Ronald Acuna

Atlanta Braves
Pos: OF | Hand: R
Status: Active
player props
FPTS 2 4 5 7 9 11 13 14 16 18 SAL $6.3K $6.7K $7.1K $7.5K $8K $8.4K $8.8K $9.2K $9.6K $10K
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 12
  • FPTS: 17
  • FPTS: 18
  • FPTS: 2
  • FPTS: 3
  • FPTS: 2
  • FPTS: 14
  • FPTS: 4
  • FPTS: 5
  • FPTS: 7
  • FPTS: 2
  • FPTS: 7
  • FPTS: 2
  • FPTS: 15
  • FPTS: 10
  • SAL: $6.4K
  • SAL: $6.5K
  • SAL: $6.4K
  • SAL: $5.9K
  • SAL: $6.1K
  • SAL: $6.2K
  • SAL: $6.2K
  • SAL: $6.4K
  • SAL: $6.2K
  • SAL: $10K
  • SAL: $6.3K
  • SAL: $6.2K
  • SAL: $6.1K
  • SAL: $9.8K
  • SAL: $6K
  • SAL: $6K
05/01 05/04 05/05 05/05 05/07 05/08 05/10 05/11 05/12 05/13 05/14 05/17 05/19 05/20 05/20
Date Opp DKSAL FDSAL DKFPTS FDFPTS sf ab slg h so hbp gidp 1b babip 2b pa 3b sb hr xbh r obp rbi iso bb ops ibb
2024-05-20 vs. SD $6K -- 10 12.2 0 4 0.75 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 4 1 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 0.5 0 1 0
2024-05-20 vs. SD $6K $3.9K 15 18.7 0 5 0.8 3 1 0 0 2 0.75 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.6 1 0.2 0 1.4 0
2024-05-19 vs. SD $9.8K $4.1K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2024-05-17 vs. SD $6.1K $3.9K 7 9.2 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2024-05-14 vs. CHC $6.2K $4K 2 3.2 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-05-13 vs. CHC $6.3K $4K 7 9.5 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 1 0 1 0.83 0
2024-05-12 @ NYM $10K $4K 5 6 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2024-05-11 @ NYM $6.2K $4K 4 6.5 0 4 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 1 0 1 0.2 0
2024-05-10 @ NYM $6.4K $4K 14 18.7 0 5 0.8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.2 1 0.6 0 1 0
2024-05-08 vs. BOS $6.2K $4.2K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2024-05-07 vs. BOS $6.2K $4.2K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2024-05-05 @ LAD $6.1K $4.2K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2024-05-04 @ LAD $5.9K $4.1K 18 21.2 0 4 1 3 0 0 0 2 0.75 1 4 0 1 0 1 1 0.75 0 0.25 0 1.75 0
2024-05-03 @ LAD $6.4K $4.2K 17 21.7 0 5 1 2 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.4 1 0.6 0 1.4 0
2024-05-01 @ SEA $6.5K $4.2K 12 15.9 0 5 0.4 2 3 0 0 2 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0.4 1 0 0 0.8 0
2024-04-30 @ SEA $6.4K $4.1K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-29 @ SEA $6.4K $4.1K 15 18.2 0 4 0.25 1 3 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 2 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2024-04-28 vs. CLE $6.3K $4.2K 7 9.4 0 5 0.2 1 3 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2024-04-27 vs. CLE $6.6K $4.2K 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-26 vs. CLE $6.5K $4.5K 6 9.2 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 2 0.4 0
2024-04-24 vs. MIA $6.5K $4.5K 13 18.4 0 3 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 2 0.4 0 0 2 0.4 0
2024-04-23 vs. MIA $6.5K $4.4K 7 9 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.4 0 0.25 1 0.9 0
2024-04-22 vs. MIA $6.4K $4.3K 8 9 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2024-04-21 vs. TEX $6.2K $4.2K 10 12.4 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2024-04-20 vs. TEX $6.4K $4.4K 14 18.2 0 3 0.33 1 1 1 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0.6 0 0 1 0.93 0
2024-04-19 vs. TEX $6.5K $4.4K 6 9.2 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 2 0.5 0
2024-04-17 @ HOU $6.5K $4.3K 17 21.7 0 5 1 2 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.4 1 0.6 0 1.4 0
2024-04-15 @ HOU $6.5K $4.3K 12 15.2 0 4 0.75 2 2 0 0 1 1 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.6 0 0.25 1 1.35 0
2024-04-14 @ MIA $6.5K $4.2K 19 24.9 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 1 0 0 2 0.6 1 0 1 1.1 0
2024-04-13 @ MIA $6.7K $4.2K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2024-04-12 @ MIA $6.5K $4.2K 20 24.2 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 2 0 0 1 0.6 0 0 1 1.1 0
2024-04-11 vs. NYM $6.5K $4.1K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-09 vs. NYM $6.6K $4.4K 31 39.6 0 3 0.67 2 0 1 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 3 0 0 3 0.8 0 0 1 1.47 0
2024-04-08 vs. NYM $6.4K $4.3K 6 9.2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 2 0.4 0
2024-04-07 vs. ARI $6.5K $4.3K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-06 vs. ARI $6.4K $4.5K 12 15.9 0 5 0.4 2 2 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0.4 1 0 0 0.8 0
2024-04-05 vs. ARI $6.5K $4.6K 7 9.5 0 5 0.4 1 2 0 0 0 0.33 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.2 1 0.2 0 0.6 0
2024-04-02 @ CHW $6.5K $4.5K 2 3 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2024-04-01 @ CHW $6.5K $4.5K 13 18.9 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 5 0 0 0 1 2 0.4 1 0.25 1 0.9 0
2024-03-31 @ PHI $6.5K $4.6K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2024-03-30 @ PHI $6.5K $4.4K 13 15.4 0 5 0.6 3 0 0 0 3 0.6 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0.6 0 0 0 1.2 0
2024-03-29 @ PHI $6.5K $4.5K 17 21.7 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0.6 1 0 1 1.1 0
2024-03-26 @ MIN -- -- 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-03-24 @ BOS $4.5K -- 6 6 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2024-03-23 vs. TB -- -- 3 3 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.67 0
2024-03-21 vs. NYY $4.5K -- 7 9.5 0 2 0.5 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.67 1 0 1 1.17 0
2024-03-20 vs. TOR $4.5K -- 15 23.2 1 3 0.67 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.25 4 0.33 0 0.92 0
2024-03-18 @ TB $4.5K -- 7 9.2 0 3 0.67 1 1 0 0 0 0.5 1 3 0 0 0 1 1 0.33 0 0.33 0 1 0
2024-03-17 vs. BOS -- -- 5 6 0 2 0.5 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.67 0 0 1 1.17 0
2024-03-14 vs. TB $4.5K -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-02-29 vs. MIN -- -- 7 9.5 0 3 0.67 1 0 0 0 0 0.33 1 3 0 0 0 1 0 0.33 1 0.33 0 1 0
2024-02-26 vs. BAL -- -- 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-02-25 vs. BOS -- -- 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-10-12 @ PHI $6.5K $9.5K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-10-11 @ PHI $6.3K $4.8K 15 18.2 0 5 0.6 2 0 0 0 1 0.4 1 5 0 1 0 1 1 0.4 0 0.2 0 1 0
2023-10-09 vs. PHI $6.5K $4.7K 13 18.4 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 2 0.5 0 0 1 0.5 0
2023-10-07 vs. PHI $6.6K $4.7K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-10-01 vs. WSH $6.8K $5K 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-30 vs. WSH $6.8K $4.9K 21 27.4 0 3 1 2 1 0 0 1 1 1 5 0 1 0 1 2 0.8 0 0.33 2 1.8 0
2023-09-29 vs. WSH $6.8K $5K 17 21.7 0 2 0.5 1 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 0.5 1 0 0 1 0
2023-09-28 vs. CHC $6.8K $5K 7 9.5 0 3 0.33 1 0 1 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 1 0 0 0.83 0
2023-09-27 vs. CHC $6.9K $5K 22 27.9 0 5 0.4 2 0 0 0 2 0.4 0 5 0 2 0 0 2 0.4 1 0 0 0.8 0
