Sign In $

Edwin Encarnacion

Chicago White Sox
Pos: DH | Hand: R
Status: Inactive
player props
FPTS 2 3 5 6 8 10 11 13 14 16 SAL $510 $1K $1.5K $2K $2.6K $3.1K $3.6K $4.1K $4.6K $5.1K
  • FPTS: 4
  • FPTS: 2
  • FPTS: 5
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 16
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 14
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 10
  • FPTS: 7
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 4
  • FPTS: 0
  • SAL: $4.4K
  • SAL: $4.8K
  • SAL: $4.9K
  • SAL: $4.6K
  • SAL: $3.9K
  • SAL: $3.9K
  • SAL: $3.8K
  • SAL: $4.2K
  • SAL: $5.1K
  • SAL: $4.8K
  • SAL: $4K
  • SAL: $4.6K
  • SAL: $4K
  • SAL: $3.8K
  • SAL: $3.4K
  • SAL: --
09/12 09/12 09/15 09/17 09/18 09/19 09/20 09/21 09/22 09/23 09/24 09/26 09/26 09/27 09/30
Date Opp DKSAL FDSAL DKFPTS FDFPTS sf ab slg h so hbp gidp 1b babip 2b pa 3b sb hr xbh r obp rbi iso bb ops ibb
2020-09-30 @ OAK -- -- 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-09-27 vs. CHC $3.4K $2.8K 4 6.2 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2020-09-26 vs. CHC $3.8K $2.8K 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-09-25 vs. CHC $4K $2.8K 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-09-24 @ CLE $4.6K $2.8K 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-09-23 @ CLE $4K $2.8K 7 9.5 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 1 0 1 0.83 0
2020-09-22 @ CLE $4.8K $2.8K 10 12 0 3 1 2 0 0 0 1 0.67 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.75 0 0.33 1 1.75 0
2020-09-21 @ CLE $5.1K $2.8K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-09-20 @ CIN $4.2K $2.8K 14 18.7 0 4 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 1 0.75 0 1.25 0
2020-09-19 @ CIN $3.8K $2.8K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-09-18 @ CIN $3.9K $2.9K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-09-17 vs. MIN $3.9K $6K 16 21.7 0 3 1.33 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 0 1.83 0
2020-09-14 vs. MIN $4.6K $2.9K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-09-12 vs. DET $4.9K $3K 5 6.5 0 5 0.2 1 2 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 1 0 0 0.4 0
2020-09-11 vs. DET $4.8K $3K 2 3 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 1 0.33 0
2020-09-08 @ PIT $4.4K $2.9K 4 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 2 0.5 0
2020-09-06 @ KC $4.2K $2.9K 23 32.2 0 5 1 2 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.4 4 0.6 0 1.4 0
2020-09-04 @ KC $4.2K $2.8K 6 9.7 1 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 1 0 1 0.2 0
2020-09-03 @ KC $4K $2.9K 18 24.9 0 4 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.4 1 0.75 0 1.4 0
2020-09-02 @ MIN $3.8K $2.8K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2020-09-01 @ MIN $4K $2.8K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-08-31 @ MIN $3.8K $2.7K 6 9.2 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 2 0.4 0
2020-08-29 vs. KC $3.9K $6K 16 22.2 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 2 0.75 0 1.25 0
2020-08-28 vs. KC $3.8K $2.8K 4 6 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 2 0.5 0
2020-08-26 vs. PIT $7.2K $2.7K 21 27.9 0 4 1.5 2 0 0 1 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 1 2 2 0.5 1 1 0 2 0
2020-08-25 vs. PIT $3.8K $2.8K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2020-08-22 @ CHC $3.9K $2.8K 7 9.2 0 5 0.4 1 3 0 0 0 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.2 0 0.2 0 0.6 0
2020-08-21 @ CHC $3.6K $2.7K 0 0 0 5 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-08-20 vs. DET $4.7K $2.5K 6 9.5 0 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 1 0 1 0.4 0
2020-08-19 vs. DET $3.8K $2.5K 28 37.4 0 4 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 2 2 0.5 2 1.5 0 2.5 0
2020-08-18 vs. DET $3.9K $2.6K 4 6 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 2 0.5 0
2020-08-17 vs. DET $3.9K $2.7K 7 9 0 3 0.67 1 0 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 0 0.33 1 1.17 0
