SAL: $2.9K
  • SAL: $2.9K
  • SAL: $2.9K
  • SAL: $4.8K
  • SAL: $4.8K
09/20 09/20 09/26 09/27 09/30 09/30 10/03 10/04 10/07 10/16 10/19 10/20 10/23 10/29 10/31
Date Opp Salary FPTS gp pa ab h hbp 1b 2b 3b hr r rbi bb ibb so sb sf xbh gidp obp slg iso babip ops
2023-10-30 @ ARI $4.8K 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-10-28 vs. ARI $4.8K 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-10-22 @ HOU $2.9K 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-10-20 vs. HOU $2.9K 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-10-18 vs. HOU $2.9K 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-10-16 @ HOU $2.9K 2 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-10-07 @ BAL $3K 5 1 5 5 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.2 1 0.6
2023-10-04 @ TB $3.1K 3 1 5 5 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.2 0.2 0 0.33 0.4
2023-10-03 @ TB $3.2K 2 1 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.2
2023-09-30 @ SEA $3.2K 3 1 5 5 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.2 0.2 0 0.33 0.4
2023-09-29 @ SEA $3.3K 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0.5
2023-09-26 @ LAA $3.1K 2 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 0 0 0.33
2023-09-25 @ LAA $3.2K 4 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.67 0 0 0 0.67
2023-09-20 vs. BOS $3.1K 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-19 vs. BOS $3.4K 4 1 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0.5
2023-09-17 @ CLE $3.3K 3 1 4 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 0.33 0.5
2023-09-16 @ CLE $3.5K 3 1 3 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.33 0.33 0 0.5 0.67
2023-09-15 @ CLE $3.2K 2 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25
2023-09-14 @ TOR $3.3K 17 1 5 3 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0.8 0.67 0 0.67 1.47
2023-09-13 @ TOR $2.9K 27 1 5 3 2 0 1 0 0 1 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.8 1.67 1 0.5 2.47
2023-09-12 @ TOR $3.1K 18 1 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 0.5 1.33 1 0 1.83
2023-09-11 @ TOR $3K 10 1 4 3 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0.5 0.67 0 0.5 1.17
2023-09-10 vs. OAK $3K 9 1 4 4 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.25 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.75
2023-09-09 vs. OAK $3K 10 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.75 0 0 0 0.75
2023-09-08 vs. OAK $3K 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-06 vs. HOU $3K 0 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-05 vs. HOU $3.1K 2 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 0 0 0.33
2023-09-04 vs. HOU $3.1K 2 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.33
2023-09-03 vs. MIN $3.1K 2 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25
2023-09-02 vs. MIN $3K 15 1 5 4 3 0 2 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0.6 1 0.25 0.6 1.6
2023-09-01 vs. MIN $3.2K 5 1 3 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.33 0.67 0.33 0.33 1
2023-08-29 @ NYM $3K 5 1 3 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.67 0.5 0 0.5 1.17
2023-08-28 @ NYM $3K 2 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-27 @ MIN $3K 9 1 4 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.75 0.5 0 0.5 1.25
2023-08-26 @ MIN $2.9K 11 1 4 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0.5 0.67 0.33 0.5 1.17
2023-08-21 @ ARI $2.8K 0 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-20 vs. MIL $3K 3 1 4 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 0.5 0.5
2023-08-19 vs. MIL $2.9K 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-18 vs. MIL $2.9K 7 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 1 3
2023-08-16 vs. LAA $2.9K 2 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.33
2023-08-14 vs. LAA $3K 16 1 5 4 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 0.6 1 0.5 0.67 1.6
2023-08-09 @ OAK $2.8K 3 1 4 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 0.25 0.5
2023-08-08 @ OAK $2.4K 16 1 4 3 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 0.75 1.33 0.67 1 2.08
2023-08-07 @ OAK $2.6K 9 1 4 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 0.67 0.33 0.33 1.17
2023-08-06 vs. MIA $2.6K 0 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-05 vs. MIA $2.5K 20 1 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0.5 1.33 1 0 1.83
2023-08-04 vs. MIA $2.6K 3 1 4 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0.25 0.25 0 0.5 0.5
2023-08-02 vs. CHW $2.5K 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-30 @ SD $2.4K 9 1 5 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.8 0.5 0 1 1.3
2023-07-28 @ SD $2.3K 2 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25
2023-07-26 @ HOU $2.3K 17 1 5 5 2 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0.4 1 0.6 0.4 1.4
2023-07-24 @ HOU $2.4K 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-23 vs. LAD $2.4K 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-22 vs. LAD $2.3K 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-19 vs. TB $2.2K 2 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25