2023-09-26 vs. CHC $6.9K $5K 16 22.2 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 2 0.75 0 1.25 0
2023-09-24 @ WSH $6.9K $5K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-09-22 @ WSH $6.8K $5K 25 34.1 0 4 1.5 2 1 1 0 0 0.5 1 5 0 0 1 2 3 0.6 1 1 0 2.1 0
2023-09-21 @ WSH $6.9K $5K 15 18.2 0 6 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.17 0 6 1 1 0 1 1 0.17 0 0.33 0 0.67 0
2023-09-20 vs. PHI $6.8K $5K 5 6.2 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2023-09-19 vs. PHI $6.9K $5K 38 49.6 0 5 1.8 3 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 1 2 2 3 0.6 2 1.2 0 2.4 0
2023-09-18 vs. PHI $6.9K $5K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2023-09-15 @ MIA $7K $5K 14 18.9 1 3 0.67 2 0 0 1 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0.6 1 0 1 1.27 0
2023-09-13 @ PHI $6.8K $5K 16 18.2 0 5 0.6 3 1 0 0 3 0.75 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0.6 0 0 0 1.2 0
2023-09-12 @ PHI $6.6K $5K 16 22.2 0 5 0.8 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.2 2 0.6 0 1 0
2023-09-11 @ PHI $6.6K -- 4 6.2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2023-09-11 @ PHI $9.4K $5K 26 34.2 0 5 1 2 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 6 0 1 1 1 1 0.5 2 0.6 1 1.5 0
2023-09-10 vs. PIT $6.9K $4.9K 11 16.2 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 2 0 1 0.83 0
2023-09-09 vs. PIT $6.9K $4.9K 19 24.7 0 3 0.67 2 0 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0.8 1 0 2 1.47 0
2023-09-08 vs. PIT $6.8K $4.8K 26 34.4 0 4 1.5 3 0 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.8 2 0.75 1 2.3 0
2023-09-07 vs. STL $6.8K $4.8K 28 37.4 0 5 1.6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 2 2 0.4 2 1.2 0 2 0
2023-09-06 vs. STL $6.8K $5K 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 1 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2023-09-05 vs. STL $6.8K $4.8K 2 3.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
2023-09-03 @ LAD $6.6K $4.9K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-02 @ LAD $6.9K $4.9K 14 18.7 0 5 0.8 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.2 1 0.6 0 1 0
2023-09-01 @ LAD $6.9K $4.8K 28 36.9 0 4 1.5 2 0 0 1 0 0.33 1 5 0 1 1 2 2 0.6 1 1 1 2.1 0
2023-08-31 @ LAD $6.7K $4.9K 33 44.2 0 4 1.5 3 0 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 1 1 1 1 0.8 4 0.75 1 2.3 1
2023-08-30 @ COL $7K $5.2K 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2023-08-29 @ COL $7K $5.2K 6 6 0 5 0.4 2 0 0 0 2 0.4 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 0 0.8 0
2023-08-28 @ COL $7K $5.1K 51 69.3 0 5 1.6 4 0 0 0 2 0.75 1 6 0 2 1 2 4 0.83 5 0.8 1 2.43 0
2023-08-27 @ SF $10K $4.7K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-26 @ SF $6.8K $4.8K 10 12.2 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2023-08-25 @ SF $6.8K $4.8K 10 12.2 0 4 0.75 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 4 1 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 0.5 0 1 0
2023-08-23 vs. NYM $6.8K $4.9K 6 6 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2023-08-22 vs. NYM $6.7K $4.8K 20 24 0 4 0.75 2 1 0 0 1 0.67 1 5 0 2 0 1 0 0.6 0 0.25 1 1.35 0
2023-08-21 vs. NYM $6.8K $4.8K 8 9.2 0 5 0.4 2 1 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 0 0.8 0
2023-08-20 vs. SF $6.7K $4.7K 9 12.2 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-08-19 vs. SF $6.8K $4.7K 14 18.7 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 1 0.75 0 1.25 0
2023-08-18 vs. SF $6.8K $4.7K 5 6.2 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2023-08-16 vs. NYY $6.6K $4.8K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-08-15 vs. NYY $6.8K $4.8K 21 28.4 0 5 1 2 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.4 2 0.6 0 1.4 0
2023-08-14 vs. NYY $6.7K $4.6K 7 9 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 0 0 2 0.93 0
2023-08-13 @ NYM $9.8K $4.7K 13 15.2 0 5 0.4 2 1 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 0 0.8 0
2023-08-12 @ NYM $6.8K -- 4 6.2 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2023-08-12 @ NYM $6.8K $4.9K 23 31.1 0 3 0.67 2 0 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 1 0 0 3 0.8 1 0 2 1.47 0
2023-08-11 @ NYM $6.7K $4.9K 4 6.2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2023-08-10 @ PIT $6.6K $4.9K 7 9.5 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 1 0 1 0.65 0
2023-08-09 @ PIT $6.8K $4.9K 15 18.7 0 6 0.67 3 3 0 0 2 1 1 6 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 1 0.17 0 1.17 0
2023-08-08 @ PIT $6.6K $4.8K 16 21.7 0 3 1.33 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 0 1.83 0
2023-08-07 @ PIT $6.6K $4.7K 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-06 @ CHC $6.6K $4.7K 19 24.7 0 4 0.75 2 1 1 0 1 0.67 1 5 0 1 0 1 1 0.6 1 0.25 0 1.35 0
2023-08-05 @ CHC $6.6K $4.7K 16 18.5 0 5 0.6 3 1 0 1 3 0.75 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0.6 1 0 0 1.2 0
2023-08-04 @ CHC $9.8K $4.7K 18 21.7 0 5 1 3 0 0 0 2 0.6 0 5 1 0 0 1 1 0.6 1 0.4 0 1.6 0
2023-08-02 vs. LAA $6.5K $4.7K 34 47.3 0 4 1.75 3 0 0 0 1 0.67 1 5 0 0 1 2 4 0.8 3 1 1 2.55 0
2023-08-01 vs. LAA $6.7K $4.7K 4 6 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 2 0.5 0
2023-07-31 vs. LAA $6.6K $4.7K 2 3 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-07-30 vs. MIL $6.6K $4.6K 15 18.4 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 1 2 0.5 0 4 0 1 0 0 2 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2023-07-29 vs. MIL $6.6K $4.6K 31 40.4 0 4 1.5 3 0 0 1 2 0.67 0 5 0 1 1 1 2 0.8 2 0.75 1 2.3 0
2023-07-28 vs. MIL $6.6K $4.6K 19 24.7 0 3 0.67 2 1 0 0 2 1 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0.8 1 0 2 1.47 0
2023-07-26 @ BOS $6.7K $4.7K 6 9.2 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 1 0.5 0
2023-07-25 @ BOS $6.7K $4.6K 12 15 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 2 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2023-07-23 @ MIL $6.6K $4.7K 13 15.2 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2023-07-22 @ MIL $6.6K $4.8K 15 18.2 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0.6 0 0 1 1.1 0
2023-07-21 @ MIL $6.6K $4.7K 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-20 vs. ARI $6.5K $4.8K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-07-19 vs. ARI $6.5K $4.8K 7 9.2 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2023-07-18 vs. ARI $6.6K $4.7K 15 18.4 0 5 0.4 2 2 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 1 0 0 2 0.4 0 0 0 0.8 0
2023-07-16 vs. CHW $6.6K $4.7K 7 9 0 2 0.5 1 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.75 0 0 2 1.25 0
2023-07-15 vs. CHW $6.6K $4.7K 38 49.9 0 5 1.8 3 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 1 2 2 2 0.6 3 1.2 0 2.4 0
2023-07-14 vs. CHW $6.6K $4.6K 11 15.2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 2 0.4 0
2023-07-11 @ AL -- -- 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-09 @ TB $6.4K $4.6K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-08 @ TB $6.3K $4.6K 14 18.7 0 4 0.75 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.6 1 0.25 1 1.35 0
