Paul Goldschmidt

St. Louis Cardinals
Pos: 1B | Hand: R
Status: Active
player props
FPTS 3 6 10 13 16 19 22 26 29 32 SAL $4.1K $4.6K $5K $5.4K $5.9K $6.3K $6.7K $7.1K $7.6K $8K
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 3
  • FPTS: 19
  • FPTS: 9
  • FPTS: 13
  • FPTS: 16
  • FPTS: 12
  • FPTS: 3
  • FPTS: 7
  • FPTS: 9
  • FPTS: 3
  • FPTS: 10
  • FPTS: 32
  • FPTS: 14
  • FPTS: 12
  • SAL: $4.7K
  • SAL: $4.5K
  • SAL: $4.5K
  • SAL: $4.4K
  • SAL: $4K
  • SAL: $4.3K
  • SAL: $4K
  • SAL: $4.1K
  • SAL: $4K
  • SAL: $4K
  • SAL: $3.9K
  • SAL: $4K
  • SAL: $3.8K
  • SAL: $8K
  • SAL: $3.7K
  • SAL: $3.8K
05/11 05/11 05/12 05/14 05/15 05/16 05/18 05/18 05/19 05/20 05/22 05/25 05/26 05/27 05/28
Date Opp DKSAL FDSAL DKFPTS FDFPTS sf ab slg h so hbp gidp 1b babip 2b pa 3b sb hr xbh r obp rbi iso bb ops ibb
2024-05-28 @ CIN $3.8K $2.9K 12 15.2 0 4 0.75 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.6 0 0.25 1 1.35 0
2024-05-27 @ CIN $3.7K $2.7K 14 18.7 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 1 0.75 0 1.25 0
2024-05-26 vs. CHC $8K $2.7K 32 44.4 0 4 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 2 2 0.5 4 1.5 0 2.5 0
2024-05-25 vs. CHC $3.8K $2.7K 10 12.5 0 5 0.6 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.4 1 0.2 0 1 0
2024-05-22 vs. BAL $4K -- 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2024-05-20 vs. BAL $3.9K $2.8K 9 12.2 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2024-05-19 vs. BOS $4K $2.8K 7 9.2 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2024-05-18 vs. BOS $4K $2.9K 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 2 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2024-05-17 vs. BOS $4.1K $2.9K 12 15.7 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.6 1 0 1 1.1 0
2024-05-15 @ LAA $4K $2.8K 16 21.7 0 4 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.4 1 0.75 1 1.4 0
2024-05-14 @ LAA $4.3K $2.9K 13 15.2 0 5 0.4 2 3 0 0 2 1 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 0 0.8 0
2024-05-13 @ LAA $4K $2.8K 9 12.7 0 4 0.25 1 1 1 1 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 1 0 0 0.65 0
2024-05-12 @ MIL $4.4K $2.8K 19 25.2 0 5 1 2 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.4 2 0.6 0 1.4 0
2024-05-11 @ MIL $4.5K $2.9K 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 4 0 0 1 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2024-05-10 @ MIL $4.5K $2.9K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-05-07 vs. NYM $4.7K $3K 0 0 0 5 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-05-06 vs. NYM $4.9K $3K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2024-05-05 vs. CHW $4.8K $3K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-05-04 vs. CHW $4.8K $2.9K 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-05-03 vs. CHW $4.8K $2.9K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2024-05-01 @ DET $4.8K $2.9K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2024-04-30 @ DET $4.8K -- 16 18.2 0 5 1 4 0 0 0 3 0.8 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.8 0 0.2 0 1.8 0
2024-04-30 @ DET $4.8K $2.9K 5 6.2 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2024-04-28 @ NYM $4.6K $2.9K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2024-04-27 @ NYM $4.7K $3K 21 28.4 0 5 0.6 2 3 0 0 1 1 1 5 0 1 0 1 2 0.4 2 0.2 0 1 0
2024-04-26 @ NYM $4.7K $2.8K 7 9.2 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2024-04-24 vs. ARI $4.6K $2.8K 10 12.2 0 4 0.75 2 1 0 0 1 0.67 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 0 0.25 0 1.25 0
2024-04-23 vs. ARI $4.6K $2.8K 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-22 vs. ARI $4.5K $2.8K 19 24.9 0 4 1.25 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 1 0.75 0 1.75 0
2024-04-21 vs. MIL $4.8K $2.8K 5 6 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2024-04-20 vs. MIL $4.7K $2.9K 7 9.5 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 1 0 1 0.65 0
2024-04-19 vs. MIL $4.7K $2.9K 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-17 @ OAK $4.9K $2.8K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2024-04-15 @ OAK $4.9K $2.9K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2024-04-14 @ ARI $4.9K $2.9K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-13 @ ARI $4.7K $3K 6 6 0 5 0.4 2 0 0 0 2 0.4 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 0 0.8 0
2024-04-12 @ ARI $4.7K $3K 9 12.7 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 1 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 1 0 1 0.65 0
2024-04-10 vs. PHI $5K $3K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-09 vs. PHI $5.1K $3.2K 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-08 vs. PHI $5.1K $3.3K 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 2 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2024-04-07 vs. MIA $5.2K $3.4K 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-06 vs. MIA $5.2K $3.4K 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2024-04-04 vs. MIA $5K $3.5K 9 12.7 0 4 0.25 1 0 1 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 1 0 0 0.65 0
2024-04-03 @ SD $4.8K $3.5K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 1 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2024-04-02 @ SD $4.8K $3.5K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2024-04-01 @ SD $4.8K $3.5K 7 9.5 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 1 0 1 0.65 0
2024-03-31 @ LAD $9K $3.5K 7 10 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 2 0 0 0.5 0
2024-03-30 @ LAD $4.9K $3.7K 4 6.5 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 1 0 1 0.2 1
2024-03-29 @ LAD $5.2K $3.6K 6 9.2 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 2 0.5 0
2024-03-28 @ LAD $5.1K $3.6K 20 24.7 0 4 1.5 3 1 0 0 2 1 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.75 1 0.75 0 2.25 0
2024-03-26 @ CHC $4.5K -- 7 9.2 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 3 0
2024-03-25 @ CHC $4.5K -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-03-24 @ HOU -- -- 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-03-23 vs. WSH -- -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-03-21 vs. HOU $4.5K -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-03-19 vs. MIA -- -- 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2024-03-17 vs. HOU -- -- 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2024-03-15 vs. MIA -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-03-14 vs. NYM -- -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-03-11 vs. WSH -- -- 16 21.7 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 0
2024-03-10 @ MIA -- -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-03-09 vs. NYM $4.5K -- 4 6 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.67 0 0 2 0.67 0
