Aaron Judge

New York Yankees
Pos: OF | Hand: R
Status: Active
player props
FPTS 5 9 12 15 19 22 25 28 32 35 SAL $6.2K $6.6K $6.9K $7.2K $7.6K $7.9K $8.2K $8.5K $8.9K $9.2K
  • FPTS: 2
  • FPTS: 21
  • FPTS: 7
  • FPTS: 35
  • FPTS: 14
  • FPTS: 22
  • FPTS: 5
  • FPTS: 16
  • FPTS: 12
  • FPTS: 4
  • FPTS: 20
  • FPTS: 25
  • FPTS: 16
  • FPTS: 23
  • FPTS: 3
  • FPTS: 3
  • SAL: $6K
  • SAL: $6K
  • SAL: $6K
  • SAL: $5.9K
  • SAL: $9.2K
  • SAL: $6K
  • SAL: $5.9K
  • SAL: $6.2K
  • SAL: $6.2K
  • SAL: $6.2K
  • SAL: $6.2K
  • SAL: $6.2K
  • SAL: $6.3K
  • SAL: $6.1K
  • SAL: $6.3K
  • SAL: $6.1K
05/12 05/14 05/15 05/16 05/17 05/18 05/19 05/20 05/21 05/22 05/23 05/25 05/26 05/26 05/29
Date Opp DKSAL FDSAL DKFPTS FDFPTS sf ab slg h so hbp gidp 1b babip 2b pa 3b sb hr xbh r obp rbi iso bb ops ibb
2024-05-28 @ LAA $6.1K $4.6K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2024-05-26 @ SD $6.3K $4.6K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2024-05-25 @ SD $6.1K $4.5K 23 31.4 0 4 1.5 2 2 0 0 0 1 1 4 0 0 1 2 2 0.5 2 1 0 2 0
2024-05-24 @ SD $6.3K $4.5K 16 22.2 1 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.2 2 0.75 0 1.2 0
2024-05-23 vs. SEA $6.2K $4.5K 25 33.9 0 2 3 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 0 0 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 4 0
2024-05-22 vs. SEA $6.2K $4.5K 20 28.4 0 3 1.33 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 2 1 1 1.83 0
2024-05-21 vs. SEA $6.2K $4.5K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2024-05-20 vs. SEA $6.2K $4.4K 12 15.2 0 4 0.75 2 1 0 0 1 0.67 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.6 0 0.25 1 1.35 0
2024-05-19 vs. CHW $6.2K $4.5K 16 22.2 0 4 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 2 0.75 0 1.25 0
2024-05-18 vs. CHW $5.9K $4.3K 5 6 0 4 0.25 1 3 0 0 1 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2024-05-17 vs. CHW $6K $4.2K 22 30.9 0 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 2 1 1 3 3 5 1
2024-05-16 @ MIN $9.2K $4.1K 14 18.2 0 3 1.33 2 0 0 0 0 0.67 2 4 0 0 0 2 1 0.75 0 0.67 1 2.08 0
2024-05-15 @ MIN $5.9K $4.2K 35 46.4 0 4 2.5 4 0 0 0 0 1 3 5 0 0 1 4 2 1 2 1.5 1 3.5 0
2024-05-14 @ MIN $6K $4.3K 7 9.2 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 1
2024-05-12 @ TB $6K $4.1K 21 28.2 0 4 1.25 2 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.6 2 0.75 1 1.85 0
2024-05-11 @ TB $6K $4K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 0
2024-05-10 @ TB $6K $3.8K 6 9.2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 2 0.5 0
2024-05-09 vs. HOU $9K $3.8K 14 18.7 0 4 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 1 0.75 0 1.25 0
2024-05-08 vs. HOU $5.9K $3.8K 28 37.7 0 5 1.6 3 1 0 0 0 0.67 2 5 0 0 1 3 1 0.6 3 1 0 2.2 0
2024-05-07 vs. HOU $6K $3.8K 11 15.7 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.6 1 0 2 0.93 0
2024-05-05 vs. DET $6.1K $3.7K 21 27.7 0 3 2 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 4 0 0 1 2 1 0.75 1 1.33 1 2.75 0
2024-05-04 vs. DET $6.2K $3.6K 14 18.9 0 4 0.75 2 2 0 0 1 1 1 4 0 0 0 1 2 0.5 1 0.25 0 1.25 0
2024-05-03 vs. DET $6.1K $3.8K 12 15.2 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2024-05-02 @ BAL $6K $3.8K 2 3 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 1 0.33 0
2024-05-01 @ BAL $6K $4.1K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-30 @ BAL $6K $4.2K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2024-04-29 @ BAL $6K $3.9K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2024-04-28 @ MIL $5.9K $4K 26 34.7 0 4 1.5 3 0 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.8 3 0.75 1 2.3 0
2024-04-27 @ MIL $6.1K $3.9K 23 31.4 0 4 1.25 2 1 0 1 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.6 2 0.75 1 1.85 0
2024-04-26 @ MIL $5.9K $3.8K 2 3 0 4 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 1
2024-04-25 vs. OAK $9.6K $3.5K 4 6 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 2 0.4 0
2024-04-24 vs. OAK $6K $3.6K 19 25.2 0 5 1 2 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.4 2 0.6 0 1.4 0
2024-04-23 vs. OAK $6.1K $3.7K 9 12.2 0 3 0.67 1 0 1 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 0 0.33 0 1.17 0
2024-04-22 vs. OAK $9.6K $3.7K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-21 vs. TB $6.1K $3.8K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2024-04-20 vs. TB $6.1K $3.9K 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-19 vs. TB $6.1K $3.8K 10 12 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2024-04-17 @ TOR $6.1K $3.9K 7 10 0 5 0.2 1 3 0 1 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 2 0 0 0.4 0
2024-04-16 @ TOR $6.1K $4K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-15 @ TOR $6.2K $3.9K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-14 @ CLE $6.2K $4K 22 31.9 0 4 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.4 3 0.75 1 1.4 1
2024-04-13 @ CLE $9.2K -- 7 9 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.4 0 0.25 1 0.9 0
2024-04-13 @ CLE $9.6K $4.1K 8 9 0 5 0.6 2 0 0 0 1 0.4 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.4 0 0.2 0 1 0
2024-04-10 vs. MIA $6.2K $4.1K 2 3 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2024-04-09 vs. MIA $6.2K $4.3K 11 15 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 3 3 0
2024-04-08 vs. MIA $6K $4.2K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-07 vs. TOR $6.2K $4K 6 9.2 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 2 0.4 0
2024-04-06 vs. TOR $6K $4.2K 25 34.4 0 3 1.67 2 1 0 0 1 1 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.8 2 1 2 2.47 0
2024-04-05 vs. TOR $6.1K $4.3K 4 6 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 2 0.5 0
2024-04-03 @ ARI $6.1K $4K 25 34.7 0 4 1.5 2 1 0 0 0 0.5 1 5 0 0 1 2 1 0.6 3 1 1 2.1 0
2024-04-02 @ ARI $6.1K $4K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2024-04-01 @ ARI $6.2K $4K 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 0 0 1 1 0.2 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2024-03-31 @ HOU $6.2K $4.1K 2 3.5 1 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
2024-03-30 @ HOU $6K $4.3K 5 6 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2024-03-29 @ HOU $6.2K $4.3K 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-03-28 @ HOU $6.3K $4.3K 9 12.2 0 4 0.5 1 2 0 1 0 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.4 0 0.25 1 0.9 0
2024-03-25 vs. NYM $4.5K -- 5 6.2 0 3 0.33 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 0 0 0.67 0
2024-03-23 vs. PHI -- -- 5 6 0 3 0.67 1 1 0 0 0 0.5 1 3 0 0 0 1 0 0.33 0 0.33 0 1 0
2024-03-22 vs. NYM $4.5K -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-03-20 vs. PIT $4.5K -- 13 18.9 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 1 1 3 0
2024-03-10 vs. ATL $4.5K -- 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-03-08 @ TOR $4.5K $5.5K 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-03-06 vs. TB $4.5K -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-03-03 vs. DET $4.5K -- 2 3 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 1 0.33 0
2024-03-01 vs. TOR -- $5.5K 4 6.2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 0 1 0.33 0
2024-02-25 vs. TOR -- -- 14 18.9 0 2 1.5 2 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 0.5 0 2.5 0
2023-09-30 @ KC $6.3K $4.6K 5 6 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2023-09-29 @ KC $6.3K $4.5K 11 15.4 0 3 0.67 1 0 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 2 0.5 0 0.33 1 1.17 0
2023-09-28 @ TOR $6.2K $4.3K 2 3 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 1
2023-09-27 @ TOR $6.3K $4.3K 38 53.6 0 3 2.67 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 2 3 0.8 4 2 2 3.47 1
2023-09-25 vs. ARI $9.8K $4.1K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-09-24 vs. ARI $6.7K $3.9K 11 15.5 0 3 0.67 1 2 0 0 0 1 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.6 1 0.33 2 1.27 0
2023-09-22 vs. ARI $6.5K $4.1K 53 72.6 0 4 3.5 4 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 0 0 3 4 3 1 6 2.5 0 4.5 0