2023-07-07 @ TB $6.4K $4.6K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-05 @ CLE $6.7K $4.8K 6 6 0 6 0.33 2 1 0 0 2 0.4 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.67 0
2023-07-04 @ CLE $6.5K $4.8K 15 18.2 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0.6 0 0 1 1.1 0
2023-07-03 @ CLE $6.6K $4.8K 10 12.2 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-07-02 vs. MIA $6.6K $4.7K 22 27.2 0 3 1 2 1 0 0 1 1 1 4 0 2 0 1 1 0.75 0 0.33 1 1.75 0
2023-07-01 vs. MIA $6.5K $4.6K 14 18.7 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 1 0.75 0 1.25 0
2023-06-30 vs. MIA $6.6K $4.5K 32 43.6 0 3 1.67 2 0 1 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 1 1 1 3 0.8 2 1 1 2.47 0
2023-06-28 vs. MIN $9.6K $4.6K 14 18.2 0 2 0.5 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0.75 0 0 2 1.25 0
2023-06-27 vs. MIN $6.6K $4.6K 28 37.4 0 4 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 2 2 0.5 2 1.5 0 2.5 0
2023-06-26 vs. MIN $6.5K $4.6K 18 25.2 0 3 1.33 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 2 1 1 1.83 0
2023-06-25 @ CIN $6.5K $4.6K 17 21.2 0 6 0.67 2 0 0 0 0 0.33 2 6 0 1 0 2 1 0.33 0 0.33 0 1 0
2023-06-24 @ CIN $6.5K $4.6K 10 12 0 4 0.25 1 0 1 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 0 0.65 0
2023-06-23 @ CIN $6.6K $4.6K 27 33.9 0 5 1.2 3 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 1 1 1 2 0.6 1 0.6 0 1.8 0
2023-06-22 @ PHI $6.6K $4.6K 10 12.2 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2023-06-20 @ PHI $6.5K $4.6K 13 15.5 0 5 0.4 2 0 0 0 2 0.4 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0.4 1 0 0 0.8 0
2023-06-18 vs. COL $6.6K $4.6K 9 12.2 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 2 0.75 0
2023-06-17 vs. COL $6.6K $4.6K 7 9.2 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2023-06-16 vs. COL $6.6K $4.6K 9 12.2 0 3 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-06-15 vs. COL $6.6K $4.6K 6 9.7 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 1 0 1 0.25 0
2023-06-14 @ DET -- -- 20 27.9 0 3 1.33 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.6 1 1 2 1.93 0
2023-06-14 @ DET $6.5K $4.6K 29 37.7 0 5 1.2 3 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 1 1 1 1 0.6 3 0.6 0 1.8 0
2023-06-12 @ DET $9.8K $4.6K 11 16.5 0 5 0.4 1 0 0 0 0 0.2 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.2 3 0.2 0 0.6 0
2023-06-11 vs. WSH $6.5K $4.6K 5 6.2 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2023-06-10 vs. WSH $6.4K $4.6K 30 40.9 0 4 2 3 0 0 0 0 0.67 2 4 0 0 1 3 2 0.75 3 1.25 0 2.75 0
2023-06-09 vs. WSH $6.5K $4.6K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-06-08 vs. NYM $6.4K $4.6K 14 18.7 0 5 0.6 2 0 0 1 1 0.4 1 6 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 1 0.2 1 1.1 0
2023-06-07 vs. NYM $6.2K $4.6K 18 21.5 0 5 0.4 2 2 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 2 0 0 0 0.4 1 0 0 0.8 0
2023-06-06 vs. NYM $6.4K $4.5K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 1 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-06-04 @ ARI $6.4K $4.3K 23 27.4 0 5 0.6 3 0 0 0 3 0.6 0 5 0 2 0 0 2 0.6 0 0 0 1.2 0
2023-06-03 @ ARI $6.5K $4.5K 26 33.9 0 5 1.2 2 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 5 0 1 1 2 2 0.4 1 0.8 0 1.6 0
2023-06-02 @ ARI $6.5K $4.4K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-05-31 @ OAK $6.4K $4.5K 15 18.5 0 5 0.6 2 0 0 0 1 0.4 1 5 0 1 0 1 0 0.4 1 0.2 0 1 0
2023-05-30 @ OAK $6.4K $4.6K 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-05-29 @ OAK $6.2K $4.6K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-28 vs. PHI $9.8K $4.6K 27 34.9 0 5 1.2 4 1 0 0 3 1 0 5 1 0 0 1 2 0.8 3 0.4 0 2 0
2023-05-27 vs. PHI $6.4K $4.7K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-05-26 vs. PHI $6.4K $4.7K 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-25 vs. PHI $6.5K $4.7K 18 21 0 5 0.6 2 0 0 0 1 0.4 1 5 0 2 0 1 0 0.4 0 0.2 0 1 0
2023-05-24 vs. LAD $6.4K $4.7K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-23 vs. LAD $6.5K $4.7K 7 9 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-05-22 vs. LAD $6.5K $4.7K 16 21.4 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 5 0 1 0 1 2 0.4 0 0.25 1 0.9 0
2023-05-21 vs. SEA $6.4K $4.6K 5 6.2 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-05-20 vs. SEA $6.2K $4.6K 10 12.4 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2023-05-19 vs. SEA $6.4K $4.6K 7 9.2 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2023-05-17 @ TEX $6.2K $4.6K 23 30.9 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 1 1 2 0.4 1 0.75 1 1.4 0
2023-05-16 @ TEX $6.3K $4.6K 17 21.7 0 4 1.25 2 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 1 0.75 0 1.75 0
2023-05-15 @ TEX $6.3K $4.6K 18 25.2 0 4 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.4 2 0.75 1 1.4 0
2023-05-14 @ TOR $6.3K $4.6K 21 27.9 0 4 1.25 2 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.6 1 0.75 1 1.85 0
2023-05-13 @ TOR $6.5K $4.6K 15 18 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 2 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2023-05-12 @ TOR -- -- 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-05-10 vs. BOS $6.4K $4.5K 17 21.7 0 4 1.25 2 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 1 0.75 0 1.75 0
2023-05-09 vs. BOS $6.5K $4.6K 16 21.6 0 4 0.75 2 1 0 0 1 0.67 1 5 0 0 0 1 3 0.6 0 0.25 1 1.35 0
2023-05-07 vs. BAL $10K $4.6K 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-06 vs. BAL $6.5K $4.6K 7 9.5 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 1 0 1 0.83 0
2023-05-05 vs. BAL $6.6K $4.6K 7 9.2 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2023-05-04 @ MIA $6.5K $4.6K 14 18.7 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 1 0 1 0.83 1
2023-05-03 @ MIA $6.5K $4.6K 22 31.9 0 5 0.8 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 6 0 0 1 1 2 0.33 3 0.6 1 1.13 0
2023-05-02 @ MIA $6.4K $4.5K 14 18.5 1 3 0.67 1 2 0 0 0 0.5 1 5 0 1 0 1 0 0.4 1 0.33 1 1.07 0
2023-05-01 @ NYM -- -- 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
2023-05-01 @ NYM $9.8K $4.5K 26 34.1 0 5 1.4 3 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 5 0 0 1 2 3 0.6 1 0.8 0 2 0
2023-04-28 @ NYM $6.5K $4.6K 7 9.7 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0.33 1 0 0 0.67 0
2023-04-27 vs. MIA $6.7K $4.6K 4 6.5 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 0 1 0.25 0
2023-04-26 vs. MIA $6.5K $4.6K 18 24.7 0 3 1.33 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.6 1 1 2 1.93 1
2023-04-25 vs. MIA $6.6K $4.6K 15 18.2 0 4 0.75 2 1 0 0 1 0.67 1 4 0 1 0 1 1 0.5 0 0.25 0 1.25 0
2023-04-24 vs. MIA $6.5K $4.6K 2 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2023-04-23 vs. HOU $6.5K $4.5K 14 18.2 0 3 0.67 1 1 0 0 0 0.5 1 4 0 1 0 1 1 0.5 0 0.33 1 1.17 0
2023-04-22 vs. HOU $6.5K $4.6K 21 24 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 4 0 3 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2023-04-21 vs. HOU $6.5K $4.7K 12 15.2 0 5 0.8 2 1 0 0 0 0.5 2 5 0 0 0 2 1 0.4 0 0.4 0 1.2 0
