Jason Kipnis

Chicago Cubs
Pos: 2B | Hand: L
Status: Inactive
player props
FPTS 1 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 12 13 SAL $620 $1.2K $1.9K $2.5K $3.1K $3.7K $4.3K $5K $5.6K $6.2K
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 13
  • FPTS: 6
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 3
  • FPTS: 4
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 3
  • FPTS: 5
  • FPTS: 2
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 4
  • FPTS: 2
  • FPTS: 0
  • SAL: $3.4K
  • SAL: $3.3K
  • SAL: $3.6K
  • SAL: $3.4K
  • SAL: $3.6K
  • SAL: $3.4K
  • SAL: $6.2K
  • SAL: $3.4K
  • SAL: $3.3K
  • SAL: $3.1K
  • SAL: $3.2K
  • SAL: $3.3K
  • SAL: $3K
  • SAL: $3K
  • SAL: --
  • SAL: $2.9K
09/12 09/13 09/16 09/17 09/19 09/20 09/21 09/22 09/23 09/24 09/26 09/26 09/27 09/30 10/02
Date Opp DKSAL FDSAL DKFPTS FDFPTS sf ab slg h so hbp gidp 1b babip 2b pa 3b sb hr xbh r obp rbi iso bb ops ibb
2020-10-02 vs. MIA $2.9K $2.3K 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-09-30 vs. MIA -- -- 2 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 1 0.33 0
2020-09-27 @ CWS $3K $2.6K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2020-09-26 @ CWS $3K $2.6K 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-09-25 @ CWS $3.3K $2.6K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2020-09-24 @ PIT $3.2K $2.6K 5 6 0 3 0.67 1 1 0 0 0 0.5 1 3 0 0 0 1 0 0.33 0 0.33 0 1 0
2020-09-23 @ PIT $3.1K $2.6K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2020-09-22 @ PIT $3.3K $2.6K 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-09-21 @ PIT $3.4K $2.6K 4 6.2 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 0 0 0.33 0
2020-09-20 vs. MIN $6.2K $5K 3 3 0 2 0.5 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2020-09-18 vs. MIN $3.4K $2.7K 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-09-16 vs. CLE $3.6K $2.7K 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-09-15 vs. CLE $3.4K $2.7K 6 6 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2020-09-13 @ MIL $3.6K $2.7K 13 19.4 1 4 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.2 1 5 0 0 0 1 2 0.2 2 0.25 0 0.7 0
2020-09-12 @ MIL $3.3K $2.7K 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-09-08 vs. CIN $3.4K $2.6K 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-09-07 vs. STL $5.1K $2.5K 12 15.7 0 2 1.5 2 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0.5 0 2.5 0
2020-09-06 vs. STL $3.3K $2.5K 16 22.2 0 3 1.33 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 1 0.33 2 1 0 1.67 0
2020-09-05 @ STL -- -- 7 9 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 3 0
2020-09-04 vs. STL $2.5K $2.5K 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-09-03 @ PIT $2.8K $2.5K 8 9.2 0 4 0.5 2 2 0 0 2 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2020-09-01 @ PIT $2.8K $2.6K 9 13 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 2 0 1 0.83 0
2020-08-30 @ CIN $3K $2.7K 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-08-29 @ CIN $9.3K $5K 7 9 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2020-08-29 @ CIN $6.8K $5.5K 3 3 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.67 0
2020-08-28 @ CIN $3.1K $2.7K 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-08-26 @ DET $3.1K $2.6K 4 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.67 0 0 2 0.67 0
2020-08-25 @ DET $2.9K $2.7K 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-08-23 vs. CWS $9.9K $2.7K 3 3 0 3 0.33 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.67 0
2020-08-22 vs. CWS $3K $2.9K 7 9 0 3 0.67 1 1 0 0 0 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 0 0.33 1 1.17 0
2020-08-21 vs. CWS $2.9K $3K 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0
2020-08-19 @ STL -- -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-08-19 vs. STL $7.8K $6.5K 4 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.67 0 0 2 0.67 0
2020-08-18 vs. STL $2.7K $3.1K 4 6.5 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 0 1 0.25 0
2020-08-17 @ STL $2.5K $2.7K 2 3 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 1 0.33 0
2020-08-16 vs. MIL $7.2K $3K 7 10 0 3 0.33 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 2 0 0 0.67 0
2020-08-15 vs. MIL $7.5K $6K 7 9.2 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2020-08-14 vs. MIL $2.6K $3K 7 9.7 0 3 0.33 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0.33 1 0 0 0.67 0
2020-08-12 @ CLE $3K $2.8K 9 12.5 0 3 0.67 1 1 0 0 0 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 1 0.33 1 1.17 0
2020-08-11 @ CLE $3.1K $2.8K 9 12.2 0 3 0.67 1 1 0 0 0 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 0 0.33 1 1.17 0
2020-08-06 @ KC $2.8K $2.9K 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-08-04 vs. KC $3K $2.5K 18 25.2 0 3 1.33 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 2 1 1 1.83 0
2020-07-31 vs. PIT $2.9K $2.4K 19 24.7 0 3 1.67 2 1 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.75 1 1 1 2.42 0
2020-07-28 @ CIN $3.4K $2.4K 15 18.7 0 4 1 2 1 0 0 1 0.67 0 4 1 0 0 1 1 0.5 1 0.5 0 1.5 0
2020-07-27 @ CIN $3.5K $2.3K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-07-25 vs. MIL $3.3K $2.5K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 1 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2019-09-15 vs. MIN -- -- 7 9.2 0 3 0.67 1 0 0 0 0 0.33 1 3 0 0 0 1 1 0.33 0 0.33 0 1 0