2023-09-21 vs. TOR $6.5K $3.9K 10 12.5 0 4 0.75 2 1 0 0 1 0.67 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 1 0.25 0 1.25 0
2023-09-20 vs. TOR $6.4K $3.9K 4 6 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 2 0.5 0
2023-09-19 vs. TOR $6.4K $3.9K 8 9.2 0 4 0.5 2 2 0 0 2 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2023-09-17 @ PIT $6.5K $4K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-16 @ PIT $6.5K $4K 8 12.2 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.6 0 0 3 0.6 0
2023-09-15 @ PIT $6.2K $4.1K 13 15.7 0 5 0.6 3 2 0 0 3 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.6 1 0 0 1.2 0
2023-09-14 @ BOS $6.3K -- 26 38.2 0 2 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.8 4 1.5 3 2.8 1
2023-09-14 @ BOS $6.3K $4.1K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-12 @ BOS $6.4K -- 4 6 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 2 0.4 1
2023-09-12 @ BOS $6.4K $4.1K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-10 vs. MIL $6.6K $4.3K 2 3 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 1
2023-09-09 vs. MIL $6.4K $4.3K 5 6 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2023-09-08 vs. MIL $6.5K $4.3K 9 12.2 0 2 0.5 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.75 0 0 2 1.25 0
2023-09-07 vs. DET $6.4K $4.3K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-06 vs. DET $6.5K $4.2K 12 15.2 0 4 0.75 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.6 0 0.25 1 1.35 0
2023-09-05 vs. DET $6.7K $4.1K 11 15.2 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 3 2 0
2023-09-03 @ HOU $10K $4.1K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-02 @ HOU $6.6K $4.1K 18 24.9 0 4 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.4 1 0.75 1 1.4 0
2023-09-01 @ HOU $6.5K $4.3K 19 24.9 0 4 1.25 2 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 1 0.75 0 1.75 0
2023-08-31 @ DET $9.8K $4.3K 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-30 @ DET $6.6K $4.3K 2 3 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2023-08-29 @ DET $6.4K $4.3K 5 6.2 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-08-28 @ DET $6.4K $4.3K 20 27.9 0 3 1.33 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.6 1 1 2 1.93 0
2023-08-27 @ TB $6.5K $4.4K 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-26 @ TB $6.5K $4.4K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-25 @ TB $6.4K $4.4K 4 6.2 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2023-08-24 vs. WSH $6.2K $4.2K 16 21.7 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.4 1 0.75 1 1.4 0
2023-08-23 vs. WSH $6.2K $4.2K 48 66.6 0 4 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 3 3 0.75 6 2.25 0 3.75 0
2023-08-22 vs. WSH $6.2K $4.2K 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-20 vs. BOS $6.4K $4.2K 2 3 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2023-08-19 vs. BOS $6.3K $4.2K 14 18.7 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 1 0.75 0 1.25 0
2023-08-18 vs. BOS $6.1K $4K 16 22.2 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 2 0.75 0 1.25 0
2023-08-16 @ ATL $6K $4.2K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 3 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-08-15 @ ATL $6.5K $4.3K 4 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 2 0.5 0
2023-08-14 @ ATL $6.4K $4K 6 6 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2023-08-13 @ MIA $6.4K $4.2K 6 9.2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 2 0.4 0
2023-08-12 @ MIA $6.3K $4.1K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-08-11 @ MIA $6.4K $4K 18 24.7 0 3 1.33 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.6 1 1 2 1.93 0
2023-08-09 @ CHW $6.4K $4K 7 9.2 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2023-08-08 @ CHW $6.5K $4K 20 27.7 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.8 1 1.5 3 2.8 0
2023-08-07 @ CHW $6.4K $3.8K 12 15.2 0 4 0.75 2 1 0 0 1 0.67 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.6 0 0.25 1 1.35 0
2023-08-06 vs. HOU $6.5K $4K 6 9.5 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 1 0 2 0.33 0
2023-08-05 vs. HOU $6.4K $4K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-04 vs. HOU $6.3K $4.2K 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-03 vs. HOU $6.3K $4.2K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-08-02 vs. TB $6.3K $4.2K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-08-01 vs. TB $6.4K $4.2K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-07-31 vs. TB $6.2K $4.2K 6 9 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.75 0 0 3 0.75 0
2023-07-29 @ BAL $6K $4.2K 24 31.4 0 5 1.2 3 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.6 2 0.6 0 1.8 0
2023-07-28 @ BAL $6K $4.2K 6 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.75 0 0 3 0.75 0
2023-07-26 vs. NYM $4.9K $4K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-22 vs. KC $5.1K $4K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-15 @ COL $5K $4K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-01 @ STL $5K $3.9K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-06-03 @ LAD $6.3K $4.6K 16 21.7 0 3 1.33 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 1.83 0
2023-06-02 @ LAD $6.3K $4.5K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-31 @ SEA $6.2K $4.6K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 1
2023-05-30 @ SEA $6.3K $4.4K 20 27.9 0 3 1.33 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.6 1 1 2 1.93 0
2023-05-29 @ SEA $6.4K $4.4K 39 53.1 0 4 2.5 3 0 0 0 0 0.5 1 5 0 0 2 3 3 0.8 3 1.75 1 3.3 0
2023-05-28 vs. SD $6.3K $4.5K 21 28.4 0 4 1.25 2 2 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 2 0.75 0 1.75 0
2023-05-27 vs. SD $6.3K $4.5K 5 6.2 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 1 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-05-26 vs. SD $6.3K $4.5K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 3 0 0 0 1 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2023-05-25 vs. BAL $6.4K $4.5K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-05-24 vs. BAL $6.2K $4.5K 6 9 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 0 0 3 0.6 0
2023-05-23 vs. BAL $6.3K $4.5K 16 21.7 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.4 1 0.75 1 1.4 0
2023-05-20 @ CIN $6.2K $4.5K 24 31.7 0 4 1.25 4 0 0 0 3 1 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 1 3 0.25 1 2.25 0
2023-05-19 @ CIN $6K $4.5K 18 24.9 0 4 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.4 1 0.75 1 1.4 0
2023-05-18 @ TOR $5.8K $4.4K 21 28.2 0 4 1.5 2 1 0 0 0 0.5 1 4 0 0 1 2 1 0.5 2 1 0 2 0
2023-05-17 @ TOR $6K $4.2K 12 15 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0.6 0 0 2 0.93 1
2023-05-16 @ TOR $6.1K $3.8K 16 22.2 0 5 0.8 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.2 2 0.6 0 1 0
2023-05-15 @ TOR $6.2K $3.8K 36 49.9 0 2 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 2 2 1 3 3 3 5 1
2023-05-14 vs. TB $6.2K $3.7K 5 6.5 0 5 0.2 1 2 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 1 0 0 0.4 0
2023-05-13 vs. TB $6.3K $3.7K 34 47.4 0 4 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 2 2 0.6 4 1.5 1 2.6 0
2023-05-12 vs. TB $6.2K $3.8K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-05-11 vs. TB $6.1K $4K 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-10 vs. OAK $6.3K $4K 17 21.4 0 4 1 3 1 0 0 2 1 1 5 0 0 0 1 2 0.8 0 0.25 1 1.8 0
2023-05-09 vs. OAK $6.2K $3.9K 8 13.2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 2 0 1 0.2 0
2023-05-05 @ TB $5K $3.9K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-01 vs. CLE $6.4K $3.9K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-27 @ TEX $6.3K $3.8K 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-26 @ MIN $6.4K $3.8K 23 31.7 0 4 1.25 3 1 0 0 1 1 2 5 0 0 0 2 1 0.8 3 0.5 1 2.05 0