2024-03-07 vs. HOU $4.5K -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-03-05 vs. MIN -- -- 18 25.2 1 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 1 0.67 2 3 1 4.67 0
2024-03-01 vs. NYM $4.5K -- 2 3.5 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
2024-02-29 vs. WSH $4.5K -- 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-02-27 vs. BOS $4.5K -- 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-02-26 @ MIA $4.5K -- 5 6 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0
2024-02-24 vs. MIA -- -- 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-30 vs. CIN $5.1K $3.3K 18 24.9 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 2 2 1 1 1 1 3 0
2023-09-29 vs. CIN $5K $3.3K 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-26 @ MIL $5.2K $3.5K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-24 @ SD $5.4K $3.6K 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-23 @ SD $5.1K $3.6K 8 12.2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.6 0 0 3 0.6 1
2023-09-22 @ SD $5.3K $3.6K 5 6.2 0 5 0.2 1 2 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2023-09-21 vs. MIL $5.3K $3.6K 8 9 0 3 1 2 1 0 0 1 1 1 3 0 0 0 1 0 0.67 0 0.33 0 1.67 0
2023-09-20 vs. MIL $4.9K $3.6K 5 6.5 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 1 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 0 0 0.5 0
2023-09-19 vs. MIL $5.2K $3.5K 4 6 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 2 0.4 0
2023-09-18 vs. MIL $5.1K $3.4K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-17 vs. PHI $5.2K $3.4K 25 34.9 0 4 1.5 2 1 0 0 0 0.5 1 4 0 0 1 2 2 0.5 3 1 0 2 0
2023-09-16 vs. PHI $5.1K $3.4K 9 12.5 0 4 0.5 1 2 0 0 0 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.4 1 0.25 1 0.9 0
2023-09-15 vs. PHI $5.2K $3.4K 12 15.2 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2023-09-13 @ BAL $5.3K $3.4K 4 6 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 2 0.5 0
2023-09-12 @ BAL $5.2K $3.4K 14 18.7 0 4 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 1 0.75 0 1.25 0
2023-09-11 @ BAL $5.1K $3.5K 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2023-09-09 @ CIN $5.3K $3.5K 2 3 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 1
2023-09-08 @ CIN $5.2K $3.5K 8 12.4 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0.4 0 0 2 0.4 0
2023-09-07 @ ATL $5.1K $3.4K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-09-06 @ ATL $5.1K $3.4K 23 31.4 0 4 1.25 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.6 2 0.75 1 1.85 0
2023-09-05 @ ATL $5.3K $3.5K 12 15.7 0 4 0.5 2 2 0 0 2 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.6 1 0 1 1.1 0
2023-09-03 vs. PIT $5.3K $3.7K 4 6 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 2 0.4 0
2023-09-02 vs. PIT $5.3K $3.7K 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2023-09-01 vs. PIT $5.4K $3.7K 2 3.5 1 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
2023-08-30 vs. SD $5.3K $3.7K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-29 vs. SD $5.5K $3.7K 12 15.2 0 3 0.67 2 1 0 0 2 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.8 0 0 2 1.47 1
2023-08-28 vs. SD $5.5K $3.7K 19 24.7 0 3 1.67 2 1 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.75 1 1 1 2.42 0
2023-08-27 @ PHI $5.6K $3.8K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 2 0 0 0 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2023-08-26 @ PHI $5.6K $3.6K 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-25 @ PHI $5.6K $3.6K 16 22.2 0 4 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 2 0.75 0 1.25 0
2023-08-23 @ PIT $10K $3.6K 16 21.9 0 3 0.67 2 0 1 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0.8 1 0 1 1.47 0
2023-08-22 @ PIT $5.6K $3.6K 7 9.2 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2023-08-21 @ PIT $5.8K $3.6K 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-20 vs. NYM $5.7K $3.6K 26 34.9 0 5 1.2 3 2 0 0 2 1 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.6 3 0.6 0 1.8 0
2023-08-19 vs. NYM $5.8K $3.6K 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-18 vs. NYM $5.7K $3.6K 2 3 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2023-08-17 vs. NYM $5.8K $3.6K 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2023-08-16 vs. OAK $5.7K $3.4K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-08-15 vs. OAK $5.7K $3.3K 16 21.7 0 4 1 2 2 0 0 0 1 2 5 0 0 0 2 1 0.6 1 0.5 1 1.6 0
2023-08-14 vs. OAK $5.8K $3.3K 32 43.4 0 2 2.5 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 5 0 1 1 1 2 1 2 1.5 3 3.5 0
2023-08-12 @ KC $5.8K $3.4K 6 6 0 5 0.4 2 1 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 0 0.8 0
2023-08-11 @ KC $5.9K $3.4K 4 6 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 2 0.4 0
2023-08-10 @ TB $6K $3.4K 5 6 0 5 0.4 1 1 0 0 0 0.25 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.2 0 0.2 0 0.6 0
2023-08-09 @ TB $5.9K $3.5K 7 10 0 5 0.2 1 2 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 2 0 0 0.4 0
2023-08-08 @ TB $5.9K $3.5K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-06 vs. COL $5.8K $3.5K 7 9 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.4 0 0.25 1 0.9 0
2023-08-05 vs. COL $5.8K $3.5K 10 12.2 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.6 0 0 1 1.1 0
2023-08-04 vs. COL $5.7K $3.7K 8 9.5 0 5 0.4 2 0 0 1 2 0.4 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 1 0 0 0.8 0
2023-08-03 vs. MIN $5.8K $3.7K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-02 vs. MIN $5.7K $3.6K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-01 vs. MIN $5.6K $3.8K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-07-30 vs. CHC $5.9K $4K 5 6.5 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 0 0 0.5 0
2023-07-29 vs. CHC $5.8K $4K 5 6 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2023-07-28 vs. CHC $5.8K $4K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-27 vs. CHC $6K $3.9K 2 3 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 1 0.33 0
2023-07-26 @ ARI $5.8K $3.9K 18 25.2 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.4 2 0.75 1 1.4 0
2023-07-25 @ ARI $6.1K $3.8K 10 12 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2023-07-24 @ ARI $6.1K $3.8K 23 31.9 0 5 1 2 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.4 3 0.6 0 1.4 0
2023-07-22 @ CHC $6K $3.8K 9 12.7 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 1 0 1 0.65 0
2023-07-21 @ CHC $9.6K $3.8K 4 6.2 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2023-07-20 @ CHC $5.7K $3.8K 12 15.4 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 1 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0.6 0 0 1 1.1 0
2023-07-19 vs. MIA $5.4K $3.9K 5 6.2 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-07-18 vs. MIA $5.6K $3.9K 4 6 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 2 0.4 1