2020-08-16 vs. STL $4K $2.8K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-08-15 vs. STL -- -- 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-08-15 vs. STL $11.1K $6K 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-08-12 @ DET $11.4K $5.5K 2 3.2 0 5 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-08-11 @ DET $3.8K $2.6K 16 21.9 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 2 0.25 1 0.75 0 1.25 0
2020-08-04 @ MIL $4.4K $2.8K 3 3 0 2 0.5 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2020-08-02 @ KC $4K $2.8K 6 6 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2020-08-01 @ KC $4.4K $2.9K 7 9.2 0 5 0.2 1 2 0 0 1 0.33 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 0 1 0.53 0
2020-07-29 @ CLE $7.6K $3.1K 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-07-28 @ CLE $17.1K $3.1K 5 6 0 4 0.25 1 2 1 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 0 0.65 0
2020-07-26 vs. MIN $4.7K $3K 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-07-25 vs. MIN $5.1K $3.1K 16 22.2 0 4 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 2 0.75 0 1.25 0
2020-07-24 vs. MIN $5K $3.1K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-10-19 @ HOU -- -- 2 3 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2019-10-17 vs. HOU -- -- 2 3 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2019-10-15 vs. HOU -- -- 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2019-10-13 @ HOU -- -- 2 3 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2019-10-12 @ HOU -- -- 2 3 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2019-10-07 @ MIN -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-10-05 vs. MIN -- -- 12 15.7 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.6 1 0 1 1.1 0
2019-10-04 vs. MIN -- -- 14 18.7 0 5 0.8 2 1 0 0 0 0.5 2 5 0 0 0 2 1 0.4 1 0.4 0 1.2 0
2019-09-12 @ DET -- -- 18 25.2 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 1 0.67 2 1.5 1 2.67 0
2019-09-10 @ DET -- -- 16 22.2 0 5 0.8 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.2 2 0.6 0 1 0
2019-09-09 @ BOS -- -- 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2019-09-08 @ BOS -- -- 13 15.7 0 5 0.6 3 1 0 0 3 0.75 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.6 1 0 0 1.2 0
2019-09-07 @ BOS -- -- 23 31.7 0 5 1.2 2 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 5 0 0 1 2 1 0.4 3 0.8 0 1.6 0
2019-09-06 @ BOS -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-09-04 vs. TEX -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-09-03 vs. TEX -- -- 21 28.4 0 4 1.25 2 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 2 0.75 0 1.75 0
2019-08-03 vs. BOS -- -- 17 22.2 0 4 0.75 3 1 1 0 3 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.8 2 0 0 1.55 0
2019-08-02 vs. BOS -- -- 6 9.2 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 2 0.5 0
2019-07-31 vs. ARI -- -- 7 9.2 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2019-07-30 vs. ARI -- -- 12 15.5 0 3 1 2 0 0 0 1 0.67 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.75 1 0.33 1 1.75 0
2019-07-28 @ BOS -- -- 10 12.2 0 5 0.6 2 2 0 0 1 0.67 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.4 0 0.2 0 1 0
2019-07-27 @ BOS -- -- 14 18.5 0 4 1 2 1 0 0 0 0.67 2 5 0 0 0 2 0 0.6 1 0.5 1 1.6 0
2019-07-26 @ BOS -- -- 5 6.2 0 5 0.2 1 3 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2019-07-25 @ BOS -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-07-24 @ MIN -- -- 21 27.9 0 5 1.2 2 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 5 0 0 1 2 2 0.4 1 0.8 0 1.6 0
2019-07-23 @ MIN -- -- 14 18.4 0 5 0.6 2 3 0 0 1 1 1 6 0 0 0 1 2 0.5 0 0.2 1 1.1 0
2019-07-22 @ MIN -- -- 10 12.5 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 1 0 1 1.1 0
2019-07-21 vs. COL -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-07-20 vs. COL -- -- 14 19.5 0 5 0.6 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.4 3 0.2 0 1 0
2019-07-19 vs. COL -- -- 20 29.2 0 5 0.8 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.2 4 0.6 0 1 0