2023-04-25 @ MIN $6.2K $4.1K 5 6.2 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-04-24 @ MIN $6.3K $4.2K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2023-04-23 vs. TOR $6.1K $4.3K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-22 vs. TOR $6.2K $4.3K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-21 vs. TOR $6.3K $4.2K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-04-20 vs. LAA $6K $4.2K 9 12.4 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2023-04-19 vs. LAA $6.1K $4.3K 20 28.2 0 3 1.33 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.6 2 1 2 1.93 1
2023-04-18 vs. LAA $6.4K $4.3K 2 3.5 1 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
2023-04-16 vs. MIN $6.4K $4.5K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-04-15 vs. MIN $6.4K $4.5K 11 15.2 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.75 0 0.5 2 1.75 0
2023-04-14 vs. MIN $6.4K $4.5K 14 18.7 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 1 0.75 0 1.25 0
2023-04-13 vs. MIN $6.5K $4.6K 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-12 @ CLE $6.3K $4.5K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-04-11 @ CLE $7 $4.4K 8 9.2 0 5 0.4 2 1 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 0 0.8 0
2023-04-10 @ CLE $7 $4.3K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-04-09 @ BAL $6.5K $4.4K 33 43.6 0 4 2.25 3 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 2 2 3 0.75 2 1.5 0 3 0
2023-04-08 @ BAL $6.5K $4.3K 9 12.5 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 0
2023-04-07 @ BAL $6.4K $4.3K 7 9 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2023-04-05 vs. PHI $6.5K $4.4K 12 15.2 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2023-04-04 vs. PHI $6.5K $4.5K 2 3 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-04-03 vs. PHI $6.4K $4.5K 7 9.2 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2023-04-02 vs. SF $6.4K $4.4K 14 18.7 0 4 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 1 0.75 0 1.25 0
2023-04-01 vs. SF $6.4K $4.4K 13 15.7 0 5 0.6 3 1 0 0 3 0.75 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.6 1 0 0 1.2 0
2023-03-30 vs. SF -- -- 19 25.2 0 4 1.25 2 2 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 2 0.75 0 1.75 0
2023-03-28 @ WSH -- -- 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-03-26 vs. TOR -- -- 21 28.2 0 2 2.5 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 1.5 1 3.5 0
2023-03-25 @ PHI -- -- 14 18.9 0 3 0.67 2 0 0 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 0 0 2 0.75 1 0 1 1.42 0
2023-03-24 vs. MIN -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-03-21 vs. DET -- -- 2 3.2 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-03-19 vs. BAL -- -- 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-03-18 @ TOR -- -- 5 6.2 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-03-16 vs. PIT -- -- 7 9.7 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 1 0 0 0.5 0
2023-03-15 vs. PHI -- -- 7 9.2 0 2 0.5 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0.67 0 0 1 1.17 0
2023-03-11 vs. PHI -- -- 2 3 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 1 0.33 0
2023-03-09 vs. BOS -- -- 5 6 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0
2023-03-08 vs. STL -- -- 3 3 0 2 0.5 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2023-03-06 vs. PIT -- -- 18 25.7 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 3 1.5 0 2.5 0
2023-03-03 vs. DET -- -- 6 6 0 3 0.67 2 0 0 0 2 0.67 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.67 0 0 0 1.33 0
2023-03-01 vs. WSH -- -- 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-02-26 vs. ATL -- -- 5 6.2 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0
2022-10-23 vs. HOU $6.2K $4.8K 2 3 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2022-10-22 vs. HOU $6.2K $4.8K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-10-20 @ HOU $11K $9.5K 5 6.2 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-10-19 @ HOU $6.1K $4.8K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-10-18 vs. CLE $6.4K $5K 17 21.7 0 4 1.25 2 2 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 1 0.75 0 1.75 0
2022-10-17 vs. CLE -- -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-10-16 @ CLE $10.2K $10K 5 6.2 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-10-15 @ CLE $6.3K $5K 16 22.2 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 2 0.75 0 1.25 0
2022-10-14 vs. CLE $6.3K $5.1K 0 0 0 5 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-10-11 vs. CLE $6.3K $5.3K 9 12.2 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2022-10-04 @ TEX $6.5K -- 14 18.7 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 1 1.5 0 2.5 0
2022-10-04 @ TEX $10.2K $5.3K 5 6.2 0 5 0.2 1 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2022-10-03 @ TEX $6.5K $5.3K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-10-02 vs. BAL $6.5K $5.2K 2 3 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2022-10-01 vs. BAL $6.4K $5.3K 8 12.2 0 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.6 0 0 2 0.6 0
2022-09-30 vs. BAL $6.5K $5.1K 7 9 0 2 0.5 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.75 0 0 2 1.25 1
2022-09-28 @ TOR $6.3K $5K 20 28.4 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.4 2 0.75 1 1.4 0
2022-09-27 @ TOR $6.2K $5K 12 18.4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0.8 0 0 4 0.8 0
2022-09-26 @ TOR $6.4K $5.1K 9 12.2 0 3 0.33 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.6 0 0 2 0.93 1
2022-09-25 vs. BOS $10.6K $5.2K 7 9 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.5 1 3 0 0 0 1 0 0.67 0 0.5 1 1.67 0
2022-09-24 vs. BOS $10K $5.3K 2 3 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2022-09-23 vs. BOS $6.2K $5.4K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-09-22 vs. BOS $6.5K $5.3K 6 9 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 0 0 3 0.6 0
2022-09-21 vs. PIT $6.4K $5.3K 16 21.4 0 4 1 2 1 0 0 0 0.67 2 5 0 0 0 2 2 0.6 0 0.5 1 1.6 0
2022-09-20 vs. PIT $6.5K $5.2K 16 21.7 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.4 1 0.75 1 1.4 0
2022-09-18 @ MIL $6.5K $5.2K 44 59.6 0 5 2.2 4 0 0 0 1 0.67 1 6 0 0 2 3 3 0.83 4 1.4 1 3.03 0
2022-09-17 @ MIL $6.5K $5K 7 9 0 3 0.67 1 1 0 0 0 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 0 0.33 1 1.17 0
2022-09-16 @ MIL $6.5K $5.1K 12 15.4 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0.6 0 0 1 1.1 1
2022-09-14 @ BOS $6.4K $5K 7 9.2 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2022-09-13 @ BOS $6.4K $5K 35 46.6 0 4 2.25 3 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 2 2 3 0.8 2 1.5 1 3.05 1
2022-09-11 vs. TB $6.5K $5.2K 7 9.7 1 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 1 0 0 0.45 0
2022-09-10 vs. TB $6.4K $5.2K 13 15.7 0 4 0.75 3 1 0 0 3 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.75 1 0 0 1.5 0
2022-09-09 vs. TB $6.5K $5.3K 10 12.5 0 4 0.5 2 2 0 0 2 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 1 0 1 1.1 0
2022-09-08 vs. MIN $6.4K $5.1K 12 15.2 0 4 0.75 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.6 0 0.25 1 1.35 1
2022-09-07 vs. MIN $6.5K -- 11 15 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0.6 0 0 3 0.6 1
2022-09-07 vs. MIN $6.5K $4.9K 18 24.7 0 3 1.33 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.6 1 1 2 1.93 2
2022-09-05 vs. MIN $6.5K $4.8K 25 34.4 0 3 2 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 4 0 0 1 2 2 0.75 2 1.33 1 2.75 0
2022-09-04 @ TB $6.5K $4.8K 24 30.9 0 5 1.4 3 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 5 0 0 1 2 2 0.6 1 0.8 0 2 0
2022-09-03 @ TB $6.4K $4.9K 17 21.7 0 4 1.25 2 2 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 1 0.75 0 1.75 0
2022-09-02 @ TB $6.4K $5K 2 3 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 1 0.33 0
2022-08-31 @ LAA $6.5K $5K 9 12 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 2 0.5 0
2022-08-30 @ LAA $6.5K $5K 26 34.9 0 5 1.2 3 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.6 3 0.6 0 1.8 0
2022-08-29 @ LAA $6.4K $5K 18 24.7 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.75 1 1.5 2 2.75 2
2022-08-28 @ OAK $6.2K $5.1K 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-27 @ OAK $6.3K $5K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2022-08-26 @ OAK $6.2K $5K 24 34.7 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.8 3 1.5 3 2.8 1