2023-04-19 @ SD $6.5K $4.7K 10 12 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2023-04-18 @ SD $6.1K $4.6K 4 6.2 0 4 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2023-04-17 @ SD $6.5K $4.6K 13 15.2 0 5 0.8 3 0 0 0 2 0.6 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.6 0 0.2 0 1.4 0
2023-04-16 @ KC $6.5K $4.4K 15 18.2 0 4 0.75 2 1 0 0 1 0.67 1 4 0 1 0 1 1 0.5 0 0.25 0 1.25 0
2023-04-15 @ KC $6.5K $4.2K 8 12.4 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 2 0.33 0 0 1 0.33 0
2023-04-14 @ KC $6.5K $4.1K 26 34.6 0 5 1.2 3 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 1 1 3 0.6 2 0.6 0 1.8 0
2023-04-12 vs. CIN $6.5K $4.1K 22 28.5 0 4 1 3 1 0 0 2 1 1 4 0 1 0 1 0 0.75 3 0.25 0 1.75 0
2023-04-11 vs. CIN $6.3K $4.2K 9 12.5 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 1 0 2 0.93 0
2023-04-10 vs. CIN $6.3K $4.4K 9 9 0 5 0.6 3 1 0 0 3 0.75 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 0 0 0 1.2 0
2023-04-09 vs. SD $9 $4.4K 15 18.5 0 3 0.67 2 0 0 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0.75 1 0 1 1.42 0
2023-04-08 vs. SD $6.3K $4.4K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-07 vs. SD $6.2K $4.4K 16 21.4 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 2 0 0 2 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2023-04-06 vs. SD $6.2K $4.2K 9 12.2 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.4 0 0.25 1 0.9 0
2023-04-05 @ STL $6.3K $4.3K 10 12.4 0 5 0.4 2 1 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0.4 0 0 0 0.8 0
2023-04-04 @ STL $6.4K $4.1K 13 15.2 0 5 0.4 2 2 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 0 0.8 0
2023-04-03 @ STL $6.2K $4.1K 30 40.9 0 4 1.75 3 0 0 0 1 0.67 1 5 0 0 1 2 2 0.8 3 1 1 2.55 0
2023-04-02 @ WSH $6.2K $4.1K 6 9.2 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 2 0.5 0
2023-04-01 @ WSH $6.2K $4.1K 14 18.7 0 5 0.8 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.2 1 0.6 0 1 0
2023-03-30 @ WSH -- -- 11 12 0 6 0.33 2 0 0 0 2 0.33 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.67 0
2023-03-28 @ BOS -- -- 12 15.4 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 2 0
2023-03-27 vs. BOS -- -- 6 9.2 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 2 0.5 0
2023-03-26 vs. PIT -- -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-03-25 vs. MIN -- -- 21 28.4 0 4 1.25 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 2 0.75 0 1.75 0
2023-03-24 @ BOS -- -- 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-03-23 vs. NYM -- -- 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-03-05 vs. NYY -- -- 15 18.4 0 3 0.67 2 0 0 0 2 0.67 0 3 0 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 0 0 1.33 0
2023-03-04 vs. MIN -- -- 10 12.7 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 0 0 1 0
2023-03-01 vs. TB -- -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-02-27 vs. TOR -- -- 7 9.2 0 2 0.5 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0.67 0 0 1 1.17 0
2023-02-25 vs. BOS -- -- 7 9.2 0 2 0.5 1 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0.67 0 0 1 1.17 0
2022-10-15 @ PHI $5.9K $4K 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-10-14 @ PHI $5.8K $4K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-10-12 vs. PHI $5.8K $3.9K 7 9.2 0 3 0.33 1 1 1 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 0 0.83 0
2022-10-11 vs. PHI $5.9K $3.8K 15 18.2 0 4 1 3 0 0 0 2 0.75 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.8 0 0.25 1 1.8 0
2022-10-04 @ MIA $5.8K $3.8K 14 18.5 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0.6 1 0 2 0.93 1
2022-10-03 @ MIA $5.7K $3.8K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-10-02 vs. NYM $10.2K $3.8K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2022-10-01 vs. NYM $5.7K $3.8K 11 12.2 0 4 0.75 3 0 0 0 3 0.75 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.75 0 0 0 1.5 0
2022-09-30 vs. NYM $6.2K $3.9K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-09-28 @ WSH $6.1K $4K 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-09-27 @ WSH $6K $4K 28 37.4 0 5 1.6 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 2 2 0.4 2 1.2 0 2 0
2022-09-26 @ WSH $6.2K $4K 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-09-25 @ PHI $6.4K $3.8K 9 12.7 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 1
2022-09-22 @ PHI $5.9K $3.8K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-09-21 vs. WSH $6.1K $3.8K 10 12.7 0 5 0.4 2 1 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 1 0 0 0.8 0
2022-09-20 vs. WSH $5.7K $3.8K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-09-19 vs. WSH $5.7K $3.8K 7 9 0 3 0.67 1 0 0 1 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 0 0.33 1 1.17 0
2022-09-18 vs. PHI $5.8K $3.8K 7 9.2 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2022-09-17 vs. PHI $5.6K $3.7K 25 35.2 0 4 1.5 2 1 0 0 0 0.5 1 4 0 0 1 2 1 0.5 4 1 0 2 0
2022-09-16 vs. PHI $5.7K $3.7K 18 25.2 0 3 1.33 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 2 1 1 1.83 0
2022-09-14 @ SF $5.7K $3.7K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-09-13 @ SF $5.6K $3.7K 10 12.2 0 5 0.6 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.4 0 0.2 0 1 0
2022-09-12 @ SF $5.4K $3.7K 11 12 0 4 0.5 2 2 0 0 2 1 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2022-09-11 @ SEA $5.4K $4.1K 7 9 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.2 0
2022-09-10 @ SEA $5.7K $4K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-09-09 @ SEA $5.8K $3.9K 10 12.2 0 5 0.2 1 2 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2022-09-07 @ OAK $5.9K $4K 5 6.5 0 5 0.2 1 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 1 0 0 0.4 0
2022-09-06 @ OAK $5.7K $4K 12 15.4 0 5 0.6 2 1 0 1 1 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 2 0.4 0 0.2 0 1 0
2022-09-04 vs. MIA $6K $4K 12 16 0 5 0.6 2 2 0 0 1 0.67 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.4 2 0.2 0 1 0
2022-09-03 vs. MIA $6.1K $4K 2 3 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2022-09-02 vs. MIA $6K $4.1K 8 9 0 5 0.6 2 0 0 0 1 0.4 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.4 0 0.2 0 1 0
2022-09-01 vs. COL $6K $4.2K 2 3 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2022-08-31 vs. COL $5.9K $3.9K 14 18.7 0 4 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 1 0.75 0 1.25 0
2022-08-26 @ STL $5.9K $4.1K 10 13 0 6 0.33 2 0 0 0 2 0.33 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 2 0 0 0.67 0
2022-08-24 @ PIT $5.9K $4K 13 18.9 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0.6 1 0 2 0.93 0
2022-08-23 @ PIT $5.6K $4.1K 5 6.2 0 5 0.2 1 2 0 1 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2022-08-22 @ PIT $5.4K $4.2K 8 9 0 4 0.75 2 1 0 0 1 0.67 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 0 0.25 0 1.25 0
