Ozzie Albies

Atlanta Braves
Pos: 2B | Hand: S
Status: Active
player props
FPTS 2 5 7 10 12 14 17 19 22 24 SAL $5.6K $6K $6.5K $6.9K $7.3K $7.7K $8.1K $8.6K $9K $9.4K
  • FPTS: 2
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 5
  • FPTS: 10
  • FPTS: 5
  • FPTS: 3
  • FPTS: 10
  • FPTS: 3
  • FPTS: 10
  • FPTS: 24
  • FPTS: 23
  • FPTS: 2
  • FPTS: 2
  • FPTS: 8
  • FPTS: 4
  • FPTS: 0
  • SAL: $5.3K
  • SAL: $5.3K
  • SAL: $5.4K
  • SAL: $5.5K
  • SAL: $5.6K
  • SAL: $9.4K
  • SAL: $5.4K
  • SAL: $5.4K
  • SAL: $5.2K
  • SAL: $5.2K
  • SAL: $5.2K
  • SAL: $5.2K
  • SAL: $5.2K
  • SAL: $5.2K
  • SAL: $5.3K
  • SAL: $5.2K
06/26 06/27 06/28 06/29 06/30 07/02 07/03 07/04 07/05 07/06 07/07 07/09 07/10 07/11 07/12
Date Opp DKSAL FDSAL DKFPTS FDFPTS sf ab slg h so hbp gidp 1b babip 2b pa 3b sb hr xbh r obp rbi iso bb ops ibb
2024-07-11 @ ARI $5.2K $3.7K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-07-10 @ ARI $5.3K $3.8K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2024-07-09 @ ARI $5.2K $3.8K 8 9 0 5 0.2 1 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2024-07-08 @ ARI $5.2K $3.8K 2 3.5 1 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
2024-07-07 vs. PHI $5.2K $3.7K 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2024-07-06 vs. PHI $5.2K $3.6K 23 31.9 0 4 1.25 2 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 3 0.75 0 1.75 0
2024-07-05 vs. PHI $5.2K $3.4K 24 31.1 0 4 1.5 3 1 0 0 2 1 0 4 0 0 1 1 3 0.75 1 0.75 0 2.25 0
2024-07-04 vs. SF $5.2K $3.4K 10 12.2 0 4 0.75 2 1 0 0 1 0.67 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 0 0.25 0 1.25 0
2024-07-03 vs. SF $5.4K $3.4K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2024-07-02 vs. SF $5.4K $3.5K 10 12.5 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0.25 1 0 0 0.5 0
2024-06-30 vs. PIT $9.4K $3.5K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2024-06-29 vs. PIT $5.6K $3.4K 5 6 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2024-06-28 vs. PIT $5.5K $3.6K 10 12.2 0 5 0.6 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.4 0 0.2 0 1 0
2024-06-27 @ CHW $5.4K $3.6K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2024-06-26 @ STL $5.3K -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-06-26 @ STL $5.3K $3.6K 2 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2024-06-24 @ STL $5.2K $3.6K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-06-22 @ NYY $5.1K $3.5K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-06-21 @ NYY $5.3K $3.5K 25 34.4 0 5 1.2 2 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 6 0 0 1 2 2 0.5 2 0.8 1 1.7 0
2024-06-19 vs. DET $5.4K $3.5K 17 21.7 0 4 0.5 2 1 1 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0.6 1 0 0 1.1 0
2024-06-18 vs. DET $5.5K $3.5K 12 15.7 0 4 0.75 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 4 1 0 0 1 1 0.25 1 0.5 0 1 0
2024-06-17 vs. DET $5.5K $3.5K 14 18.7 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 1 0.75 0 1.25 0
2024-06-16 vs. TB $5.5K $3.5K 0 0 0 5 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-06-15 vs. TB $5.7K $3.5K 6 9.7 1 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 1 0 1 0.2 0
2024-06-14 vs. TB $5.6K $3.4K 7 9.2 0 5 0.4 1 0 0 0 0 0.2 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.2 0 0.2 0 0.6 0
2024-06-13 @ BAL $5.6K $3.3K 22 27.9 0 5 1.2 4 0 0 0 2 0.8 2 5 0 0 0 2 2 0.8 1 0.4 0 2 0
2024-06-12 @ BAL $5.5K $3.4K 5 6.2 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2024-06-11 @ BAL $5.4K $3.5K 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-06-09 @ WSH $5.3K $3.5K 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2024-06-08 @ WSH $5.2K $3.7K 7 9.5 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.75 0
2024-06-07 @ WSH $5.1K $3.7K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-06-06 @ WSH $5.1K $3.8K 7 9.2 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2024-06-05 @ BOS $5.2K $3.9K 2 3 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 1 0.33 0
2024-06-04 @ BOS $5.2K $3.9K 25 34.9 0 4 1.5 2 1 0 0 0 0.5 1 4 0 0 1 2 2 0.5 3 1 0 2 0
2024-06-02 vs. OAK $5.3K $3.9K 5 6.5 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 0 0 0.5 0
2024-06-01 vs. OAK $5.4K $3.8K 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-05-31 vs. OAK $5.2K $3.7K 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2024-05-30 vs. WSH $5.3K $3.7K 15 18 0 3 1 2 0 0 0 1 0.67 1 4 0 1 0 1 0 0.75 0 0.33 1 1.75 0
2024-05-29 vs. WSH $5.3K $3.7K 10 12.2 0 4 0.75 2 1 0 0 1 0.67 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 0 0.25 0 1.25 0
2024-05-28 vs. WSH $5.4K $3.6K 5 6 0 2 0.5 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.67 0 0 1 1.17 0
2024-05-27 vs. WSH $5.2K $3.5K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 1 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2024-05-26 @ PIT $5.4K $3.4K 18 25.4 0 4 0.75 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 2 0.6 2 0.25 1 1.35 0
2024-05-25 @ PIT $5.3K $3.4K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2024-05-24 @ PIT $5.4K $3.4K 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2024-05-23 @ CHC $5.3K $3.4K 12 15.5 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0.5 1 0 1 0.83 0
2024-05-22 @ CHC $5.3K $3.6K 5 6.5 1 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 1 0 0 0.45 0
2024-05-21 @ CHC $5.2K $3.6K 2 3 0 4 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.2 0
2024-05-20 vs. SD $5.2K -- 5 6.5 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 0 0 0.5 0
2024-05-20 vs. SD $5.4K $3.6K 5 6.2 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2024-05-19 vs. SD $9.4K $3.6K 5 6.5 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 0 0 0.5 0