2022-08-25 @ OAK $6.2K $4.8K 7 9.5 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 1 0 1 0.65 0
2022-08-23 vs. NYM $6K $4.7K 24 31.2 0 4 1.25 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 1 1 1 1 0.5 2 0.75 0 1.75 0
2022-08-22 vs. NYM $6.4K $4.8K 17 21.7 0 4 1.25 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 1 0.75 0 1.75 0
2022-08-21 vs. TOR $6.4K $4.7K 2 3 0 3 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 0
2022-08-20 vs. TOR $6.4K $5K 11 12 0 4 0.5 2 2 0 0 2 1 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2022-08-19 vs. TOR $6.4K $5K 2 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 1 0.33 0
2022-08-18 vs. TOR $6K $5K 2 3.5 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
2022-08-17 vs. TB $6.2K $5.1K 15 21.9 0 3 0.67 1 0 0 0 0 0.33 1 5 0 0 0 1 2 0.6 1 0.33 2 1.27 0
2022-08-16 vs. TB $6.4K $5.1K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-15 vs. TB $6.5K $5.1K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 1 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-08-14 @ BOS $10K $5.2K 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-13 @ BOS $6.4K $5.1K 4 6 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 2 0.5 0
2022-08-12 @ BOS $6.5K $5.1K 27 36.9 0 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 1 1 2 0.8 1 1.5 2 2.8 0
2022-08-10 @ SEA $6.5K $5.1K 18 24.7 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.75 1 1.5 2 2.75 0
2022-08-09 @ SEA $6.3K $5K 7 9 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 0 0 2 0.93 1
2022-08-08 @ SEA $6.4K $5K 23 30.9 0 4 1.5 2 1 1 0 0 0.5 1 5 0 0 1 2 2 0.6 1 1 0 2.1 0
2022-08-07 @ STL $6.4K $5.1K 18 26 0 5 0.6 2 2 0 0 1 0.67 1 6 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 4 0.2 1 1.1 1
2022-08-06 @ STL $6K $5.3K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-08-05 @ STL $5.9K $5.3K 17 21.4 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 1 0 0 2 0.6 0 0 1 1.1 0
2022-08-02 vs. SEA $6.3K $5K 6 9 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 0 0 3 0.6 0
2022-08-01 vs. SEA $6.4K $5K 23 31.4 0 4 1.5 2 1 0 0 0 0.5 1 4 0 0 1 2 2 0.5 2 1 0 2 0
2022-07-31 vs. KC $6.2K $5K 6 9.2 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 2 0.4 0
2022-07-30 vs. KC $6K $4.9K 25 34.4 0 3 1.67 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.8 2 1 2 2.47 0
2022-07-29 vs. KC $6.2K $4.9K 39 54.4 0 5 1.8 3 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 2 2 2 0.6 6 1.2 0 2.4 0
2022-07-28 vs. KC $6.1K $4.9K 21 27.7 0 3 1.33 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 1.83 0
2022-07-27 @ NYM $6.3K $4.8K 0 0 0 5 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-07-26 @ NYM $6K $4.7K 24 30.7 0 4 1.25 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 1 1 1 1 0.6 1 0.75 1 1.85 0
2022-07-24 @ BAL $6.1K $4.5K 23 31.4 0 4 1.25 2 2 0 0 1 1 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.6 2 0.75 1 1.85 0
2022-07-23 @ BAL $6.2K $4.6K 25 31 0 5 1.2 4 0 0 0 2 0.8 2 5 0 1 0 2 0 0.8 2 0.4 0 2 0
2022-07-22 @ BAL $6.2K $4.6K 32 44.4 0 4 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 2 2 0.5 4 1.5 0 2.5 0
2022-07-21 @ HOU $5.8K -- 22 31.9 0 4 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.4 3 0.75 1 1.4 0
2022-07-21 @ HOU $6.3K $4.5K 4 6 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.5 0
2022-07-17 vs. BOS $6.4K $4.2K 14 18.9 0 3 0.67 2 0 1 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 0 0 2 0.75 1 0 0 1.42 0
2022-07-16 vs. BOS $6.5K $4.1K 37 50.1 0 3 3 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 2 2 3 1 3 2 1 4 0
2022-07-15 vs. BOS $6.6K $4.2K 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-07-14 vs. CIN $6.4K $4.2K 18 24.9 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.4 1 0.75 1 1.4 0
2022-07-13 vs. CIN $6.3K $4.2K 7 9 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2022-07-12 vs. CIN $6.1K $4.2K 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-07-10 @ BOS $16.5K $9.5K 5 6.2 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 1 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2022-07-09 @ BOS $5.9K $4.3K 12 15.7 0 5 0.6 2 2 0 0 1 0.67 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.4 1 0.2 0 1 0
2022-07-08 @ BOS $6.3K $4.3K 2 3 0 5 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0.17 0 0 1 0.17 0
2022-07-06 @ PIT $6.1K $4K 35 47.2 0 4 1.75 3 1 0 0 1 1 1 5 0 1 1 2 1 0.8 4 1 1 2.55 0
2022-07-05 @ PIT $6.3K $4K 5 6.5 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 1 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 1 0 0 0.4 0
2022-07-03 @ CLE $6K $4.1K 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0
2022-07-02 @ CLE $5.7K -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-07-02 @ CLE $6.4K $4.1K 18 24.4 0 3 0.67 1 0 0 0 0 0.33 1 5 0 1 0 1 2 0.6 0 0.33 2 1.27 0
2022-06-30 @ HOU $6K $4.1K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-06-29 vs. OAK $6.3K $4.1K 20 28.4 0 3 1.33 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 2 1 1 1.83 0
2022-06-28 vs. OAK $6.1K $4.1K 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-06-27 vs. OAK $6K $4.1K 7 9.7 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 1 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 1 0 0 0.5 0
2022-06-26 vs. HOU $6.3K $4.2K 20 28.7 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.4 3 0.75 1 1.4 0
2022-06-25 vs. HOU $6.4K $4K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-06-24 vs. HOU $6K $4K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-06-23 vs. HOU $5.9K $4.1K 10 12.7 0 5 0.4 2 1 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 1 0 0 0.8 0
2022-06-22 @ TB $6.2K $4.1K 28 37.4 0 5 1.6 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 2 2 0.4 2 1.2 0 2 0
2022-06-21 @ TB $6.3K $4.2K 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-06-20 @ TB $6.3K $4K 7 9 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2022-06-19 @ TOR $6.1K $4.1K 11 15.7 0 4 0.5 1 2 0 0 0 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.4 1 0.25 1 0.9 0
2022-06-18 @ TOR $6.1K $3.6K 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-06-17 @ TOR $6.2K $3.6K 10 12.2 0 5 0.4 2 1 0 0 2 0.5 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 1 0.9 1
2022-06-16 vs. TB $6.3K $4.6K 9 12 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 2 0.5 0
2022-06-15 vs. TB $6.2K $4.6K 14 18.7 0 3 1.33 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 1 0.33 1 1 0 1.67 0
2022-06-14 vs. TB $6.2K $4.5K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-06-12 vs. CHC $6.1K $4.5K 13 15.4 0 6 0.5 3 2 0 0 3 0.75 0 6 0 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2022-06-11 vs. CHC $6.3K $4.5K 30 40.9 1 3 2.67 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 2 2 0.5 3 2 0 3.17 0
2022-06-10 vs. CHC $6.3K $4.5K 7 9 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 2 0.75 2
2022-06-09 @ MIN $6K $4.6K 11 15.4 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 1 0 0.25 1 5 0 0 0 1 2 0.4 0 0.25 1 0.9 0
2022-06-08 @ MIN $6.3K $4.5K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2022-06-07 @ MIN $6.2K $4.5K 25 34.9 0 5 1 2 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 6 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 3 0.6 1 1.5 1
2022-06-05 vs. DET $16.2K $4.5K 5 6.2 0 5 0.2 1 2 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2022-06-04 vs. DET $5.6K $4.4K 16 21.7 0 3 1.33 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 1.83 0
2022-06-03 vs. DET $5.7K $4.4K 27 34.4 0 5 1.4 4 0 0 1 3 0.75 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.8 2 0.6 0 2.2 0
2022-06-02 vs. LAA $5.5K -- 2 3 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2022-06-02 vs. LAA $5.3K $4.4K 19 24.7 0 4 1.25 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.6 1 0.75 1 1.85 1
2022-05-31 vs. LAA $5.4K $4.3K 6 9.7 1 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 1 0 1 0.2 0
2022-05-29 @ TB $5.9K $4.3K 17 21.7 0 4 1.25 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 1 0.75 0 1.75 0