2022-08-21 vs. HOU $5.4K $4.2K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-08-20 vs. HOU $5.4K $4.2K 2 3 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2022-08-19 vs. HOU $5.4K $4.2K 12 15.4 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0.6 0 0 1 1.1 0
2022-08-18 vs. NYM $5.4K $4.1K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-17 vs. NYM $5.3K $4K 2 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2022-08-16 vs. NYM $5.4K $3.9K 10 15.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 4 1 0
2022-08-15 vs. NYM $5.4K $3.9K 25 34.9 0 5 1.2 3 0 0 0 0 0.6 3 5 0 0 0 3 2 0.6 3 0.6 0 1.8 0
2022-08-14 @ MIA $5.5K $3.8K 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1
2022-08-13 @ MIA $5.3K -- 19 24.9 0 4 1.25 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 1 0.75 0 1.75 0
2022-08-13 @ MIA $5.3K $3.7K 11 12 0 5 0.4 2 2 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 0 0.8 0
2022-08-12 @ MIA $9.6K $3.7K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-10 @ BOS $4.9K $3.7K 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2022-08-09 @ BOS $5.1K $3.7K 22 27.6 0 5 0.6 3 0 0 1 3 0.6 0 6 0 1 0 0 3 0.67 0 0 1 1.27 0
2022-08-07 @ NYM $5K $3.7K 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-06 @ NYM $5K -- 7 9.5 0 4 0.5 1 2 0 0 0 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.75 0
2022-08-06 @ NYM $5K $3.8K 12 15.7 0 5 0.6 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.4 1 0.2 0 1 0
2022-08-05 @ NYM $5.1K $3.8K 19 21.2 0 5 0.8 4 0 0 0 4 0.8 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0.8 0 0 0 1.6 0
2022-08-04 @ NYM $5.1K $3.8K 16 22.2 0 4 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 2 0.75 0 1.25 0
2022-08-03 vs. PHI $5.2K $3.8K 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2022-08-02 vs. PHI $5.1K $3.9K 11 15.7 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.6 1 0 2 0.93 0
2022-07-31 vs. ARI $4.9K $4K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-07-30 vs. ARI $4.8K $4.1K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-07-29 vs. ARI $4.9K $4.1K 10 12.2 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-07-26 @ PHI $5.3K $4.1K 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-07-25 @ PHI $5.6K $4.1K 10 12 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2022-07-24 vs. LAA $5.6K $4.1K 8 9.5 0 5 0.4 2 1 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 1 0 0 0.8 0
2022-07-23 vs. LAA $5.9K $4.2K 9 12.2 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.4 0 0.25 1 0.9 0
2022-07-22 vs. LAA $6.1K $4.2K 2 3 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2022-07-17 @ WSH $6.5K $4.3K 2 3 0 4 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.2 0
2022-07-15 @ WSH $6.3K $4.4K 10 12.2 0 5 0.2 1 2 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2022-07-14 @ WSH $6.2K $4.3K 9 12.2 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2022-07-13 vs. NYM $6.3K $4.3K 10 12 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2022-07-12 vs. NYM $6.3K $4.1K 5 6 0 3 0.33 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2022-07-11 vs. NYM $6K $4.1K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2022-07-10 vs. WSH $6.2K $4.2K 2 3 0 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0.17 0 0 1 0.17 0
2022-07-09 vs. WSH $6.1K $4.1K 10 12.2 0 3 0.67 2 1 0 0 2 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.75 0 0 1 1.42 0
2022-07-08 vs. WSH $6K $4.4K 21 28.7 0 5 1 2 1 0 1 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.4 3 0.6 0 1.4 0
2022-07-07 vs. STL $5.9K $4.4K 2 3.2 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-07-06 vs. STL $6K $4.4K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-07-05 vs. STL $6.1K $4.4K 10 12.2 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2022-07-04 vs. STL $6K $4.3K 14 18.7 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 1 0 1 0.83 0
2022-07-03 @ CIN $6.3K $4K 18 21 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 2 0 0 0 0.6 0 0 1 1.1 0
2022-07-02 @ CIN $6.2K $3.9K 4 6.2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2022-07-01 @ CIN $5.9K $3.9K 16 21.4 0 3 1 2 0 2 0 1 0.67 1 5 0 0 0 1 2 0.8 0 0.33 0 1.8 0
2022-06-25 vs. LAD $5.8K $3.9K 10 12.2 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-06-24 vs. LAD $5.9K $3.9K 10 12.2 0 3 0.67 2 0 0 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.75 0 0 1 1.42 0
2022-06-22 vs. SF $5.7K $3.8K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-06-21 vs. SF $5.8K $3.9K 24 31.4 0 5 1.2 3 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.6 2 0.6 0 1.8 0
2022-06-20 vs. SF $6.1K $4K 5 6 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-06-19 @ CHC $5.6K $4.3K 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-06-18 @ CHC $5.7K $4.3K 8 9 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 0 0 1 1.1 0
2022-06-17 @ CHC $17.1K $9.5K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-06-15 @ WSH $6.1K $4.4K 0 0 0 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-06-14 @ WSH $5.9K $4.4K 2 3 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2022-06-13 @ WSH $6K $4.3K 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 2 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2022-06-12 vs. PIT $6K $4.3K 4 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 2 0.5 0
2022-06-11 vs. PIT $6.4K $4.3K 18 24.9 0 4 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.4 1 0.75 0 1.4 0
2022-06-10 vs. PIT $6.2K $4.3K 8 9 0 4 0.75 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 0 0.25 0 1.25 0
2022-06-09 vs. PIT $6.2K $4.4K 11 15.2 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 1 0.5 0
2022-06-08 vs. OAK $6.2K $4.2K 5 6.2 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-06-07 vs. OAK $6.3K $4.1K 28 37.4 0 4 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 2 2 0.5 2 1.5 0 2.5 0
2022-06-05 @ COL $5.8K $9.5K 32 40.1 0 5 1.4 4 1 0 0 3 1 0 5 0 1 1 1 3 0.8 1 0.6 0 2.2 0
2022-06-04 @ COL $5.3K $4.3K 2 3.5 1 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
2022-06-02 @ COL $5.9K $4.3K 14 18.7 0 5 0.6 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 1 6 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 1 0.2 1 1.1 0
2022-05-31 @ ARI $6.1K $3.9K 11 15.7 0 4 0.5 1 2 1 1 0 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.4 1 0.25 0 0.9 0
2022-05-30 @ ARI $5.8K $4.1K 7 9.2 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2022-05-29 vs. MIA $5.8K $4.1K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-05-28 vs. MIA $5.8K $4.1K 10 12 0 3 0.33 1 2 1 0 1 1 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0.83 0
2022-05-27 vs. MIA $5.7K $4.1K 9 12.7 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 3 0
2022-05-24 vs. PHI $6K $4.1K 14 19.7 2 3 0.67 2 1 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 3 0 0 1.07 0
2022-05-23 vs. PHI $6.1K $4.1K 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-05-22 @ MIA $5.8K $4K 8 9 0 4 0.75 2 1 0 0 1 0.67 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 0 0.25 0 1.25 0
2022-05-21 @ MIA $5.5K $4.2K 14 18.2 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0.6 0 0 2 0.93 1