2023-07-17 vs. TB $2.4K 10 1 3 3 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0.67 1 0.33 1 1.67
2023-07-16 vs. CLE $2.4K 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-15 vs. CLE $2.4K 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-09 @ WSH $4K 0 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-08 @ WSH $2.4K 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-06 @ BOS $2.4K 4 1 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25
2023-07-05 @ BOS $2.2K 5 1 4 4 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.75
2023-07-04 @ BOS $2.4K 13 1 4 4 3 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0.75 1 0.25 1 1.75
2023-07-02 vs. HOU $2.4K 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-06-27 vs. DET $2.3K 2 1 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-06-25 @ NYY $2.4K 0 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-06-24 @ NYY $2.4K 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-06-23 @ NYY $2.5K 5 1 5 5 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.6
2023-06-21 @ CHW $2.4K 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-06-17 vs. TOR $2.5K 2 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25
2023-06-15 vs. LAA $2.5K 4 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25
2023-06-14 vs. LAA $2.5K 5 1 3 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.33 0.33 0 1 0.67
2023-06-13 vs. LAA $2.5K 2 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25
2023-06-12 vs. LAA $2.7K 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-06-11 @ TB $2.7K 14 1 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.33 1.33 1 0 1.67
2023-06-09 @ TB $2.3K 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-06-07 vs. STL $2.7K 7 1 4 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0.5 0.67 0.33 0.5 1.17
2023-06-06 vs. STL $2.7K 2 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25
2023-06-05 vs. STL $2.9K 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-06-04 vs. SEA $2.9K 9 1 5 5 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.33 0.6
2023-06-03 vs. SEA $3.1K 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-06-02 vs. SEA $3K 3 1 3 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.33 0.33 0 1 0.67
2023-05-31 @ DET $3.2K 4 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0.5
2023-05-30 @ DET $2.6K 6 1 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 0 0.4
2023-05-29 @ DET $3K 8 1 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0.5
2023-05-28 @ BAL $2.7K 8 1 3 3 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.67 0.67 0 0.67 1.33
2023-05-27 @ BAL $2.8K 9 1 4 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.33 0 0.33 0.83
2023-05-26 @ BAL $2.8K 22 1 4 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.75 2 1.5 0 2.75
2023-05-24 @ PIT $2.6K 0 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-23 @ PIT $2.6K 3 1 4 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 1 0.5
2023-05-22 @ PIT $2.5K 4 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25
2023-05-21 vs. COL $2.6K 0 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-20 vs. COL $2.5K 9 1 5 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.2 0.25 0 0.2 0.45
2023-05-19 vs. COL $2.4K 5 1 4 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0.25 0 0.25 0.5
2023-05-17 vs. ATL $2.5K 7 1 4 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.33 0 0.5 0.83
2023-05-16 vs. ATL $2.9K 10 1 4 4 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 0 0.67 1
2023-05-15 vs. ATL $2.6K 3 1 5 5 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0.2 0 0.2 0.4
2023-05-14 @ OAK $2.7K 28 1 5 5 3 0 1 1 0 1 2 3 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0.6 1.4 0.8 0.67 2
2023-05-13 @ OAK $2.5K 0 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-12 @ OAK $2.5K 21 1 6 6 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0.33 1 0.67 1 1.33
2023-05-11 @ OAK $2.4K 7 1 4 4 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0.25 0.5 0.25 0.33 0.75
2023-05-10 @ SEA $2.4K 5 1 5 5 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.2 0.2 0 0.25 0.4
2023-05-08 @ SEA $2.5K 0 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-07 @ LAA $2.7K 2 1 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-06 @ LAA $2.5K 8 1 5 5 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0.4 0.4 0 1 0.8
2023-05-05 @ LAA $2.4K 5 1 6 5 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.33 0.2 0 0.33 0.53
2023-05-02 vs. ARI $2.6K 5 1 4 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 0.33 0.5
2023-04-30 vs. NYY $2.7K 15 1 5 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.6 0.33 0 1 0.93
2023-04-29 vs. NYY $2.8K 5 1 3 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.33 0.33 0 0.5 0.67
2023-04-28 vs. NYY $2.7K 28 1 4 4 3 0 0 2 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0.75 2 1.25 0.67 2.75
2023-04-27 vs. NYY $2.9K 5 1 4 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 0.33 0.5