2024-05-17 vs. SD $5.4K $3.6K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2024-05-15 vs. CHC $5.3K $3.6K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2024-05-14 vs. CHC $5.3K $3.7K 12 15.4 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0.6 0 0 1 1.1 0
2024-05-13 vs. CHC $5.3K $3.7K 6 6 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2024-05-12 @ NYM $9K $3.8K 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-05-11 @ NYM $5K $3.7K 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-05-10 @ NYM $5.2K $3.8K 16 21.7 0 3 1.33 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 1.83 0
2024-05-08 vs. BOS $5.2K $3.8K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2024-05-07 vs. BOS $5.2K $3.8K 6 9.2 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 2 0.5 0
2024-05-05 @ LAD $5.2K $3.8K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-05-04 @ LAD $5.1K $3.8K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-05-03 @ LAD $5.4K $3.9K 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2024-05-01 @ SEA $5.4K $3.9K 7 9.2 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2024-04-30 @ SEA $5.4K $3.9K 8 9.5 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 1 0 0 1 0
2024-04-29 @ SEA $5.3K $3.9K 7 9.5 0 4 0.5 1 2 0 0 0 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.75 0
2024-04-28 vs. CLE $5.4K $3.9K 14 18.7 0 4 0.75 2 2 1 0 1 1 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.6 1 0.25 0 1.35 0
2024-04-27 vs. CLE $4.8K $4K 5 6 0 5 0.4 1 1 0 0 0 0.25 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.2 0 0.2 0 0.6 0
2024-04-26 vs. CLE $4.9K $4K 12 15.7 0 4 0.75 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 1 0.25 0 1.25 0
2024-04-22 vs. MIA $5.8K $4K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-15 @ HOU $5.8K $4K 11 15.7 0 3 0.33 1 2 1 0 1 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.6 1 0 1 0.93 0
2024-04-14 @ MIA $5.7K $4K 10 12.2 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2024-04-13 @ MIA $5.7K $4.2K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 2 0 0 0 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2024-04-12 @ MIA $5.6K $4.2K 14 18.9 0 4 0.5 2 0 1 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0.6 1 0 0 1.1 0
2024-04-11 vs. NYM $5.5K $4.2K 6 6 0 5 0.4 2 0 0 0 2 0.4 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 0 0.8 0
2024-04-09 vs. NYM $5.5K $4K 14 19.2 0 4 0.75 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 2 0.25 0 1.25 0
2024-04-08 vs. NYM $5.3K $4K 18 25.7 0 4 0.75 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.6 3 0.25 1 1.35 0
2024-04-07 vs. ARI $5.5K $4.2K 7 9.2 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2024-04-06 vs. ARI $5.4K $4K 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-05 vs. ARI $5.5K $4K 5 6.2 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2024-04-02 @ CHW $5.4K $3.8K 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2024-04-01 @ CHW $5.6K $3.7K 16 21.9 0 4 0.75 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 2 0.6 1 0.25 1 1.35 0
2024-03-31 @ PHI $5.3K $3.6K 21 28.7 0 4 1.25 2 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 3 0.75 0 1.75 0
2024-03-30 @ PHI $5.2K $3.7K 31 40.9 0 5 1.2 3 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 1 1 1 2 0.6 3 0.6 0 1.8 0
2024-03-29 @ PHI $5.2K $3.7K 4 6.2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2024-03-26 @ MIN -- -- 3 3 0 2 0.5 1 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2024-03-25 vs. MIN $4.5K -- 5 6.2 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 0 0 0.67 0
2024-03-24 @ BOS $4.5K -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-03-23 vs. TB -- -- 14 18.7 0 3 1.33 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 1 0.33 1 1 0 1.67 0
2024-03-21 vs. NYY $4.5K -- 5 6 0 2 0.5 1 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.67 0 0 1 1.17 0
2024-03-20 vs. TOR $4.5K -- 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2024-03-17 vs. BOS -- -- 14 18.7 0 3 1.33 2 0 0 0 0 0.67 2 3 0 0 0 2 1 0.67 1 0.67 0 2 0
2024-03-16 vs. PIT -- -- 3 3 0 2 0.5 1 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2024-03-15 @ DET -- -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-03-13 @ BAL $4.5K -- 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2024-03-11 vs. MIN $4.5K -- 14 18.7 0 3 1.33 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 1 0.33 1 1 0 1.67 0
2024-03-09 vs. BAL $4.5K -- 7 9.5 0 3 0.67 1 0 0 0 0 0.33 1 3 0 0 0 1 0 0.33 1 0.33 0 1 0
2024-03-08 vs. PIT -- -- 9 12.7 0 2 0.5 1 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0.67 1 0 1 1.17 0
2024-03-05 vs. DET $4.5K -- 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-03-03 vs. PHI $4.5K -- 2 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 1 0.33 0
2024-03-02 @ TOR $4.5K $5K 10 12.2 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 0 0 0.67 0
2024-02-29 vs. MIN -- -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-02-26 vs. BAL -- -- 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-02-25 vs. BOS -- -- 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-10-12 @ PHI $5.1K $7.5K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-10-11 @ PHI $5.1K $3.8K 10 12.5 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 1 0 1 1.1 0
2023-10-09 vs. PHI $5.1K $3.9K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-10-07 vs. PHI $5.2K $3.9K 5 6 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 1 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2023-10-01 vs. WSH $5.8K $4.1K 16 21.6 0 3 0.67 2 0 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 0 0 3 0.8 0 0 2 1.47 0
