Adam Eaton

Los Angeles Angels
Pos: OF | Hand: L
Status: Inactive
player props
FPTS 2 3 5 7 9 10 12 14 15 17 SAL $750 $1.5K $2.3K $3K $3.8K $4.5K $5.3K $6K $6.8K $7.5K
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 2
  • FPTS: 3
  • FPTS: 5
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 3
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 17
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 2
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 2
  • FPTS: 0
  • SAL: $2.1K
  • SAL: $2.5K
  • SAL: $2.4K
  • SAL: $2.6K
  • SAL: $2.5K
  • SAL: $2K
  • SAL: $2.1K
  • SAL: $2.3K
  • SAL: $7.5K
  • SAL: $2K
  • SAL: $2.9K
  • SAL: --
  • SAL: $3K
  • SAL: $2.8K
  • SAL: $2.9K
  • SAL: $3K
07/29 07/30 07/31 07/31 08/01 08/03 08/05 08/05 08/07 08/08 08/11 08/12 08/13 08/14 08/15
Date Opp DKSAL FDSAL DKFPTS FDFPTS sf ab slg h so hbp gidp 1b babip 2b pa 3b sb hr xbh r obp rbi iso bb ops ibb
2021-08-14 vs. HOU $3K $2.5K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2021-08-13 vs. HOU $2.9K $2.5K 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
2021-08-12 vs. TOR $2.8K $2.5K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2021-08-11 vs. TOR $3K $2.5K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2021-08-10 vs. TOR -- -- 2 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 1 0.33 0
2021-08-08 @ LAD $2.9K $2.5K 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2021-08-06 @ LAD $2K $2.5K 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2021-08-05 @ TEX $7.5K $4K 17 21.7 0 4 1.25 2 2 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 1 0.75 0 1.75 0
2021-08-04 @ TEX $2.3K $2.5K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2021-08-02 @ TEX $2.1K $2.5K 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2021-08-01 vs. OAK $2K $2.4K 3 3 0 2 0.5 1 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2021-07-31 vs. OAK $2.5K $2.4K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2021-07-30 vs. OAK $2.6K $2.4K 5 6 0 3 0.67 1 1 0 0 0 0.5 1 3 0 0 0 1 0 0.33 0 0.33 0 1 0
2021-07-29 vs. OAK $2.4K $2.4K 3 3 0 3 0.33 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.67 0
2021-07-28 vs. COL $2.5K $2.4K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2021-07-27 vs. COL $2.1K $2.2K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2021-07-26 vs. COL $2K $2.4K 7 9.7 1 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 1 0 0 0.58 0
2021-07-25 @ MIN $2K $4K 10 12.2 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2021-07-24 @ MIN $2K $2.4K 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2021-07-23 @ MIN $2.2K $2.6K 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2021-07-22 @ MIN $2.1K $2.3K 5 6.2 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 0 0 0.67 0
2021-07-20 @ OAK $2K $2.3K 6 6 0 3 0.67 2 1 0 0 2 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.67 0 0 0 1.33 0
2021-07-19 @ OAK $2.2K $2.3K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2021-07-18 vs. SEA $2.4K $2.3K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2021-07-17 vs. SEA $2.6K $2.3K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2021-07-16 vs. SEA $2.7K $2.5K 10 12.2 0 4 0.75 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 0 0.25 0 1.25 0
2021-07-06 @ MIN $2.4K $2.5K 7 9.7 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 1 0 0 0.5 0
2021-07-05 @ MIN $2.7K $2.5K 7 9.2 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2021-07-04 @ DET $3.1K $2.5K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2021-07-02 @ DET $3.2K $2.5K 8 9.2 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2021-06-14 vs. TB $3.1K $2.7K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2021-06-13 @ DET $3.6K $2.7K 8 9.2 0 5 0.4 2 0 0 0 2 0.4 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 0 0.8 0
2021-06-12 @ DET $3.8K $2.9K 6 9.2 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 0 2 0.33 0
2021-06-11 @ DET $3.8K $2.6K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2021-06-09 vs. TOR $3.9K $2.2K 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2021-06-08 vs. TOR $4.2K $2.2K 7 9.7 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 0
2021-06-06 vs. DET $4.4K $2.2K 12 15.2 0 3 1 1 0 1 0 0 0.33 0 4 1 0 0 1 1 0.5 0 0.67 0 1.5 0