Aaron Judge Daily Fantasy News, Rankings, Projections

Game note: Yankees vs. Guardians has been postponed Friday due to inclement weather.

Game note: Yankees vs. Guardians has been postponed Friday due to inclement weather.

All Hands on Deck Against Top Offense Today

A well-handled PPD by MLB in New York last night leads to an impromptu two game slate on Tuesday, which includes an ALDS and NLCS game. It would seem the most important thing to note here is that the ALDS game being a finale means an all hands on deck situation, whereas we can probably trust the pitchers in the NLCS game to have quite a bit more leeway. Aaron Civale will remain the starting pitcher for the Guardians. He is the cheapest pitcher on either site, but in addition to this being an elimination game, he hasn’t pitched in two weeks. That said, Civale was tremendous over his last 10 outings, striking out 26.8% of batters with just seven walks (23.2 K-BB%) and an 86.7 mph EV, allowing just five barrels (3.7%). Civale had a 3.00 ERA and FIP and 3.02 xFIP over this span. He allowed eight home runs and 16 barrels over his first 10 starts. Perhaps a great outing gets him through the order twice. There are some strikeouts in the top two-thirds of the Yankee order, which has been confirmed, with five of the first six with a 23% or higher strikeout rate vs RHP this year, while none of the bottom third reach a 100 wRC+ vs RHP this year. Civale, like just about every post-season team except the Phillies, has a great defense behind him today (14 Runs Prevented) and one of the top defensive catchers in baseball because we know Austin Hedges (11.4 CDA) isn’t in there for his offense (though Nestor Cortes did walk him twice in Game Two). In terms of pitch mix, Civale had an above average curveball and sinker via Statcast measures, which made up about half of his pitches, though the Yankees were above average against both pitches in the second half of the season. The park may be power friendly, but actually slightly run negative, though Alan Porter is a hitter friendly umpire who tends to squeeze the strike zone. Winds are expected to be blowing out to center at near 10 mph, but effects could be counteracted by temperatures in the high 50s. No surprise that Civale is essentially tied for the worst projection on the board, but actually projects as a better value than Cortes, who is going on three days rest.