2019-09-14 vs. MIN -- -- 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 0
2019-09-11 @ LAA -- -- 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2019-09-10 @ LAA -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-09-09 @ LAA -- -- 19 25.2 0 4 1.25 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 2 0.75 0 1.75 0
2019-09-08 @ MIN -- -- 13 15.2 0 4 1 3 1 0 0 2 1 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.75 0 0.25 0 1.75 0
2019-09-07 @ MIN -- -- 8 9.5 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 1 0 0 1 0
2019-09-06 @ MIN -- -- 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-09-05 vs. CWS -- -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-09-04 vs. CWS -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-08-31 @ TB -- -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-08-30 @ TB -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-08-28 @ DET -- -- 28 37.4 0 4 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 2 2 0.5 2 1.5 0 2.5 0
2019-08-27 @ DET -- -- 18 25.4 0 5 0.8 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.2 2 0.6 0 1 0
2019-08-25 vs. KC -- -- 2 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2019-08-24 vs. KC -- -- 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2019-08-23 vs. KC -- -- 12 15.2 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 1 1 0.33 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2019-08-22 @ NYM -- -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-08-21 @ NYM -- -- 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2019-08-20 @ NYM -- -- 19 25.2 0 4 1.25 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 2 0.75 0 1.75 0
2019-08-18 @ NYY -- -- 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2019-08-17 @ NYY -- -- 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2019-08-16 @ NYY -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-08-15 @ NYY -- -- 19 24.7 0 6 1 2 1 0 0 0 0.25 1 6 0 0 1 2 1 0.33 1 0.67 0 1.33 0
2019-08-13 vs. BOS -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-08-12 vs. BOS -- -- 5 6 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2019-08-11 @ MIN -- -- 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2019-08-10 @ MIN -- -- 5 6 0 3 0.33 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2019-08-09 @ MIN -- -- 4 6.5 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 1 0 1 0.2 0
2019-08-08 @ MIN -- -- 14 19 0 4 1 2 1 0 0 0 0.67 2 4 0 0 0 2 0 0.5 2 0.5 0 1.5 0
2019-08-07 vs. TEX -- -- 14 18.7 0 4 1 2 2 0 0 0 1 2 4 0 0 0 2 1 0.5 1 0.5 0 1.5 0
2019-08-05 vs. TEX -- -- 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2019-08-04 vs. LAA -- -- 30 40.9 0 3 1.67 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 1 1 1 2 0.75 3 1 1 2.42 0
2019-08-03 vs. LAA -- -- 16 22.2 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 2 0.75 0 1.25 0
2019-08-02 vs. LAA -- -- 10 12.5 0 4 0.75 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 1 0.25 0 1.25 0
2019-08-01 vs. HOU -- -- 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2019-07-31 vs. HOU -- -- 21 28.7 0 4 1.25 2 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 3 0.75 0 1.75 0
2019-07-30 vs. HOU -- -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-07-27 @ KC -- -- 24 35.4 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.4 4 0.75 1 1.4 0
2019-07-26 @ KC -- -- 6 9.2 0 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 1 0.4 0
2019-07-25 @ KC -- -- 17 21.7 0 5 0.6 3 0 0 0 3 0.6 0 7 0 0 0 0 1 0.71 1 0 2 1.31 2
2019-07-24 @ TOR -- -- 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2019-07-23 @ TOR -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-07-22 @ TOR -- -- 16 21.9 0 3 0.67 2 0 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0.8 1 0 2 1.47 0
2019-07-21 vs. KC -- -- 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2019-07-20 vs. KC -- -- 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2019-07-19 vs. KC -- -- 5 6.5 1 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 1 0 0 0.45 0
2019-07-18 vs. DET -- -- 8 9.2 0 3 0.67 2 1 0 0 2 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0.67 0 0 0 1.33 0
2019-07-17 vs. DET -- -- 7 9.7 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 1 0 0 0.5 0
2019-07-16 vs. DET -- -- 7 9.2 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2019-07-14 vs. MIN -- -- 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2019-07-13 vs. MIN -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-07-12 vs. MIN -- -- 7 9.2 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2019-07-07 @ CIN -- -- 21 28.2 0 3 1.67 2 1 0 0 1 1 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.75 2 1 1 2.42 0
2019-07-06 @ CIN -- -- 7 9.2 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2019-07-04 @ KC -- -- 2 3.5 1 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
2019-07-03 @ KC -- -- 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2019-07-02 @ KC -- -- 4 6.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 1 0 1 0.2 0
2019-06-30 @ BAL -- -- 8 9 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2019-06-29 @ BAL -- -- 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2019-06-28 @ BAL -- -- 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2019-06-26 vs. KC -- -- 7 9.7 1 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 1 0 0 0.58 0