2023-04-26 @ CIN $6.2K 3 1 4 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 0.25 0.5
2023-04-24 @ CIN $2.6K 5 1 4 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 0.33 0.5
2023-04-23 vs. OAK $2.8K 24 1 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0.6 2 1.5 0 2.6
2023-04-21 vs. OAK $2.7K 8 1 4 4 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 0 1 1
2023-04-19 @ KC $2.6K 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-18 @ KC $2.8K 9 1 4 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0.33 0 0.33 0.83
2023-04-17 @ KC $2.7K 3 1 4 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0.25 0 0.25 0.5
2023-04-16 @ HOU $5.2K 11 1 4 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.33 0 0.5 0.83
2023-04-15 @ HOU $2.8K 2 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.33
2023-04-14 @ HOU $2.6K 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-12 vs. KC $2.8K 0 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-11 vs. KC $2.9K 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-10 vs. KC $2.7K 4 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25
2023-04-09 @ CHC $2.9K 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-08 @ CHC $2.9K 0 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-07 @ CHC $337 0 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-05 vs. BAL $2.8K 3 1 4 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 0.33 0.5
2023-04-04 vs. BAL $2.4K 0 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-03 vs. BAL $2.6K 2 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.33
2023-04-02 vs. PHI $337 5 1 3 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.33 0.67 0.33 0.33 1
2023-04-01 vs. PHI $2.7K 12 1 4 3 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0.5 0.67 0 0.67 1.17
2023-03-30 vs. PHI -- 20 1 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0.5 1.33 1 0 1.83
2023-03-28 vs. KC -- 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0.5
2023-03-27 vs. KC -- 7 1 4 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.33 0 0.33 0.83
2023-03-24 @ CHC -- 6 1 3 3 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.67 0.67 0 0.67 1.33
2023-03-23 vs. OAK -- 7 1 3 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.67 0.5 0 1 1.17
2023-03-22 @ SF -- 3 1 3 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0.33 0 0.5 0.67
2023-03-20 vs. CLE -- 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-03-19 vs. SEA -- 15 1 3 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0.67 0.5 0 0.5 1.17
2023-03-18 @ LAA -- 3 1 3 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.33 0.33 0 0.5 0.67
2023-03-16 @ LAD -- 8 1 4 3 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.75 0.67 0 0.67 1.42
2023-03-13 vs. ARI -- 2 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-03-11 vs. CIN -- 19 1 3 3 2 0 1 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.67 1.67 1 0.5 2.33
2023-03-10 @ OAK -- 10 1 3 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 0.33 0 0.5 0.67
2023-03-08 @ ARI -- 3 1 3 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.33 0.33 0 1 0.67
2023-03-06 @ COL -- 7 1 3 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 2
2023-03-05 vs. LAA -- 4 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.33
2023-03-03 vs. SF -- 9 1 2 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 0 0.5 1
2023-03-01 vs. LAD -- 2 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.33
2023-02-28 vs. COL -- 5 1 2 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 0 0.5 1
2023-02-26 @ CLE -- 11 1 3 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 2
2023-02-24 @ KC -- 16 1 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 2 1.5 0 2.5
2022-10-14 @ PHI $2.2K 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-10-11 vs. PHI $2.6K 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-10-05 @ MIA $2.4K 14 1 5 4 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 0.6 1 0.5 0.67 1.6
2022-10-04 @ MIA $2.4K 2 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25
2022-10-03 @ MIA $2.4K 3 1 3 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0.33 0 0.33 0.67
2022-09-28 @ WSH $2.3K 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-09-25 @ PHI $2.3K 0 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-09-24 @ PHI $2.7K 0 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-09-23 @ PHI $2.5K 7 1 3 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0.67 1 0 0.5 1.67
2022-09-22 @ PHI $2.6K 0 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-09-21 vs. WSH $2.4K 5 1 4 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 0.33 0.5
2022-09-20 vs. WSH $2.5K 0 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-09-18 vs. PHI $2.3K 21 1 4 4 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0.5 1.5 1 0.33 2
2022-09-16 vs. PHI $2.3K 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0.5
2022-09-14 @ SF $2.1K 11 1 3 3 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 2
2022-09-13 @ SF $2K 2 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-09-12 @ SF $2.1K 4 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.33