2021-06-05 vs. DET $4.3K $2.2K 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2021-06-04 vs. DET $4.4K $2.5K 7 9.7 0 5 0.2 1 2 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 1 0 0 0.4 0
2021-06-03 vs. DET $4.6K $2.8K 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2021-06-01 @ CLE $12K $2.7K 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2021-05-31 @ CLE $4.2K $3.4K 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2021-05-31 @ CLE $12K $2.7K 23 31.4 0 4 1.5 2 2 0 0 0 1 1 4 0 0 1 2 2 0.5 2 1 0 2 0
2021-05-26 vs. STL $12.6K $6.5K 7 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.5 0
2021-05-25 vs. STL $4.4K $2.6K 9 12.4 0 4 0.25 1 0 1 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0.4 0 0 0 0.65 0
2021-05-24 vs. STL $4.4K $2.5K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2021-05-23 @ NYY $4.5K $2.5K 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2021-05-22 @ NYY $4.3K $3K 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2021-05-21 @ NYY $4.3K $3K 4 6.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0
2021-05-19 @ MIN $3.6K $3.2K 5 6.5 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 0 0 0.5 0
2021-05-18 @ MIN $3.6K $3.2K 2 3 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2021-05-16 vs. KC $3.8K $3.4K 20 28.2 0 2 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.75 2 1.5 2 2.75 0
2021-05-15 vs. KC $3.6K $2.6K 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2021-05-14 vs. KC -- -- 11 15.2 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 3 0
2021-05-14 vs. KC $3.6K $7K 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2021-05-13 vs. MIN $10.5K $6.5K 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2021-05-12 vs. MIN $3.8K $2.9K 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2021-05-11 vs. MIN $3.7K $3.1K 10 12.5 0 4 0.75 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 1 0.25 0 1.25 0
2021-05-07 @ KC $4.2K $3.3K 9 12.7 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 1 0 1 0.65 0
2021-05-04 @ CIN $5.1K $3.7K 2 3 0 3 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 0
2021-05-02 vs. CLE $3.9K $3.7K 2 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 1 0.33 0
2021-05-01 vs. CLE $4.1K $3.7K 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2021-04-30 vs. CLE $3.9K $3.2K 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2021-04-29 vs. DET $4.2K $8.5K 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2021-04-27 vs. DET $4.3K $3.8K 8 9.2 0 5 0.4 2 0 0 0 2 0.4 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 0 0.8 0
2021-04-25 vs. TEX $4.5K $3.4K 14 19.2 0 4 0.75 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 5 1 0 0 1 1 0.25 2 0.5 0 1 0
2021-04-24 vs. TEX $4.4K $3.4K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2021-04-23 vs. TEX $4.3K $3.4K 11 16.2 0 5 0.4 1 2 0 0 0 0.33 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.2 2 0.2 0 0.6 0
2021-04-20 @ CLE $4.2K $3.4K 5 6.2 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2021-04-19 @ BOS $9.9K $3.4K 16 22.5 0 4 1 2 1 0 0 0 0.67 2 4 0 0 0 2 0 0.5 3 0.5 0 1.5 0
2021-04-18 @ BOS $9.9K -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2021-04-17 @ BOS $4.1K $3.4K 13 18.7 0 3 0.67 1 1 0 0 0 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.6 1 0.33 2 1.27 0
2021-04-15 vs. CLE $11.1K $7K 5 6 0 4 0.25 1 1 1 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 0 0.65 0
2021-04-14 vs. CLE $4.1K $3.6K 7 9.2 0 4 0.25 1 1 1 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 0 0.65 0
2021-04-13 vs. CLE $3.9K $3.1K 5 6 0 3 0.33 1 1 1 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0.83 0
2021-04-12 vs. CLE $3.7K $3.5K 18 25.7 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 3 0.75 0 1.25 0
2021-04-11 vs. KC $4.2K $3.4K 16 22.2 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 2 1.5 0 2.5 0
2021-04-08 vs. KC $3.7K $3.4K 10 13 0 5 0.4 2 1 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 2 0 0 0.8 0
2021-04-07 @ SEA $4K $3.4K 9 12.2 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2021-04-06 @ SEA $3.5K $3.4K 11 15.6 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 3 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2021-04-04 @ LAA $9.3K $3.2K 4 6.2 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2021-04-03 @ LAA $3.5K $3.1K 8 9 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 0 0 1 1.1 0