2023-09-30 vs. WSH $5.7K $4.1K 7 9.7 0 5 0.2 1 2 0 1 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 1 0 0 0.4 0
2023-09-29 vs. WSH $5.6K $4K 18 21.5 0 5 1 3 1 0 0 2 0.75 0 6 1 0 0 1 0 0.67 1 0.4 1 1.67 0
2023-09-28 vs. CHC $5.6K $3.9K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-09-27 vs. CHC $5.5K $3.9K 24 31.7 0 5 1.2 3 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.6 3 0.6 0 1.8 0
2023-09-26 vs. CHC $5.8K $3.9K 12 15.2 0 4 1 2 1 0 0 0 0.67 2 4 0 0 0 2 1 0.5 0 0.5 0 1.5 0
2023-09-24 @ WSH -- -- 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2023-09-24 @ WSH $5.9K $3.9K 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-09-22 @ WSH $5.8K $3.8K 12 15.7 0 5 0.6 2 0 0 0 1 0.4 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.4 1 0.2 0 1 0
2023-09-21 @ WSH $6K $3.8K 38 50.4 0 6 1.33 4 1 0 0 2 0.75 1 6 0 1 1 2 2 0.67 4 0.67 0 2 0
2023-09-20 vs. PHI $5.8K $3.7K 12 15.7 1 4 0.75 2 2 0 0 1 0.67 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.4 1 0.25 0 1.15 0
2023-09-19 vs. PHI $5.9K $3.6K 12 15.4 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0.6 0 0 1 1.1 0
2023-09-18 vs. PHI $6K $3.6K 14 18.7 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 1 0.75 0 1.25 0
2023-09-17 @ MIA $5.9K $3.6K 10 12 0 5 0.8 2 1 0 0 0 0.5 2 5 0 0 0 2 0 0.4 0 0.4 0 1.2 0
2023-09-16 @ MIA $6K $3.6K 16 22.2 0 5 0.8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.2 2 0.6 0 1 0
2023-09-15 @ MIA $6K $3.6K 10 13 0 5 0.4 2 0 0 0 2 0.4 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 2 0 0 0.8 0
2023-09-13 @ PHI $6K $3.6K 12 15.2 0 4 0.75 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.6 0 0.25 1 1.35 0
2023-09-12 @ PHI $5.9K $3.6K 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-11 @ PHI $5.9K -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-11 @ PHI $8.4K $3.7K 11 15.7 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.4 1 0.25 1 0.9 0
2023-09-10 vs. PIT $5.9K $3.7K 12 15.4 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 1 0 0 2 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-09-09 vs. PIT $6.1K $3.7K 8 9.5 0 5 0.4 2 1 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 1 0 0 0.8 0
2023-09-08 vs. PIT $6K $3.7K 0 0 0 5 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-07 vs. STL $6K $3.7K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-09-06 vs. STL $5.7K $3.7K 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-05 vs. STL $6K $3.7K 17 21.7 0 5 1 2 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.4 1 0.6 0 1.4 0
2023-09-03 @ LAD $6K $4K 5 6 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2023-09-02 @ LAD $5.9K $4K 6 6 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2023-09-01 @ LAD $5.5K $4K 5 6.2 0 5 0.2 1 0 0 1 1 0.2 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2023-08-30 @ COL $5.9K $3.8K 9 9 0 5 0.6 3 1 0 0 3 0.75 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 0 0 0 1.2 0
2023-08-29 @ COL $5.7K $3.8K 6 6 0 5 0.4 2 2 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 0 0.8 0
2023-08-28 @ COL $5.7K $3.8K 0 0 0 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-23 vs. NYM $5.5K $3.8K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-18 vs. SF $5.2K $3.9K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-16 vs. NYY $5.6K $3.9K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-13 @ NYM $8.6K $3.7K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-08-12 @ NYM $5.7K -- 30 40.4 0 3 1.67 2 0 1 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 1 1 1 2 0.8 2 1 1 2.47 0
2023-08-12 @ NYM $5.7K $3.8K 37 51.4 0 6 1 3 0 0 0 2 0.4 0 6 0 1 1 1 2 0.5 6 0.5 0 1.5 0
2023-08-11 @ NYM $5.6K $3.8K 7 9.5 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 1 0 1 0.65 0
2023-08-10 @ PIT $5.6K $3.8K 10 12.2 0 5 0.2 1 2 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2023-08-09 @ PIT $5.4K $3.8K 13 16 0 5 0.6 3 0 0 0 3 0.6 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 2 0 0 1.2 0
2023-08-08 @ PIT $5.4K $3.7K 5 6.2 0 5 0.2 1 2 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2023-08-07 @ PIT $5.6K $3.7K 18 25.4 0 5 0.8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.2 2 0.6 0 1 0
2023-08-06 @ CHC $5.6K $3.7K 13 15.2 0 5 0.8 3 2 0 0 2 1 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.6 0 0.2 0 1.4 0
2023-08-05 @ CHC $5.6K $3.7K 21 27.7 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 1 1 1 0.4 1 0.75 1 1.4 0
2023-08-04 @ CHC $8.6K $3.7K 7 9.2 0 5 0.4 1 1 0 0 0 0.25 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.2 0 0.2 0 0.6 0
2023-08-02 vs. LAA $5.4K $3.7K 17 22 1 4 1.25 2 0 0 0 0 0.4 1 5 1 0 0 2 0 0.4 2 0.75 0 1.65 0
2023-08-01 vs. LAA $5.6K $3.9K 5 6.2 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-07-31 vs. LAA $5.5K $3.9K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-07-30 vs. MIL $5.6K $3.9K 7 9.2 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2023-07-29 vs. MIL $5.6K $4.1K 10 12.7 0 5 0.4 2 3 0 0 2 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 1 0 0 0.8 0
2023-07-28 vs. MIL $5.6K $3.9K 7 9.7 0 5 0.2 1 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 1 0 0 0.4 0
2023-07-26 @ BOS $5.6K $3.8K 21 28.7 0 4 1.25 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 3 0.75 0 1.75 0
2023-07-25 @ BOS $5.6K $3.8K 4 6.2 0 4 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.2 0
2023-07-23 @ MIL $5.6K $3.8K 20 28.7 0 3 1.33 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 3 1 0 1.83 0