2022-09-11 @ SEA $2K 16 1 4 4 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0.25 1 0.75 0 1.25
2022-09-10 @ SEA $2.2K 0 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-09-09 @ SEA $2.2K 27 1 4 4 3 0 2 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0.75 1.5 0.75 1 2.25
2022-09-07 @ OAK $2.2K 13 1 4 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 0.67 0.33 0.33 1.17
2022-09-06 @ OAK $2.2K 2 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25
2022-09-04 vs. MIA $2.2K 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
2022-09-03 vs. MIA $2.5K 4 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0.5
2022-09-02 vs. MIA $2.4K 2 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25
2022-09-01 vs. COL $2.4K 0 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-31 vs. COL $2.1K 2 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.33
2022-08-30 vs. COL $2.4K 8 1 4 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 1 0.5
2022-08-28 @ STL $4K 2 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-27 @ STL $2.2K 0 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-26 @ STL $2K 11 1 5 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0.25 0 0.25 0.65
2022-08-24 @ PIT $2K 20 1 5 5 3 0 3 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0.6 0.6 0 0.6 1.2
2022-08-23 @ PIT $2K 7 1 4 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 0.5 0.5
2022-08-22 @ PIT $2K 0 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-21 vs. HOU $2K 0 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-20 vs. HOU $2K 7 1 4 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.33 0 1 0.83
2022-08-19 vs. HOU $2K 0 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-18 vs. NYM $2.2K 5 1 3 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.33 0.33 0 0.5 0.67
2022-08-17 vs. NYM $2.2K 20 1 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0.5 1.33 1 0 1.83
2022-08-16 vs. NYM $2.3K 14 1 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.33 1.33 1 0 1.67
2022-08-15 vs. NYM $2.4K 3 1 2 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 0 1 1
2022-08-14 @ MIA $2.2K 4 1 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0.5
2022-08-13 @ MIA $2K 8 1 4 4 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 0 0.67 1
2022-08-12 @ MIA $4K 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-09 @ BOS $2K 2 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.33
2022-08-07 @ NYM $2K 0 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-06 @ NYM $2K 9 1 5 4 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 0.4 0.5 0.25 0.5 0.9
2022-08-03 vs. PHI $2.2K 5 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 1 3
2022-07-31 @ TOR $5.2K 5 1 3 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0.33 0.67 0.33 0.5 1
2022-07-30 @ TOR $2.4K 7 1 4 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.33 0 0.5 0.83
2022-07-29 @ TOR $2.6K 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-07-28 @ TOR $2.8K 7 1 4 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 0.67 0.33 0.33 1.17
2022-07-27 vs. SD $2.9K 0 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-07-26 vs. SD $3K 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
2022-07-25 vs. SD $3K 5 1 5 5 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0.2 0 0.2 0.4
2022-07-24 vs. MIN $3K 0 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-07-23 vs. MIN $2.7K 4 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25
2022-07-21 @ OAK $2.3K 18 1 5 4 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 0.6 1 0.5 0.67 1.6
2022-07-17 @ CLE -- 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-07-16 @ CLE $2.4K 2 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.33
2022-07-15 @ CLE $2.4K 5 1 4 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.33 0 0.5 0.83
2022-07-13 @ KC $2.5K 4 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0.5
2022-07-12 @ KC $2.5K 0 1 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-07-11 @ KC $2.7K 11 1 5 5 3 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.6 0.6 0 0.75 1.2
2022-07-10 @ CWS $2.5K 2 1 4 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25
2022-07-08 @ CWS $2.5K 0 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-07-07 @ CWS $2.7K 3 1 4 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 0.33 0.5
2022-07-06 vs. CLE $2.6K 12 1 4 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0.25 0.75 0.5 0.33 1
2022-07-05 vs. CLE $2.6K 2 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25
2022-07-04 vs. CLE $2.6K 10 1 4 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0.5 0.33 0 0.5 0.83
2022-07-04 vs. CLE $2.6K 2 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25
2022-07-03 vs. KC $10.2K 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-07-01 vs. KC $2.6K 2 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25
2022-06-29 @ SF $2.5K 5 1 4 4 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0.25 0.5 0.25 0.33 0.75
2022-06-28 @ SF $2K 9 1 5 4 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 0.4 0.5 0.25 0.5 0.9