2021-04-02 @ LAA $3.4K $2.9K 11 15.9 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0.4 1 0 1 0.65 0
2021-04-01 @ LAA $3.5K $2.9K 16 22.2 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 2 0.75 0 1.25 0
2020-09-16 @ TB $6.8K $2.8K 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-09-15 @ TB $4.8K $2.9K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-09-13 vs. ATL $6.6K $2.9K 13 15 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0.6 0 0 1 1.1 0
2020-09-12 vs. ATL $3.5K $2.7K 12 15.2 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 2 1
2020-09-11 vs. ATL $4.5K $2.7K 9 12.4 0 6 0.33 1 2 0 0 0 0.25 1 6 0 0 0 1 2 0.17 0 0.17 0 0.5 0
2020-09-10 vs. ATL $5.2K $2.7K 21 28.4 0 5 1 2 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.4 2 0.6 0 1.4 0
2020-09-08 vs. TB $3.6K $2.8K 7 9 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.67 0 0.5 1 1.67 0
2020-09-07 vs. TB $3.6K $2.9K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-09-06 @ ATL $3.6K $2.9K 7 9.2 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2020-09-03 @ PHI $3.4K $2.7K 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-09-02 @ PHI $3.6K $2.7K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 0
2020-09-01 @ PHI $3.5K $2.8K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-08-31 @ PHI $3.6K $2.9K 10 12 0 4 1 2 0 0 0 0 0.5 2 4 0 0 0 2 0 0.5 0 0.5 0 1.5 0
2020-08-30 @ BOS $3.2K $2.8K 10 12.5 0 5 0.6 1 1 0 0 0 0.25 0 5 1 0 0 1 0 0.2 1 0.4 0 0.8 0
2020-08-29 @ BOS $3.4K $2.8K 5 6.5 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 1 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 1 0 0 0.4 0
2020-08-28 @ BOS $3.1K $2.8K 4 6.2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2020-08-26 vs. PHI $3.9K $2.6K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-08-25 vs. PHI $4K $2.5K 17 21.7 0 4 1.25 2 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 1 0.75 0 1.75 0
2020-08-24 vs. MIA $6K $5.5K 25 35.4 0 5 1 2 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.4 4 0.6 0 1.4 0
2020-08-23 vs. MIA $9.3K $2.6K 11 16 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.4 2 0.25 1 0.9 0
2020-08-22 @ MIA -- -- 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2020-08-21 vs. MIA $4.6K -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-08-18 @ ATL $3K $2.6K 14 18.9 0 5 0.6 2 1 0 1 1 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 2 0.4 1 0.2 0 1 0
2020-08-17 @ ATL $2.6K $2.6K 4 6 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 2 0.4 0
2020-08-15 @ BAL -- -- 5 6.2 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2020-08-14 @ BAL -- -- 16 22.4 0 5 0.6 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 1 6 0 0 0 1 2 0.4 2 0.2 0 1 0
2020-08-13 @ NYM -- -- 6 6 0 5 0.4 2 1 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 0 0.8 0
2020-08-12 @ NYM -- -- 7 9.2 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2020-08-11 @ NYM -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-08-09 vs. BAL -- -- 7 9.2 0 3 0.67 1 1 0 1 0 0.5 1 3 0 0 0 1 1 0.33 0 0.33 0 1 0
2020-08-08 vs. BAL -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-08-07 vs. BAL -- -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-08-05 vs. NYM -- -- 7 9.2 0 4 0.5 1 2 0 0 0 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2020-08-04 vs. NYM -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020-07-30 @ TOR -- -- 5 6.2 0 5 0.2 1 2 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2020-07-29 @ TOR -- -- 16 21.7 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0.6 1 0 2 0.93 0
2020-07-28 vs. TOR -- -- 5 6.5 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 0 0 0.5 0
2020-07-27 vs. TOR -- -- 5 6 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2020-07-26 vs. NYY -- -- 8 9 0 4 0.75 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 0 0.25 0 1.25 0
2020-07-25 vs. NYY -- -- 5 6.2 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2020-07-23 vs. NYY -- -- 14 18.7 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 1 1.5 0 2.5 0