On the offensive side of things, the Yankees top the board at 3.96 implied runs, despite the Cleveland pen owning a 2.92 FIP and 3.06 SIERA over the last 30 days of the season and everyone being available, even starters. Civale, himself, had virtually no split this year with batters from either side of the plate between a .297 and .317 wOBA and xwOBA against him. Yet, three of the top five projected batters and four of the top 10 on either site are Yankees. We know who the top projected bat on the board is: Aaron Judge (217 wRC+, .384 ISO vs RHP this season). He is closely followed by Giancarlo Stanton (124 wRC+, .271 ISO) and Anthony Rizzo (125 wRC+, .235 ISO) with Gleyber Torres (110 wRC+, .165 ISO) projecting in the latter half of the top 10 out of the leadoff spot today. The top four projected FanDuel values and four of the top six on DraftKings are also Yankees. On FD, five Yankees project as top 10 values overall with Stanton the only one also a top 10 projected bats. This includes the bottom five minus just Jose Trevino, all costing less than $3K, the only one of the five below a 90 wRC+ vs RHP this year. On DK, each of the bottom five project as top 10 values. That means that every single bat in the Yankee order projects as either a top 10 bat and/or value on at least one of the big two. Yankee stackers have some decisions to make.

Stacking Projections Don't Suggest Clear Dominance on Tonight's Slate

Current stacking projections (which are fluid and updated throughout the day) suggest that no single offense is going to be overwhelmingly popular. On both sites, we see the four offenses exceeding four and a half team run totals atop the ownership column, but very closely packed together without a single stack reaching a double digit Own% on FanDuel right now and Angels barely leading the pack on DraftKings not much higher. Nor do we have a clear indication of which offense is expected to smash the slate most often. The Braves currently top the column for the second day in a row, but by a very small margin (smaller still on DraftKings) over the Giants and Red Sox. The A’s and Twins project for twice as much value as any other stack on DraftKings, while the Giants are the far and away top projected value stack on FanDuel.

We’re pretty much sticking to those four top offenses tonight, but what do these jumbled and tightly packed projections think are the top rated stacks tonight? Without any offense projecting for overwhelming ownership and the Braves still projected to smash the slate a bit more often than any other offense, they are currently the top rated stack on either site, followed by the Giants on FanDuel, but Yankees on DraftKings. Josiah Gray is allowing bomb after bomb (37 home runs) and sure, there’s probably some regression coming with only six more barrels, but he’s also striking out batters at just a 12.8% clip over his last five starts. There’s no further explanation necessary as to why the Braves are the top stack tonight.

The Giants probably don’t need much explanation either. They’re facing Jose Urena in a park that may be one of the more hitter friendly environments on the slate for a change (San Francisco) and with their platoon heavy approach, they have several quality LHBs on the cheap. Especially on FanDuel. Occasionally, the affordability of bats will work against them, making them too popular, but projections don’t see that to be the case…for now.

The Yankees have a 3.89 team run total that sits in the middle of the board and after clinching the division last night, the lineup could even be a bit light tonight. However, Mitch White has struck out just six of his last 56 batters and is down to just an 18.2 K% on the season. RHBs have actually been better against him (.336 wOBA, .320 xwOBA), which probably won’t work out well against the Yankees. We don’t know who the Yankees will rest tonight, but there might be a riot if Aaron Judge is on the bench and that’s just the Maris family, who have been following the Yankees around for a week, waiting for Judge to do something besides walk.

Pair of Sluggers in Great Environment Project Atop the Board Again

Despite a lack of high end pitching, no offense exceeds five implied runs on an eight game slate that doesn’t include many of the top run environments in the league either. One-quarter of the board does have team run totals above four and a half runs though. Like yesterday, projections again favor two Yankee sluggers in the top run environment on the board, likely enhanced further by hitter friendly weather in Boston. The Yankees currently have the third highest team run total (4.68) against Brayan Bello, who has struck out 21 of 84 batters with a 14.2 SwStr% and half his contact on the ground in his most recent stint with the big league club, though he’s also walked nine. He is a well-regarded prospect (50 Future Value grade) with both a lot of strikeouts (33.8%) and walks (10%) at AAA this year. Batters from either side are within four points of a .350 wOBA against Bello, but no higher than a .320 xwOBA. Aaron Judge (217 wRC+, .392 ISO vs RHP this season) and Giancarlo Stanton (130 wRC+, .273 ISO) are the top two projected bats on the board.

We also find a pair of Orioles projecting among the top 10 against Patrick Corbin, who reverted back to form and took a beating in Philly last time out after a couple of strong starts. With just an 18.2 K% and an awful contact profile (90.8 mph EV, 11.5% Barrels/BBE, 45.9% 95+ mph EV), he has a 6.65 xERA that’s actually above his 6.30 ERA. He doesn’t have a single pitch worth more than 1 RV/100, where positive numbers are bad for pitchers. RHBs have crushed him (.395 wOBA, .402 xwOBA). Anthony Santander (159 wRC+, .248 ISO) projects right behind the two Yankees with Ryan Mountcastle (110 wRC+, .186 ISO) just a few spots behind him. The Orioles have a 4.6 run team total that’s fourth best on the board.

Continuing down the line, we find the top third of the Texas projected lineup that tops the board at 4.73 implied runs against J.P. Sears, who lasted just two innings with three home runs allowed to the White Sox in his last start. He has not been able to come close to replicating his 33.7 AAA K% this year with just a 16.0% mark at the major league level to go along with a 90.9 mph EV and 47.1% 95+ mph EV. His 3.33 ERA is purely the function of an 81.3 LOB% without a non-FIP estimator within a run. RHBs are within two points of a .320 wOBA and xwOBA against him, while LHBs have a .303 wOBA, but .353 xwOBA. Corey Seager (116 wRC+, .244 ISO), Nathaniel Lowe (180 wRC+, .224 ISO) and Marcus Semien (112 wRC+, .163 ISO) all project as top bats tonight from an offense that has pummeled LHP this year (116 wRC+, 16.5 HR/FB).

