NBA 2012: Defense vs. Position – C
Tool Description
This page shows the defensive stats for each team against each position on the court. The stats below show points, rebounds, assists etc. for each NBA defense against the Point Guard, Shooting Guard, Small Forward, Power Forward and Center Position. Our NBA Cheat Sheet takes these statistics to the next level by showing you which starters (based on most recent starting player information) are matching up against the Top and Bottom 5 defenses against their position for every day of the week.
Legend
G – Games Played
FPA/GM – Fantasy Points Allowed per Game (to respective Position)
FPA/GM Calculation – Pts=1, Reb=1, Ast=1, Stl=2, Blk=2, TO= -1
| SEASON STATS | LAST 10 GAMES STATS |
| POINT GUARDS | POINT GUARDS |
|---|---|
| SHOOTING GUARDS | SHOOTING GUARDS |
| SMALL FORWARDS | SMALL FORWARDS |
| POWER FORWARDS | POWER FORWARDS |
| CENTERS | CENTERS |
| ALL GUARDS | ALL GUARDS |
| ALL BIG MEN | ALL BIG MEN |
| ALL POSITIONS | ALL POSITIONS |
Team Defenses vs. Centers
Rank is in ascending order, meaning that #1 is the toughest team against a given position and #30 is the easiest team against that position
▾ NOTE: Table is sortable. Just click the header of each column to sort!
| RANK | TEAM | POS | GP | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG% | 3P% | FPPGA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 | Milwaukee | C | 80 | 20.3 | 15.8 | 2.6 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 2.7 | 51.2% | 35.9% | 42.6 |
| 29 | Denver | C | 79 | 19.1 | 14.1 | 3 | 1.5 | 2.9 | 3.1 | 50.3% | 32.0% | 41.9 |
| 28 | Sacramento | C | 79 | 19.3 | 13.4 | 2.2 | 1 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 52.7% | 20.0% | 40.2 |
| 27 | Phoenix | C | 80 | 19.1 | 13.9 | 2.6 | 1.2 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 50.6% | 38.9% | 39.9 |
| 26 | Orlando | C | 80 | 20.9 | 13.2 | 2.5 | 1 | 2 | 2.7 | 52.6% | 16.0% | 39.9 |
| 25 | Philadelphia | C | 79 | 19 | 13.8 | 2.4 | 1.1 | 2.2 | 2.7 | 50.0% | 19.0% | 39.1 |
| 24 | Detroit | C | 80 | 18.5 | 13.2 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 51.0% | 14.3% | 38.8 |
| 23 | Charlotte | C | 80 | 18.4 | 13.2 | 2.7 | 0.9 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 54.3% | 15.8% | 38.8 |
| 22 | Portland | C | 79 | 19.2 | 13.3 | 2.5 | 1.1 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 53.2% | – | 38.7 |
| 21 | San Antonio | C | 79 | 17.9 | 14 | 2.4 | 1.2 | 2.1 | 2.9 | 49.3% | 35.0% | 38.0 |
| 20 | Toronto | C | 79 | 19.6 | 12.4 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 2.4 | 51.3% | 52.9% | 37.9 |
| 19 | Houston | C | 79 | 17.9 | 12.6 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 2.5 | 2.7 | 51.5% | 14.3% | 37.7 |
| 18 | Boston | C | 80 | 18 | 13.6 | 2.5 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 2.8 | 52.1% | 32.3% | 37.5 |
| 17 | Dallas | C | 79 | 18.5 | 13.3 | 2.3 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 2.6 | 50.2% | 15.4% | 37.5 |
| 16 | New Orleans | C | 80 | 17.8 | 11.4 | 2.5 | 1.1 | 2.9 | 2.3 | 54.0% | 21.4% | 37.4 |
| 15 | L.A.Lakers | C | 80 | 17 | 13.3 | 2.5 | 1.4 | 2 | 2.3 | 51.0% | 30.4% | 37.3 |
| 14 | Brooklyn | C | 79 | 19 | 12.1 | 2.2 | 1 | 2.2 | 2.6 | 53.0% | 35.7% | 37.1 |
| 13 | Cleveland | C | 79 | 17.2 | 12.3 | 2.5 | 1 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 53.0% | 31.6% | 36.6 |
| 12 | Golden State | C | 80 | 17 | 13.3 | 2.4 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 50.2% | 50.0% | 36.6 |
| 11 | Atlanta | C | 80 | 17.2 | 13.3 | 2.3 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 2.6 | 50.2% | 23.8% | 36.6 |
| 10 | Oklahoma City | C | 80 | 18.5 | 13 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 1.7 | 2.7 | 48.4% | 32.1% | 36.5 |
| 9 | Washington | C | 80 | 15.7 | 14.2 | 2.7 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 2.9 | 48.6% | 31.6% | 36.3 |
| 8 | Miami | C | 79 | 18.1 | 13.4 | 2 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 2.6 | 50.8% | 28.2% | 36.3 |
| 7 | Indiana | C | 79 | 17.3 | 12.7 | 1.9 | 1 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 46.6% | 33.3% | 36.2 |
| 6 | Chicago | C | 79 | 16.9 | 12.9 | 2.1 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 2.7 | 48.2% | 25.8% | 36.2 |
| 5 | Minnesota | C | 80 | 17 | 12.3 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 2.5 | 3.2 | 54.1% | 25.0% | 35.7 |
| 4 | Utah | C | 80 | 15.5 | 12.7 | 2.1 | 1.4 | 2.4 | 3 | 48.1% | 25.0% | 34.9 |
| 3 | L.A.Clippers | C | 80 | 16.8 | 11.9 | 2.6 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 2.8 | 49.7% | 16.7% | 34.5 |
| 2 | Memphis | C | 80 | 16.2 | 12 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 2.1 | 2.9 | 49.9% | 24.1% | 34.4 |
| 1 | New York | C | 79 | 15.9 | 12.7 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 1.7 | 3.2 | 49.2% | 5.3% | 33.2 |