George Springer

Toronto Blue Jays
Pos: OF | Hand: R
Status: Active
player props
FPTS 2 5 7 9 12 14 16 18 21 23 SAL $3.9K $4K $4K $4.1K $4.2K $4.3K $4.4K $4.4K $4.5K $4.6K
  • FPTS: 3
  • FPTS: 10
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 2
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 14
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 5
  • FPTS: 15
  • FPTS: 4
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 2
  • FPTS: 3
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 23
  • FPTS: 16
  • SAL: $4.6K
  • SAL: $4.5K
  • SAL: $4.5K
  • SAL: $4.6K
  • SAL: $4.4K
  • SAL: $4.4K
  • SAL: $4.1K
  • SAL: $4.2K
  • SAL: $4.2K
  • SAL: $4K
  • SAL: $4K
  • SAL: $4K
  • SAL: $3.8K
  • SAL: $4K
  • SAL: $3.9K
  • SAL: $3.8K
05/08 05/10 05/11 05/12 05/15 05/17 05/18 05/19 05/20 05/21 05/23 05/24 05/25 05/27 05/28
Date Opp DKSAL FDSAL DKFPTS FDFPTS sf ab slg h so hbp gidp 1b babip 2b pa 3b sb hr xbh r obp rbi iso bb ops ibb
2024-05-28 @ CHW $3.8K $3K 16 21.4 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 3 2 0
2024-05-27 @ CHW $3.9K $3K 23 31.4 0 3 1.67 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 1 1 2 0.75 2 1 1 2.42 0
2024-05-25 @ DET $4K $2.9K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-05-24 @ DET $3.8K $2.9K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2024-05-23 @ DET $4K $2.9K 2 3.5 1 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
2024-05-21 vs. CHW $4K $2.9K 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-05-20 vs. CHW $4K $2.8K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2024-05-19 vs. TB $4.2K $2.8K 15 21.9 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 2 0.75 1 0.5 2 1.75 0
2024-05-18 vs. TB $4.2K $2.7K 5 6.5 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 0 0 0.5 0
2024-05-17 vs. TB $4.1K $2.7K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-05-15 @ BAL $4.4K $2.7K 14 18.2 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 5 0 1 0 1 1 0.4 0 0.25 1 0.9 0
2024-05-12 vs. MIN $4.4K $2.8K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-05-11 vs. MIN $4.6K $2.8K 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0
2024-05-10 vs. MIN $4.5K $2.8K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-05-08 @ PHI $4.5K $2.8K 10 12.2 0 5 0.2 1 2 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2024-05-07 @ PHI $4.6K $2.9K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2024-05-05 @ WSH $4.6K $2.9K 8 9 0 5 0.2 1 3 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2024-05-04 @ WSH $4.6K $2.9K 5 6.2 0 5 0.2 1 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2024-05-03 @ WSH $4.5K $3K 7 9.5 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
2024-05-01 vs. KC $4.4K $3K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2024-04-30 vs. KC $4.3K $3K 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-29 vs. KC $4.3K $3K 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 3 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2024-04-28 vs. LAD $4.3K $3K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-26 vs. LAD $4.3K $3.2K 7 9 0 3 0.67 1 0 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 0 0.33 1 1.17 0
2024-04-25 @ KC $4.2K $3.1K 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-24 @ KC $4.1K $3.1K 19 24.7 0 4 1.5 2 0 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 1 2 1 0.5 1 1 0 2 0
2024-04-23 @ KC $4.4K $3.1K 11 12.2 0 5 0.6 3 1 0 0 3 0.75 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.6 0 0 0 1.2 0
2024-04-22 @ KC $4.1K $3.1K 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-21 @ SD $4.4K $3.1K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2024-04-20 @ SD $4.2K $3.1K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-17 vs. NYY $4.6K $3.1K 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2024-04-16 vs. NYY $4.6K $3.2K 7 9 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 0 0 2 0.93 0
2024-04-15 vs. NYY $4.6K $3.2K 9 12 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 2 0.5 0
2024-04-14 vs. COL $4.6K $3.2K 15 18.4 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 4 0 1 0 0 2 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2024-04-13 vs. COL $4.6K $3K 8 9.2 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2024-04-12 vs. COL $4.5K $3K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2024-04-10 vs. SEA $4.5K $3K 2 3 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2024-04-09 vs. SEA $4.4K $3.1K 15 19 0 5 0.4 2 0 0 1 2 0.4 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0.4 2 0 0 0.8 0
2024-04-08 vs. SEA $4.6K $3.1K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-07 @ NYY $4.7K $3.2K 5 6.2 0 5 0.2 1 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2024-04-06 @ NYY $4.7K $3.3K 10 12 0 5 0.6 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 1 6 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 0 0.2 1 1.1 0
2024-04-05 @ NYY $4.8K $3.4K 9 12 0 3 0.67 1 0 0 0 0 0.33 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.6 0 0.33 2 1.27 0
2024-04-03 @ HOU $5K $3.5K 2 3 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2024-04-02 @ HOU $5K $3.5K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-01 @ HOU $5K $3.5K 4 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 2 0.5 0
2024-03-31 @ TB $5K $3.5K 9 12.4 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2024-03-30 @ TB $4.9K $3.3K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-03-29 @ TB $4.8K $3.2K 14 18.7 0 4 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 1 0.75 0 1.25 0
2024-03-28 @ TB $4.8K $3.2K 18 24.9 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.4 1 0.75 1 1.4 0
2024-03-25 @ PIT $4.5K -- 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-03-24 @ PHI $4.5K -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-03-23 vs. DET -- -- 19 24.6 0 3 1.33 3 0 1 0 2 1 1 4 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 0.33 0 2.33 0
2024-03-21 @ PIT $4.5K -- 12 15.2 0 2 1.5 2 0 0 0 1 1 1 3 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0.5 1 2.5 0
2024-03-19 vs. BAL $4.5K $5K 10 13 0 3 0.67 2 0 0 1 2 0.67 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.67 2 0 0 1.33 0
2024-03-17 vs. MIN -- -- 21 28.7 0 3 1.67 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 3 0 0 1 1 1 0.67 3 1 0 2.33 0
2024-03-16 @ NYY $4.5K -- 3 3 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.67 0
2024-03-15 vs. DET -- -- 18 24.9 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 2 0.67 1 1.5 1 2.67 0
2024-03-13 vs. PIT $4.5K $5K 11 15.2 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 2 0.5 0
2024-03-12 vs. NYY $4.5K $5K 8 9 0 3 1 2 0 0 0 1 0.67 1 3 0 0 0 1 0 0.67 0 0.33 0 1.67 0