2019-06-25 vs. KC -- -- 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2019-06-24 vs. KC -- -- 20 24.7 0 5 1.2 3 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.6 1 0.6 0 1.8 0
2019-06-23 vs. DET -- -- 12 16.2 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 2 0 0 1 0
2019-06-22 vs. DET -- -- 7 9.2 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2019-06-21 vs. DET -- -- 15 18.7 0 3 1.33 2 0 0 0 1 0.67 0 4 1 0 0 1 1 0.67 1 0.67 0 2 0
2019-06-20 @ TEX -- -- 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2019-06-19 @ TEX -- -- 36 50.4 0 2 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 2 2 1 4 3 2 5 0
2019-06-18 @ TEX -- -- 16 22.7 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.6 3 0 1 1.1 0
2019-06-17 @ TEX -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-06-16 @ DET -- -- 26 34.7 0 5 1.4 3 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 5 0 0 1 2 1 0.6 3 0.8 0 2 0
2019-06-15 @ DET -- -- 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-06-14 @ DET -- -- 4 6.2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2019-06-09 vs. NYY -- -- 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-06-08 vs. NYY -- -- 6 6 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2019-06-07 vs. NYY -- -- 10 13 1 3 0.67 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 2 0 0 1.17 0
2019-06-06 vs. MIN -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-06-05 vs. MIN -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-06-04 vs. MIN -- -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-06-02 @ CWS -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-06-01 @ CWS -- -- 2 3.5 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
2019-05-31 @ CWS -- -- 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2019-05-30 @ CWS -- -- 8 9 0 4 0.75 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 0 0.25 0 1.25 0
2019-05-29 @ BOS -- -- 3 3 0 6 0.17 1 2 0 0 1 0.25 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0.17 0 0 0 0.33 0
2019-05-27 @ BOS -- -- 12 15.7 0 4 0.75 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 1 0.25 0 1.25 0
2019-05-26 vs. TB -- -- 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2019-05-25 vs. TB -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-05-24 vs. TB -- -- 3 3 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.67 0
2019-05-23 vs. TB -- -- 5 6.2 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2019-05-22 vs. OAK -- -- 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 0 0 1 1 0.2 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2019-05-21 vs. OAK -- -- 2 3 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2019-05-20 vs. OAK -- -- 14 18.2 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 5 0 1 0 1 1 0.4 0 0.25 1 0.9 0
2019-05-19 vs. BAL -- -- 7 9.2 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2019-05-18 vs. BAL -- -- 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2019-05-17 vs. BAL -- -- 5 6 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2019-05-16 vs. BAL -- -- 38 54.6 0 6 1.33 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 0 0 2 2 3 0.33 6 1 0 1.67 0
2019-05-14 @ CWS -- -- 12 15.7 0 5 0.6 2 2 0 0 1 0.67 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.4 1 0.2 0 1 0
2019-05-13 @ CWS -- -- 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2019-05-11 @ OAK -- -- 13 15 0 5 0.6 2 1 0 1 1 0.5 1 5 0 1 0 1 0 0.4 0 0.2 0 1 0
2019-05-10 @ OAK -- -- 10 12 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2019-05-09 vs. CWS -- -- 2 3 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2019-05-08 vs. CWS -- -- 2 3 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2019-05-07 vs. CWS -- -- 10 12 0 4 1 2 1 0 1 0 0.67 2 4 0 0 0 2 0 0.5 0 0.5 0 1.5 0
2019-05-06 vs. CWS -- -- 10 12.5 0 5 0.6 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.4 1 0.2 0 1 0
2019-05-05 vs. SEA -- -- 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2019-05-04 vs. SEA -- -- 7 9.2 0 3 0.67 1 0 0 0 0 0.33 1 3 0 0 0 1 1 0.33 0 0.33 0 1 0
2019-05-03 vs. SEA -- -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-05-01 @ MIA -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-04-30 @ MIA -- -- 5 6 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2019-04-28 @ HOU -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-04-27 @ HOU -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-04-26 @ HOU -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-04-25 @ HOU -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-04-24 vs. MIA -- -- 7 9.2 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2019-04-23 vs. MIA -- -- 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2019-04-21 vs. ATL -- -- 8 9.5 0 5 0.4 2 0 0 0 2 0.4 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 1 0 0 0.8 0
2019-04-20 vs. ATL -- -- 10 12.5 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 1 0 1 1.1 0
2019-04-17 @ SEA -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019-04-16 @ SEA -- -- 15 18.2 0 4 0.75 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 4 0 1 0 1 1 0.5 0 0.25 0 1.25 0
2019-04-15 @ SEA -- -- 7 9.5 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 1 0 1 0.83 0