2023-07-17 vs. MIA $5.6K $3.9K 10 12.4 0 5 0.4 2 1 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0.4 0 0 0 0.8 0
2023-07-16 vs. WSH $5.5K $3.9K 21 28.2 0 4 1.25 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.6 2 0.75 1 1.85 0
2023-07-15 vs. WSH $5.5K $3.9K 12 15.7 0 5 0.6 2 0 0 0 1 0.4 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.4 1 0.2 0 1 0
2023-07-14 vs. WSH -- -- 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-09 @ CHW $5.5K $3.9K 2 3 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2023-07-08 @ CHW $5.7K $4K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-07-07 @ CHW $5.6K $3.9K 9 9 0 5 0.6 3 0 0 0 3 0.6 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 0 0 0 1.2 0
2023-07-05 @ MIA $5.5K $3.9K 2 3.2 0 5 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-04 @ MIA $5.4K $3.9K 3 3 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.67 0
2023-07-03 @ MIA $5.7K $3.8K 6 6 0 5 0.4 2 1 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 0 0.8 0
2023-07-02 vs. NYY $5.6K $3.8K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-01 vs. NYY -- -- 8 9 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 0 0 1 1.1 0
2023-07-01 vs. NYY $5.7K $3.9K 22 32.2 1 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 4 1.5 1 2.5 0
2023-06-29 vs. HOU $5.8K $3.7K 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-06-28 vs. HOU $5.6K $3.7K 22 28.2 0 5 1.2 3 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.6 2 0.6 0 1.8 0
2023-06-27 vs. HOU $5.9K $3.7K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-06-25 vs. CHC $9.8K $3.7K 5 6.5 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 1 0 0 0.4 0
2023-06-24 vs. CHC $9.8K $3.6K 7 9.5 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 1 0 1 0.83 0
2023-06-21 @ WSH $9.6K $3.6K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-06-20 @ WSH $5.8K $3.7K 17 21.9 0 5 0.4 2 0 0 1 2 0.4 0 5 0 1 0 0 2 0.4 1 0 0 0.8 0
2023-06-19 @ WSH $9.8K $3.6K 19 25.2 0 5 1 2 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.4 2 0.6 0 1.4 0
2023-06-18 @ NYM $5.8K $3.6K 11 16 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.4 2 0.25 1 0.9 0
2023-06-17 @ NYM $5.8K $3.7K 21 28.2 0 4 1.25 2 2 0 0 1 1 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.6 2 0.75 1 1.85 0
2023-06-16 @ NYM $5.8K $3.7K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-06-14 vs. SF $5.7K $3.7K 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 3 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2023-06-13 vs. SF $5.4K $3.6K 12 15.7 0 3 0.67 2 1 0 0 2 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.75 1 0 1 1.42 0
2023-06-12 vs. SF $5.5K $3.6K 16 22.2 0 5 0.8 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.2 2 0.6 0 1 0
2023-06-11 vs. CIN $5.6K $3.5K 8 9.2 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2023-06-10 vs. CIN $5.5K $3.7K 12 15.5 0 4 0.75 2 2 0 0 1 1 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.6 1 0.25 1 1.35 0
2023-06-09 vs. CIN $5.6K $3.8K 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-06-07 @ TEX $5.5K $3.9K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-06-06 @ TEX $5.5K $3.9K 7 9.2 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2023-06-05 @ TEX $5.6K $3.9K 2 3.5 1 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
2023-06-04 @ PIT $9.4K $4K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-06-03 @ PIT $5.6K $3.9K 8 9.2 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2023-06-02 @ PIT $5.6K $3.8K 15 18.2 0 4 1 3 1 0 0 2 1 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.8 0 0.25 1 1.8 0
2023-05-30 vs. KC $5.6K $3.9K 5 6.2 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-05-29 vs. KC $5.4K $3.9K 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-28 @ CLE $5.5K $3.9K 19 24.7 0 4 1.5 2 0 0 1 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 1 2 1 0.5 1 1 0 2 0
2023-05-27 @ CLE $5.8K $4K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-26 @ CLE $5.5K $3.9K 8 9 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 0 0 1 1.1 0
2023-05-24 @ CIN $5.9K $3.8K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-05-23 @ CIN $5.2K $3.9K 30 40.4 0 4 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 2 2 0.6 2 1.5 1 2.6 0
2023-05-22 @ CIN $5.8K $3.9K 6 9.2 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 2 0.4 0
2023-05-21 vs. LAD $5.6K $3.9K 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-20 vs. LAD $5.9K $3.9K 9 12.4 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 1
2023-05-19 vs. LAD $5.7K $3.9K 11 15 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0.75 0 0 3 0.75 0
2023-05-18 vs. LAD $5.9K $3.9K 17 24.6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 3 0.6 0 0 3 0.6 1
2023-05-17 vs. MIL $5.9K $4K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-05-16 vs. MIL $5.9K $4K 2 3 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2023-05-15 vs. MIL $6.1K $4.1K 18 25.2 0 3 1 2 0 0 0 1 0.67 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.8 2 0.33 2 1.8 0
2023-05-14 @ BOS $10K $4.1K 10 12.5 0 5 0.6 2 2 0 0 1 0.67 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.4 1 0.2 0 1 0
2023-05-13 @ BOS $6.1K $4K 9 12.2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-05-12 @ BOS $5.7K $3.9K 11 12.2 0 5 0.6 3 2 0 0 3 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.6 0 0 0 1.2 0
2023-05-10 @ CHC $5.9K $4K 5 6.2 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-05-09 @ CHC $6.1K $4K 5 6.2 0 5 0.2 1 2 0 1 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2023-05-08 @ CHC $6K $3.8K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-07 vs. DET $5.4K $4K 54 71.8 0 5 2.6 4 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 1 3 3 4 0.8 4 1.8 0 3.4 0
2023-05-06 vs. DET $5.6K $4K 2 3 0 4 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2023-05-05 vs. DET $5.3K $3.8K 15 18.2 0 5 1 3 1 0 0 1 0.75 2 5 0 0 0 2 1 0.6 0 0.4 0 1.6 0
2023-05-04 vs. LAA $5.7K $3.8K 12 16 0 5 0.6 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.4 2 0.2 0 1 0
2023-05-03 vs. LAA $5.7K $3.9K 2 3 0 3 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 0
2023-05-02 vs. LAA $5.7K $3.9K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2023-04-30 @ LAD $5.8K $3.9K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-04-29 @ LAD $5.6K $3.9K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-04-28 @ LAD $5.8K $3.9K 19 24.2 0 4 1 2 0 0 0 0 0.5 2 5 0 1 0 2 1 0.6 0 0.5 1 1.6 0
2023-04-27 @ SF $5.9K $3.4K 4 6.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 1 0 1 0.2 0
2023-04-26 @ SF $6K $3.4K 36 46.4 0 5 2.2 4 0 0 1 1 0.67 1 5 0 0 2 3 2 0.8 2 1.4 0 3 0
2023-04-25 @ SF $6.1K $3.5K 10 13 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 2 0 0 1 0