2024-03-10 vs. BAL -- $5K 5 6.2 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 0 0 0.67 0
2024-03-09 @ PHI $4.5K -- 21 28.4 0 4 1.25 2 2 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 2 0.75 0 1.75 0
2024-03-07 @ DET -- $5K 7 9.2 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2024-03-04 vs. PHI $4.5K $5K 2 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 1 0.33 0
2024-03-02 vs. ATL $4.5K $5K 2 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.5 0
2024-02-29 vs. PHI $4.5K $5.5K 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-10-04 @ MIN $4.7K $3.2K 6 6 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2023-10-03 @ MIN $4.6K $3.2K 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-30 vs. TB $4.8K $3.1K 10 12.5 0 5 0.6 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.4 1 0.2 0 1 0
2023-09-29 vs. TB $4.5K $3.1K 2 3 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2023-09-28 vs. NYY $4.7K $3.1K 13 15.2 0 5 0.8 3 0 0 0 2 0.6 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.6 0 0.2 0 1.4 0
2023-09-27 vs. NYY $4.7K $3.1K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-26 vs. NYY $4.8K $3.1K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-09-24 @ TB $4.8K $3.1K 18 25.7 0 5 0.8 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.2 3 0.6 0 1 0
2023-09-23 @ TB $4.8K $3.1K 11 16.2 0 6 0.33 1 1 0 0 0 0.2 1 6 0 0 0 1 1 0.17 2 0.17 0 0.5 0
2023-09-22 @ TB $4.8K $3.1K 15 18.7 0 5 0.4 2 1 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0.4 1 0 0 0.8 0
2023-09-21 @ NYY $4.7K $3.1K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-09-20 @ NYY $4.7K $3.1K 10 12.4 0 5 0.4 2 2 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0.4 0 0 0 0.8 0
2023-09-19 @ NYY $4.8K $3.2K 21 27.9 0 4 1.25 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.6 1 0.75 1 1.85 0
2023-09-17 vs. BOS $4.8K $3.6K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-09-16 vs. BOS $4.8K $3.6K 0 0 0 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-15 vs. BOS $4.9K $3.6K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-14 vs. TEX $4.8K $3.6K 2 3 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-09-13 vs. TEX $4.8K $3.5K 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-12 vs. TEX $4.8K $3.5K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-09-11 vs. TEX $4.8K $3.5K 8 9.5 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 1 0 0 1 0
2023-09-10 vs. KC $4.8K $3.4K 5 6 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2023-09-09 vs. KC $4.8K $3.4K 35 47.4 0 4 2.25 3 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 2 2 2 0.75 4 1.5 0 3 0
2023-09-08 vs. KC $4.8K $3.4K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-09-06 @ OAK $4.6K $3.4K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-05 @ OAK $4.7K $3.4K 16 22.7 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.6 3 0 1 1.1 0
2023-09-04 @ OAK $4.6K $3.4K 11 15.7 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.4 1 0.25 1 0.9 0
2023-09-03 @ COL $9.6K $3.7K 5 6 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2023-09-02 @ COL $5.1K $3.6K 15 21.4 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 2 0.8 0 0.5 3 1.8 0
2023-09-01 @ COL $5.1K $3.6K 13 15.7 0 6 0.5 3 0 0 0 3 0.5 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 0 0 1 0
2023-08-30 vs. WSH $4.7K $3.1K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-29 vs. WSH $4.8K $3K 5 6 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2023-08-28 vs. WSH $4.8K $3K 21 27.7 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 1 1 0.33 0 5 0 2 0 0 1 0.6 1 0 2 0.93 0
2023-08-27 vs. CLE $4.8K $3.1K 21 27.9 0 4 1.25 2 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.6 1 0.75 1 1.85 1
2023-08-26 vs. CLE $8.8K $3.1K 14 18.4 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 1 0 1 2 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2023-08-25 vs. CLE $4.8K $3.1K 14 18.7 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 1 0.75 0 1.25 0
2023-08-24 @ BAL $4.9K $3.1K 2 3.5 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
2023-08-23 @ BAL $4.9K $3.1K 3 3 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.67 0
2023-08-22 @ BAL $4.7K $3.1K 4 6.2 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2023-08-20 @ CIN $5K $3.1K 23 31.2 0 4 1.5 2 1 0 0 0 0.5 1 5 0 0 1 2 1 0.6 2 1 1 2.1 0
2023-08-19 @ CIN $9K $3K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-16 vs. PHI $4.8K $3K 7 9.2 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-15 vs. PHI $4.9K $3.1K 5 6.5 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 0 0 0.5 0
2023-08-13 vs. CHC $5K $3.1K 7 9.5 0 4 0.25 1 3 0 0 1 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 1 0 1 0.65 0
2023-08-12 vs. CHC $5.1K $3K 5 6 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2023-08-11 vs. CHC $5K $3K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-10 @ CLE $5K $2.9K 13 15 0 4 0.75 2 1 0 0 1 0.67 1 4 0 1 0 1 0 0.5 0 0.25 0 1.25 0
2023-08-09 @ CLE $4.9K $2.9K 20 24.7 0 4 1.5 3 0 0 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.75 1 0.75 0 2.25 0
2023-08-08 @ CLE $5K $2.9K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-08-07 @ CLE $5K $3K 5 6.5 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 0 0 0.5 0
2023-08-06 @ BOS $5K $2.8K 14 18.7 1 5 0.8 2 0 0 1 0 0.33 2 6 0 0 0 2 1 0.33 1 0.4 0 1.13 0
2023-08-05 @ BOS $5K $2.8K 23 27.4 0 4 1 4 0 0 0 4 1 0 5 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 2 0
2023-08-04 @ BOS $5K $2.9K 11 15.7 0 3 0.67 1 1 0 0 0 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 1 0.33 1 1.17 0
2023-08-03 vs. BAL $5K $2.9K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-08-02 vs. BAL $5K $2.9K 9 12.7 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 0 1 0.83 0
2023-08-01 vs. BAL $5.2K $2.9K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-30 vs. LAA $9.2K $3.2K 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-29 vs. LAA $5.1K $3.2K 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-28 vs. LAA $4.8K $3.2K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-26 @ LAD $4.8K $3.1K 2 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2023-07-25 @ LAD $5.3K $3.1K 4 6.2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 1 0.5 0
2023-07-24 @ LAD $4.9K $3.3K 0 0 0 6 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-23 @ SEA $5K $3.3K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 0
2023-07-22 @ SEA $4.9K $3.3K 7 9.2 0 5 0.2 1 2 0 0 1 0.33 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 0 1 0.53 0
2023-07-21 @ SEA $5K $3.3K 4 6 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 2 0.4 0
