Vladimir Guerrero Jr.

Toronto Blue Jays
Pos: 1B | Hand: R
Status: Active
player props
FPTS 3 5 8 10 13 15 18 20 23 25 SAL $4.7K $4.7K $4.8K $4.8K $4.9K $4.9K $5K $5K $5.1K $5.1K
  • FPTS: 2
  • FPTS: 11
  • FPTS: 6
  • FPTS: 25
  • FPTS: 7
  • FPTS: 11
  • FPTS: 5
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 15
  • FPTS: 6
  • FPTS: 11
  • FPTS: 0
  • FPTS: 11
  • FPTS: 23
  • FPTS: 10
  • FPTS: 5
  • SAL: $5K
  • SAL: $4.9K
  • SAL: $4.9K
  • SAL: $5K
  • SAL: $4.6K
  • SAL: $4.6K
  • SAL: $4.6K
  • SAL: $4.9K
  • SAL: $4.8K
  • SAL: $4.8K
  • SAL: $4.9K
  • SAL: $4.8K
  • SAL: $4.9K
  • SAL: $5.1K
  • SAL: $5K
  • SAL: $5K
05/08 05/10 05/11 05/12 05/13 05/15 05/17 05/18 05/19 05/20 05/21 05/22 05/23 05/24 05/25
Date Opp DKSAL FDSAL DKFPTS FDFPTS sf ab slg h so hbp gidp 1b babip 2b pa 3b sb hr xbh r obp rbi iso bb ops ibb
2024-05-25 @ DET $5K $3.2K 5 6 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2024-05-24 @ DET $5K $3.1K 10 12 0 3 1 2 0 0 0 1 0.67 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.75 0 0.33 1 1.75 0
2024-05-23 @ DET $5.1K $3.1K 23 31.4 0 5 1.2 2 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 5 0 0 1 2 2 0.4 2 0.8 0 1.6 0
2024-05-22 vs. CHW $4.9K $3.2K 11 15.9 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0.4 1 0 1 0.65 0
2024-05-21 vs. CHW $4.8K $3.2K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-05-20 vs. CHW $4.9K $3.2K 11 15.7 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.6 1 0 2 0.93 0
2024-05-19 vs. TB $4.8K $3.2K 6 6 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2024-05-18 vs. TB $4.8K $3.2K 15 18.7 0 4 1 3 0 0 0 2 0.75 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.75 1 0.25 0 1.75 0
2024-05-17 vs. TB $4.9K $3.2K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-05-15 @ BAL $4.6K $3.1K 5 6.2 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2024-05-13 @ BAL $4.6K $3.1K 11 15.2 0 2 0.5 1 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.8 0 0 3 1.3 1
2024-05-12 vs. MIN $4.6K $3K 7 9.2 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2024-05-11 vs. MIN $5K $3K 25 31.7 0 5 0.8 4 0 0 0 4 0.8 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0.8 3 0 0 1.6 0
2024-05-10 vs. MIN $4.9K $3K 6 6 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2024-05-08 @ PHI $4.9K $3.1K 11 12.5 0 5 0.6 3 1 0 0 3 0.75 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 1 0 0 1.2 0
2024-05-07 @ PHI $5K $3.2K 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2024-05-05 @ WSH $5.1K $3K 25 35.2 0 4 1.25 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.6 4 0.75 1 1.85 0
2024-05-04 @ WSH $4.9K $3K 5 6.2 0 5 0.2 1 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2024-05-03 @ WSH $5K $3K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 2 0 0 0 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2024-05-01 vs. KC $4.9K $3K 5 6 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2024-04-30 vs. KC $4.9K $2.9K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2024-04-29 vs. KC $4.8K $2.9K 14 18.7 0 4 0.75 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.6 1 0.25 1 1.35 0
2024-04-28 vs. LAD $5K $2.9K 6 6 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2024-04-27 vs. LAD $7.6K $2.9K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 3 0 0 0 1 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2024-04-26 vs. LAD $4.9K $3K 2 3.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
2024-04-25 @ KC $4.6K $3.1K 2 3 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 1 0.33 0