2023-07-22 @ MIL $6.3K $3.9K 4 6.2 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2023-07-21 @ MIL $6K $3.9K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-07-20 vs. ARI $6.1K $3.9K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-07-19 vs. ARI $6.1K $3.9K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-18 vs. ARI $5.7K $3.9K 11 15.4 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 5 0 0 0 1 2 0.4 0 0.25 1 0.9 0
2023-07-16 vs. CHW $5.7K $3.9K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 0
2023-07-15 vs. CHW $5.6K $3.9K 20 24.2 0 4 1 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 1 1 0 1 1 0.6 0 0.5 1 1.6 0
2023-07-14 vs. CHW $5.6K $4K 18 25.7 1 3 1 2 0 1 0 1 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.6 3 0.33 0 1.6 0
2023-07-11 @ AL -- -- 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-09 @ TB $5.8K $4K 5 6.2 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-07-08 @ TB $5.6K $4K 7 9.2 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2023-07-07 @ TB $5.6K $3.9K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-05 @ CLE $5.7K $3.7K 8 9.2 0 5 0.4 2 0 0 0 2 0.4 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 0 0.8 0
2023-07-04 @ CLE $5.6K $3.8K 32 43.9 0 3 2.67 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 2 2 0.75 3 2 1 3.42 0
2023-07-03 @ CLE $5.9K $3.6K 7 9.5 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 1 0 1 0.83 0
2023-07-02 vs. MIA $5.7K $3.7K 16 22.2 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 2 0.75 0 1.25 0
2023-07-01 vs. MIA $6K $3.6K 14 18.7 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 1 0.75 0 1.25 0
2023-06-30 vs. MIA $5.6K $3.6K 7 9.2 0 5 0.4 1 0 0 0 0 0.2 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.2 0 0.2 0 0.6 0
2023-06-28 vs. MIN $8.6K $3.6K 2 3.5 1 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
2023-06-27 vs. MIN $5.5K $3.6K 12 15.2 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 4 1 0 0 1 1 0.5 0 0.67 1 1.5 0
2023-06-26 vs. MIN $5.2K $3.5K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-06-25 @ CIN $5.2K $3.7K 11 15.7 1 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 1 0 0 1 0.17 1 0 1 0.17 0
2023-06-24 @ CIN $5K $3.7K 24 30.9 0 4 1.25 2 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 1 1 1 2 0.5 1 0.75 0 1.75 0
2023-06-23 @ CIN $4.9K $3.7K 12 15.2 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2023-06-22 @ PHI $5K $3.7K 5 6 0 5 0.4 1 1 0 0 0 0.25 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.2 0 0.2 0 0.6 0
2023-06-20 @ PHI $4.8K $3.7K 5 6.5 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 1 0 0 0.4 0
2023-06-18 vs. COL $5.1K $3.3K 28 38.2 0 5 1.2 3 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 6 0 0 1 1 1 0.67 4 0.6 1 1.87 0
2023-06-17 vs. COL $5K $3.1K 19 24.9 0 5 1 2 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.4 1 0.6 0 1.4 0
2023-06-16 vs. COL $4.8K $3.1K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-06-15 vs. COL $4.8K $3.2K 17 22.5 0 4 1 3 0 0 0 2 0.75 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.75 3 0.25 0 1.75 0
2023-06-14 @ DET -- -- 21 27.9 0 4 1.5 2 1 0 0 0 0.5 1 4 0 0 1 2 2 0.5 1 1 0 2 0
2023-06-14 @ DET $4.6K $3.2K 9 12.2 0 2 0.5 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.75 0 0 2 1.25 0
2023-06-12 @ DET $9K $3.2K 11 15.7 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0.25 1 0 1 0.25 0
2023-06-11 vs. WSH $4.7K $3.2K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-06-10 vs. WSH $4.6K $3K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-06-09 vs. WSH $4.4K $3K 7 9.2 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2023-06-08 vs. NYM $4.5K $3K 22 31.9 0 5 0.8 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 0 0 1 1 2 0.33 3 0.6 1 1.13 0
2023-06-07 vs. NYM $4.4K $3K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-06-06 vs. NYM $4.5K $3K 16 21.7 0 3 1.33 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 1.83 1
2023-06-04 @ ARI $4.4K $3K 32 40.4 0 5 1.4 4 0 0 0 3 0.75 0 5 0 1 1 1 2 0.8 2 0.6 0 2.2 0
2023-06-03 @ ARI $4.6K $3.2K 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-06-02 @ ARI $4.7K $3.1K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-05-31 @ OAK $4.5K $3.1K 16 22.2 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 2 0.75 0 1.25 0
2023-05-30 @ OAK $4.5K $3.1K 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-29 @ OAK $4.4K $3.1K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2023-05-28 vs. PHI $7.2K $3.1K 10 13 0 5 0.4 2 0 0 0 2 0.4 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 2 0 0 0.8 0
2023-05-27 vs. PHI $4.6K $3.1K 2 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 1 0.33 0
2023-05-26 vs. PHI $4.5K $3.1K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-25 vs. PHI $4.6K $3.2K 8 9.2 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2023-05-24 vs. LAD $4.7K $3.2K 6 9.7 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 1 0 1 0.25 0
2023-05-23 vs. LAD $4.6K $3.3K 8 9 0 4 0.75 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 0 0.25 0 1.25 0
2023-05-22 vs. LAD $4.7K $3.3K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-21 vs. SEA $4.8K $3.3K 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-20 vs. SEA $4.5K $3.3K 2 3 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-05-19 vs. SEA $4.8K $3.3K 7 9.2 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2023-05-17 @ TEX $4.8K $3.2K 7 9.7 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 1 0 0 0.5 0
2023-05-16 @ TEX $4.6K $3.2K 7 9.2 0 3 0.33 1 2 1 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 0 0.83 0
2023-05-15 @ TEX $4.8K $3.3K 12 15.5 0 5 0.8 2 0 0 0 0 0.4 2 5 0 0 0 2 0 0.4 1 0.4 0 1.2 0
2023-05-14 @ TOR $4.5K $3.3K 16 22.2 0 5 0.8 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.2 2 0.6 0 1 0