2023-04-24 @ SF $6.1K $3.5K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2023-04-23 @ SEA $6.1K $3.6K 9 12.4 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2023-04-22 @ SEA $6.3K $3.6K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-21 @ SEA $5.9K $3.7K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-19 vs. ARI $5.8K $3.7K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-04-18 vs. ARI $5.7K $3.7K 21 27.9 0 5 1.2 2 2 0 0 0 0.5 1 5 0 0 1 2 2 0.4 1 0.8 0 1.6 0
2023-04-17 vs. ARI $5.7K $3.7K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-16 vs. PIT $5.9K $3.8K 9 12.4 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2023-04-15 vs. PIT $5.7K $3.9K 12 15.5 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0.4 1 0 1 0.65 0
2023-04-14 vs. PIT $6K $3.9K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-04-13 vs. PIT $5.9K $3.8K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2023-04-12 @ COL $5.8K $4.1K 16 21.7 0 4 1 2 2 0 0 0 1 2 5 0 0 0 2 1 0.6 1 0.5 1 1.6 0
2023-04-11 @ COL $5.6K $4.2K 13 19.4 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0.4 2 0 1 0.65 0
2023-04-10 @ COL $5.9K $4.2K 14 19.2 0 3 0.67 2 0 0 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.75 2 0 1 1.42 0
2023-04-09 @ MIL $5.6K $3.8K 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2023-04-08 @ MIL $5.6K $4K 7 9.2 0 5 0.4 1 0 0 0 0 0.2 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.2 0 0.2 0 0.6 0
2023-04-07 @ MIL $5.7K $4K 2 3 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-04-05 vs. ATL $5.5K $4.1K 6 9 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.75 0 0 2 0.75 0
2023-04-04 vs. ATL $5.6K $4K 5 6 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 1 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2023-04-03 vs. ATL $5.3K $3.9K 19 24.7 0 4 1.25 2 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.6 1 0.75 1 1.85 0
2023-04-02 vs. TOR $5.7K $3.9K 8 9 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 0 0 1 1.1 0
2023-04-01 vs. TOR $5.3K $3.9K 8 9.2 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2023-03-30 vs. TOR -- -- 19 24.7 0 4 0.75 2 1 0 0 1 0.67 1 5 0 1 0 1 1 0.6 1 0.25 1 1.35 0
2023-03-27 @ BAL -- -- 2 3.5 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
2023-03-25 vs. MIA -- -- 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-03-23 vs. NYY -- -- 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-03-05 vs. NYM -- -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-03-02 vs. HOU -- -- 3 3 0 2 0.5 1 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2023-02-28 @ WSH -- -- 17 21.7 0 3 1.67 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 3 0 0 1 1 1 0.67 1 1 0 2.33 0
2023-02-27 vs. NYM -- -- 8 9 0 2 0.5 1 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2023-02-25 vs. WSH -- -- 3 3 0 2 0.5 1 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2022-10-08 vs. PHI $5.7K $3.6K 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-10-07 vs. PHI $5.7K $4.5K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 0
2022-10-04 @ PIT $5.6K $4.3K 2 3.5 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
2022-10-03 @ PIT $5.6K $4K 7 9.2 0 2 0.5 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0.67 0 0 1 1.17 0
2022-10-01 vs. PIT $5.5K $3.8K 6 9.4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 0.33 0 0 1 0.33 0
2022-09-30 vs. PIT $5.9K $3.8K 6 6 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2022-09-28 @ MIL $5.9K $4K 3 3 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.67 0
2022-09-27 @ MIL $5.9K $4K 17 22 1 4 0.75 2 2 0 0 1 0.67 1 5 0 1 0 1 0 0.4 2 0.25 0 1.15 0
2022-09-25 @ LAD $5.9K $3.8K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-09-24 @ LAD $5.9K $3.8K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-09-23 @ LAD $5.8K $4K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 0
2022-09-22 @ SD $6.2K $4.4K 6 6 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 1 2 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2022-09-21 @ SD $6.2K $4.4K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2022-09-20 @ SD $6.2K $4.4K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2022-09-17 vs. CIN $6.3K $4.4K 0 0 0 5 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-09-17 vs. CIN $6.2K $4.4K 7 9.5 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 1 0 1 0.83 0
2022-09-16 vs. CIN $6.2K $4.5K 16 21.9 0 4 1 2 2 0 0 0 1 2 4 0 0 0 2 2 0.5 1 0.5 0 1.5 0
2022-09-15 vs. CIN $6.3K $4.6K 9 12.5 0 3 0.67 1 1 0 0 0 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 1 0.33 1 1.17 0
2022-09-14 vs. MIL $6.2K $4.2K 8 9 0 3 0.67 2 0 0 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.75 0 0 1 1.42 0
2022-09-13 vs. MIL $6.1K $4.2K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-09-10 @ PIT $6.3K $4.3K 4 6.2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2022-09-09 @ PIT $6.3K $4.3K 7 9.2 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2022-09-08 vs. WSH $6.3K $4.3K 5 6.5 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 0 0 0.5 0
2022-09-07 vs. WSH $6.4K $4.7K 18 24.9 0 3 1.33 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 1 1 1 1.83 0
2022-09-06 vs. WSH $6.2K $4.7K 5 6 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2022-09-05 vs. WSH $6.3K $4.7K 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2022-09-04 vs. CHC $6.4K $4.6K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2022-09-03 vs. CHC $6.5K $4.6K 28 37.4 0 4 1.25 2 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 1 1 1 2 0.6 2 0.75 1 1.85 0
2022-09-02 vs. CHC $6.5K $4.6K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2022-08-31 @ CIN $6.3K $4.7K 11 15.4 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 6 0 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 0 2 0.75 0
2022-08-30 @ CIN $6.4K $4.7K 2 3 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2022-08-29 @ CIN $6.2K $4.7K 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-28 vs. ATL $11K $4.5K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-08-27 vs. ATL $6.5K $4.5K 13 18.4 0 2 0.5 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0.8 0 0 2 1.3 0
2022-08-26 vs. ATL $6K $4.4K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-08-25 @ CHC $6.3K $4.6K 41 57.1 0 4 2.25 3 1 0 0 1 1 0 5 0 0 2 2 3 0.8 5 1.5 1 3.05 0
2022-08-23 @ CHC $6K -- 3 3 0 6 0.17 1 2 0 1 1 0.25 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0.17 0 0 0 0.33 0
2022-08-23 @ CHC $9.8K $4.7K 5 6 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2022-08-22 @ CHC $6.2K $4.7K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-21 @ ARI $5.9K $4.7K 7 9.2 0 4 0.25 1 1 1 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 0 0.65 0
2022-08-20 @ ARI $6K $4.8K 28 38.4 0 6 1 3 0 0 0 2 0.4 0 6 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 4 0.5 0 1.5 0