2023-07-20 vs. SD $5K $3.3K 2 3 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2023-07-19 vs. SD $5K $3.3K 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2023-07-18 vs. SD $5K $3.3K 5 6.2 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 1 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-07-16 vs. ARI $4.9K $3.3K 8 9 0 5 0.6 2 2 0 0 1 0.67 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.4 0 0.2 0 1 0
2023-07-15 vs. ARI $4.6K $3.3K 14 19 0 3 1 2 1 0 0 1 1 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.75 2 0.33 1 1.75 0
2023-07-14 vs. ARI $5.5K $3.6K 5 6 0 4 0.25 1 1 1 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 0 0.65 0
2023-07-07 @ DET $4.7K $3.6K 25 34.7 0 5 1.2 2 0 1 0 0 0.25 1 6 0 0 1 2 1 0.5 3 0.8 0 1.7 0
2023-07-06 @ CHW $4.9K -- 5 6.2 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2023-07-06 @ CHW -- $3.6K 10 12.7 0 5 0.4 2 1 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 1 0 0 0.8 0
2023-07-04 @ CHW $4.9K $3.5K 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-02 vs. BOS $5K $3.5K 10 12.2 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-07-01 vs. BOS $4.8K $3.5K 22 27.9 0 5 1.2 3 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.6 1 0.6 0 1.8 0
2023-06-30 vs. BOS $5K $3.5K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-06-29 vs. SF $4.8K $3.4K 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-06-28 vs. SF $5.3K $3.4K 15 18.7 0 4 1 3 0 0 1 2 0.75 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.75 1 0.25 0 1.75 0
2023-06-27 vs. SF $5.6K $3.4K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 2 0 0 0 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2023-06-25 vs. OAK $5.3K $3.3K 23 31.4 1 3 1.67 2 0 0 1 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.6 2 1 1 2.27 0
2023-06-24 vs. OAK $5.1K $2.9K 8 9.2 0 5 0.4 2 0 0 0 2 0.4 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 0 0.8 0
2023-06-23 vs. OAK $5.1K $2.9K 2 3 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-06-21 @ MIA $5.4K $2.9K 12 16.2 0 5 0.4 2 0 0 1 2 0.4 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 2 0 0 0.8 0
2023-06-20 @ MIA $4.8K $3.1K 10 12.5 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0.25 1 0 0 0.5 0
2023-06-19 @ MIA $5.3K $3.1K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-06-18 @ TEX $5K $3.1K 19 24.9 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 1 0 0 2 0.6 1 0 1 1.1 0
2023-06-17 @ TEX $5.1K $3.1K 6 6 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2023-06-16 @ TEX $4.9K $3.1K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-06-15 @ BAL $5.1K $3.1K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-06-14 @ BAL $4.9K $3.1K 16 21.9 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 2 0.25 1 0.75 0 1.25 0
2023-06-13 @ BAL $5K $3.1K 10 12.2 0 4 0.75 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 0 0.25 0 1.25 0
2023-06-11 vs. MIN $5K $3.2K 9 12.2 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.6 0 0 2 0.93 0
2023-06-10 vs. MIN $4.9K $3.1K 10 12.2 0 5 0.6 2 0 0 1 1 0.4 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.4 0 0.2 0 1 0
2023-06-09 vs. MIN $5K $3.3K 12 15.5 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 1 0 3 0
2023-06-08 vs. HOU $4.9K $3.3K 2 3 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-06-07 vs. HOU $5.3K $3.3K 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-06-06 vs. HOU $4.7K $3.3K 16 22.2 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 2 0.75 0 1.25 0
2023-06-05 vs. HOU $5.1K $3.3K 2 3 0 4 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.2 0
2023-06-04 @ NYM $5K $3.3K 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-06-03 @ NYM $5K $3.2K 13 15.2 0 5 0.4 2 1 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 0 0.8 0
2023-06-02 @ NYM $4.9K $3.2K 14 18.7 0 4 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 1 0.75 0 1.25 0
2023-06-01 vs. MIL $4.9K $3.1K 11 12 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2023-05-31 vs. MIL $4.8K $3.1K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-30 vs. MIL $4.9K $3.1K 7 9.2 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2023-05-28 @ MIN $4.7K $3.1K 12 15.2 0 3 1 2 1 0 0 1 1 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.75 0 0.33 1 1.75 0
2023-05-27 @ MIN $4.7K $3K 5 6.2 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2023-05-26 @ MIN $4.8K $3K 12 15.2 0 4 1 2 1 0 0 0 0.67 2 4 0 0 0 2 1 0.5 0 0.5 0 1.5 0
2023-05-25 @ TB $4.8K $3K 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0
2023-05-24 @ TB $4.5K $2.9K 2 3.5 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
2023-05-23 @ TB $4.4K $2.9K 34 43.6 0 5 1.8 4 0 0 0 2 0.75 0 5 1 0 1 2 3 0.8 2 1 0 2.6 0
2023-05-22 @ TB $4.4K $2.9K 7 9 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 0 0 2 0.93 0
2023-05-21 vs. BAL $4.2K $2.8K 15 18.2 0 5 0.4 2 1 0 1 2 0.5 0 6 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 1 0.9 0
2023-05-20 vs. BAL $4.4K $2.8K 30 40.9 0 4 1.25 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 1 1 1 2 0.6 3 0.75 1 1.85 0
2023-05-19 vs. BAL $4.2K $2.8K 8 9 0 4 0.75 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 0 0.25 0 1.25 0
2023-05-18 vs. NYY $4.1K $2.8K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-17 vs. NYY $4.4K $2.8K 5 6 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2023-05-16 vs. NYY $4.4K $2.8K 10 12.2 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.6 0 0 1 1.1 0
2023-05-15 vs. NYY $4.6K $2.8K 4 6.7 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
2023-05-14 vs. ATL $4.5K $2.8K 17 21.7 0 5 1 2 1 0 1 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.4 1 0.6 0 1.4 0
2023-05-13 vs. ATL $4.8K $2.8K 10 12.2 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-05-12 vs. ATL -- -- 7 9.5 0 3 0.33 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 1 0 1 0.83 0
2023-05-09 @ PHI $5.1K $2.8K 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-07 @ PIT $5.3K $2.8K 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2023-05-06 @ PIT $5.3K $2.8K 9 12.2 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 2 0.75 0
2023-05-05 @ PIT $5.1K $2.8K 16 22.2 0 5 0.8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.2 2 0.6 0 1 0
2023-05-04 @ BOS $8.4K $2.8K 9 12.7 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 1 0 1 0.65 0
2023-05-03 @ BOS $5.2K $2.8K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-02 @ BOS $5K $3.1K 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-30 vs. SEA $4.8K $3.1K 11 12.2 0 6 0.5 3 0 0 0 3 0.5 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2023-04-29 vs. SEA $5.2K $3.2K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-28 vs. SEA $5K $2.8K 10 12.5 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0.25 1 0 0 0.5 0