Jason Kipnis Daily Fantasy News, Rankings, Projections

Indians currently have the highest total on the slate vs. Skoglund

The Royals are calling 6’7 lefty Eric Skoglund up from AAA to make this start in Cleveland vs. the Indians. Over 63 innings (11 starts) in AAA, Skoglund had a 6.14 ERA, 6.49 xFIP, 1.71 HR/9, 9.3% K-BB, 1.52 WHIP and 42% FB rate. Over 88 career MLB innings, Skoglund has a 6.03 ERA and 5.13 xFIP. Skoglund has no problem with control as evidenced by his 6.1% BB rate in AAA this year and career 8% BB rate, but lacks swing and miss stuff (career 16.3% K rate, 7.2% SwStr) and his approach leads to him often getting hammered (career 90.2 MPH aEV, .353 xwOBA allowed). Though they just lost Jose Ramirez to the IL, the Indians suddenly have a dangerous lineup after acquiring Yasiel Puig and Franmil Reyes at the deadline and have some nice options tpday. Carlos Santana (.358 xwOBA vs. LHP this year), Yasiel Puig (.341), Francisco Lindor (.338), Franmil Reyes (.321), Oscar Mercado (.315) and Jason Kipnis (.286) are all in play. Santana has been their hottest bat with a .419 xwOBA over the past 14 days. Franmil Reyes is a nice value batting 5th at just $3.8k, followed by Jason Kipnis at $3.9k. The Indians have a 6.14 implied total vs. Skoglund and the Royals.