2022-08-19 @ ARI $5.8K $4.8K 26 34.4 0 4 1.5 3 1 0 0 2 1 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.8 2 0.75 1 2.3 0
2022-08-18 vs. COL $5.8K $4.7K 19 25.2 0 4 1.25 3 0 0 0 1 0.75 2 4 0 0 0 2 1 0.75 2 0.5 0 2 0
2022-08-17 vs. COL $5.7K $4.7K 10 12 0 3 1 2 0 0 1 1 0.67 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.75 0 0.33 1 1.75 0
2022-08-16 vs. COL $6.1K $4.6K 18 25.7 1 3 1.33 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 3 1 0 1.58 0
2022-08-14 vs. MIL $6.2K $4.5K 6 9.2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 2 0.5 0
2022-08-13 vs. MIL $6.3K $4.4K 5 6.2 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-08-12 vs. MIL $6.4K $4.2K 16 22.2 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 2 0.75 0 1.25 0
2022-08-11 @ COL $6.2K $4.6K 28 37.9 0 5 1.4 3 1 0 0 1 0.67 1 5 0 0 1 2 2 0.6 3 0.8 0 2 0
2022-08-10 @ COL $6.2K $4.5K 7 9.2 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2022-08-09 @ COL $6.4K $4.5K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2022-08-07 vs. NYY $6.3K $4.2K 8 13 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 2 0 2 0.4 0
2022-08-06 vs. NYY $6.1K $4.4K 14 18.2 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 1 3 0
2022-08-05 vs. NYY $6.1K $4.4K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2022-08-04 vs. CHC $6.1K $4.2K 10 12.2 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.6 0 0 1 1.1 0
2022-08-04 vs. CHC -- -- 14 18.7 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 1 0.75 0 1.25 0
2022-08-03 vs. CHC -- -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-02 vs. CHC $5.9K $4.3K 23 31.7 0 3 1.67 2 1 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.75 3 1 1 2.42 0
2022-07-31 @ WSH $6K $4.4K 0 0 0 5 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-07-30 @ WSH $6.2K $4.4K 5 6.2 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-07-29 @ WSH $5.9K $4.4K 5 6.5 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 0 0 0.5 0
2022-07-24 @ CIN $5.6K $4.2K 30 40.9 0 4 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 2 2 0.5 3 1.5 0 2.5 0
2022-07-23 @ CIN $5.5K $4.3K 21 28.2 0 4 1.25 2 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.6 2 0.75 1 1.85 0
2022-07-22 @ CIN $10.6K $4.3K 19 25.2 0 5 1 2 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.4 2 0.6 0 1.4 0
2022-07-17 vs. CIN -- -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-07-16 vs. CIN $4.9K $3.7K 21 28.7 0 5 1 2 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.4 3 0.6 0 1.4 0
2022-07-15 vs. CIN $4.9K $3.7K 6 9.2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 2 0.5 0
2022-07-14 vs. LAD $5K $3.7K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-07-13 vs. LAD $5.3K $3.8K 9 13.2 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 2 0 0 0.5 0
2022-07-12 vs. LAD $5.2K $3.9K 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2022-07-11 vs. PHI $4.8K $4K 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-07-10 vs. PHI $4.8K $4.2K 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0
2022-07-09 vs. PHI $4.9K $4.3K 5 6 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-07-08 vs. PHI $5.3K $4.3K 6 6 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2022-07-07 @ ATL $5.1K $4.2K 12 15 0 4 0.5 1 2 0 0 0 0.5 1 5 0 1 0 1 0 0.4 0 0.25 1 0.9 0
2022-07-06 @ ATL $4.9K $4.2K 10 12 0 3 1 2 1 0 0 1 1 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.75 0 0.33 1 1.75 0
2022-07-05 @ ATL $5.3K $4.2K 7 9.2 0 3 0.33 1 1 1 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 0 0.83 0
2022-07-04 @ ATL $5.4K $4.2K 5 6 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2022-07-03 @ PHI $16.2K $10K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-07-02 @ PHI $5.4K $4.4K 14 18.4 0 4 0.75 2 1 1 0 1 0.67 1 5 0 0 0 1 2 0.6 0 0.25 0 1.35 0
2022-07-01 @ PHI $5.5K $4.3K 12 15.4 0 4 0.75 2 2 0 0 1 1 1 4 0 0 0 1 2 0.5 0 0.25 0 1.25 0
2022-06-29 vs. MIA $5.4K $4.3K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-06-28 vs. MIA $6K $4.3K 7 9.5 0 3 0.33 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 1 0 1 0.83 0
2022-06-27 vs. MIA $6K $4.4K 29 37.4 0 4 2 4 0 0 0 2 1 1 4 0 0 1 2 2 1 2 1 0 3 0
2022-06-26 vs. CHC $6.1K $4.3K 16 21.7 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.4 1 0.75 1 1.4 0
2022-06-25 vs. CHC $6K $4K 8 9.2 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2022-06-24 vs. CHC $5.5K $4K 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2022-06-23 @ MIL $5.8K $4.1K 15 21.9 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 2 0.75 1 0.5 2 1.75 0
2022-06-22 @ MIL $5.4K $4.1K 20 28.4 0 3 1.33 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 2 1 1 1.83 0
2022-06-20 @ MIL $5.6K $4.1K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-06-19 @ BOS $5.4K $4.2K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2022-06-18 @ BOS $5.3K $4.3K 12 16.2 0 5 0.4 2 1 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 2 0 0 0.8 0
2022-06-17 @ BOS $5.9K $4K 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 2 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2022-06-15 vs. PIT $5.8K $3.8K 7 9 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 1 0 0.25 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.4 0 0.25 1 0.9 0
2022-06-14 vs. PIT $5.7K -- 44 60.1 0 4 2.5 4 0 0 0 2 1 0 5 0 0 2 2 3 1 5 1.5 1 3.5 0
2022-06-13 vs. PIT $5.8K $4K 26 33.9 0 4 1.75 3 0 0 0 1 0.67 1 5 0 0 1 2 2 0.8 1 1 1 2.55 0
2022-06-11 vs. CIN $5.8K $4.2K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-06-10 vs. CIN $5.8K $4.3K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2022-06-09 @ TB $5.7K $4.4K 4 6.2 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 0 1 0.33 0
2022-06-08 @ TB $5.7K $4.4K 3 3 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.67 0
2022-06-07 @ TB $5.6K $4.4K 7 9 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.4 0 0.25 1 0.9 0
2022-06-05 @ CHC $17.4K $10K 8 9.2 0 5 0.4 2 1 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 0 0.8 0
2022-06-04 @ CHC $5.5K -- 7 9.4 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2022-06-04 @ CHC -- $4.5K 4 6 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 2 0.5 0
2022-06-03 @ CHC $16.8K $4.5K 24 34.9 0 3 1.33 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.6 3 1 2 1.93 0
2022-06-02 @ CHC $5.6K $4.5K 9 12.7 0 5 0.4 1 2 0 0 0 0.33 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.2 1 0.2 0 0.6 0
2022-06-01 vs. SD $6K $4.4K 11 15.4 0 2 0.5 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 2 0.75 0 0 2 1.25 0
2022-05-31 vs. SD $5.7K $4.3K 13 18.7 0 3 0.67 1 1 0 0 0 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.6 1 0.33 2 1.27 1
2022-05-30 vs. SD $15.3K $9.5K 18 25.2 0 3 1.33 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 2 1 1 1.83 0
2022-05-29 vs. MIL $5.2K $4.2K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0