2023-05-13 @ TOR $4.8K $3.3K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-12 @ TOR -- -- 2 3 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.33 0
2023-05-10 vs. BOS $4.5K $3.5K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-09 vs. BOS $4.5K $3.5K 5 6.5 0 5 0.2 1 0 0 1 1 0.2 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 1 0 0 0.4 0
2023-05-07 vs. BAL $6.6K $3.5K 2 3.2 0 5 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-06 vs. BAL $4.3K $3.5K 8 9 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-05-05 vs. BAL $4.6K $3.2K 6 6 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2023-05-04 @ MIA $4.1K $3.2K 11 12 0 5 0.8 3 0 0 0 2 0.6 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.6 0 0.2 0 1.4 0
2023-05-03 @ MIA $4.4K $3.2K 31 40.4 0 5 1.8 4 0 0 0 1 0.75 2 5 0 0 1 3 2 0.8 2 1 0 2.6 0
2023-05-02 @ MIA $4.2K $3.8K 21 27.7 0 4 1.5 2 0 0 0 0 0.33 1 5 0 0 1 2 1 0.6 1 1 1 2.1 0
2023-05-01 @ NYM -- -- 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 1 0 0.25 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2023-05-01 @ NYM $7.4K $3.8K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-28 @ NYM $4.3K $3.4K 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-27 vs. MIA $4.8K $3.2K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-26 vs. MIA $4.5K $3K 9 12.2 0 2 0.5 1 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.75 0 0 2 1.25 1
2023-04-25 vs. MIA $4.3K $3.1K 28 37.4 0 4 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 2 2 0.5 2 1.5 0 2.5 0
2023-04-24 vs. MIA $4.8K $3.1K 17 22.5 0 5 0.8 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 1 0 0 1 0 0.4 3 0.4 0 1.2 0
2023-04-23 vs. HOU $4.3K $3.1K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 0
2023-04-22 vs. HOU $4.8K $3K 19 25.2 0 4 1.25 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 2 0.75 0 1.75 0
2023-04-21 vs. HOU $4.5K $3K 13 19.2 0 3 0.67 1 1 0 0 0 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 2 0.33 1 1.17 0
2023-04-19 @ SD $4.7K $3.1K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-18 @ SD $4.4K $3K 18 25.7 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 3 0.75 0 1.25 0
2023-04-17 @ SD $4.6K $2.8K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-04-16 @ KC $4.3K $2.8K 21 27.9 0 4 1.5 2 0 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 1 2 2 0.5 1 1 0 2 0
2023-04-15 @ KC $4.7K $2.8K 17 23 0 5 0.6 3 0 0 0 3 0.6 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 4 0 0 1.2 0
2023-04-14 @ KC $4.3K $2.8K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-12 vs. CIN $4.7K $2.8K 5 6.2 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-04-11 vs. CIN $4.7K $3K 16 22.2 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 2 0.75 0 1.25 0
2023-04-10 vs. CIN $4.7K $3K 5 6.2 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-04-09 vs. SD $96 $3.1K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-04-08 vs. SD $4.8K $3.1K 5 6 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2023-04-07 vs. SD $4.6K $3.1K 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-06 vs. SD $4.7K $3.2K 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-05 @ STL $4.5K $3.2K 5 6.5 1 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 0 0 0.58 0
2023-04-04 @ STL $4.8K $3.3K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-04-03 @ STL $4.6K $3.4K 16 22.2 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 2 0.75 0 1.25 0
2023-04-02 @ WSH $4.6K $3.6K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-04-01 @ WSH $4.6K $3.6K 5 6 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2023-03-30 @ WSH -- -- 8 9.5 0 5 0.4 2 0 0 0 2 0.4 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 1 0 0 0.8 0
2023-03-28 @ BOS -- -- 5 6.5 0 2 0.5 1 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 1 0 0 1 0
2023-03-27 vs. BOS -- -- 9 12.2 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 0 1 0.33 0
2023-03-26 vs. PIT -- -- 9 13 0 2 0.5 1 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.67 2 0 1 1.17 0
2023-03-25 vs. MIN -- -- 10 12.7 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 0 0 1 0
2023-03-24 @ BOS -- -- 19 24.7 0 3 1.67 2 1 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.75 1 1 1 2.42 0
2023-03-23 vs. NYM -- -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-03-20 vs. TB -- -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-03-19 @ MIN -- -- 19 24.9 0 4 1.25 2 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 1 0.75 0 1.75 0
2023-03-18 vs. PHI -- -- 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-03-17 @ BOS -- -- 7 9.7 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 1 0 0 0.5 0
2023-03-15 vs. HOU -- -- 7 9.5 0 2 0.5 1 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.67 1 0 1 1.17 0
2023-03-14 @ PHI -- -- 22 31.9 0 3 1.33 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 3 1 1 1.83 0
2023-03-11 vs. DET -- -- 18 25.7 0 3 1.33 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 1 0.33 3 1 0 1.67 0
2023-03-07 vs. BOS -- -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-03-04 vs. MIN -- -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-03-01 vs. TB -- -- 2 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 1 0.33 0
2023-02-27 vs. TOR -- -- 5 6.5 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 1 0 0 0.67 0
2023-02-25 vs. BOS -- -- 2 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.5 0
2022-09-17 vs. PHI $4.7K $2.6K 9 12.4 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 2 0
2022-09-16 vs. PHI $4.9K $2.6K 9 13 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 2 0.25 0 0.75 0