Ronald Acuna Daily Fantasy News, Rankings, Projections

Braves vs. Padres will be delayed due to inclement weather Saturday.

Braves vs. Padres will be delayed due to inclement weather Saturday.

This Offense Tops the Slate for the Second Straight Day

For the second straight day on a 12 game slate, the Atlanta Braves top the board as the only offense reaching five implied runs with only another three above four and a half. There’s some decent pitching on this board, but even more pitcher friendly weather just about everywhere except for some west coast parks. Although projections still feature three top 10 Atlanta bats, they’re not as heavy on Braves as Tuesday with none of those three projecting among the top five batters tonight. Ronald Acuna (123 wRC+, .161 ISO vs RHP this year) is still your top projecting Brave against Josiah Gray, who has not only allowed 37 home runs on 43 barrrels (10.7%), but now he’s also only struck out 12.8% of batters over his last five starts too (7.2 SwStr%). Non-FIP estimators are all more than half a run below his 5.17 ERA, while he still has a 24.2 K%, but also a 10.2 BB%. He also has a pretty massive split, which could help him here (LHBs .415 wOBA, .363 xwOBA – RHBs .309 wOBA, .288 xwOBA). It’s a decent park with a hitter friendly umpire expectation, but pitcher friendly weather. Matt Olson (111 wRC+, .239 ISO) and Austin Riley (123 wRC+, .225 ISO) also project among the top 10 bats tonight.

Last night’s top projected bat is also tonight’s top projected bat and that’s Mike Trout (160 wRC+, .341 ISO) against Adrian Martinez tonight. On the one hand, Martinez has struck out 13 of his last 45 batters and has a slightly above average 10.9 SwStr% on the year with a respectable 20.2 K%. On the other hand, he’s been bombed for 16 runs and six home runs with a 90 mph EV over his last 13.2 innings. While all estimators are well below his 6.10 ERA, the best is still just a 4.22 xFIP. Martinez has one Quality Start in 10 tries and batters from either side of the plate exceed a .345 wOBA and xwOBA against him. This is another hitter friendly park with a hitter friendly umpire, but also potentially hitter friendly weather too. Shohei Ohtani (154 wRC+, .281 ISO) also projects as a top five bat tonight.

Rafael Devers (151 wRC+, .256 ISO) and Xander Bogaerts (119 wRC+, .142 ISO) also project as top 10 bats against Dean Kremer, who shut out the Astros on four hits (six strikeouts) last time out, which dropped his ERA down to 3.07, though with just a 17.4 K% all non-FIP estimators are more than a run and two-tenths higher. The FIP is a bit lower with just one-third of his barrels leaving the yard. Batters from either side of the plate are between a .290 and .325 wOBA and xwOBA against him this year. Fenway is certainly a park downgrade for Kremer this year and the weather is expected to be somewhat neutral here.

LaMonte Wade Jr. (107 wRC+, .191 ISO) and Joc Pederson (144 wRC+, .260 ISO) are the remaining pair of teammates projected among the top 10 bats tonight. An 18.3 K% over his last five starts constitutes a strikeout spike for Jose Urena, who still has just a 3.6 K-BB% on the season. Even with a 50.5 GB%, his best estimator is a 4.77 xFIP. LHBs have a .402 wOBA and .361 xwOBA against him this year and San Francisco may be one of the more hitter friendly parks on this slate. If you have yet to guess, the Angels, Red Sox and Giants are the other offenses exceeding four and a half team run totals.

Two Predominantly Right-Handed Lineups Project Strongly Against LHP

Six of 22 teams on the Tuesday night slate have at least a 4.9 run team total with just one more above four and a half implied runs, but discussing our top projected bats has to start with a caveat that we don't know who's pitching for the Giants at Coors yet, beyond the opener. Now, we can mention that the top projected bat on the board is Aaron Judge (222 wRC+, .396 ISO vs RHP this year) with the Yankees at 5.33 implied runs against Luis Ortiz, making his second major league starts, but Judge is not joined by any other Yankees among the current top 10 projected bats.

The first pair of teammates we find among the top 10 projected bats on either site are a pair of Angels (4.43 implied runs) or rather, THE pair of Angels, against a rookie lefty who had a 20+ K-BB% in the minors this year, but just a 2.6 K-BB% at the major league level. Cole Ragans has exhibited a massive split (RHBs .389 wOBA, .370 xwOBA – LHBs .165 wOBA, .231 xwOBA), which certain justifies Mike Trout (202 wRC+, .340 ISO) as a top three projected bat, but Shohei Ohtani (128 wRC+, .220 ISO) also projects sixth best.

Also a top three projected bat, Ronald Acuna (104 wRC+, .139 ISO) and the Braves top the board at 5.81 implied runs at home against Patrick Corbin, who continues to get destroyed by RHBs (.388 wOBA, .396 xwOBA), which is why Austin Riley (208 wRC+, .376 ISO) and Dansby Swanson (138 wRC+, .189 ISO) also project among the top bats tonight.

We do know who’s pitching for the home team at Coors tonight and that’s Kyle Freeland (16.8 K% with 9.5% Barrels/BBE) against whom RHBs have a .326 wOBA and .328 xwOBA. If we spread out beyond the top 10 and consider the top 15 projected bats tonight, you’ll Austin Slater (133 wRC+, .149 ISO), David Villar (173 wRC+, .298 ISO), Wilmer Flores (105 wRC+, .170 ISO), Evan Longoria (121 wRC+, .206 ISO) and J.D. Davis (126 wRC+, .177 ISO). The Giants are tied for the second highest team total on the board at 5.75 runs.

Stacking Projections Favor Two Offenses Well Above Rest of the Board

On a seven game slate with some clear separation, where just two teams fall between four and five implied runs and both exceed four and a half run team totals, we find the affordable San Francisco Giants have actually fallen to the second highest team run total (5.68), just behind the Braves, but still project to be the most popular offense on the board because you can stack Giants with expensive pitching. The Giants also project to smash the slate just slightly more frequently than the Braves, though both teams separate from the rest of the board there. As mentioned, the affordability of the Giants projects a strong value rating on either site, though the Miami Marlins project as a better value on DraftKings with many of them costing less than $3K from the right-hand side against Wade Miley. For more on which stacks rate best on both sites tonight, check out today’s PlateIQ Live Blog.