2019-07-18 vs. TB -- -- 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2019-07-18 vs. TB -- -- 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2019-07-16 vs. TB -- -- 21 27.9 0 3 1.67 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 1 1 2 0.75 1 1 1 2.42 1
2019-07-15 vs. TB -- -- 30 40.9 0 4 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 2 2 0.5 3 1.5 0 2.5 0
2019-07-13 vs. TOR -- -- 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 0
2019-07-12 vs. TOR -- -- 14 19.5 0 4 0.75 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 3 0.25 0 1.25 0
2019-07-07 @ TB -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-07-06 @ TB -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-07-05 @ TB -- -- 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-07-04 @ TB -- -- 14 18.7 0 5 0.8 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.2 1 0.6 0 1 0
2019-07-02 @ NYM -- -- 5 6.2 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2019-06-30 @ BOS -- -- 8 12.4 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 2 0.33 0 0 2 0.33 0
2019-06-29 @ BOS -- -- 9 12.7 0 6 0.33 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 6 0 0 0 1 1 0.17 1 0.17 0 0.5 0
2019-06-26 vs. TOR -- -- 7 9.2 0 5 0.4 1 1 0 0 0 0.25 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.2 0 0.2 0 0.6 0
2019-06-25 vs. TOR -- -- 18 24.7 0 2 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.75 1 1.5 1 2.75 0
2019-06-23 vs. HOU -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-06-22 vs. HOU -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-06-21 vs. HOU -- -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-06-20 vs. HOU -- -- 24 34.6 0 3 1.33 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 3 0.6 2 1 2 1.93 0
2019-06-19 vs. TB -- -- 9 12.7 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 1 0 1 0.65 0
2019-06-18 vs. TB -- -- 14 18.7 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 1 0.75 0 1.25 0
2019-06-17 vs. TB -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-06-12 @ MIN -- -- 4 6.2 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 0.17 0 0 1 0.17 0
2019-06-11 @ MIN -- -- 22 31.7 0 3 1.33 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.6 3 1 2 1.93 0
2019-06-09 @ LAA -- -- 30 40.9 0 5 1.6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 2 2 0.4 3 1.2 0 2 0
2019-06-08 @ LAA -- -- 16 21.7 0 3 1.33 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 1.83 0
2019-06-07 @ LAA -- -- 2 3 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2019-06-06 vs. HOU -- -- 18 24.9 0 5 0.6 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 1 7 0 0 0 1 2 0.57 1 0.2 2 1.17 0
2019-06-05 vs. HOU -- -- 22 31.9 0 4 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.4 3 0.75 1 1.4 0
2019-06-04 vs. HOU -- -- 2 3 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2019-06-03 vs. HOU -- -- 14 18.7 0 5 0.8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.2 1 0.6 0 1 0
2019-06-02 vs. LAA -- -- 3 3 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.67 0
2019-06-01 vs. LAA -- -- 30 40.9 0 4 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 2 2 0.5 3 1.5 0 2.5 0
2019-05-30 vs. LAA -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-05-29 vs. TEX -- -- 8 9 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 0 0 1 1.1 0
2019-05-28 vs. TEX -- -- 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2019-05-26 @ OAK -- -- 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2019-05-25 @ OAK -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-05-24 @ OAK -- -- 2 3 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2019-05-22 @ TEX -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-05-21 @ TEX -- -- 5 6.2 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2019-05-20 @ TEX -- -- 20 28.1 0 4 1 2 1 0 0 0 0.67 2 5 0 0 0 2 3 0.6 1 0.5 1 1.6 0
2019-05-19 vs. MIN -- -- 28 37.9 0 4 1.75 3 0 0 0 1 0.67 1 4 0 0 1 2 2 0.75 3 1 0 2.5 0