Ozzie Albies Daily Fantasy News, Rankings, Projections

Top Prospect With a Wild Streak Could Be One to Stack Against

If all you’re concerned about is the probability of “smashing” the slate, then the Yankees are your best bet, as the only team that projects above a 10 Smash% in PlateIQ simulations. Kansas City is an overwhelming Value stack on DK (19.3%) currently, while San Francisco, Texas and Detroit are showing stacking value on FanDuel. Getting into Leverage projections, which means we’re looking for the lowest ownership with the best probability of going off, we again find San Francisco along with Atlanta as solid options on FanDuel, while Atlanta (again) and Houston project strong leverage possibilities on DK.

The Giants are in Cleveland tonight, against Zach Plesac. It’s a very strikeout prone, but productive projected lineup against a pitcher whom batters from either side of the plate have an xwOBA within six points of .320 against since last year. In fact, not a single batter expected to be in tonight’s lineup drops below a 97 wRC+ or .186 ISO against RHP since last year. Led by Brandon Belt (170 wRC+, .348 ISO vs RHP since 2021) as the only Giant above $3K on FanDuel, an affordable San Francisco stack could certainly take down a GPP tonight.

Atlanta faces a top prospect making his debut in pitcher friendly environment in San Diego. Mackenzie Gore struck out seven of 16 in his first start at AAA this season, but lost some of his luster last season (6.3 K-BB% in six AAA starts). There is some polarization around him as a prospect and ZIPs projections currently see him as a pitcher with a four and a half ERA this season. This is a pitcher Atlanta could have their way with if he carries his wild streak with him to the majors tonight. The Braves have, inexplicably, had their issues with LHP the last few years, despite running with a predominantly RH lineup most nights. The exceptions to that have been Ozzie Albies (146 wRC+, .262 ISO vs LHP since LY) and Travis d’Arnaud (149 wRC+, .167 ISO). Dansby Swanson (90 wRC+ .219 ISO) and Austin Riley (99 wRC+, .152 ISO) could do some damage as well.

RHBs Have a .387 wOBA Against This Pitcher Since Last Year

Patrick Corbin wasn’t awful in his first start, against the Mets (4 IP – 2 R – 2 BB – 4 K) and the Braves had just a 93 wRC+ vs LHP last year, despite a predominantly right-handed lineup. Yet, Atlanta is still just one of two teams with a run total above five runs tonight. Last year, Corbin produced a 5.62 ERA with a 4.29 xFIP his only estimator below four and a half. His strikeout rate dropped to 19% last year and 22.6% of his fly balls left the yard for a career high 37 dingers allowed. RHBs have a .387 wOBA against Corbin since last year. The Braves are the early Smash% favorite in LineupHQ and several of their hitters project near the top of the board (PlateIQ), including Ozzie Albies, who’s mashed LHP since last year (142 wRC+, .260 ISO) and Marcell Ozuna, who has not in a smaller sample (70 wRC+, .154 ISO). However, Ozuna is a relatively cheap bat in the middle of a highly regarded lineup tonight. If you’re looking for even more value for your Atlanta stack, you might want to consider starting at the bottom on DraftKings, as Orlando Arcia (86 wRC+) is the top point per dollar value, aside from Ozuna. On FanDuel, it’s Adam Duvall (.182 ISO) at $2.9K. The Brewers, Cardinals, Yankees, Astros and Angels are also around five implied runs, while the Rangers join the Braves at the top of the board above five.

Looking at a Pair of Rookie Starters on Friday

Reid Detmers is the top prospect for the Angels (via Fangraphs), moving pretty quickly through the minors last season (just 62 innings with a strikeout rate above one-third of batters) after being drafted in 2020. He did struggle to a 7.9 K-BB% over five major league starts (20.2 IP) and 11.6% Barrels/BBE, but also had an 11.6 SwStr%. He struck out 11 in 5.2 spring innings. While his Fangraphs scouting report doesn’t see a ton of further upside, it does suggest he’s ready to be a mid-rotation contributor this year. The contact prone Astros had a 117 wRC+ vs RHP last year. This will be a very difficult spot for the rookie.