Last up is a pair of Dodger teammates and guess where their team run total lies? That’s right, they’re second on the board (4.69) against Zach Davies, who continues to manage contact well (87 mph EV, 34.3% 95+ mph EV) with a below average strikeout rate (18.2%). He hasn’t completed six innings since June or has a single estimator that’s not at least a quarter of a run above his 4.09 ERA. Sinkers and changeups have comprised 87% of his arsenal this year. The Dodgers are a top three offense against both pitches since the break. Batters from either side of the plate are between a .303 and .333 wOBA and xwOBA against Davies this year. Mookie Betts (138 wRC+, .266 ISO) and Freddie Freeman (167 wRC+, .216 ISO) project to do the most damage.

Two Thumpers Projected to Punish Hard Contact Prone Pitcher in Great Park

Not a single team on a 10 game slate (we still don’t have information for the second game of the Tampa Bay/Toronto double-header, available only on DraftKings), we don’t have a single offense exceeding five implied runs, although the Mets (Adrian Sampson), White Sox (Chad Kuhl) and Twins (Kris Bubic) all come very close, while four more offenses also exceed four and a half team run totals. The Yankee lineup in general may be struggling, but Aaron Judge (212 wRC+, .380 ISO vs RHP this season) is not and he is the top projected bat on the board tonight at Fenway, against Nick Pivetta. Since striking out nine of 25 Orioles with a single walk, Pivetta has struck out just one more batter than he’s walked over his last three starts. He can occasionally throw a gem and the 13.5 K-BB% isn’t even bad, but opponents have a 90.4 mph EV with only 38.3% of the contact on the ground against him. He’s completed six innings in just two of his last 12 starts and all estimators are within half a run of his 4.29 ERA with only a 3.91 DRA below three. RHBs have a .306 wOBA, but .325 xwOBA against him. Giancarlo Stanton (131 wRC+, .278 ISO) is the third best projected bat on the board.

Eloy Jimenez (158 wRC+, .194 ISO) is the bat projections sandwich in between the two Yankees. Ever since shutting out the Dodgers on three hits at Coors (yes, that is a thing that really happened this year), Chad Kuhl has neither gone beyond five innings, nor allowed fewer than three runs in nine straight starts, over which he has a 9.02 ERA/8.16 FIP/5.42 xFIP. On the season, he has just a 7.9 K-BB%, 90.6 mph EV and no estimators below 4.87 (SIERA & xFIP). To make matters worse, his only positively graded pitch this year is a slider (36.4%, -1 RV/100, 35.9 Whiff%, wOBA and xwOBA below .275), while the White Sox are the second best slider hitting team (1.12 wSL/C) since the break. That may be why we find three White Sox projecting among the top 10 tonight with Jose Abreu (138 wRC+, .130 ISO) and Gavin Sheets (110 wRC+, .182 ISO) slightly behind Jimenez. Batters from either side of the plate are between a .346 and .365 wOBA and xwOBA against Kuhl this year.

We also find a pair of Orioles atop the lineup projecting as top 10 bats against Corey Abbott in Washington. About two-thirds of Abbott’s work this season has been as a starter. He’s missed bats at an average rate (21.3 K%) with a respectable 11.7 K-BB%, but also has a 90.5 Z-Contact%, 26.4 GB% and has allowed 12.0% Barrels/BBE. A .202 BABIP and 86.8 mph EV are responsible for a 4.22 ERA being below all estimators with one exception. A 3.34 xERA that makes absolutely not sense considering all the barrels. LHBs have a .366 wOBA, but more average .307 xwOBA against him in a small sample. Projections believe Cedric Mullins (131 wRC+, .169 ISO) and Adley Rutschman (151 wRC+, .228 ISO) may do some damage.

Strong Contact Profile May Not Be Enough to Tame This Powerful Lineup

The New York Yankees, with the second highest implied run line on the board (5.2), are currently projected to be the most popular stack on a nine game slate, though just slightly ahead of the Mets (5.29) on FanDuel and Guardians (5.01) on DraftKings. They also smash the slate most often in simulations, around 15% of the time, again just slightly higher than the Mets. When we move to the Value% column, we finally find some separation, but only on DraftKings. While the Rangers currently project as the top value stack on either site (though projections are fluid and updated throughtout the day), the Tigers and White Sox are nipping at their heels on FanDuel. However, Texas stacks are projecting for at least 50% more value than any other DraftKings stack. Spenser Watkins has just a 13.8 K% and 5.9 K-BB% on the season, but 18.6 K% and 14.2 K-BB% in five starts back from the IL. Watkins does throw about 65% cutters and four-seamers, two of the pitchers the Texas offense performs worst against. These are a couple of factors projections may not immediately inject. For more on what this means for Leverage Ratings, check out tonight’s PlateIQ Live Blog.

The Slugger Who Breaks Up the Dodger Party Atop Hitter Projections

Basically all you need to know to figure out which offense sits atop the board tonight is that the Dodgers are still at Coors. Even on a 13 game Friday night board, a 7.02 implied run line for the Coors visitors separates from the rest of the board by more than a run. Five more teams reach a five run team total, but only one more above four and a half after that because this board is also loaded with pitching at both the top and in the middle. Much like yesterday, hitter projections are dominated by the Dodgers. Four of the top five projected bats on either site and six of the top 10 are Dodgers. Freddie Freeman (172 wRC+, .228 ISO vs RHP this year) is once again the top projected bat on the board, followed by Mookie Betts (132 wRC+, .251 ISO), Trea Turner (134 wRC+, 164 ISO) and Will Smith (116 wRC+, .190 ISO), Rounding out the top 10 are Max Muncy (88 wRC+, .130 ISO) and Jake Lamb (121 wRC+, .216 ISO). Chad Kuhl has struck out just 12 of his last 85 batters with 10 walks and five home runs, allowing 17 runs over as many innings against marginal offenses (Arizona twice, San Diego and Milwaukee) with only two of those games at Coors. His strikeout rate is down to 16.8% (7.3 K-BB%) with all estimators above, but within half a run of his 4.48 ERA. His sinker is being thrown 42.4% of the time and being shelled (1.2 RV/100, wOBA & xwOBA above .400). The Dodgers are a top five offense against heaters (0.49 wFB/C). LHBs (.366 wOBA, .357 xwOBA) have been much better than RHBs (.296 wOBA, .301 xwOBA) against Kuhl this year.

Considering there are only four spots left after the Dodgers, it’s a bit surprising that the Yankees also land a pair of top 10 projections. They are tied for second on the board with a 5.86 team run total at home against Kris Bubic, who has had a lot of ups and downs this year. Most recently, he’s allowed four runs (two earned) in 14 innings over his last two starts (Blue Jays & Rays), but still has just a 5.8 K-BB% and 47.2% 95+ mph EV on the year. He has just one additional Quality Start this year. Estimators range from a 4.77 xFIP to a 5.71 xERA. Bubic is still throwing his four-seamer (2.3 RV/100, .452 wOBA) 51.8% of the time and the Yankees simply crush fastballs at the second best rate in the league (0.58 wFB/C). Aaron Judge (146 wRC+, .323 ISO vs LHP this year) crushed a middle-middle fastball for the only run of the game last night and breaks up the Dodger party as the third best projected bat on the board tonight. Anthony Rizzo (130 wRC+, .266 ISO) lands among the top 10 as well. LHBs (.495 wOBA, .438 xwOBA) have actually had more success than RHBs (.315 wOBA, .343 xwOBA) against Bubic this year, but it’s a small sample that managers will rarely (if ever) act on. The Yankees don’t even have that capability.