2019-05-18 vs. MIN -- -- 11 12.5 0 4 0.75 3 0 0 0 3 0.75 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.75 1 0 0 1.5 0
2019-05-17 vs. MIN -- -- 12 15.5 0 3 1 2 1 0 0 1 1 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.75 1 0.33 1 1.75 0
2019-05-16 vs. MIN -- -- 5 6.2 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2019-05-14 vs. OAK -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-05-13 vs. OAK -- -- 4 6.2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2019-05-12 @ BOS -- -- 2 3.5 1 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
2019-05-11 @ BOS -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-05-10 @ BOS -- -- 7 9.5 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.75 0
2019-05-09 @ NYY -- -- 4 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 2 0.5 0
2019-05-08 @ NYY -- -- 20 28.4 1 3 1.33 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.4 2 1 1 1.73 0
2019-05-07 @ NYY -- -- 16 21.7 0 3 1.33 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 1.83 0
2019-05-06 @ NYY -- -- 7 9.2 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2019-05-05 @ CLE -- -- 21 28.4 0 5 1 2 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.4 2 0.6 0 1.4 0
2019-05-04 @ CLE -- -- 16 21.7 0 3 1.33 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 1.83 0
2019-05-03 @ CLE -- -- 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2019-05-01 vs. CHC -- -- 2 3 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2019-04-30 vs. CHC -- -- 20 27.9 0 3 1.33 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.6 1 1 2 1.93 0
2019-04-28 vs. TEX -- -- 2 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 1 0.33 0
2019-04-27 vs. TEX -- -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-04-26 vs. TEX -- -- 25 35.2 0 4 1.25 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.6 4 0.75 1 1.85 0
2019-04-25 vs. TEX -- -- 13 18.6 0 3 0.33 1 1 1 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 3 0.6 0 0 1 0.93 0
2019-04-24 @ SD -- -- 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-04-23 @ SD -- -- 4 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 2 0.5 0
2019-04-21 @ LAA -- -- 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-04-20 @ LAA -- -- 14 18.7 0 5 0.8 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.2 1 0.6 0 1 0
2019-04-19 @ LAA -- -- 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-04-18 @ LAA -- -- 11 15.4 0 4 0.25 1 0 1 0 1 0.25 0 6 0 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 0 1 0.75 0
2019-04-17 vs. CLE -- -- 5 6 0 3 0.33 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2019-04-16 vs. CLE -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-04-15 vs. CLE -- -- 21 28.2 0 4 1.5 2 1 0 0 0 0.5 1 4 0 0 1 2 1 0.5 2 1 0 2 0
2019-04-14 vs. HOU -- -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-04-12 vs. HOU -- -- 2 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2019-04-11 @ KC -- -- 7 9.5 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 1 0 1 0.65 0
2019-04-10 @ KC -- -- 10 13 1 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 2 0 0 0.9 0
2019-04-09 @ KC -- -- 7 9.2 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2019-04-08 @ KC -- -- 34 47.4 0 4 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 2 2 0.6 4 1.5 1 2.6 0
2019-04-07 @ CWS -- -- 28 38.4 0 5 1.2 3 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.6 4 0.6 0 1.8 0
2019-04-06 @ CWS -- -- 9 12.4 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2019-04-01 vs. LAA -- -- 5 6 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2019-03-30 vs. BOS -- -- 8 9.2 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2019-03-29 vs. BOS -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-03-28 vs. BOS -- -- 19 24.7 0 4 1.25 2 0 1 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.6 1 0.75 0 1.85 0
2019-03-21 @ OAK -- -- 6 9 0 3 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 2 0.5 0
2019-03-20 @ OAK -- -- 8 12.4 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0.4 0 0 2 0.4 0