2022-06-26 @ ARI $2.1K 8 1 5 5 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0.4 0 0.4 0.8
2022-06-25 @ ARI $2K 5 1 4 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 0.5 0.5
2022-06-24 @ ARI $2.4K 9 1 4 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 0.67 0.33 0.33 1.17
2022-06-22 @ BOS $2.3K 2 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25
2022-06-21 @ BOS $2.2K 4 1 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.2
2022-06-20 @ BOS $2.3K 3 1 4 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 0.33 0.5
2022-06-19 vs. TEX $2.2K 27 1 5 3 2 0 1 0 0 1 1 4 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0.8 1.67 1 1 2.47
2022-06-18 vs. TEX $2.2K 24 1 5 4 3 1 2 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0.8 1.5 0.75 1 2.3
2022-06-17 vs. TEX $2.4K 0 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-06-16 vs. TEX $2.4K 2 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-06-15 vs. CWS $2.6K 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-06-14 vs. CWS $2.5K 0 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-06-13 vs. CWS $2.6K 3 1 4 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 0.25 0.5
2022-06-12 vs. TOR $2.8K 3 1 3 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.33 0.33 0 1 0.67
2022-06-10 vs. TOR $2.6K 3 1 3 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0.33 0 0.33 0.67
2022-05-29 vs. CLE $3.3K 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-05-28 vs. CLE $3.3K 3 1 4 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 0.5 0.5
2022-05-26 vs. CLE $3.3K 14 1 5 4 2 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0.6 0.75 0.25 0.67 1.35
2022-05-25 @ MIN $3.4K 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-05-24 @ MIN $3.7K 0 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-05-23 @ MIN $4.1K 0 1 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-05-22 @ CLE $4K 14 1 4 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0.5 0.67 0.33 0.5 1.17
2022-05-20 @ CLE $4K 0 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-05-18 @ TB $3.9K 0 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-05-17 @ TB $4K 6 1 4 4 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 0 0.5 1
2022-05-16 @ TB $4.2K 2 1 4 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25
2022-05-15 vs. BAL $4.1K 3 1 4 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.25 0.25 0 0.5 0.5
2022-05-14 vs. BAL $4.1K 0 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-05-13 vs. BAL $4.1K 4 1 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0.5
2022-05-12 vs. OAK $4.3K 2 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-05-10 vs. OAK -- 4 1 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.2
2022-05-10 @ OAK $13.8K 6 1 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.2
2022-05-09 vs. OAK $14.1K 2 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25
2022-05-08 @ HOU $4.2K 2 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25
2022-05-07 @ HOU $4K 7 1 4 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0.33 0 0.33 0.83
2022-05-06 @ HOU $4.2K 4 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25
2022-05-05 @ HOU $4K 5 1 4 4 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.75
2022-05-04 vs. PIT -- 10 1 5 5 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0.4 0.6 0.2 0.5 1
2022-05-04 vs. PIT $3.4K 2 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-05-01 @ LAD $3.2K 9 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
2022-04-30 @ LAD $3.4K 2 1 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.2
2022-04-29 @ LAD $3.4K 2 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25
2022-04-28 @ MIN $3.4K 9 1 5 5 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.6 0.6 0 0.6 1.2
2022-04-27 @ MIN $3.4K 5 1 4 4 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0.25 0.5 0.25 0.33 0.75
2022-04-26 @ MIN $3.4K 7 1 5 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.4 0.25 0 0.5 0.65
2022-04-24 vs. COL $3.4K 8 1 4 4 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 0 0.67 1
2022-04-23 vs. COL $3.6K 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
2022-04-23 vs. COL $3.4K 17 1 5 4 3 0 3 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.8 0.75 0 1 1.55
2022-04-21 vs. NYY $3.7K 17 1 4 3 3 0 2 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1.33 0.33 1 2.33
2022-04-20 vs. NYY $4K 3 1 5 5 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.2 0.2 0 0.33 0.4
2022-04-19 vs. NYY $4K 5 1 5 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0.2 0.25 0 0.33 0.45
2022-04-16 @ KC $4K 7 1 4 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.75 0.5 0 0.5 1.25
2022-04-12 vs. BOS $11.4K 4 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.33
2022-04-11 vs. BOS $11.4K 0 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-04-10 vs. CWS $4.2K 0 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-04-09 vs. CWS $4.6K 0 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-04-08 vs. CWS $4.7K 11 1 5 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.6 0.33 0 1 0.93