Paul Goldschmidt Daily Fantasy News, Rankings, Projections

The Stack Projected to Smash the DK Slate at a Nearly 20% Rate

With a two game difference between slates and the FanDuel one carrying just six games, which omits the top team run total of the night (St Louis), we’re going to see some diversity in the stacking projections for tonight (although, remember that they are fluid and updated throughout the day). The Cardinals do project to be the most popular DraftKings offense tonight, though not too far ahead of the pair of stacks which are nearly tied for the top ownership projection on FanDuel (Phillies & Twins). We also find the Cardinals projected to smash the slate most often, nearly 20% of the time on DraftKings, a bit ahead of the Brewers, who project to smash the FanDuel slate most frequently. The only problem there is that we still don’t really know who they’ll be facing other than it being a bullpen game for the Pirates. The Brewers also project to be the highest value stack on FanDuel, while tying for the top honor on DraftKings with the Cardinals, who have a mix of cheap and expensive bats. For more on the top rated stacks tonight, check out today’s PlateIQ Live Blog.

Tonight's Top Projected Bat Has Destroyed LHP (276 wRC+, .413 ISO)

The Braves (5.29 implied runs) and Phillies (5.26) are essentially tied atop Monday night’s eight game board with the Twins (5.09) and Dodgers (5.04) reaching five run team totals as well, but no other offense exceeding four and a half runs. Philadelphia is really the only positive run environment on this slate, according to Statcast Park Factors (rolling three years), so perhaps it’s a surprise to see one-quarter of the board reaching five runs. The top projected bat on the board comes from none of those offenses though. Despite the pitcher friendly forecast at Wrigley, Paul Goldschmidt is the top main tonight and the most important thing to know here is that he’s facing a LHP. Not that Drew Smyly has been bad. He has gone away from his cutter (14.4%) and been more fastball heavy (43.4%) since his return from the IL, throwing it and his curveball almost equally, resulting in fewer ground balls (34.3%), but a few more strikeouts (21.7%, 16.8 K-BB%). He’s also been getting a lot of popups (16 in 16 starts) with just an 85.9 mph EV (33.9% 95+ mph EV). Smyly doesn’t have an estimator below four, but only a 4.41 DRA is more than half a run removed from his 3.67 ERA. However, RHBs have a .336 wOBA and .312 xwOBA against him this season and he’ll be facing a predominantly right-handed lineup, led by Goldy’s 276 wRC+ and .413 ISO against southpaws this year. However, players may have a decision to make (at least on DraftKings) because Albert Pujols has also been smoking LHP (225 wRC+, .388 ISO) and costs less than half of what Goldshmidt costs. Pujols is not a top 10 projected bat tonight, but is the top projected DraftKings value. Tyler O’Neill (117 wRC+, .123 ISO) does project as a top 10 overall bat tonight.

We also find a pair of Twins among the top 10 projections. Cole Ragans has struck out just seven of 64 batters (11.4 CStr%, 92.9 Z-Contact%) with eight walks and five barrels (10.2%), despite an 86.1 mph EV. He has generated just 32.7% of his contact on the ground, but with a 25.0 IFFB%. Despite just a 40 Future Value grade (Fangrpahs), Ragans did exceed a 20 K-BB% at both Double and Triple A this year and he’s gotten some usage out of a his changeup (36.5%, -1.8 RV/100, 21.2 Whiff%, wOBA & xwOBA below .300), a pitch the Twins have struggled against this year (-0.06 wCH/C is bottom third of the league). Despite the platoon busting pitch seemingly working well, RHBs have still smoked him for a .375 wOBA and .370 xwOBA so far, so apparently he’s not throwing it often enough. Byron Buxton (155 wRC+, .343 ISO) projects as a top three bat tonight with Carlos Correa (139 wRC+, .165 ISO) also among the top 10.

Ironically, the top two offenses on the board only place a single batter each among the top 10 projected (Ronald Acuna Jr. & Kyle Schwarber, though Rhys Hoskins projects right on the edge of the top 10), but we also find a pair of Dodgers. Eric Lauer’s strikeout rate has risen and fallen with his velocity, both on a roller coaster ride all season long. Most recently, both had been down. Lauer had just a 16.4 K% and 4.9 K-BB% over a five start span going into his last game against the Dodgers, when his velocity spiked and he struck out seven of 26 batters over seven innings (three runs). Who knows what you’re going to get in any given start? On the season, a 3.58 ERA is below estimators all above four, as he’s stranded 81.2% of runners with more than 10% of his runs being unearned. It wasn’t an entirely clean outing against the Dodgers last time out, as they did put a few on the board against him. Batters from either side of the plate are between a .313 and .320 wOBA and xwOBA against him. The Dodgers will test him again tonight with Mookie Betts (176 wRC+, .284 ISO) and Freddie Freeman (125 wRC+, .163 ISO) projecting best.

This Offense Separates from the Board, Dominates Projections

With a team run total even higher than last night, now that they are facing a LHP at Coors tonight, the Cardinals (119 wRC+ vs LHP) top a nine game Wednesday night board at 6.67 implied runs. They are more than a full run ahead of the Rockies (5.33), who exploded for double digit runs last night and now also face a LHP with a predominantly right-handed lineup (102 wRC+ vs LHP). The Dodgers (5.08) are the only other team to reach five runs tonight with five more reaching the four and a half run mark.

St Louis bats, once again, dominate projections and are the only offense with multiple top 10 projected bats tonight. In fact, each of the top four projected bats tonight are Cardinals. Freeland has struck out 20 of his last 75 against three playoff bound National League offenses, including the Dodgers at Coors. Are we going to believe in that guy or the one with a 17.0 K with an ERA and non-FIP estimators above four and a half this year? He’s been a bit fortunate that just 13 of 34 barrels (8.8%) have left the yard too. RHBs have a .318 wOBA and .324 xwOBA against him this year (which really isn’t too bad, considering the first number isn’t park adjusted). Paul Goldschmidt (282 wRC+, .389 ISO vs LHP this year), Nolan Arenado (169 wRC+, .400 ISO), Dylan Carlson (159 wRC+, .205 ISO) and Tyler O’Neill (118 wRC+, .098 ISO) are the top projected bats on the board with Tommy Edman (98 wRC+, .110 ISO) and even Albert Pujols (147 wRC+, .215 ISO) among the top 12 projections on either site. Despite the team run totals exceeding five runs, neither the Rockies (vs Jose Quintana), nor Dodgers (vs Sonny Gray) project a single batter inside the top 10.

A Scorching Offense in a Great Park

The Cardinals have a team 140 wRC+ over the last week and 107 wRC+ vs RHP this year. They head to Coors off of a series bludgeoning of quality Yankee pitching with a board topping 6.23 implied run line. The Mets are nearly a half run below yesterday (5.65), but this may be more due to the weather being not as hitter friendly because Mike Minor hasn’t been much better than Justin Dunn. The Atlanta Braves (5.23) are the only other team above five implied runs, as they travel to Fenway, which is projected to have some hitter friendly weather, against Rich Hill. Five more teams exceed four and a half run team totals on a 14 game loaded pitching board.

The top three projected bats on the board and five of the top eight are Cardinals tonight. Ryan Feltner has a nearly league average strikeout rate (20.8%), 14.8 K-BB% and has only allowed 7.7% Barrels/BBE. However, 46.9% of his contact has had at least a 95 mph EV, which aligns his 5.75 ERA with a 5.60 xERA. All other estimators are more than a run lower (.331 BABIP, 67.0 LOB%, 16.3 HR/FB). Seven of his 10 barrels have left the yard, so it is a bit of an outlier to see his xERA so much higher than his FIP (4.52) in this situation. He really hasn’t been bad, but it’s Coors and the Cardinals are a good offense, so it is what it is. Paul Goldshmidt (166 wRC+, .257 ISO vs RHP this year), Tyler O’Neill (80 wRC+, .131 ISO) and Nolan Arenado (155 wRC+, .219 ISO) are the top projected bats on the board. RHBs have a .320 wOBA and .340 xwOBA against Feltner, but LHBs are even better (.396 wOBA, .383 xwOBA). Nolan Gorman (118 wRC+, .220 ISO) and Dylan Carlson (88 wRC+, .146 ISO) are top 10 projected bats as well.