Edwin Encarnacion Daily Fantasy News, Rankings, Projections

Soft Tossing Lefty

With so many great spots on this slate, I don’t think a lot of people will be stacking the White Sox. Brett Anderson is a soft tossing lefty with no strikeout pitch. He will be making his first start of 2020 tonight. He had a .330 wOBA with a 12.9% strikeout rate against right-handed hitters in 2019. He gives up a lot of hard contact while trying to induce groundballs. With his low strikeout rate, I like to target teams with power against him. Moncada, Abreu, Encarnacion, Jimenez, and McCann all have an ISO over .200 against left-handed pitching since the start of the 2019 season. On FanDuel, I like the fact that you can play Abreu and Encarnacion in your stack together.

8/03/20, 10:28 AM ET

The Yankeees pounded Jake Odorizzi for nine runs in four innings last time he faced them

Perhaps a surprising thing about Minnesota is that it is considered a positive run environment. However, with temperatures potentially below 60 degrees at game time tonight, that may not really be the case tonight. That said, it’s still virtually impossible to side with Jake Odorizzi tonight, especially in an elimination spot (though anyone expected to go through the order more than once is GPP viable on a four game slate). His overall numbers are fine this year (27.1 K%, 4.14 SIERA, 3.36 FIP, 4.23 DRA, 78.8 Z-Contact%, .296 xwOBA). Even his board high 7.8% Barrels/BBE is not too bad and he ended the season on quite the run, striking out 26 of his last 66 batters, but 44 of those batters were White Sox and Tigers. Here, he’s an extreme fly ball pitcher (35 GB%) with a career reverse split in a park that generally favors RH power, facing a lineup loaded with such. The good news for Twins fans is that he exhibited a more normal split this year (RHBs .255 wOBA, LHBs .324). Unfortunately, Statcast doesn’t agree (RHBs .309 xwOBA, RHBs .282). Again, that’s not a poor number, but this is the Yankees against whom he experienced his worst start of the season (9 ER, 2 HR, 4 IP) in July. They’re expected to send out six batters above a .200 ISO vs RHP this year and two of the three below that mark are DJ LeMahieu (119 wRC+ vs RHP) and Giancarlo Stanton (128 wRC+). What order the Yankees send those batters out in is a more complicated matter because virtually any order makes some sense, but LeMahieu and Aaron Judge (121 wRC+, .251 ISO) are virtual locks at the top of the order, while Edwin Encarnacion (121 wRC+, .266 ISO), Gary Sanchez (123 wRC+, .302 ISO) and Gleyber Torres (121 wRC+, .256 ISO) are additional premium bats against RHP.

10/07/19, 11:26 AM ET

Yankees bats are affordable despite being in a great spot in game 2 of doubleheader tonight

The Yankees get a matchup vs. Brian Johnson tonight in Yankee Stadium in the 2nd game of their doubleheader and currently have a healthy 5.94 implied total. Johnson was just activated from the IL to start this game and likely won’t see a heavy pitch count. In 113 1/3 innings between the rotation and bullpen over the past 2 years, Johnson has pitched to a 4.45 ERA, 4.87 xFIP and 11.1% K-BB with a .344 wOBA allowed. Aaron Judge (.405 xwOBA vs. this year), DJ LeMahieu (.367), Cameron Maybin (.362), Gio Urshela (.361), Edwin Encarnacion (.353), Gleyber Torres (.346) and Aaron Hicks (.297) are all great options in the projected lineup tonight. Austin Romine is another option if he’s in the lineup; he’s been the Yankees hottest hitter over the past 2 weeks with a .453 xwOBA. Gio Urshela (.442) and Gleyber Torres (.411) have also seen the ball well recently. Aaron Hicks (.288) has continued to struggle but his 121 wRC+ since 2017 suggests he will likely turn it around soon. All Yankees hitters will be $4.6k or less on Draftkings in this matchup; some great values include Judge ($4k), Torres and Urshela ($3.9k) and Romine ($3.3k).

8/03/19, 10:29 AM ET

Powerful Lineup in Favorable Matchup

Look, I get it, I’m a sucker. I’m simplistic. I see the Yankees are facing an average-to-below-average lefty and automatically get excited about stacking them. Quite honestly, stacking the Yankees hasn’t been a very successful GPP strategy since their offensive explosion in London but I still can’t resist the desire to get exposure to their powerful lineup in a favorable matchup.