Robbie Grossman Daily Fantasy News, Rankings, Projections

Robbie Grossman scratched Monday

Robbie Grossman scratched Monday

This Entire Lineup is too Cheap on FanDuel

So you’re paying up for pitching and need some value bats. The answer to that might be pretty straight forward on FanDuel, according to current projections (PlateIQ), and that’s simply to stack the Tigers against Bryse Wilson. He’s only recorded one fifth inning out over his three starts with eight runs allowed. A 3.1 K-BB% with a 90.3 mph EV is not going to keep anyone in a major league rotation for too long. A 4.49 DRA is his only estimator below a 4.70 ERA. Batters from either side of the plate exceed a .330 wOBA and xwOBA against Wilson since last season. Jonathan Schoop (78 wRC+, .130 ISO vs RHP since 2021), Robbie Grossman (104 wRC+, .151 ISO) and Miguel Cabrera (94 wRC+, .140 ISO) are currently the top three projected point per dollar values on FanDuel (Bryan Reynolds is fourth in this same game). Of course, this is more due to price tag (all $2.6K or less) and matchup than their own production. The Tigers do own the fourth highest team run total on the board (4.61). Javier Baez (107 wRC+, .220 ISO) is the only batter in the projected lineup above $3K on FD, while Jeimer Candelario (114 wRC+, .164 ISO) and Akil Baddoo (118 wRC+, .212 ISO) are top 10 projected values as well.

Detroit also is one of just two teams featuring multiple top 10 projected values on DraftKings, one who doesn’t even make the list on FanDuel and that’s because Spencer Torkelson (100 wRC+, .136 ISO) costs $100 less on DraftKings. He’s joined by Grossman. Baez is the only one costing above $3.5K on DraftIngs as well. We also find both Franchy Cordero ($2.1K) and Jackie Bradley Jr. ($2K) as top 10 values against Noah Syndergaard. This is purely a function of cost. Neither Syndergaard, nor Cordero have much in the way of volume the last couple of years, while Bradley has been very silent (31 wRC+ vs RHP). The top projected value on DraftKings is currently Jose Miranda at just $2K. Remember that Baltimore plays a bit more difficultly for RH power these days, but Bruce Zimmermann still has a 92.4 mph EV this year and Miranda makes top projected overall batters Byron Buxton and Carlos Correa much easier fits.