Indians’ bats are a sneaky option vs. struggling Odorizzi

With Jose Ramirez looking like himself again and newly acquired Yasiel Puig and Franmil Reyes in the lineup, the Indians suddenly have a dangerous offense. They’ll face Jake Odorizzi, who started the season hot but has really fallen apart of late. Since July 1st, Odorizzi has posted a 6.21 ERA, 5.60 xFIP and 9.9% K-BB with a 1.55 WHIP, 2.2 HR/9 and 88.4 MPH aEV. Odorizzi has a bit of a reverse platoon split, but can be targeted from both sides of the plate. Carlos Santana (.375 xwOBA vs. RHP this year), Franmil Reyes (.367), Jason Kipnis (.358), Jose Ramirez (.339), Francisco Lindor (.337), Tyler Naquin (.336) and Yasiel Puig (.324) are all good options tonight. Jason Kipnis has been the Indians’ hottest hitter with a .427 xwOBA over the past 14 days, followed by Jose Ramirez with a .414 mark. Franmil Reyes has been cold (.227) but costs only $3.4k on Draftkings. Other good values include Yasiel Puig ($4k), Jose Ramirez ($4.3k), Jason Kipnis ($4.1k) and Tyler Naquin ($3.5k). The Indians should see decently low ownership Saturday night and make for an intriguing stack in tournaments. They currently have a 4.55 implied line.

Ariel Jurado has a .369 road xwOBA since last year

While Cleveland is a bit of a park bump for Rangers pitchers, it’s still one of the more positive run environments in the league and Ariel Jurado has just a 5.5 SwStr% with a board high .385 xwOBA over the last month. As far as getting out of Texas goes, since the start of last season, he owns a .368 road xwOBA. His 9.2% Barrels/BBE in 2019 is third highest of any pitcher on the slate with a start this season. Over the last 12 months batters from either side of the plate are above a .330 wOBA and within a point of a .355 xwOBA against him. The projected lineup for the new look Indians does not contain a single batter below a .170 ISO vs RHP over the last calendar year. Surprisingly, Jason Kipnis has the highest wRC+ (128) with a .222 ISO. This is now a group of quality bats with above average power, including a great rebound from Carlos Santana (126 wRC+, .239 ISO). It’s difficult to find a poor value among the bunch with an offense that has currently moved into second place on the board tonight at 6.18 implied runs.

Top Stack

The Indians get a great matchup against Glenn Sparkman. Sparkman has struggled this season with lefties and the Indians have a bunch of left handed bats to throw out against him. This season Sparkman is giving up a 288 ISO, 44% fly ball rate, and a 44% hard hit rate to lefties. My main targets in my stack will be Lindor, Santana, Ramirez, and Kipnis but all of the lefties are in play.

Aaron Sanchez has allowed at least four runs in eight of nine starts

Aaron Sanchez has failed to allow at least four runs in just one of his last nine starts and that was against Baltimore where he still walked four and allowed a HR. His 5.0 K-BB%, 6.26 ERA, 8.00 DRA, 24 LD%, .360 xwOBA and 89.9 mph aEV (42.8% 95+ mph EV) are just some of the numbers that will entice daily fantasy players to load up their lineups with Cleveland bats despite a mere 95 wRC+ vs RHP. The Indians also have just a 14.5 K% and 37.9 Hard-Soft% over the last week though, both best in the majors. Batters from either side of the plate have hammered Sanchez over the last 12 months. Neither side drops below a .348 wOBA or xwOBA. Francisco Lindor (109 wRC+, .214 ISO vs RHP last calendar year) and Oscar Mercado (119 wRC+, .191 ISO) are both above a 150 wRC+ over the last week. Jason Kipnis (117 wRC+, .193 ISO) costs just $3.6K on DraftKings. Only one other team on the slate is more than one-tenth of a run above Cleveland’s 5.5 implied runs tonight.

LHBs own a career .344 wOBA vs Spencer Turnbull (6.3 K-BB% last seven starts)

Spencer Turnbull has a 6.3 K-BB% over his last seven starts. A 50.5 GB% and 9.1 HR/FB are the only things keeping his ERA below five over that span and the latter can certainly be argued against with a 29.8 Hard-Soft% over that span. Turnbull now owns an 88.3 mph aEV for the season. The high ground ball rate will help him, but with a higher rate of contact, and harder contact at that, it’s not going to save him. After a terrible start, the Indians are now up to a 94 wRC+ with a 13.2 K-BB% and 14.4 HR/FB vs RHP, essentially league average. Turnbull is now exhibiting a substantial platoon issue as well. LHBs own a .344 wOBA and .357 xwOBA against him in his short career now. The Indians will attack him with seven lefties tonight. Their 5.92 implied run line is fourth best on the board with all three offenses above them having potential weather concerns tonight. Francisco Lindor (106 wRC+, .205 ISO vs RHP last calendar year), Carlos Santana (129 wRC+, .233 ISO), and Jason Kipnis (114 wRC+, .192 ISO) lead the charge in the top half of the lineup. Jose Ramirez (90 wRC+, .179 ISO) is actually one of the hottest Cleveland bats since the break (156 wRC+, 52.2 Hard%).