2023-04-26 vs. CHW $4.9K $2.8K 4 6.2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-04-25 vs. CHW $5K $3.1K 16 18.5 0 4 0.75 3 0 0 0 3 0.75 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0.75 1 0 0 1.5 0
2023-04-24 vs. CHW $4.6K $3.1K 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-23 @ NYY $5.2K $3.2K 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-22 @ NYY $4.8K $3.3K 5 6 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 1 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2023-04-21 @ NYY $5.3K $3.4K 7 9.2 0 5 0.4 1 1 0 0 0 0.25 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.2 0 0.2 0 0.6 0
2023-04-19 @ HOU $5.2K $3.6K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-18 @ HOU $5.2K $3.7K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-17 @ HOU $5.3K $3.7K 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-16 vs. TB $5.3K $3.7K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-04-15 vs. TB $5.3K $3.7K 11 15.5 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0.4 1 0 2 0.4 0
2023-04-14 vs. TB $5.3K $3.7K 16 21.7 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.4 1 0.75 1 1.4 0
2023-04-13 vs. DET $5.3K $3.7K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 3 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-04-12 vs. DET $5.4K $3.7K 8 9.5 0 5 0.4 2 2 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 1 0 0 0.8 0
2023-04-11 vs. DET $5.3K $3.7K 14 18.7 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 1 0.75 0 1.25 0
2023-04-09 @ LAA $5.2K $3.7K 9 12.7 0 5 0.2 1 2 0 0 1 0.33 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 0.33 1 0 1 0.53 0
2023-04-08 @ LAA $5K $3.8K 19 24.9 0 5 1 2 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.4 1 0.6 0 1.4 0
2023-04-07 @ LAA $5.1K $3.8K 5 6.2 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-04-06 @ KC $5.3K $3.9K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-05 @ KC $37 $3.7K 5 6 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2023-04-04 @ KC $5K $3.8K 12 15 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 2 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2023-04-03 @ KC $4.9K $3.8K 5 6.5 0 5 0.2 1 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 1 0 0 0.4 0
2023-04-02 @ STL $5K $3.7K 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-01 @ STL $4.9K $3.7K 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-03-30 @ STL -- -- 25 31.3 0 6 0.83 5 1 0 0 5 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 4 0.83 1 0 0 1.67 0
2023-03-28 @ PHI -- -- 5 6.2 0 2 0.5 1 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2023-03-25 vs. DET -- -- 5 6 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2023-03-24 vs. PHI -- -- 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-03-22 vs. BAL -- -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-03-19 @ TB -- -- 15 18 0 2 0.5 1 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0.67 0 0 1 1.17 0
2023-03-18 vs. NYY -- -- 3 3 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.67 0
2023-03-17 vs. PHI -- -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-03-17 @ PHI -- -- 3 3 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.67 0
2023-03-14 @ NYY -- -- 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-03-12 @ PHI -- -- 17 21.7 0 3 1.67 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 3 0 0 1 1 1 0.67 1 1 0 2.33 0
2023-03-11 vs. BAL -- -- 18 25.7 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 3 0.75 0 1.25 0
2023-03-09 vs. ATL -- -- 16 22.2 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 2 0.75 0 1.25 0
2023-03-09 @ TB -- -- 16 22.2 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 2 0.75 0 1.25 0
2023-03-08 vs. MIN -- -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-03-05 vs. PHI -- -- 5 6.5 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 0 0 0.5 0
2023-03-03 vs. TB -- -- 5 6.5 0 2 0.5 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 1 0 0 1 0
2023-03-02 vs. PIT -- -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-02-28 vs. DET -- -- 5 6 0 2 0.5 1 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.67 0 0 1 1.17 0
2023-02-28 @ PHI -- -- 5 6 0 2 0.5 1 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.67 0 0 1 1.17 0
2022-10-08 vs. SEA $5.1K $3.8K 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-10-07 vs. SEA $4.9K $4.1K 8 9 0 3 0.67 2 0 1 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.75 0 0 0 1.42 0
2022-10-03 @ BAL $5.3K $3.8K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-10-02 vs. BOS $5K $3.8K 8 9.5 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 1 0 0 1 0
2022-10-01 vs. BOS $5K $3.6K 11 12.2 0 4 0.75 3 0 0 0 3 0.75 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.75 0 0 0 1.5 0
2022-09-30 vs. BOS $5K $3.6K 28 37.9 0 4 1.25 2 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 1 1 1 2 0.5 3 0.75 0 1.75 0
2022-09-28 vs. NYY $5K $3.7K 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2022-09-27 vs. NYY $5.2K $3.7K 19 24.9 0 4 1.25 2 0 0 1 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 1 0.75 0 1.75 0
2022-09-26 vs. NYY $5.9K $3.7K 0 0 0 5 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-09-25 @ TB $5.2K $4K 35 46.9 0 4 2.25 3 1 0 0 1 1 0 5 0 0 2 2 2 0.8 3 1.5 1 3.05 0
2022-09-24 @ TB $5.8K $3.9K 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-09-23 @ TB $5.3K $3.7K 4 6.5 1 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 1 0 1 0.2 0
2022-09-22 @ TB $5.1K $3.9K 13 15.2 0 4 1 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 1 0 0 1 1 0.5 0 0.5 0 1.5 0
2022-09-21 @ PHI $5.3K $3.8K 5 6.2 0 5 0.2 1 0 0 1 1 0.2 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2022-09-20 @ PHI $5.2K $3.8K 14 18.7 0 5 0.6 2 0 0 0 1 0.4 1 6 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 1 0.2 1 1.1 0
2022-09-18 vs. BAL $5.3K $3.8K 11 15.7 0 4 0.5 1 1 1 0 0 0.33 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.4 1 0.25 0 0.9 0
2022-09-17 vs. BAL $5.5K $3.7K 14 19.2 0 4 0.75 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 2 0.25 0 1.25 0
2022-09-16 vs. BAL $5.4K $3.8K 18 25.7 0 4 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 3 0.75 0 1.25 0
2022-09-15 vs. TB $5K $3.8K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-09-14 vs. TB $5.4K $3.9K 5 6 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2022-09-13 vs. TB $5.4K -- 16 22.2 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 2 0.75 0 1.25 0
2022-09-13 vs. TB $5.5K $3.9K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-09-12 vs. TB $5.5K $3.9K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2022-09-11 @ TEX $5.4K $3.7K 4 6 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 2 0.4 0