This Offense Has Turned it Around Against LHP

Seven of either 26 or 30 teams (depending on which site you are playing on) reach the five implied run mark on Tuesday with another nine above 4.7 runs. With hitter friendly weather conditions across the country, it’s an offensive oriented slate on Tuesday night. The Detroit Tigers are one of those offenses with a team run line above five (5.19), as they’ve come a long way against LHP (98 wRC+) and get a park bump in Baltimore against Keegan Akin, who has been shelled for 10.5% Barrels/BBE with a 90.2 mph on just a 36.8 GB% and 11.3 K-BB%. While his 7.66 ERA is probably a bit unfortunate (.377 BABIP, 59.4 LOB%), he doesn’t have a single estimator below four and a half. Detroit projects to stack their lineup entirely right-handed, which creates further problems for Akin, as batters from that side own a .380 wOBA (.374 xwOBA) against him this year. Should the Tigers get to Akin and knock him out early, the Baltimore bullpen owns a major league worst 6.85 ERA over the last 30 days, supported by a 4.93 xFIP that’s third worst. Jonathan Schoop (180 wRC+, .263 ISO) and Eric Haase (189 wRC+, .402 ISO) have absolutely destroyed LHP this season, while Robbie Grossman (137 wRC+, .226 ISO) may bump up to the leadoff spot against a lefty and costs a manageable $4K on DraftKings. No Detroit batter projected to start tonight exceeds a $3.4K on FanDuel.

Below Average Lineup May Have Value Against These Splits

A good curveball is supposed to be a strong reverse platoon weapon and despite all his faults, Justin Dunn has a good one (.213 xwOBA, 30.9 Whiff% this year), but it hasn’t really aided him against LHBs (.369 wOBA, .417 ISO). These numbers are so bad that they may over-ride a negative run environment and give a below average lineup some value against him tonight. The attraction of a partial Detroit stack that might include Robbie Grossman (109 wRC+ vs RHP since 2019), Jeimer Candelario (94 wRC+) and Nomar Mazara (95 wRC+) is that it might get you not only one of tonight’s high priced arms on FanDuel with room to spare, but potentially two of them on DraftKings. In fact, Niko Goodrum is the only Detroit bat exceeding $4K on DraftKings, while none exceed $3K on FanDuel.

Cheap Stack Against Blowup Prone Pitcher

While he's had several strong outings recently, Reynaldo Lopez is no stranger to completely imploding in a given game. Oakland has a 5.2 implied run total and you can easily make a 5-man stack for under $20k total on DraftKings. Playing two of Davis, Piscotty, Grossman alongside Olson & Chapman makes a lot of sense, and make sure not to forget about Profar (.209 ISO vs. righties) for $3500 at a scarcer 2B position. Although the wind will be blowing in at 10+ mph tonight that sours the appeal for these bats in GPP, that fact may potentially decrease their ownership in the process.

Jake Odorizzi's Z-Contact has cratered (90%+ three of last four) and taken the rest of his game with it

Jake Odorizzi allowed just a single run in Cleveland last time out, but still struck out just two for the third time in four starts. His previously elite Z-Contact rate (76.3% through his first 12 starts) has cratered over his last five (88.2%). In fact, it’s been above 90% in three of his last four. The results, multiple HRs in three of his last five starts. Odorizzi has a .355 xwOBA over the last month that’s more than 50 points above his season rate to go with his 16.7 K% over the same span. An extreme fly ball pitcher (32.3 GB%), his Barrels/BBE is up to 10.2% without a particularly high aEV (87.4 mph). Also consider that his xwOBA against RHBs over the last calendar year (.334) is 83 points higher than his actual mark and Oakland bats pick up some potentially concealed value here. Matt Chapman (148 wRC+, .282 ISO), Mark Canha (134 wRC+, .261 ISO) and Ramon Laureano (126 wRC+, .227 ISO) have hit same-handed pitching exceptionally well over the last 12 months. In fact, not a single batter in the projected lineup is below a 104 wRC+ vs RHP over that span with only Marcus Semien (.160) and Robbie Grossman (.132) below a .200 ISO. Add in a possible weather boost and this could be a strong spot for the A’s on Friday night.