Reiver Sanmartin made his major league debut last season with two starts after splitting his 82.1 AAA innings between the pen and rotation with an impressive 25.9 K% (19.2 K-BB%). However, his Fangraphs player page gives him a 35 Future Value grade without a prospect ranking within the organization. Sanmartin covered just four innings over two spring starts. We’re likely to see a lot of bullpen in this one. This should be a decent spot to expect an Atlanta bounce back. Despite owning the highest implied run line on the slate currently (5.19), Atlanta bats don’t project to be over-owned at this point. Ozzie Albies was much more efficient from the right-side last year (144 wRC+, .262 ISO).

Terrible Bullpens Backing Struggling Lefties

There are two bullpens in the major leagues with both a FIP and xFIP above five over the last 30 days and both of those teams are starting struggling pitchers, to be kind. While an absurd .390 BABIP and 58.1 LOB% are contributing heavily to Keegan Akin’s 8.13 ERA, it’s not like he’s doing himself any favors with a 19.6 K%, 35 GB% and 90.4 mph EV. Estimators average out around five, while Akin has completed five innings just twice this year. That means Atlanta is going to see a lot of a Baltimore bullpen with a disturbing 7.34 ERA, 5.99 FIP and 5.42 xFIP over the last 30 days. Let’s start with Akin’s .390+ wOBA against batters from either side of the plate, even though Statcast substantially lowers same-handed batters (.317 xwOBA), it confirms the punishment RHBs have doled out (.371 xwOBA) and Freddie Freeman (119 wRC+, .173 ISO vs LHP this year) has been on fire (154 wRC+ last 30 days) and may only face Akin twice. He’s also the only LHB projected to be in the Atlanta lineup tonight. The Braves have a 6.2 team total that’s only third best on the board tonight. It’s going to be difficult to find a poor play in this lineup tonight, though Ozzie Albies (152 wRC+, .286 ISO) and Jorge Soler (119 wRC+, .281 ISO) are two of the top overall bats on the board tonight.

Patrick Corbin has allowed 38 runs (36 earned) over his last 44 innings with 13 home runs (24.5 HR/FB), just a 15.9 K% and 17 barrels (11%). Contact neutral estimators (xFIP, SIERA) run around four and a half this year with remaining estimators above five. RHBs have a .378 wOBA and xwOBA against him this year with the Milwaukee lineup projecting to present with six of them tonight. Surprise NL MVP candidate, Willy Adames (108 wRC+, .242 ISO vs LHP this season) is one of the top bats here, but perhaps a better value might be Avisail Garcia (172 wRC+, .247 ISO), who has a 170 wRC+ over the last 30 days and costs just $3K on FanDuel ($4.4K on DraftKings). For some reason, the Nationals are allowing Corbin to run through lineups nearly three times, but perhaps it’s because the bullpen behind him owns a 5.76 ERA, 5.41 FIP and 5.49 xFIP over the last 30 days. All of this combines to give the Brewers a 5.32 implied run line.

Power + Speed

Let me preface my love for a Braves stack by saying that I am 100% biased against Steven Matz. Matz undeniably had an excellent second half of the 2019 season, posting a 3.49 ERA over his last 10 starts. Furthermore, he's actually had notable success against the Braves with a 2.94 ERA over 13 starts. You know what I say to that? Who cares! The reason why I will almost always have some exposure against Matz when he toes the rubber is his career 16% HR-to-flyball-ratio and 1.52 HR/9. Oh, it also helps that he has been below average in terms of stolen base prevention every year since 2016. For those not up to date with advanced metrics, all of that was a fancy way of saying Matz allows A LOT of HRs and also a fair amount of stolen bases. Both of those are things we want to chase for fantasy and both are things the Braves lineup is constructed to take advantage of.

Jack Flaherty & Mike Foltynewicz had great second halves & pitched well in Game Two

Wednesday’s MLB slate features two elimination games in the National League. This means that no starting pitcher is safe from the quick hook, although the Cardinals certainly have their best pitcher on the mound. Jack Flaherty struck out eight of the 29 Braves he faced, walking just one with a single HR and three earned runs despite keeping 60% of his contact on the ground. He ties for the slate lead with a 29.9 K% this year and his 2.75 ERA tops the board by more than a full half run, though his estimators are more in line with the two pitchers in Los Angeles tonight. Flaherty’s 80.6 Z-Contact% is best on the board by nearly four full points and his 86.1 mph aEV is best on the board by more than a mile per hour. At Flaherty’s $7.4K price tag on DraftKings, he may be the best value there. The Braves had a 23.2 K% vs RHP this year, although today’s specific lineup features just four batters below a 17 K%.

Offensively, it’s a very tight board with only the Nationals outside a 3.75 to 4.0 implied run range. Atlanta is the much more hitter friendly run environment here too. The surprise in this lineup is Adam Duvall (91 wRC+, .247 ISO vs RHP this year), who’s had some big hits in this series, replacing Matt Joyce. While Flaherty had just 18 points separating his wOBA between RH and LH batters this season (both below .270), his xwOBA pushed that past 60 points (LHBs .306), making this a questionable decision. A healthy Freddie Freeman (154 wRC+, .280 ISO) would be the top bat in this spot, but there’s some question about how healthy he really is. Ozzie Albies (98 wRC+, .177 ISO) and Nick Markakis (112 wRC+, .147 ISO) are more league average bats against RHP, while Brian McCann (97 wRC+, .178 ISO) is certainly viable behind the plate here.