Unfortunately, no other offense features multiple top 10 projected bats with the Cardinals dominating a large field. The Mets and Braves only place a single batter each on this list with Pete Alonso (162 wRC+, .266 ISO vs LHP this year) facing a lefty who has surrendered a .435 wOBA and .381 xwOBA to RHBs this year and Ronald Acuna (142 wRC+, .191 ISO) facing a slightly better one (.345 wOBA, .342 xwOBA), but under more hitter friendly conditions in a much more hitter friendly park.

One Team Dominates Top of the Board for Hitter Projections

On a seven game Wednesday night slate we find our first team with more than five run team total on a main slate this week, along with multiple teams above four and a half implied runs for the first time as well. A grand total of two teams exceed a four and a half run team total tonight (Cardinals & Mets), while the Rangers & Astros just miss the mark. There are clearly some pitchers worth attacking on this slate.

The Cardinals certainly own the projections tonight, featuring three of the top four projected batters on either site (PlateIQ projections) and five of the top 10 on DraftKings. There’s good reason for this. Spenser Watkins has walked as many as he’s struck out (10 each) and also been lucky that just three of seven barrels (9.3%) have left the yard. A 4.51 DRA is his only estimator below five. Same-handed (RH) batters own a wOBA and xwOBA above .400 against him since last year and he’ll be facing a predominantly right-handed lineup. Further, while St Louis is generally a run and power suppressing environment, conditions (weather and umpire) suggest this may be much less true tonight. Paul Goldschmidt (124 wRC+, .184 ISO vs RHP since 2021), Nolan Arenado (116 wRC+, .223 ISO) and Tyler O’Neill (125 wRC+, .238 ISO) are your top projected bats, while Juan Yepez (286 wRC+, .313 ISO) and Tommy Edman (92 wRC+, .102 ISO) grade very well too. At a $3K price tag, Yepez projects as one of the best values on the board as well.

While Francisco Lindor (110 wRC+, .188 ISO vs RHP since LY) and Brandon Nimmo (138 wRC+, .164 ISO) are just outside the top 10 on DraftKings, both currently carry top 10 overall projections on FanDuel against Aaron Sanchez in Washington. It’s a large park upgrade for this offense in addition to Sanchez’s 5.5 SwStr% and 95.5 mph EV. About the only positive is that he keeps more than half his contact on the ground, but the Mets haven’t been doing it with power this year. Get ‘em on. Get ‘em over. Get ‘em in. This is a full stacking situation with the expectation of the bases being littered with traffic all game long.

No other offense places multiple batters near the top of the board (top 10) tonight. Not even the Angels, which can be expected when Shohei Ohtani pitches and is not available as a batter, but even Mike Trout (188 wRC+, .186 ISO vs LHP since last season) is a bit lower than normal in a tough assignment against Shane McClanahan (RHBs .293 wOBA since 2021).

Patrick Corbin should have a long leash, but has allowed the hardest contact on the board (9.4% Barrels/BBE)

Ironically, with similarly expected conditions to Yankee Stadium tonight (temperatures in the mid-60s and negligible wind effects), Weather Edge is showing a run and power decline in such games, which makes quite a bit more sense. Overall, this park has been a positive run environment, though not as much of a power haven as Yankee Stadium.

Dakota Hudson is the low man on the pitching pole today. His 18 K% is more than 10 points below any other pitcher today with a 5.08 SIERA that’s the only mark above four and a .335 xwOBA that’s more than 30 points higher than anyone else. What he does do is keep the ball on the ground for the most part (56.9%) with that mark jumping to 63.9% against RHBs, who had a .285 wOBA and .302 xwOBA against him this year. It makes one wonder if either Asdrubal Cabrera (99 wRC+, .194 ISO vs RHP) or Matt Adams (89 wRC+, .138 ISO) could see the field over Howie Kendrick (136 wRC+, .221 ISO) or Ryan Zimmerman (65 wRC+, .148 ISO) tonight, as LHBs had a .347 wOBA (.369 xwOBA) with a 49.6 GB% against Hudson, but why fix what’s not broken? Juan Soto (155 wRC+, .303 ISO) may be the top overall bat on the slate. Adam Eaton (108 wRC+, .152 ISO) may be your top value. The Nationals top the board with 4.23 implied runs.

On the brink of elimination, a lineup shuffle for the Cardinals in game three had no effect, and there’s probably not much more they could do in game four either. With a 3-0 series lead, Patrick Corbin likely has the longest leash tonight and costs less than $10K on either site. His 28.5 K%, 3.88 SIERA, 3.09 DRA and .303 xwOBA hardly stand out on a four man board that includes Gerrit Cole or even his own rotation, though he was likely one of the top 10 pitchers in the National League. Corbin did have that awful relief outing against the Dodgers, but still struck out 14 of the 41 he faced in the series. Corbin does have the highest aEV (88.9 mph) and Barrels/BBE (9.4%) on the board, so it’s the strikeout rate that really gives him value and it does make some middle of the order St Louis bats interesting here. Paul Goldschmidt (148 wRC+), Marcell Ozuna (92 wRC+), Jose Martinez (160 wRC+) and Tommy Edman (151 wRC+) all exceeded a .260 ISO vs LHP this year, while Yadier Molina (130 wRC+, .147 ISO) had a .382 xwOBA with the platoon advantage, but has the disadvantage of having the speed of a 37 year-old catcher.

Nats @ Cards has O/U of 7, each team is below 4 implied runs

Adam Wainwright is starting for the Cardinals this afternoon and has quietly been an effective pitcher in his age 38 season despite appearing to be in decline in 2017 and 2018. Wainwright posted a 4.19 ERA / 4.39 xFIP / 4.70 SIERA with a 1.43 WHIP, 12% K-BB, .327 xwOBA allowed and 6.9% barrel rate over 171 and 2/3 innings this year. It’s worth noting that Wainwright has been a much better pitcher at home: since 2015, Wainwright has posted a 3.06 ERA / 3.44 FIP, 12.7% K-BB and .311 xwOBA allowed at home compared to a 6.09 ERA / 4.83 FIP, 10.2% K-BB and .341 xwOBA allowed on the road. Wainwright has also been a bit more vulnerable to lefties, posting a .343 xwOBA vs. LHB compared to a .309 xwOBA allowed vs. RHP since 2015. Wainwright last pitched on 10/6 (7 and 2/3 innings, no runs, 8 Ks) so he is pitching on full rest.

The Nationals had just a 100 wRC+ vs. RHP during the regular season, but do have a league-leading .350 xwOBA vs. RHP over the past 30 days. They currently have an implied total of just 3.75 vs. Wainwright. Here’s their projected order: 1. Turner (.339 xwOBA vs. RHP this year), 2. Eaton (.348), 3. Rendon (.410), 4. Soto (.422), 5. Kendrick (.413), 6. Zimmerman (.327), 7. Taylor (.254), 8. Gomes (.268). Rendon and Kendrick have been the Nats’ most productive hitters this postseason with xwOBAs over .425. Taylor (.189), Gomes (.203) and Turner (.261) have struggled a bit. If BVP is your thing, it’s worth nothing that Ryan Zimmerman has an other-worldly .833 xwOBA vs. Wainwright over 40 PA since 2015. Once Wainwright is out of the game, they’ll face a Cardinals ‘pen that has allowed a .320 xwOBA over the past 30 days, regular season and postseason included.