Adam Eaton Daily Fantasy News, Rankings, Projections

Take The Over

The Washington/Philly game is currently sitting at a 10 total, and I don't think that is high enough. We tend to see the favorites in these games have massive ownership, which will hopefully lower the ownership for Washington. Spencer Howard has been decent against righties, but he's really struggled with left-handed hitters. In a small sample size, he has a .544 wOBA with a .423 ISO and a 10% strikeout rate against left-handed hitters. I think Soto is the top play on the slate, and you can pair him with anyone in the top of this lineup. I do like the lefties more than the righties.

Top Offense On The Slate

Find a way to get some exposure to the Nationals' offense today. Soto is my first choice. The Washington star has a great matchup today against Zack Godley, who has allowed a .389 wOBA to left-handed hitters so far in 2020 (and has been equally bad against righties, too). Soto owns a .497 wOBA and .353 ISO against RHP this year, with a 17% walk rate and an 11% strikeout rate. The Washington offense is locked in right now, and Eaton is also a very nice value on this Sunday slate.

Key Value Piece

The Nationals went off last night and have a good matchup today against Mazza. Their lineup provides the opportunity for us to find some value. Adam Eaton owns a .358 wOBA and .200 ISO and carries a very reasonable price tag on every site. He’s a core value for me on this slate.

Core Value

s for Washington’s bats, the lefties would be the first place to look. LHBs have tagged Howard for a .423 batting mark and a .549 wOBA in his brief MLB sample, and Howard profiles as a traditional splits RHP. Soto would be the obvious first choice, while Adam Eaton and Asdrubal Cabrera are more cost controlled options in decent lineup spots. They are nothing special, but the salary relief is welcome on this slate. That has earned Eaton core play status, as he has a solid .354 wOBA and .200 ISO against RHP so far this season.

Targeting Inexperience

Kyle Wright is a nice prospect and he will probably be a very good MLB pitcher someday. However, he has not gotten results early in his career posting a 5.33 SIERA and 6.07 XFIP. He has struggled to both sides of the plate but even more so to lefties allowing .447 wOBA and .227 ISO. Juan Soto is on fire with 5 HR in his last 7 games and is one of the top options on the slate. Wright's control problems put the full stack in play; Trea Turner at the top of the order and Adam Eaton with an attractive price tag across the industry should be the the next guys in.

Nats @ Cards has O/U of 7, each team is below 4 implied runs

Adam Wainwright is starting for the Cardinals this afternoon and has quietly been an effective pitcher in his age 38 season despite appearing to be in decline in 2017 and 2018. Wainwright posted a 4.19 ERA / 4.39 xFIP / 4.70 SIERA with a 1.43 WHIP, 12% K-BB, .327 xwOBA allowed and 6.9% barrel rate over 171 and 2/3 innings this year. It’s worth noting that Wainwright has been a much better pitcher at home: since 2015, Wainwright has posted a 3.06 ERA / 3.44 FIP, 12.7% K-BB and .311 xwOBA allowed at home compared to a 6.09 ERA / 4.83 FIP, 10.2% K-BB and .341 xwOBA allowed on the road. Wainwright has also been a bit more vulnerable to lefties, posting a .343 xwOBA vs. LHB compared to a .309 xwOBA allowed vs. RHP since 2015. Wainwright last pitched on 10/6 (7 and 2/3 innings, no runs, 8 Ks) so he is pitching on full rest.

The Nationals had just a 100 wRC+ vs. RHP during the regular season, but do have a league-leading .350 xwOBA vs. RHP over the past 30 days. They currently have an implied total of just 3.75 vs. Wainwright. Here’s their projected order: 1. Turner (.339 xwOBA vs. RHP this year), 2. Eaton (.348), 3. Rendon (.410), 4. Soto (.422), 5. Kendrick (.413), 6. Zimmerman (.327), 7. Taylor (.254), 8. Gomes (.268). Rendon and Kendrick have been the Nats’ most productive hitters this postseason with xwOBAs over .425. Taylor (.189), Gomes (.203) and Turner (.261) have struggled a bit. If BVP is your thing, it’s worth nothing that Ryan Zimmerman has an other-worldly .833 xwOBA vs. Wainwright over 40 PA since 2015. Once Wainwright is out of the game, they’ll face a Cardinals ‘pen that has allowed a .320 xwOBA over the past 30 days, regular season and postseason included.

Max Scherzer gets the nod for the Nationals and last pitched on 10/7 versus the Dodgers, allowing just 1 earned run over 7 innings with a 7/3 K/BB ratio. 35 year old Scherzer is coming off another great regular season and actually set career bests in K%, K-BB%, FIP and SwStr%. Scherzer is a bit more vulnerable vs. lefties (.279 xwOBA vs. LHB, .224 xwOBA vs. RHP since 2015) but the Cardinals project to have just four lefties in their lineup today. Overall, the Cardinals had a 93 wRC+ and 23.2% K rate vs. RHP on the year. The Cardinals currently have just a 3.25 implied line vs. Scherzer.