The Offense that Dominates Projections Against Pitcher with a 0.0 K-BB%

Facing the Rockies, but not at Coors, the Atlanta Braves still top a 12 game board at 5.87 implied runs on Tuesday night. The only flaw in Atlanta’s armor is a 25.1 K% vs RHP, but Jose Urena has both an 11.6% strikeout and walk rate. More than half a run lower, but still reaching five runs are the Brewers (Mitch Keller) and Yankees (Mike Mayers). Only three more offenses exceed four and a half runs or even 4.3 runs on a very pitching heavy board. Each of the first two, four of the top six, and even six of the top 12 projected bats are Braves tonight. While Urena has a 95 point split this season (LHBs .400 wOBA) and the projected Atlanta lineup only includes three from that side, Statcast narrows the gap to less than 20 points (LHBs .367 xwOBA, .RHBs .349 xwOBA). Urena’s only positive attribute is a 50.2 GB%, which makes this even more of a stacking situation with the main obstacle being price, considering the price of pitching tonight. Ronald Acuna Jr. (114 wRC+, .124 ISO vs RHP this season) and Matt Olson (129 wRC+, .269 ISO) are tonight’s top projected bats, not too far ahead of Austin Riley (122 wRC+, .225 ISO) and Dansby Swanson (113 wRC+, .159 ISO) with William Contreras (122 wRC+, .264 ISO) and Michael Harris (152 wRC+, .260 ISO) just outside the top 10.

The Milwaukee Brewers and Los Angeles Angels also feature a pair of top 10 projected bats. It’s the obvious in L.A.. Twelve of Jameson Taillon’s 24 walks this season came in a four start stretch that started towards the end of July, but he hasn’t walked a batter in three starts since. It’s mentioned because a 4.2 BB% is the key to his season with a marginal 20.2 K% and very average contact profile. His 3.89 ERA is within a quarter run of all estimators, a perfectly fourth starter type. It’s actually probably a small victory that Mike Trout (165 wRC+, .357 ISO) and Shohei Ohtani (160 wRC+, .292 ISO) at least project among the latter half of the top 10. Batters from either side of the plate are between a .298 and .338 wOBA and xwOBA against Taillon this year.

So much for “at least Mitch Keller is generating ground balls”. He’s struck out just 13 of his last 108 batters with a 42.9 GB%. His 4.30 ERA over this five spot span is a bit misleading because six of the 17 runs he’s allowed have been unearned. His season ground ball rate has dropped to 49.5% with just a 10.2 K-BB%. His 4.50 matches his 4.50 DRA, but is slightly above other estimators, which drop as far as a 3.99 FIP with just 11 of 29 barrels exiting the park. Batters from either side are between a .314 and .350 wOBA and xwOBA against him, while the Pittsburgh pen has been heavily worked recently too. Christian Yelich (122 wRC+, .154 ISO) and Willy Adames (115 wRC+, .249 ISO) are top projecting bats tonight.

Ronald Acuna Jr. (lower body) scratched Sunday

Ronald Acuna Jr. (lower body) scratched Sunday

Projections Have Little Faith in Pitcher Making His First Start Since 2020

Despite the absence of Coors on tonight’s 11 game slate, we still have the Braves and Blue Jays tied atop the head at 5.83 implied runs each, while the Guardians (5.26) are the only other team above a five run team total. Four more exceed four and a half on a pitching heavy slate. The Braves are facing Anibal Sanchez, who last took a major league mound in 2020. He’s struck out 13 of 58 AAA batters this season (9.3 SwStr%) with eight walks and seven runs allowed (six earned) over 12.2 innings. It’s unlikely the 38 year-old has very much left in the tank, but we’ll see. The Blue Jays will host the Royals and whoever is left eligible to pitch once they get there, which likely includes some AAA arms among the mix. We don’t even know for sure yet.

The odd thing is that neither team dominates hitter projections tonight, though the Braves place a pair, Ronald Acuna Jr. (117 wRC+, .137 ISO vs RHP this year) and Matt Olson (130 wRC+, .248 ISO), among the top 10 against Sanchez. Jose Ramirez (177 wRC+, .310 ISO) is the top projected bat on the board against Elvin Rodriguez, who has struck out just 16 of 96 batters with nine walks and as many home runs surrendered. He’s allowed 12.9% Barrels/BBE, while rocking the 93.6 mph EV. Batters from either side of the plate are above a .380 wOBA and xwOBA against him, though Ramirez is not joined by any of his Cleveland teammates atop the projections tonight.

In fact, the top 10 hitter projections reads mostly like a list of this year’s MVP candidates. The Houston Astros (4.52 run team total) are the only other offense with multiple top 10 projected bats. Reid Detmers has struck out 19 of his last 61 batters and 14 of 22 AAA batters in between, but has done this with very little increase to his swinging strike rate (9.3% last three starts, 8.9% season). On the season, he’s still registering a mere 11.3 K-BB% with 9.4% Barrels/BBE. He did appear to throw many more sliders (33%) in two of his starts, but just 11% against the Royals. Ironically, a 14.1 HR/FB nearly balances out a .200 BABIP and his 4.22 ERA isn’t so far removed from estimators ranging from a 4.47 SIERA to a 4.97 FIP. Batters from the right-hand side have a .319 wOBA, but .372 xwOBA against him this year and he’s projected to face eight right-handed Astros tonight. However, it’s Kyle Tucker (136 wRC+, .232 ISO vs LHP this year) and Jose Altuve (212 wRC+, .418 ISO) who PlateIQ projections expect to do the most damage. Detmers has held LHBs to a .200 wOBA, but .296 xwOBA.

Several Pairs of Teammates Projecting as Top of the Board Bats Tonight

Either a nine or 10 game slate (FD omitting second game of double-header in Cincinnati) features a bit of separation atop the board with one caveat. That being that the Reds have not yet named a game two pitcher, so there is not currently a reliable line on that game. We will proceed accordingly, but a reminder to check in on projections and see where all that fits in later. Currently, the Braves sit atop the board at 5.9 implied runs, facing the talented, but still developing Matthew Liberatore at home. They are nearly a half run ahead of the Dodgers, who are nearly a half run ahead of the Yankees, as the only three teams exceeding five implied runs tonight. Again, that could change with Pittsburgh/Cincinnati coming on board as the pitching in that game is likely to be subpar, which we already know about Bryse Wilson. Seven more teams reach the four and half run team total mark tonight, making it more than half the board. What we currently see are more Dodgers atop the board in terms of PlateIQ projections, though several teams put a pair of bats in the top 10. It’s essentially a lineup of the top hitters in the league without particular matchups generating anyone we wouldn’t expect to normally be up there.

Mark Leiter has struck out 15 of 50 batters faced out of the bullpen since returning to the majors in late June, but just seven of 45 in three April starts. He threw 57 pitches last time out and should be stretched out for about five innings here and now has a fairly impressive 24.8 K% with a 51.3 GB% on the season, but he’s also walked 10.4% and probably won’t hold that strikeout rate in a starting role. Leiter has a sizeable reverse split with RHBs owning a .348 wOBA against him (LHBs .255), though Statcast closes that gap significantly to .338 and .323 xwOBAs, still in favor of RHBs, just slightly now. Projections…well…project Mookie Betts (136 wRC+, .240 ISO vs RHP since 2021), Trea Turner (127 wRC+, .171 ISO) and Freddie Freeman (148 wRC+, .209 ISO) to do some work against him.