Most teams have two, maybe three, legitimate HR threats in their lineup while New York casually runs Stanton-less lineups with seven hitters with ISO’s north of .200 against left-handed pitchers over the last two seasons. Gleyber Torres, who is the owner of a .259 ISO and .371 wOBA against southpaws over the last two years, routinely hits in the seven-hole for goodness sake.

New York is one of the more expensive stacks of the night which means you’ll probably need to get a little wild at the pitcher position to make things work. On FanDuel, Trevor Richards is ridiculously underpriced and is the natural choice to pair with Yankee stacks. On multi-SP sites you may get away with rostering a high-priced pitcher with a cheaper arm but you’ll more than likely have to settle with pairing Richards with a low-floor, low-upside, dirt-cheap option like Shaun Anderson or Ivan Nova.

7/22/19, 1:43 PM ET

Yanks have whopping 7.14 implied total vs. Freeland in the Bronx

It’s been quite the fall for Freeland, who went from receiving Cy Young votes last year to pitching to a 7.39 ERA, 5.34 xFIP and 5.18 SIERA this year. Freeland was sent down to AAA earlier in the year and it doesn’t seem like he figured much out, as he posted an 8.80 ERA and 5.01 xFIP with an 8.4% K-BB over 30 innings. In his first start back from AAA on 7/13 Freeland only lasted 4 innings, giving up 5 earned runs, 9 hits and striking out 3. The Yankees lineup looks as dangerous as it has all season, and just about the whole lineup is in play vs. Freeland. Aaron Judge (.434 xwOBA vs. LHP this year), DJ LeMahieu (.390), Luke Voit (.383), Edwin Encarnacion (.376), Mike Tauchman (.345) and Gary Sanchez (.345) have been the Yankees’ best bats vs. LHP this year. Hicks, Torres and Urshela all have an xwOBA vs. LHP under .300 on the year but are still very much in play. Considering the great match-up and sky-high total, Yankees bats are pretty affordable, with Aaron Judge being the only hitter over $5k on Draftkings. Of course, Yankees hitters figure to see very high ownership tonight across all contests.

7/19/19, 3:01 PM ET

Savage Lineup Faces Struggling Pitcher

Kyle Freeland has a 2.27 HR/9 that is the fourth-worst rate among all pitchers with at least 60 innings this season, but if you exclude his home games in Coors Field… …he still has a 2.08 HR/9 with 7 HRs allowed in 30.1 innings. Tonight he gets a nightmare matchup against a savage Yankees lineup that has the highest implied run total on the slate and ranks second in team wOBA, slugging percentage, and OPS over the past 30 days. Whoever the Yankees put in the lineup is in play tonight, and I’ll be targeting the top of the order – DJ LeMahieu, Aaron Judge, Luke Voit, Gary Sanchez, and Edwin Encarnaction.

7/19/19, 11:04 AM ET

Yankees bats are the premier stack on the early slate

The Yankees have an implied total over 7 for the 2nd day in a row, facing Clayton Richard at home in the Bronx. Richard has had a tough year that has seen him post a 6.23 ERA, 5.27 xFIP and 5.55 SIERA with just a 1.6% K-BB and miniscule 5.9% SwStr. Richard has a very wide platoon split; since 2018 he has allowed a .370 xwOBA to righties while only allowing a .292 xwOBA to lefties. Unfortunately for him, the Yankees will stack their lineup with 7 right-handed bats. Roth’s WeatherEdge (available to premium subscribers) also sees a sharp jump in homeruns and total offense in the Bronx this afternoon, further sweetening this matchup for the Yanks. Aaron Judge (.428 xwOBA vs. LHP this year), Luke Voit (.397), Edwin Encarnacion (.390), DJ LeMahieu (.378), Gary Sanchez (.352), Gleyber Torres (.295) and Aaron Hicks (.291) are all great options. Brett Gardner (.283) and Didi Gregorious (.201) are also in play. Despite the implied total over 7, all Yankees bats besides LeMahieu and Judge can be had on Draftkings for less than $5k. Voit, Encarnacion and Gregorious are all $4.3k or less.