Here’s the Cardinals projected lineup: 1. Fowler (.338 xwOBA vs. RHP this year), 2. Wong (.308), 3. Goldschmidt (.343), 4. Ozuna (.380), 5. Molina (.305), 6. Carpenter (.325), 7. Edman (.324), 8. DeJong (.328). Marcell Ozuna has been their hottest hitter in the playoffs with a .456 xwOBA, followed by Paul Goldschmidt at .408. The rest of the projected lineup has been held under a .285 xwOBA thus far. The coldest bats are Paul DeJong (.169) and Yadi Molina (.217). When / if the Cardinals chase Scherzer from the game, they will face a Nationals bullpen that has allowed a .323 xwOBA over the past 30 days.

Consider attacking a regressing Mike Soroka (.363 xwOBA last 30 days)

Mike Soroka has been regressing with a 4.11 ERA over the last in line with his season SIERA, but he’s also been a bit worse. Strikeouts are down (under 20% for the season now), his ground ball rate has been below 48% in seven of his last nine starts (still 52.4% on the year) and he has a .363 xwOBA over the last 30 days (61 points higher than actual results) with 37.9% 95+ mph EV now. He’s allowed five HRs over his last two starts and faces Washington for a second straight outing. The only thing that’s remained consistent is his excellent control (5.6 BB%). For the season, RHBs have been grounded by Soroka (.234 wOBA, .273 xwOBA, 57.1 GB%), but LHBs have had some success (.321 wOBA, .345 xwOBA, 46.9 GB%). The Nationals have a 4.48 implied run line that sits in the middle of the board, but there seems to be some contrarian upside in attacking Soroka with quality LHBs at this point. This makes Adam Eaton (112 wRC+, .159 ISO vs RHP) a solid value at the top of the lineup and Juan Soto (162 wRC+, 324 ISO) just a great overall choice. Asdrubal Cabrera (96 wRC+, .199 ISO) and Matt Adams (91 wRC+, .250 ISO) would be additional reasonably priced options with decent lineup spots.

Asher Wojciechowski has reduced Ks with the highest rate of Barrels/BBE (13.5%)

The magic is gone for Asher Wojciechowski. After striking out at least six in each of his first five starts, he’s generated a total of 21 over his last five, good for just an 18.4 K% (8.4 SwStr%) this month. Unfortunately, the hard air contact remains consistent. His 13.5% Barrels/BBE (26.4 GB%) easily towers over the slate (Ross Detwiler 10.8% is next highest), resulting in a .355 xwOBA over the last month and an ERA with estimators all above six. Nine balls have left the yard in these five starts. While it’s nice getting out of Baltimore, Washington isn’t really much of an upgrade in terms of run environment for Asher. A 6.39 implied run line gives the Nationals the second best mark on the board and tops outside Coors. This is a well-disciplined offense with a 5.7 K-BB% over the last seven days. LHBs have a particular advantage against Wojciechowksi (.376 wOBA, .367 xwOBA last calendar year), though RHBs should be fine too (.302 wOBA, .314 xwOBA, 22.1 GB%). Juan Soto (157 wRC+, .294 ISO last calendar year) is one of the top bats outside Coors on the entire slate. Anthony Rendon (164 wRC+, .283 ISO) has a 213 wRC+ over the last week. Each of the first four batters in the projected lineup (Turner, Eaton, Rendon, Soto) are above a 115 wRC+ against RHP over the last 12 months.

Adam Eaton scratched Tuesday; Gerardo Parra replaces

Eaton has been scratched from the Washington Nationals original confirmed lineup and will not start in Tuesday’s matchup against the San Francisco Giants due to a presently unspecified reason. He’ll be replaced in the lineup by Gerardo Parra, who will now play right field and slot directly into Eaton’s vacated second spot in the order. However, the remainder of the Nationals lineup will stay intact offensively as they face off against left-hander Conner Menez on the road this evening.

Kyle Wright has struggled at the major league level (17.2 K% & BB% in 20 innings)

Kyle Wright will replace Julio Teheran tonight. Wright has some prospect shine (#4 org., #46 MLB with a 55 Future Value grade according to Fangraphs), but the 23 year-old had a modest 15.5 K-BB% in 70.1 AAA innings and has struggled through 20 career major league innings with batters from either side of the plate owning an xwOBA above .370 against him and exactly as many walks as strikeouts (17.2% each). Wright may also be a pitcher the Nationals can run on according to the PlateIQ Stolen Base Ratings (premium subscription required). This adds some value to lower power bats like Trea Turner (105 wRC+, .183 ISO vs RHP last calendar year) and Adam Eaton (112 wRC+, .117 ISO) atop the a lineup implied for 4.95 runs tonight (tied for fifth on the board) under likely hitter friendly conditions in Atlanta tonight.