Mike Foltynewicz has the worst season numbers on the board. His 21.4 K% is the only mark below 29% and his estimators (all above four) are the only ones above four. In fact, he owns the only DRA above three and his .325 xwOBA is worst on the board by exactly 50 points. That said, he struck out seven of 24 Cardinals, allowing just three hits without a run in his first start of the series and finished up on quite the run. After being recalled to the majors in August, he has a 2.65 ERA and 3.77 FIP with a 16.5 K-BB% in 10 starts. With the top park neutral matchup on the board (Cardinals 93 wRC+, 23.2 K% vs RHP), Folty is at least viable in a secondary DraftKings spot at the lowest price on the board ($6K). Dexter Fowler (107 wRC+, .179 ISO vs RHP) is the lowest priced Cardinal on DraftKings ($3.7K) and potentially the top value bat in this game (also below $3K on FanDuel). Marcell Ozuna (113 wRC+, .224 ISO) has been heating up in this series. Paul DeJong (104 wRC+, .228 ISO) is the only other batter in the lineup above a .200 ISO vs RHP this year. Yadiers Molina (77 wRC+) is the only batter in the lineup outside a 97-113 wRC+ range vs RHP this year.

Cards/Braves features two highest GB rates in the majors, but lowest K rates on the board

The game in St Louis features the two highest ground ball rates in baseball this year (more than 100 IP), but also the only two strikeout rates on the board lower than 23% in Dallas Keuchel (18.7 K%, 60.1 GB%) and Dakota Hudson (18 K%, 56.9 GB%). They are also the only pitchers on the board above a .300 wOBA (both are above .330) and above 35.5% 95+ mph EV (both are above 38%). While these are clearly the bottom two pitchers on the board from a daily fantasy standpoint and further burdened by the prospect of elimination (in Hudson’s case) or working on just three days rest (in Keuchel’s case), none the less, either must be considered in a secondary role on DraftKings, where they’re the two lowest priced pitchers on the board. One reason is the favorable environment in St Louis, a clear pitcher’s park in the cooler months of the season. Another is the fact that it’s hard to call any pitcher really safe today. Even Max Scherzer fails to fit that description in an elimination game against the Dodgers.

All that said, this is certainly not a spot to avoid batters either. RHBs were right around a .340 wOBA and xwOBA against Keuchel this season, still with a 59.3 GB%, but much lower than LHBs (.277 wOBA, 70 GB%). The frightening thing here though, is that this St Louis lineup features just three batters above a .150 ISO vs LHP this year and also just three above a 97 wRC+. Tommy Edman (151 wRC+, .262 ISO) is just one of two above both and he’s batting seventh. The other, and clearly the most coveted batter in this lineup, is Paul Goldschmidt (148 wRC+, .298 ISO).

For the road team, Hudson’s splits have been even worse. LHBs are above a .350 wOBA and xwOBA this year with a ground ball rate (50.2%) nearly 15 points lower. This makes Freddie Freeman (154 wRC+, .280 ISO vs RHP) the clear top bat here, but also adds value to cheaper bats in Nick Markakis (112 wRC+, .147 ISO), Matt Joyce (131 wRC+, .163 ISO) and Brian McCann (97 wRC+, .178 ISO), who has very similar numbers to Ozzie Albies against RHP (98 wRC+, .177 ISO) this year.

Despite injuries, Atlanta lineup should remain potent vs LHP

Mike Montgomery has walked six with as many strikeouts over his last 14 innings (12 ERs). He has allowed the highest rate of contact above a 95 mph EV (45%) and has the second highest xwOBA on the board (.388). Batters from either side of the plate have tattooed him for a wOBA and xwOBA above .350. An Atlanta lineup likely lacking Ronald Acuna and Freddie Freeman tonight is still above five implied runs (5.28) and contains several bats who hammer LHP. Injuries may give Adam Duvall (198 wRC+, .424 ISO), Austin Riley (138 wRC+, .403 ISO) or Adeiny Hechavarria (123 wRC+, .304 ISO) a chance to move up the lineup. All are small sample sizes, but all are also below $2.5K on FanDuel. Josh Donaldson (124 wRC+, .233 ISO) and Ozzie Albies (189 wRC+, .306 ISO) are your more established bats, who will most certainly bat towards the top of the lineup.

Vince Velasquez's tendencies towards walks (9.1%) and Barrels (10.7%), a dangerous combo in Atlanta

Vince Velasquez has an 8.59 ERA over the last month that’s two runs above his FIP and nearly four runs above his non-FIP estimators. He’s been hammered in road starts by the Mets and Marlins. The issue for Velasquez this year has been control (9.1 BB%) and hard contact. He’s one of five pitchers on the board with a double digit Barrels/BBE rate (10.7%). The Braves represent a tough matchup for him on a warm day in Atlanta with the wind lightly blowing out to center. They have a 103 wRC+ vs RHP, but their 10% walk rate is the highest split on the board. Velasquez has only faced 13 Braves this year without a walk, but they did get him for four runs back in June. With only one batter in the projected Altanta lineup below a 9% walk rate vs RHP this year, this is a really dangerous spot for Velasquez and presents a nice stacking opportunity. The Braves have a 5.79 implied run line that’s currently sixth best on the board. Batters from either side of the plate are above a .330 wOBA and xwOBA against Velasquez this year. The top half of the Atlanta lineup, likely including Ronald Acuna (120 wRC+, .221 ISO vs RHP), Ozzie Albies (98 wRC+, .178 ISO), Freddie Freeman (159 wRC+, .291 ISO) and Josh Donaldson (137 wRC+, .280 ISO) should all have some value here.

Powerful Offense Gets Park Upgrade Tonight

The Atlanta Braves offense ranks 6th in ISO and 7th in slugging percentage against left-handed pitching this season, and tonight the team takes on Jason Vargas, who has put up worse numbers (4.93 ERA and 1.38 WHIP) since being traded from the Mets to Philadelphia. Part of the that could be due to Vargas now pitching in Citizens Bank Park, where the game will take place tonight in a park upgrade for the Braves. I’ll be targeting the top of the Atlanta order in GPPs, particularly Ronald Acuna, Ozzie Albies, Freddie Freeman, and Josh Donaldson.