Sneaky Stack

The Cleveland Indians are a nice sneaky stack today against Jake Odorizzi. In Odorizzi's last 3 outings he struggled before going on IL. In those three games, he had a fly ball rate of 52.5%, hard hit rate of 61%, and his strikeout rate went down to 19%. Then we have the Indians, who over the last month of the season are 7th ISO, 4th wOBA, and 25th in strikeouts with only a 19.8% strikeout rate as a team. The Indians should for sure go overlooked tonight, which makes them a great under-owned stack in GPPs.

Cleveland left-handed bats are in a good spot vs. Mahle in GABP

Tyler Mahle has been a decent pitcher this year, but given his extreme platoon splits (.365 xwOBA vs. lefties, .290 xwOBA vs. righties since 2018) it becomes clear which matchups to target him. Since 2018, Mahle has allowed a .379 OBP and .555 SLG to left-handed batters. The Indians will have 7 left-handed hitters out of 8 in their lineup tonight in Great American Ball Park, a great park for left-handed power. In addition, WeatherEdge (available to premium subscribers) projects an increase in home runs in what is already a homer-friendly park. Carlos Santana (.399 xwOBA vs. RHP this year, Jason Kipnis (.362), Francisco Lindor (.348), Tyler Naquin (.335), Jose Ramirez (.312), Jake Bauers (.305) and Greg Allen (.285) are all 7 lefties in the CLE order this afternoon. Allen hasn’t seen much success vs. RHP this year but is batting 2nd at just $3k on Draftkings. Kipnis, Bauers and Naquin are all $3.7k or less on DK. Jose Ramirez has a .339 xwOBA over the past 14 days as he’s looked much better at the plate compared to earlier in the year. He’ll bat 5th and cost $4.3k. Also working in the Indians’ favor is a hitter friendly ump in David Rackley. Cleveland currently has a 4.65 implied line vs. Mahle and the Reds.

This Position Is A Pay Down Spot Today

With the breadth of options available under $4k on DraftKings, it seems unlikely you should be paying up at second base in cash games or even GPPs. Jose Altuve ($3900) and Jason Kipnis ($3700) stand out the most having the platoon advantage over pitchers that give up excessive hard hit rates to that side of the plate. Although he's batting at the bottom of the Cubs order, switch-hitting Robel Garcia ($2200) is dirt cheap facing contact-friendly Ivan Nova and could be viable in GPP lineup constructions that pay up at SP and OF.

Jake Junis has allowed multiple HRs in six of last 13 starts

Jakob Junis has allowed multiple HRs in six of his last 13 starts, which is perhaps the most glaring stat here upon viewing conditions that are expected to strongly boost overall offense and power in Kansas City tonight. Another glaring stat is that his 29.7 Hard-Soft% is worst on the board, as his 89.6 mph aEV has led to a .354 xwOBA that’s just two points removed from his actual mark. Despite 5.12 implied runs, the Tribe is barely inside the top third of the board tonight and could go over-looked in this spot due to offensive struggles this season (90 wRC+, 13.7 HR/FB vs RHP), but this is a strong spot for them in a park that is generally power suppressing, though shouldn’t be tonight. LHBs have hammered Junis to the tune of a .362 wOBA and 45.2 Hard% over the last 12 months. While only Francisco Lindor (109 wRC+, .217 ISO) and Carlos Santana (118 wRC+, .213 ISO) are above a .200 ISO over the last calendar year against RHP, Oscar Mercado (142 wRC+, .185 ISO), Jason Kipnis (121 wRC+, .196 ISO), Jose Ramirez (95 wRC+, .190 ISO) and Jake Bauers (93 wRC+, .172 ISO) have shown some pop as well.