2022-09-10 @ TEX $5.5K $3.9K 16 21.2 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 6 0 1 0 1 1 0.5 0 0.25 2 1 0
2022-09-09 @ TEX $5.4K $3.8K 5 6.2 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 1 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2022-09-07 @ BAL $5.7K $3.8K 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-09-06 @ BAL $5.8K $3.8K 10 12.2 0 5 0.6 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.4 0 0.2 0 1 0
2022-09-05 @ BAL -- -- 4 6.2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2022-09-05 @ BAL $5.7K $3.9K 17 22.1 0 5 0.6 3 0 0 0 3 0.6 0 5 0 0 0 0 3 0.6 1 0 0 1.2 0
2022-09-03 @ PIT $5.9K $3.9K 15 18.2 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0.6 0 0 1 1.1 0
2022-09-02 @ PIT $5.9K $3.8K 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-31 vs. CHC $5.8K $4K 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-30 vs. CHC $5.5K $4K 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2022-08-29 vs. CHC $5.7K $4K 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-28 vs. LAA $5.4K $4K 16 21.7 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.4 1 0.75 1 1.4 0
2022-08-27 vs. LAA $5.7K $4.1K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-08-26 vs. LAA $5.4K $4.1K 8 9 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-08-25 @ BOS $5.3K $3.9K 11 15.5 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0.67 1 0 3 1 0
2022-08-24 @ BOS $5.3K $3.9K 15 18.7 0 5 0.8 3 1 0 0 2 0.75 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.6 1 0.2 0 1.4 0
2022-08-23 @ BOS $5.3K $3.9K 17 22.5 0 5 0.8 2 0 0 1 1 0.4 0 5 1 0 0 1 0 0.4 3 0.4 0 1.2 0
2022-08-21 @ NYY $5.2K $3.9K 3 3 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0
2022-08-18 @ NYY $5.2K $3.8K 23 27.9 0 5 1.2 5 0 0 0 4 1 1 5 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 0.2 0 2.2 0
2022-08-17 vs. BAL $5.3K $3.8K 7 9.7 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 0
2022-08-16 vs. BAL $5.3K $3.8K 5 6.2 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-08-15 vs. BAL $5.1K $3.8K 12 15.2 0 4 0.75 2 1 0 0 1 0.67 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.6 0 0.25 1 1.35 0
2022-08-04 @ MIN $5.2K $3.9K 11 16.2 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 2 0 1 0.65 0
2022-07-30 vs. DET $5.3K $4.3K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2022-07-28 vs. DET $5.5K $4K 5 6.2 0 5 0.2 1 2 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2022-07-27 vs. STL $5.5K $3.8K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-07-26 vs. STL $5.3K $3.8K 28 38.4 0 5 1.2 3 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.6 4 0.6 0 1.8 0
2022-07-24 @ BOS $5.2K $3.8K 13 15.2 0 6 0.33 2 0 0 0 2 0.33 0 6 0 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 0 0 0.67 0
2022-07-23 @ BOS $5.1K $3.8K 7 9.5 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 1 0 1 0.83 0
2022-07-16 vs. KC $5.3K $3.9K 9 13.2 0 5 0.2 1 2 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 2 0 0 0.4 0
2022-07-15 vs. KC $5.1K $3.9K 8 9 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 0 0 1 1.1 0
2022-07-14 vs. KC $5K $3.9K 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2022-07-13 vs. PHI $4.8K $3.8K 5 6.2 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-07-12 vs. PHI $4.8K $3.7K 10 12.2 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-07-10 @ SEA $4.6K $3.7K 21 27.9 0 5 1.2 2 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 5 0 0 1 2 2 0.4 1 0.8 0 1.6 0
2022-07-09 @ SEA $4.7K $3.9K 14 18.7 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 1 0.75 0 1.25 0
2022-07-08 @ SEA $5.1K $3.9K 7 9 0 5 0.4 1 2 0 0 0 0.33 1 6 0 0 0 1 0 0.33 0 0.2 1 0.73 0
2022-07-06 @ OAK $5.9K $4.1K 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-07-05 @ OAK $5.7K $4.1K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-07-04 @ OAK $5.7K $3.9K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-07-03 vs. TB $5.5K $3.9K 9 12.2 0 4 0.5 1 2 0 0 0 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.4 0 0.25 1 0.9 0
2022-07-02 vs. TB $5.2K $3.8K 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2022-07-01 vs. TB $4.6K $3.7K 11 16.2 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 2 0 1 0.83 0
2022-06-30 vs. TB $4.6K $3.6K 12 15 0 2 0.5 1 0 1 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0.75 0 0 1 1.25 0
2022-06-29 vs. BOS $4.6K $3.5K 16 21.7 0 5 0.8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 1 1 1 0.33 1 0.6 1 1.13 0
2022-06-28 vs. BOS $4.9K $3.5K 12 15.2 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2022-06-27 vs. BOS $4.8K $3.6K 18 24.9 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.4 1 0.75 1 1.4 0
2022-06-26 @ MIL $4.8K $3.8K 5 6.2 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-06-21 @ CWS $4.8K $3.5K 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-06-20 @ CWS $5.1K $3.5K 8 9 0 5 0.2 1 2 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2022-06-19 vs. NYY $4.9K $3.7K 19 24.7 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 1 1 1 0.25 1 0.75 0 1.25 0
2022-06-18 vs. NYY $5.1K $3.8K 6 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.75 0 0 3 0.75 0
2022-06-17 vs. NYY $5.4K $3.8K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-06-15 vs. BAL $5.7K $3.8K 0 0 0 5 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-06-14 vs. BAL $5.3K $3.7K 2 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2022-06-13 vs. BAL $5.6K $3.7K 12 15.4 0 4 0.75 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 2 0.5 0 0.25 0 1.25 0
2022-06-12 @ DET $5.8K $3.7K 8 9 0 5 0.2 1 2 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2022-06-11 @ DET $6K $3.7K 5 6.5 0 5 0.2 1 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 1 0 0 0.4 0
2022-06-10 @ DET $5.7K $3.9K 30 40.6 0 3 2.33 3 0 0 0 1 1 1 4 0 0 1 2 3 1 2 1.33 1 3.33 0
2022-06-08 @ KC $15K $9.5K 6 6 0 5 0.4 2 0 0 0 2 0.4 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 0 0.8 0
2022-06-07 @ KC $5.2K $4K 2 3 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2022-06-06 @ KC $5K $4K 6 9.4 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2022-06-05 vs. MIN $4.9K $3.8K 17 21.7 0 5 1 2 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.4 1 0.6 0 1.4 0
2022-06-04 vs. MIN $13.8K $9.5K 12 16 1 4 0.25 1 1 0 1 1 0.25 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0.2 2 0 0 0.45 0
2022-06-03 vs. MIN $4.8K $3.7K 14 18.7 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 1 0.75 0 1.25 0
2022-05-31 vs. CWS $4.8K $3.7K 10 12.2 0 5 0.6 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.4 0 0.2 0 1 0
2022-05-29 @ LAA $5K $3.7K 10 12.2 0 6 0.5 2 0 0 1 1 0.33 1 6 0 0 0 1 1 0.33 0 0.17 0 0.83 0
2022-05-28 @ LAA $5.1K $3.7K 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1

