Dario Agrazal

Detroit Tigers
Pos: SP | Hand: R
Status: Inactive
player props
FPTS -3 -1 2 4 6 9 11 13 16 SAL $620 $1.2K $1.9K $2.5K $3.1K $3.7K $4.3K $5K $5.6K $6.2K
  • FPTS: 6.8
  • FPTS: 16.7
  • FPTS: 10.7
  • FPTS: 6.7
  • FPTS: 17.9
  • FPTS: 1
  • FPTS: 7.45
  • FPTS: -2.75
  • FPTS: 6.5
  • FPTS: 10.65
  • FPTS: 7.85
  • FPTS: -5.45
  • FPTS: 6.6
  • FPTS: 11.05
  • FPTS: 15.3
  • SAL: --
  • SAL: --
  • SAL: --
  • SAL: --
  • SAL: --
  • SAL: --
  • SAL: --
  • SAL: --
  • SAL: $6.2K
  • SAL: $5.5K
  • SAL: $4.4K
  • SAL: $5.3K
  • SAL: $5.3K
  • SAL: $4.9K
  • SAL: $4.7K
06/27 07/06 07/17 07/21 07/26 07/31 08/05 08/21 08/25 08/31 09/05 09/12 09/18 09/25
Date Opp DKSAL FDSAL DKFPTS FDFPTS k ip ab sho w hra l er cg ha 3ba bba sba ibba whip hbp qstart 1ba k/9 2ba
2019-09-25 vs. CHC $4.7K $5.6K 15.3 31 5 6 2 0 0 1 0 2 0 6 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 4 7.5 0
2019-09-18 vs. SEA $4.9K $5.7K 11.05 21 6 5 1 0 0 2 1 4 0 6 0 1 0 0 1.4 0 0 2 10.8 2
2019-09-11 @ SF $5.3K $5.6K 6.6 12 2 4 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 4.5 0
2019-09-05 vs. MIA $5.3K $5.6K -5.45 1 1 4.1 2 0 0 1 1 5 0 9 0 2 1 0 2.54 1 0 7 2.08 1
2019-08-30 @ COL $4.4K $5.5K 7.85 18 2 5 2 0 1 1 0 3 0 9 0 0 0 0 1.8 0 0 6 3.6 2
2019-08-25 vs. CIN $5.5K $6.2K 10.65 24 5 5 1 0 1 0 0 4 0 7 0 2 2 0 1.8 2 0 6 9 1
2019-08-21 vs. WSH $6.2K $6.3K 6.5 9 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.5 0
2019-08-05 vs. MIL -- -- -2.75 3 1 5 1 0 0 2 1 5 0 8 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 6 1.8 0
2019-07-31 @ CIN -- -- 7.45 17 5 3.2 1 0 0 2 1 3 0 6 0 0 0 0 1.64 2 0 3 12.3 1
2019-07-26 @ NYM -- -- 1 4 1 5.1 2 0 0 3 1 5 0 4 1 0 0 0 0.75 1 0 0 1.69 0
2019-07-21 vs. PHI -- -- 17.9 34 5 6 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 2 0 0 0.83 1 1 2 7.5 1
2019-07-16 @ STL -- -- 6.7 19 0 6 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 3 1 0 1.33 0 1 2 0 3
2019-07-06 vs. MIL -- -- 10.7 25 1 6 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 5 0 2 0 0 1.17 1 1 2 1.5 1
2019-06-26 @ HOU -- -- 16.7 34 3 6 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 5 0 3 0 0 1.33 0 1 3 4.5 1
2019-06-15 @ MIA -- -- 6.8 15 3 4 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 6 0 0 1 0 1.5 1 0 6 6.75 0

Dario Agrazal Daily Fantasy News, Rankings, Projections

Struggling Cubs have some value against lowest strikeout rate on the board (Dario Agrazal 12.1 K%)

The Cubs are technically still playing for something, at least for one more day, though they’re not doing a very good job of it. Dario Agrazal has been a strong contact manager (86.3 mph aEV, 28.2% 95+ mph EV are both top two marks on the board), but he also owns the lowest strikeout rate (12.1%) with a 5.08 ERA and estimators all more than one half run higher. Daily fantasy players may have no choice but to side with cold Cubs’ bats here, those that remain healthy at least. Agrazal has allowed at least three runs in fewer than six innings in eight straight starts. He actually has a reverse split (RHBs .410 wOBA, LHBs .302) with the gap closed a bit by Statcast, though still substantial (.368, .325). This is where the absence of Kris Bryant hurts and power suppressing environment of Pittsburgh against RHBs helps, but not enough. Willson Contreras (122 wRC+, .252 ISO vs RHP) and Nick Castellanos (108 wRC+, .215 ISO) are still expected to supply RH power in the top half of this lineup, while Anthony Rizzo (151 wRC+, .241 ISO) and Kyle Schwarber (122 wRC+, .294 ISO) are both useful from the left-hand side in this spot. All but Contreras actually have a wRC+ above 110 over the last week, suggesting the fault in this collapse lies in other spots. The Cubs (5.42) are currently the lowest of nine teams above 5.1 implied runs tonight.

Start of MIL-PIT will be delayed due to rain Saturday

The start of the matchup between the Milwaukee Brewers and Pittsburgh Pirates on Saturday afternoon will be delayed due to rain. There’s yet to be any confirmation of an official start time, and the Pirates have not yet committed to a specific timeline for providing further updates. The definitive late start is potentially better news for the prospects of starting pitchers like Dario Agrazal not being pulled from the game early because of a mid-game stoppage, but as Kevin Roth detailed in the latest update to his MLB weather forecast, this contest certainly carries at least some late postponement risk even though that doesn't appear to be the likeliest outcome.