Top Five Projected Bats Belong to Either of These Two Offenses

Last night, the ground baller, Graham Ashcraft, held the Yankee lineup in check (three runs), but tonight, it’s Mike Minor, who actually set a season high with eight strikeouts last time out. He’s only struck out more than four twice in seven starts, but the Reds are content to let him eat innings in hopes of showcasing him for a trade. He’s faced at least 24 batters in five straight with at least six innings in four of those, yet only one Quality Start to show for it. Batters are not only making contact (91.1 Z-Contact%), but good contact (33.1 GB%, 12.3% Barrels/BBE). While the 20.0 HR/FB should regress, especially if he gets out of Cincinnati, RHBs, especially, have been having a great time against him (.432 wOBA, .398 xwOBA). Non-FIP estimators are below his 6.63 ERA, but all are above four and a half. Giancarlo Stanton (119 wRC+, .233 ISO) is the third best projected bat on the board and they are joined by Anthony Rizzo (129 wRC+, .276 ISO) and Josh Donaldson (82 wRC+, .204 ISO) among the top 10. LHBs have just a .291 wOBA (.256 xwOBA) against Minor this year though.

It certainly makes sense that the Padres are the only other offense responsible for multiple top 10 projected bats. In fact, three of the top five are Padres against Chad Kuhl, who’s only Quality Start over his last six outings was a complete game three-hitter against the Dodgers and he still has an ERA and estimators well above four over this span. He’s down to just an 8.0 K-BB% on the season (5.1% last 10 starts) that puts him in a hole, even if with a fairly moderate contact profile (89.8 mph EV, 6.9% Barrels/BBE). His 4.02 ERA is actually more than a quarter of a run below all estimators. He does have about a 50 point split (LHBs .351 wOBA, .365 xwOBA – RHBs .279 wOBA, .305 xwOBA), though Manny Machado (151 wRC+, .183 ISO vs RHP this season) and Luke Voit (120 wRC+, .233 ISO) are the top projected Padres, along with Jake Cronenworth (106 wRC+, .158 ISO).

Top Projected Bat on the Board Does Not Come From Coors

On Monday, Coors dominated projections and while the Padres hit their six run team total, several other teams on a moderately sized slate beat that. Once again, the Padres top the board at 6.13 implied runs, but this time, on a near full slate, they are a bit less than half a run removed from the rest of the board. Two more non-Coors offenses have team run totals exceeding five and a half runs, while a total of 12 are above four and a half. As a result, the Padres still feature three batters who project as top 10 bats tonight, but they don’t dominate the top of the board like they did yesterday or even have the top projected bat on the board. None the less, Austin Gomber’s 17.7 K% is a career low. He was temporarily shifted to the bullpen after being thrashed in three of four starts mid-June, but has allowed seven runs in 10.2 innings since returning to the rotation. While he doesn’t’ have an estimator below four, all are more than a run below his 6.46 ERA (.322 BABIP, 59.3 LOB%). Even with the expected regression, RHBs still have a .398 wOBA and .384 xwOBA against Gomber this season, while LHBs are below .300. Projections like Manny Machado (170 wRC+, .342 SIO vs LHP this season), Luke Voit (79 wRC+, .068 ISO) and even Jake Cronenworth (112 wRC+, .125 ISO) most here.

Aaron Judge (179 wRC+, .324 ISO vs RHP this year) is the top projected bat on the board in a home matchup against Graham Ashcraft. After a career best start in which he struck out eight of 30 Giants over eight innings of two run ball, Ashcraft’s struck out just two of his last 46 batters faced. The contact profile (53.4 GB%, 85.9 mph EV, 5.1% Barrels/BBE) and control (4.1 BB%) are impressive, which should help him as much here as it does in Cincinnati, but a 13.4 K% (8.0 SwStr%) certainly won’t play. A 3.76 xERA is not only his only estimator below four, but the only one not within one-third of a run of his 4.35 ERA. In other words, he’ll need to continue suffocating contact to have any chance at being even an average pitcher and that doesn’t bode well for him here, especially considering his reverse split (RHBs .387 wOBA, .379 xwOBA, 45.1 GB%). Giancarlo Stanton (138 wRC+, .292 ISO) is a top five projected bat as well. Beware that there are some weather concerns in NY in Kevin’s recent forecast though. No other offense features multiple to 10 projected bats.

Top Projected Bats Not Necessarily From the Top Spots on the Board

Today’s only second full 15 game slate of the season is also one of the hitter friendliest slates of the year, as we find seven offenses at 5.25 implied runs or above, led by the Guardians (6.18) at Coors, and then seven more above a four and a half run team total. That’s half the board. The end result is that only two teams place a pair of teammates among the top 10 projected bats by PlateIQ today (although projections are fluid and subject to change). Both Vladimir Guerrero Jr. (156 wRC+, .280 ISO vs RHP since 2021) and George Springer (136 wRC+, .273 ISO) are among the top 10 projected hitters for the second straight day, as they look to punish Baltimore pitching again. Over his last three starts, Jordan Lyles has wiped out much of the good will he spent his first nine starts earning (14.1 K-BB%). He’s struck out just seven of 72 batters with six walks, allowing 14 runs over 14.1 innings. Sure, there’s a .421 BABIP and 61.6 LOB%, but just two of his 10 barrels (16.9%) have left the yard over this span. He’s been getting tattooed. His best season estimator is now a 4.25 xFIP and batters from either side of the plate exceed a .340 wOBA and xwOBA against him since last year. It’s difficult to find a Toronto batter who may project poorly here, but Guerrero Jr. and Springer are the cream of the crop for the offense with the sixth highest implied run line on the slate (5.41).

Aaron Judge (168 wRC+, .290 ISO) is the second best projected hitter on the slate and is joined in the top 10 by Giancarlo Stanton (136 wRC+, .254 ISO), despite the Yankees being only 10th on the board with a 4.82 run team total in Tampa Bay tonight. The Rays have been keeping Corey Kluber healthy and efficient on lower pitch counts (more than 80 just three times) and even with those restrictions, he still has Quality Starts in five of his last eight starts. Why? Because four of his nine walks came in his first start of the season. Over this eight start span, Kluber has a 21.3 K-BB% with an 86.5 mph EV and just seven barrels (6.0%) allowed. On the season, estimators range from a 3.59 SIERA to a 4.30 xERA with his 3.88 ERA right in the middle. The Rays have also maintained a strong bullpen (3.28 FIP last 30 days), despite tons of injuries, but RHBs do own a .340 wOBA and .342 xwOBA against Kluber since last year and these two monsters have been smashing just about every pitcher they’ve faced this year. It’s a bit odd that Coors and Wrigley bats aren’t dominating the projections (though Jose Ramirez is the top projected bat on the slate and Manny Machado is among the top 10), but this is a very large slate with lots of great offensive choices.