Mike Trout (181 wRC+, .374 ISO) and Shohei Ohtani (152 wRC+, .304 ISO) both project as top three bats against Jordan Lyles in Baltimore. The Orioles allow Lyles to pitch deep into games and he hasn’t been horrible (11.9 K-BB%), though he has allowed 10.1% Barrels/BBE and been a bit fortunate that only 12 of 31 have left the yard. Batters from either side of the plate exceed a .335 wOBA against him since last season. The Angels present an interesting dynamic this year where they offer a stars and scrubs lineup, smash or crash, where they strikeout so often and have so many outs in the lower half that you can often stack their top bats, while also benefit by utilizing the same pitcher against them. This may be one of those cases.

Ronald Acuna Jr. (169 wRC+, .299 ISO vs LHP since LY) is also a top three projected bat and is joined in the top 10 by Matt Olson (142 wRC+, .282 ISO). Liberatore may one day become the All-Star pitcher that scouting reports suggest he has the talent to be, but for now he’s just a guy with a 7.2 K-BB%, 29.4 GB% and 14% Barrels/BBE through his first five starts. More than half his contact (52.6%) has been hard hit (95+ mph EV) and all estimators exceed five. He does have two starts of five shutout innings each, both at home (Pirates, Brewers), but has been wrecked in three road starts (13 runs in 10.2 innings). RHBs exceed a .400 wOBA and xwOBA against him, but LHBs have hit him well too (.331 wOBA, .346 xwOBA) and Olson crushes same-handed pitching.

Vladimir Guerrero Jr. (154 wRC+, .253 ISO) and George Springer (130 wRC+, .224 ISO) are the last pair of top projected teammates. Since being hit on the wrist by a comebacker at the end of April, Marco Gonzales has compiled nine Quality Starts in 12 attempts, including four straight and he’s done this with just a 2.3 K-BB%. While Gonzales has managed contact fairly well over this span (6.9% Barrels/BBE, 87.1 mph EV), it’s a .243 BABIP and 84.1 LOB% that bear responsibility for a 3.18 ERA with estimators two runs higher. In fact, he doesn’t have an estimator below a 4.75 xERA on the season. RHBs have a wOBA and xwOBA within three points of .330 against him since last season. It may be a pitcher friendly park, but PlateIQ projections don’t expect Gonzales to continue his magic tricks against the Jays tonight.

Projections Are Dominated by Two Offenses on Monday

The Blue Jays (5.46 implied runs), Cardinals (5.46) and Braves (5.39) are essentially tied at the top of the board with the Astros (5.03) also reaching a five run team total on a 20 team board, where three more teams (Padres, Diamondbacks, Nationals) also exceed four and a half runs. Projections for two of the top three teams simply dominate PlateIQ projections tonight (though projections are fluid and subject to change). Each of the top four projected bats and seven of the top 10 overall are either Toronto Blue Jays or Atlanta Braves, leaving the Cardinals as the odd offense out, despite the slightly higher run total than the Braves. Paul Goldschmidt (133 wRC+, .205 ISO vs RHP since 2021) is the only Cardinal to project as a top 10 bat against Mitch Keller on either site.

Ronald Acuna Jr. (150 wRC+, .269 ISO) is tonight’s top projected bat. Josiah Gray accomplished the double feat of walking fewer than three batters and failing to allow a home run for the first time this year. He’s done either a few times, but never both in the same start until his most recent one. Missing bats has never been the problem for Gray (25.9 K%, 12.6 SwStr%). Failure to find the strike zone often enough (10.9 BB%) and getting hammered from always pitching behind in the count (17.9 HR/FB, 24.2 GB%, 13.5% Barrels/BBE) has been. A 4.16 SIERA is his only estimator below a 4.33 ERA. Gray has had particular issues with LHBs in his short major league career (.377 wOBA, .384 xwOBA), which would seem to make a predominantly right-handed Altanta lineup a better matchup for him, though he hasn’t been particularly strong against same-handed batters either (.320 wOBA, .302 xwOBA). Joining Acuna Jr. as top 10 projected bats are Matt Olson (137 wRC+, .229 ISO) and Austin Riley (137 wRC+, .243 ISO). All three are quite expensive though.

Vladimir Guerrero Jr. (155 wRC+, .278 ISO) and George Springer (135 wRC+, .274 ISO) are both top three projected bats, hosting Kyle Bradish. There’s nothing lacking in his bat missing ability (24 K%, 11.2 SwStr%), but he walks a few too many (9.6%) and the contact profile is a disaster. Bradish has allowed a home run in every start with 10 of 13 barrels (12%) leaving the yard on a 92.3 mph average EV overall. Considering how far the walls were moved back and up in Baltimore this off-season, one could argue that none of those home runs were given up in power friendly environments. Even worse for Bradish in this spot, RHBs have torched him (.488 wOBA, .461 xwOBA). Bo Bichette (111 wRC+, .177 ISO) and Teoscar Hernandez (104 wRC+, .175 ISO) join their teammates as top 10 projected bats.

This Offense Separates from the Board by Team Total and Projections

The Atlanta Braves, for the third night in a row, top the slate, but are the only team above five implied runs on either a five or six game board with a 5.42 team run total at home against J.T. Brubaker. While half the board is above four and a half runs, the Braves do separate themselves from it by more than half a run currently. Tonight’s PlateIQ projections, which are fluid and subject to change, currently project three Atlanta batters among the top 10 overall bats tonight. Ten of Brubaker’s 23 strikeouts over his last five starts came in one start (Cubs) and 19 of 40 over his last eight have come in just two (Reds). Considering he had an 18+ SwStr% in each of those games and just 11% on the year, it’s hard to trust any of his season strikeout numbers (22.5%) and may make us more concerned about a 10.2 BB%. He’s walked at least two in nine of 11 starts. While all estimators are below his 4.70 ERA, the lowest is a 3.98 DRA, so again, some concern if the strikeout rate is not real or at least consistent. A wild pitcher is a good one to stack against. Projections strongly suggest Ronald Acuna Jr. (147 wRC+, .265 ISO vs RHP since LY), Austin Riley (138 wRC+, .243 ISO) and Matt Olson (139 wRC+, .228 ISO) should be part of those stacks. Batters from either side of the plate are above a .325 wOBA and xwOBA against Brubaker since last season.

A pair of Yankees are also top projected bats on either site. After getting off to a surprisingly strong start, Dylan Bundy has struck out three or fewer in four of his last five starts with at least four runs allowed in three of them. He’s allowed eight home runs and 13 barrels (13.4%) over his last six. About the only thing that remains positive is that he’s not walking anybody (4.8%). Non-FIP estimators (14.5 HR/FB) are all more than a run below his 5.57 ERA, but a 3.81 xERA is the only one below four. Batters from either side of the plate exceed a .330 wOBA and xwOBA against him. Aaron Judge (166 wRC+, .283 ISO) is the second best projected bat on the board (Jose Ramirez is first) with Giancarlo Stanton (137 wRC+, .251 ISO), while Anthony Rizzo (109 wRC+, .220 ISO) also merits a top 10 projection with the smaller slate on FanDuel. No other projected lineup includes more than one top 10 projected bat, even on such a small slate, especially with Shohei Ohtani unavailable as a batter tonight.