George Springer Daily Fantasy News, Rankings, Projections

George Springer (illness) scratched Monday

George Springer (illness) scratched Monday

The Surprising Stack That Rates as Well as the Brewers

It’s not going to surprise anybody that the visiting offense at Coors is projected to smash the slate more often than any other offense. And if it were a smaller slate, the margin of more than twice any other team projected Smash% would not even be much of a surprise. However, this is a 12 game slate we’re talking about with the Brewers exceeding a 20% Smash projection and no other team in double digits currently (though projections are fluid and constantly updated throughout the day). However, the Brewers top the board at 6.39 implied runs where the Dodgers are the only other offense exceeding a five run total, where we don’t even know who’s pitching for the Giants yet and nearly ever park east of Coors is expecting pitcher friendly weather. So, the dynamic is that the Brewers are expected to smash the slate nearly a quarter of the time and project to be owned more than twice as much as any other stack on FanDuel. They’re also projected to be the most popular stack on DraftKings, but only 50% more than the Guardians and Cardinals currently. Where we do see a more interesting dynamic is in the Value% column. The Cubs are easily projected to be the top value stack on DraftKings (though Milwaukee is second, about 10 percentage points behind). However, both the Brewers and Cubs are packed in with the Guardians and Giants atop value projections.

With smash projections well ahead of also heavy ownership projections, the Brewers do project the top Leverage Rating on DraftKings, where they’re slightly more expensive than on FanDuel, making them a bit tougher to afford with a lack of viable low priced pitching (which should also make Mike Mayers correlate very well with Milwaukee stacks). They also project the second best rating on FanDuel currently, but behind the Toronto Blue Jays, which is interesting considering that this is now a park that suppresses right-handed power. Kyle Bradish had a 13.2 K-BB%, but was allowing 11.7% Barrels/BBE through his first 10 major league starts. His second go around has resulted in a K-BB increase (14.5%) with just 3.6% Barrels/BBE over seven starts with a 2.66 ERA/3.78 FIP/3.94 xFIP. He’s thrown an impressive 15 scoreless innings in Cleveland and Houston over his last two starts. The Blue Jay sit in the middle of the board with a 4.25 team run total, though Bradish does have a pretty substantial reverse split (RHBs .384 wOBA, .352 xwOBA). The Blue Jays have scored 11 runs against Bradish in 14.1 innings (two home runs, three barrels).

The Cardinals and Astros are two more offenses that draw strong ratings. These are the two offenses right below the Brewers and Dodgers, though neither exceeds five implied runs. Paolo Espino has allowed 16 home runs (17.4 HR/FB), but just 17 barrels (7.4%) over 15 starts. However, his 4.65 ERA aligns closely with his 4.60 xERA on the season with his 4.22 within half a run of all estimators. Espino doesn’t walk many (4.7%), but doesn’t strike out many either (18.5%) and his next six inning start will be his first. St Louis is a firmly negative run environment with pitcher friendly weather expectations, but the Cardinals have a 121 wRC+ at home. Tyler O’Neill and Yadier Molina are the only two in the projected lineup below a 100 wRC+ vs RHP this season.