7/13/19, 9:39 AM ET

Wild Pitcher Faces Potent Offense

The Yankees have the highest implied run total on the board tonight at nearly seven runs, and their stacked offense could exceed even that lofty total if opposing pitcher Aaron Sanchez can’t find his control tonight. Sanchez has the worst BB% among qualified pitchers this season at 13.0%, and he also ranks last in SIERA at 5.57. Every hitter in this lineup is in play, but I’ll be targeting the hitters near the top of the lineup, namely DJ LeMahieu, Aaron Judge, Gary Sanchez, and Edwin Encarnacion.

7/12/19, 1:03 PM ET

Aaron Sanchez has highest 30-day SIERA on the board (6.27) vs. Yankees in the Bronx tonight

Sanchez has largely struggled all year and has certainly not improved of late as he has a 13.05 ERA, 6.27 SIERA, 5.96 xFIP and 0 K-BB% over the past 30 days. He has a 6.16 ERA, 5.33 xFIP and 5.57 SIERA with a 4.9% K-BB on the year. Sanchez still induces a lot of groundballs and keeps the ball out of the air (49% GB rate, 28.3% FB rate this year) but the K/BB ratio is awful, and he allows way too many baserunners as evidenced by his 1.75 WHIP. After having very wide platoon splits throughout his career, Sanchez has actually been worse vs. RHB this year with a .377 wOBA vs. righties compared to a .347 wOBA vs. lefties. The Yankees currently have the highest implied total on the slate at 7.07. Gleyber Torres (137 wRC+, .251 ISO vs. RHP this year), DJ LeMahieu (137 wRC+, .186 ISO), Gio Urshela (137 wRC+, .186 ISO), Brett Gardner (125 wRC+, .258 ISO), Didi Gregorious (125 wRC+, .167 ISO), Gary Sanchez (123 wRC+, .315 ISO), Edwin Encarnacion (115 wRC+, .265 ISO) and Aaron Hicks (110 wRC+, .263 ISO) are all options in the Yanks’ projected lineup. Aaron Judge has a 110 wRC+ / .263 ISO vs. RHP this year in 107 PA but has a 139 wRC+ / .243 ISO vs. RHP since 2018. DJ Lemahieu has been their hottest hitter over the past 30 days with a 196 wRC+. Besides DJ Lemahieu, all Yankees bats are available under $5k on Draftkings tonight.

7/12/19, 8:33 AM ET

Clayton Richard has a 93.4 mph aEV (55.8% 95+ mph EV) and RHBs are above a .400 wOBA last calendar year

The game at Yankee Stadium between the Yankees and Blue Jays may not currently have a total due to the uncertain pitching plans of the home team, but it wouldn’t be a bad guess to suggest the Yankees might be the top offense on the board, well above six runs, once their total is posted. A few words, or numbers, concerning Clayton Richard, starter for the Blue Jays tonight. He has a -0.8 K-BB% and despite a 55.8 GB%, has allowed a HR in five straight starts. His 95.4 Z-Contact% is worst on the board by more than four points. Exactly one quarter of the fly balls he’s allowed have left the yard. Sustainable? Maybe not, but deserved? He owns a board worst 93.4 mph aEV and 55.8% 95+ mph EV (no other pitcher today is above 49%). The only thing keeping his Barrels/BBE in single digits (9.3%) is that ground ball rate. Over the last calendar year, RHBs own a .402 wOBA, .407 xwOBA, 44.7 Hard% and 50 GB% against him. The Yankees could legitimately post a lineup with six to seven All-Star caliber RH bats. Giancarlo Stanton (120 wRC+, .179 ISO vs LHP last calendar year) could even be considered one of the “weak spots”. Edwin Encarnacion (130 wRC+, .244 ISO), Luke Voit (155 wRC+, .297 ISO), Gleyber Torres (106 wRC+, .268 ISO), Gary Sanchez (134 wRC+, .329 ISO) and Aaron Judge (211 wRC+, .300 ISO) should all put fear into the minds of southpaws. It may be obvious, but it’s hard to imagine the Yankees allowing Richard to get very deep into this effort.

6/25/19, 10:45 AM ET