Max Scherzer gets the nod for the Nationals and last pitched on 10/7 versus the Dodgers, allowing just 1 earned run over 7 innings with a 7/3 K/BB ratio. 35 year old Scherzer is coming off another great regular season and actually set career bests in K%, K-BB%, FIP and SwStr%. Scherzer is a bit more vulnerable vs. lefties (.279 xwOBA vs. LHB, .224 xwOBA vs. RHP since 2015) but the Cardinals project to have just four lefties in their lineup today. Overall, the Cardinals had a 93 wRC+ and 23.2% K rate vs. RHP on the year. The Cardinals currently have just a 3.25 implied line vs. Scherzer.

Here’s the Cardinals projected lineup: 1. Fowler (.338 xwOBA vs. RHP this year), 2. Wong (.308), 3. Goldschmidt (.343), 4. Ozuna (.380), 5. Molina (.305), 6. Carpenter (.325), 7. Edman (.324), 8. DeJong (.328). Marcell Ozuna has been their hottest hitter in the playoffs with a .456 xwOBA, followed by Paul Goldschmidt at .408. The rest of the projected lineup has been held under a .285 xwOBA thus far. The coldest bats are Paul DeJong (.169) and Yadi Molina (.217). When / if the Cardinals chase Scherzer from the game, they will face a Nationals bullpen that has allowed a .323 xwOBA over the past 30 days.

Cards/Braves features two highest GB rates in the majors, but lowest K rates on the board

The game in St Louis features the two highest ground ball rates in baseball this year (more than 100 IP), but also the only two strikeout rates on the board lower than 23% in Dallas Keuchel (18.7 K%, 60.1 GB%) and Dakota Hudson (18 K%, 56.9 GB%). They are also the only pitchers on the board above a .300 wOBA (both are above .330) and above 35.5% 95+ mph EV (both are above 38%). While these are clearly the bottom two pitchers on the board from a daily fantasy standpoint and further burdened by the prospect of elimination (in Hudson’s case) or working on just three days rest (in Keuchel’s case), none the less, either must be considered in a secondary role on DraftKings, where they’re the two lowest priced pitchers on the board. One reason is the favorable environment in St Louis, a clear pitcher’s park in the cooler months of the season. Another is the fact that it’s hard to call any pitcher really safe today. Even Max Scherzer fails to fit that description in an elimination game against the Dodgers.

All that said, this is certainly not a spot to avoid batters either. RHBs were right around a .340 wOBA and xwOBA against Keuchel this season, still with a 59.3 GB%, but much lower than LHBs (.277 wOBA, 70 GB%). The frightening thing here though, is that this St Louis lineup features just three batters above a .150 ISO vs LHP this year and also just three above a 97 wRC+. Tommy Edman (151 wRC+, .262 ISO) is just one of two above both and he’s batting seventh. The other, and clearly the most coveted batter in this lineup, is Paul Goldschmidt (148 wRC+, .298 ISO).

For the road team, Hudson’s splits have been even worse. LHBs are above a .350 wOBA and xwOBA this year with a ground ball rate (50.2%) nearly 15 points lower. This makes Freddie Freeman (154 wRC+, .280 ISO vs RHP) the clear top bat here, but also adds value to cheaper bats in Nick Markakis (112 wRC+, .147 ISO), Matt Joyce (131 wRC+, .163 ISO) and Brian McCann (97 wRC+, .178 ISO), who has very similar numbers to Ozzie Albies against RHP (98 wRC+, .177 ISO) this year.

Focus on offense in Atlanta with temperatures in the 90s

Temperatures in Atlanta are expected to be the highest they’ve been all season (mid to upper 90s). While this was already the game to target for offense today due to inferior pitching, the weather only makes it more attractive. Dallas Keuchel (18.7%) and Miles Mikolas (18.5%) have essentially the same strikeout rate with the two west coast pitchers tonight both around 10 points higher. Keuchel (23.9%) has a HR/FB 7.8 points higher than Mikolas, the second highest rate on the board, but he also generates grounders at a 60.1% clip with the other three pitchers below 50%. This should help him better deal with conditions. Statcast numbers are basically the same for Mikolas (87.8 mph aEV, 6.3% Barrels/BBE) and Keuchel (88 mph aEV, 6.9% Barrels/BBE).

Both offenses in this game have implied run lines above four with the Braves topping the board by more than a full half run at 4.83. Both pitchers had a wOBA and xwOBA between .330 and .340 against opposite handed batters this season. While Keuchel dominates lefties (.268 wOBA, .302 xwOBA, 68.8 GB%), Mikolas has been merely average (.307 wOBA, .320 xwOBA) with the platoon advantage.

Your top overall bats today are probably the competing first basemen in this game: Freddie Freeman (158 wRC+, .285 ISO vs RHP) and Paul Goldschmidt (145 wRC+, .313 ISO). Tommy Edman was better from the RH side (155 wRC+, .272 ISO), but is the second highest priced batter in this game on DraftKings, though just $3.1K on FanDuel. Josh Donaldson (134 wRC+, .274 ISO) costs a very reasonable $4.3K on DraftKings. DraftKings makes the dynamic even more difficult, where you have to choose two pitchers and Mikolas costs just $5.5K, allowing players to focus on offense, but this remains a very dangerous spot.

Lots of value and upside bats in Wrigley on the afternoon slate

The wind is projected to be blowing out to left field at up to 18 MPH this afternoon in Wrigley, and so WeatherEdge is seeing a huge bump in home runs and overall production for this game between the Cardinals and Cubs. For the Cardinals, they’ll face Jose Quintana who has had a very up and down year which has been mostly down of late. Over the past 30 days, Quintana has posted a 7.65 ERA, 4.91 xFIP, 1.95 WHIP, .371 wOBA allowed and 5% K-BB. Paul Goldschmidt (.446 xwOBA vs. LHP this year), Marcell Ozuna (.367), Matt Carpenter (.347), Yadier Molina (.346), Dexter Fowler (.325), Paul DeJong (.311) and Tommy Edman (.304) are all potential options. Fowler is leading off at jut $4k on DK, while Goldschmidt ($4.8k) and Ozuna ($4.5k) are good values considering the matchup and environment. Besides Edman at $4.8k, the rest of the Cards’ bats are $4.3k or less. The Cubs also get a nice matchup vs. Dakota Hudson who has a 3.35 ERA , but a 4.99 FIP, 5.04 SIERA, 1.39 WHIP, 6.5% K-BB and 40.4% hard contact rate are all indicators that he’s not nearly as good as the ERA suggests. Nick Castellanos (.406 xwOBA vs. RHP this year since joining CHC), Anthony Rizzo (.405), Kyle Schwarber (.374), Jason Heyward .349), Victor Caratini (.344), Nico Hoerner (.333), Kris Bryant (.330) and Ben Zobrist (.308) are all good options here. Cubs’ top of the order bats will cost anywhere from $4.5k to $5.2k on DK, while guys like Zobrist, Caratini and Hoerner are all in the $3k range. This game as a O/U of 12 and batters should see very high ownership on the afternoon slate.