Houston is also a negative run environment (though power friendly) with the roof closed. Glenn Otto has struck out just 18 batters over his last five starts, a season high eight of them in his last start against the Red Sox. He’s completed six innings in just five of his 21 starts (all Quality Starts) with all estimators above his 4.82 ERA (5.9 K-BB%) and only a 4.97 xFIP below five. There are some leaks in the Houston lineup, but there’s also Jose Altuve, Alex Bregman, Yordan Alvarez and Kyle Tucker all above a 135 wRC+ and .180 ISO vs RHP this season and batters from either side of the plate within five points of a .350 xwOBA against Otto this year.

You May Be Surprised at Which Offense Projects to Smash the Slate

On a 12 team board with a clear hierarchy (Phillies at 5.76 implied runs, more than half a run above four more teams above four and a half), the Phillies project to be the most popular offense on the board. They’re facing a struggling young pitcher in the most power friendly park on the board and may get an additional weather boost. Additional incentive includes some generous pricing on FanDuel, where their ownership projection separates a bit more from the Blue Jays, the offense with the second highest team run total and ownership projections currently (although projections are fluid and updated throughout the day). The Phillies do not smash the slate most often in early simulations though. Those projections currently favor the Blue Jays, just slightly more than Phillies, who they favor slightly more than the Mets. In terms of top projected value stack, that’s easily the Phillies, followed by the Blue Jays on FanDuel. It’s simple enough to include an Aaron Nola with a Philly/Toronto stack. It’s a bit tougher on DraftKings, where the meager offenses of the A’s and Reds battle it out for top projected value stack. You may have already figured out the top rated stack from the information above, but which other stacks may also rate better than the Phillies? Check out today’s PlateIQ Live Blog to find out.

Stacking Projections See This Offense Being More Dominant Than Sportsbooks

The most obvious thing about Tuesday night’s 13 game slate is that it seems fairly well distributed and early stacking ownership projections (which are fluid and subject to change) agree without any offense currently projecting in double digits on either site. In fact, on FanDuel, no stack currently projects for even seven percent ownership. However, it seems that stacking projections slightly disagree with the sportsbooks because while the Blue Jays do have the highest team run line tonight (5.07) they don’t separate from the rest of the board nearly as much as they do in early simulations which have Toronto smashing the slate around 15% of the time, almost twice as often as any other offense on either site. We can’t find a clear answer in the Value% column either though, Washington (FanDuel) and Detroit (DraftKings) stacks have small early projection leads. It’s probably no secret that the Blue Jays do rate as a top stack tonight, but which stack currently projects a better rating on one site? Check out today’s PlateIQ Live Blog to find out.

This Stack is Projected to Smash Against Pitcher with 10 Barrels Allowed Last Three Starts

It’s an interesting slate on Tuesday, favoring hitters, with half the board (14 teams) above four and a half implied runs and half of those teams (seven) with at least a 5.25 run team total, while the Cleveland Guardians separate slightly at Coors with a 6.18 run team total, nearly four-tenths of a run removed from any other offense. Current stacking projections, which are fluid and subject to change, suggest this may make Cleveland the most popular stack on DraftKings tonight (12.13%), but not too far ahead of San Diego (10.5%) with great conditions (weather, umpire) at Wrigley. The Toronto Blue Jays are the only stack that projects for double digit ownership on FanDuel right now, against the struggling Jordan Lyles, who has allowed 10 barrels over his last 14.1 innings. Although no team gets to a double digit Smash%, the Blue Jays are also the offense that smashes the slate most often in simulations.

Some of these numbers could change as weather conditions are updated and reconsidered. Something less likely to change, at least drastically, are the value projections because pricing is not going to change and the conditions at Wrigley were not a consideration when this slate was priced. Sure, Jake Cronenworth and Manny Machado cost more than $5K, but no other Padres in the projected lineup exceeds $4K on DraftKings, while the White Sox are the only double digit Value% on FanDuel against Drew Hutchison and the Detroit bullpen. With all this talk about weather conditions, it’s actually a few good offenses under normal expected conditions that really stand out in terms of ratings. Read today’s PlateIQ Live Blog to find out more.

Projections and Sportsbooks Like This Offense to Punish Rookie Pitcher

Our first full 15 game slate of the year without most of the extremely positive run environments on the board finds just three teams currently exceeding a five run team total with the Blue Jays (5.42) at the top of the board, just ahead of the Yankees (5.27) and Braves (5.08). However, 10 more teams have an implied total of at least four and a half runs, which should make this a well spread out slate in terms of bat ownership. However, half of the top 10 projected batters by PlateIQ still come from the top two teams without any other offense placing multiple batters atop the board. Projections love George Springer (132 wRC+, .270 ISO vs RHP since 2021), Vladimir Guerrero Jr. (157 wRC+, .281 ISO) and Bo Bichette (110 wRC+, .174 ISO) to do major damage against rookie Elvin Rodriguez, whom batters from either side of the plate are above a .400 wOBA and .350 xwOBA against in a small sample. He’s struck out just 14 of 72 batters with a 6.9 SwStr%, walked seven and allowed six home runs on six barrels (11.8%) with just 36% of his contact on the ground and 92.7 mph EV. Teoscar Hernandez (106 wRC+, .178 ISO) is just outside the top 10.

Aaron Judge (151 wRC+, .291 ISO vs LHP since LY) is the top projected bat on FanDuel (second on DraftKings) with Giancarlo Stanton (142 wRC+, .224 ISO) just outside the top five. Wade Miley has made just three starts, bookended by IL stints. Five of his seven walks came in his first outing against the Padres, while he’s struck out nine of 47 since and kept the ball on the ground (58.3%). The IL stint was short, but with no rehab starts and not having pitched in nearly three weeks. RHBs have a .330 wOBA and .322 xwOBA against Miley since last season, but we’ll likely be seeing a lot of the Chicago bullpen too in this one. They rank as a middling unit with a 4.45 ERA and 4.20 FIP, but 3.42 xFIP and 3.11 SIERA over the last 30 days.