A’s bats are an intriguing stack vs. struggling Odorizzi

Odorizzi had a surprisingly good start to the season, which saw him post a 1.92 ERA, 2.76 FIP, 4.32 xFIP ad 20.5% K-BB with a .284 xwOBA allowed up until mid-June. Since June 15th, Odorizzi has posted an ugly 6.46 ERA, 5.84 xFIP and 9.5% K-BB with a .355 xwOBA allowed. His four-seamer, easily his most used pitch with a 58% usage rate, had a .277 xwOBA against earlier in the year but has recently been shelled for a .386 xwOBA against since June 15th. The Athletics come into this game with a 5th best 116 wRC+ over the past 30 days and a 101 wRC+ vs. RHP on the year. Matt Olson (.405 xwOBA vs. RHP this year), Matt Chapman (.384), Mark Canha (.360), Robbie Grossman (.351), Marcus Semien (.326), Ramon Laureano (.325) and Khris Davis (.324) are all good options in the projected order tonight. Olson has been their hottest hitter over the past 2 weeks with a .474 xwOBA, followed by Matt Chapman with a .448 xwOBA and Ramon Laureano with a .421 xwOBA. Though he’s not been his usual self this year, Khris Davis might be the best value in the lineup with just a $3.4k price on Draftkings. Of all the hitters just mentioned, only Davis and Robbie Grossman ($3.8k on DK) will have a price tag under $4.4k, but none go above $4.8k. The A’s should see decently low ownership in this matchup and have a 4.95 implied line in seemingly underrated hitter's park Target Field. Keep an eye on the weather as we get closer to lock.

A’s have highest total and affordably priced bats in great matchup

The A’s will get a solid matchup at home tonight versus Gabriel Ynoa, who has a 5.02 ERA, 5.00 xFIP and 4.75 SIERA with a 10.3% K-BB and 9.7% SwStr splitting time between both the bullpen and rotation. He also has a .333 xwOBA allowed with an 89.6 aEV and 8.1 % barrel rate. Ynoa has been worse over the last 30 days with a 5.87 xFIP / 5.65 SIERA, 4.6% K-BB, 2.25 HR/9 and .353 xwOBA allowed. Matt Olson (.384 xwOBA vs. RHP this year), Matt Chapman (.368), Mark Canha (.359), Marcus Semien (.337), Robbie Grossman (.337), Khris Davis (.316) and Ramon Laureano (.312) are all great options tonight. Matt Olson has been their hottest hitter with a .397 xwOBA over the past 2 weeks. All A’s bats are available at $4.6k or less on Draftkings tonight despite the great matchup. The A’s will also have the benefit of a very hitter-friendly umpire in Paul Emmel. They will carry a healthy 5.52 implied line into tonight’s matchup versus Ynoa and the Orioles.

Stephen Piscotty scratched Saturday; Robbie Grossman replaces

Piscotty has been scratched from the Oakland Athletics original confirmed lineup and will not start in Saturday’s matchup against the Seattle Mariners due to a presently unspecified reason. He’ll be replaced in the lineup by Robbie Grossman, who will now play left field and slot into the eighth spot in the order, which bumps Matt Olson, Mark Canha, Jurickson Profar, Ramon Laureano, up to fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh, respectively. However, the remainder of the Athletics lineup will stay intact offensively as they face off against left-hander Yusei Kikuchi at home this afternoon.

Khris Davis scratched Saturday; Robbie Grossman replaces

Davis has been scratched from the Oakland Athletics original confirmed lineup and will not start in Saturday’s matchup against the Detroit Tigers due to a presently unspecified reason. He’ll be replaced in the lineup by Robbie Grossman, who will now play left field and slot into the sixth spot in the order, which shuffles quite a few players around in the Athletics order but, most notably, bumps Mark Canha all the way up to the two-hole. So, be sure to double check the Starting Lineups page for the updated lineup as Oakland faces off against left-hander Matt Boyd on the road this afternoon.