This Stack Smashes and Projects for Great Value

With the Blue Jays separating themselves from the rest of the board by more than half a run with a team total of 5.34 runs, they are projected to be the most popular stack on the board and the gap could get wider if the game in Cincinnati is rained out, as expected, because the Diamondbacks are projected to be the second most popular stack tonight. With a mix of value bats and top bats, the Angels are the only stack projecting for more than 10% ownership on either site, although PlateIQ projections are fluid and subject to change. No offense smashes the slate nearly as often as the Blue Jays in current simulations. In fact, they do so in more than 20% of them, which is more than 50% more than any other offense. Diamondbacks project as the top value stack a bit higher than Blue Jays and Angels on FanDuel, while the three are essentially tied for top value on DraftKings. We know that the Blue Jays smash the stack and have value according to the projections, but is that enough to make them the best rated stack? See Monday’s PlateIQ Live Blog for the answer.

Top Projected Bats Not Necessarily Coming from Teams with Largest Run Lines

On a nearly full slate just two games shy of 15 on Friday night, only the two teams at Coors (Reds & Rockies) are currently above five implied runs tonight in a suppressed 2022 run environment (8.04 runs per game MLB average). The Yankees and Dodgers sit right around the five run mark, while the Braves and Giants the only other two teams firmly above four and a half runs. Interestingly, among those six teams, only the Dodgers have multiple batters among the top 10 projected overall bats tonight (PlateIQ). That would be Mookie Betts (122 wRC+, .197 ISO vs LHP since 2021) and Trea Turner (194 wRC+, .298 ISO), who are both top three overall projected bats against Tyler Alexander, who has completed just 10 innings over three starts with as many runs crossing the plate. He’s struck out just eight of 47 with a 7.2 SwStr%, but an 86 mph EV has prevented even more damage (5.6% Barrels/BBE). RHBs own a wOBA and xwOBA within a point of .333 on either site.

Two AL East teams also list multiple batters among the top 10 projected hitter point totals tonight. The Yankees are not one of them though with only Aaron Judge (178 wRC+, .328 ISO vs LHP) among the top three against Kris Bubic (RHBs .342 wOBA since LY). The Red Sox are expected to be facing well regarded Kyle Bradish, making his major league debut. He’s certainly talented enough to be worth an SP2 flyer on DraftKings at the minimum priced (in fact, he’s currently the top projected point per dollar value), but both Xander Bogaerts (143 wRC+, .213 ISO vs RHP since 2021) and Trevor Story (83 wRC+, .168 ISO) project as top 10 batters overall bats. Vladimir Guerrero Jr. (170 wRC+, .298 ISO) and George Springer (133 wRC+, .272 ISO) have become daily staples of the top 10 and face Jose Urquidy, who has struck out just seven of 62 batters (7.0 SwStr%) with merely a 25 GB% and 91.9 mph EV, resulting in three home runs on six barrels (11.3%). This, despite his velocity being up a full mile per hour (93.5). A 4.92 xFIP is his lone estimator below five at this point. In Toronto’s predominantly right-handed lineup’s favor though, is an 80 point reverse wOBA split (RHBs .326) since last season that’s pretty much confirmed by Statcast (RHBs .341 xwOBA). Toronto does sit inside the top third of the board at 4.37 implied runs tonight.

Top Lineup Has Great Career Numbers Against Tonight's Opposing Pitcher

Consulting Weather Edge suggests the worst hitting conditions on the board by a fair amount probably reside in the Toronto/Minnesota game, but there are still some interesting bits of information concerning the bats in that game. Specifically their career totals against tonight’s starting pitchers. Steven Matz has pitched well enough for the Blue Jays, decreasing home runs behind increased sinker usage, but Josh Donaldson (140 wRC+, .287 ISO vs LHP) is someone who has hit well against him with three home runs in 17 PAs and a 97 mph EV on 12 BBEs. Most of those plate appearances occurring fairly recently during their NL East battles. Michael Pineda has not been as successful this year with a 90.1 mph EV, 40.6 GB% and strikeout rate below 20%. Batters from either side of the plate exceed a .320 xwOBA against him and there are three batters in the projected lineup for Toronto with multiple career home runs against him. The smallest sample belongs to Jake Lamb (95 wRC+, .200 ISO vs RHP) with two (plus a double) in just eight PAs. He could be interesting as a punt play for $2.3K or less. The only other projected LHB for the Blue Jays tonight, Corey Dickerson (98 wRC+, .136 ISO), has displayed little power this year, but has two home runs (plus three doubles) in 19 PAs against Pineda. Lastly, George Springer (122 wRC+, .289 ISO) punishes most pitchers, but has given Pineda nightmares with three home runs and three doubles in just 26 PAs. We generally don’t need much incentive to roster Toronto bats and while the weather might be a turnoff, the matchup certainly is not.

Six Extra-Base Hits in 23 PAs Against Tonight's Pitcher

Michael Pineda has struck out exactly three in five straight appearances (one in relief), going back to before he hit the IL in August. As usual, Pineda exhibits excellent control (4.7 BB%) with some issues in his contact profile (90.7 mph EV), though just a 20.4 K% this year. His 3.87 ERA is below, but within half a run of most contact neutral estimators with an xERA nearly a full run higher (4.81). That he has a .313 wOBA against RHBs would seem to help him in a matchup with a predominantly right-handed lineup. However, Statcast raises that to a .340 xwOBA, which is much less ideal against the Toronto Blue Jays, who have the fourth best implied run line tonight (5.43). Randal Grichuk (91) is the only batter in the projected lineup below a 98 wRC+ vs RHP this season and nobody is below a .160 ISO. This would seem like a smash spot for Vladimir Guerrero Jr. (171 wRC+, .315 ISO vs RHP) and friends. George Springer (139 wRC+, .319 ISO) even has a history of smashing Pineda, homering three times and adding three doubles in 23 PAs against him good for a .504 xwOBA with a 95.6 mph EV.