2024-04-24 @ KC $4.6K $3.1K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2024-04-23 @ KC $4.7K $3.3K 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-22 @ KC $4.7K $3.3K 7 9.2 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2024-04-21 @ SD $4.8K $3.3K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-20 @ SD $4.6K $3.2K 10 12.2 0 4 0.75 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 0 0.25 0 1.25 0
2024-04-19 @ SD $4.8K $3.2K 8 9.5 0 5 0.4 2 2 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 1 0 0 0.8 0
2024-04-17 vs. NYY $5K $3.2K 5 6 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2024-04-16 vs. NYY $5K $3.5K 14 19 0 3 0.67 2 0 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.8 2 0 2 1.47 0
2024-04-15 vs. NYY $5K $3.5K 4 6 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 2 0.5 0
2024-04-14 vs. COL $5.2K $3.5K 7 9.7 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 1 0 0 0.5 0
2024-04-13 vs. COL $5K $3.3K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2024-04-12 vs. COL $5.2K $3.2K 2 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2024-04-10 vs. SEA $4.9K $3.1K 16 21.7 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.4 1 0.75 1 1.4 0
2024-04-09 vs. SEA $4.8K $3.2K 2 3.2 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-08 vs. SEA $5K $3.2K 12 15.7 0 4 0.75 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 1 0.25 0 1.25 0
2024-04-07 @ NYY $5.1K $3.2K 11 15.7 0 4 0.5 1 1 1 0 0 0.33 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.4 1 0.25 0 0.9 0
2024-04-06 @ NYY $5.2K $3.4K 16 21.7 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.4 1 0.75 1 1.4 0
2024-04-05 @ NYY $5.3K $3.5K 0 0 0 5 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-03 @ HOU $5.5K $3.6K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2024-04-02 @ HOU $5.5K $3.6K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2024-04-01 @ HOU $5.5K $3.7K 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-03-31 @ TB $5.5K $3.7K 8 12.2 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.6 0 0 3 0.6 0
2024-03-30 @ TB $5.5K $3.6K 5 6 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2024-03-29 @ TB $5.3K $3.6K 8 9 0 3 0.67 2 0 0 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.75 0 0 1 1.42 0
2024-03-28 @ TB $5.6K $3.6K 14 18.7 0 5 0.8 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.2 1 0.6 0 1 0
2024-03-24 @ PHI $4.5K -- 6 6 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2024-03-23 vs. DET -- -- 15 18.9 0 4 0.75 3 0 0 0 3 0.75 0 4 0 0 0 0 2 0.75 1 0 0 1.5 0
2024-03-22 vs. BOS $4.5K -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-03-20 @ ATL $4.5K -- 16 21.7 0 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 5 0
2024-03-19 vs. BAL $4.5K $5.5K 5 6 0 2 0.5 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.67 0 0 1 1.17 0
2024-03-17 vs. MIN -- -- 8 9.5 0 3 0.67 2 1 0 0 2 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.67 1 0 0 1.33 0
2024-03-15 vs. DET -- -- 23 32.2 0 3 1.67 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 3 0 0 1 1 1 0.67 4 1 0 2.33 0
2024-03-13 vs. PIT $4.5K $5.5K 7 9.2 0 2 0.5 1 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0.67 0 0 1 1.17 0
2024-03-09 @ PHI $4.5K -- 7 10 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 2 0 0 0.67 0
2024-03-05 @ PIT -- -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-03-04 vs. PHI $4.5K $5.5K 19 25.2 0 3 1.67 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 3 0 0 1 1 1 0.67 2 1 0 2.33 0
2024-03-02 vs. ATL $4.5K $5.5K 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024-02-29 vs. PHI $4.5K $5.5K 8 9 0 3 1 2 0 0 0 1 0.67 1 3 0 0 0 1 0 0.67 0 0.33 0 1.67 0
2024-02-28 vs. TB $4.5K $5.5K 5 6 0 2 0.5 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.67 0 0 1 1.17 0
2024-02-26 vs. PIT -- $5.5K 3 3 0 2 0.5 1 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2023-10-04 @ MIN $4.9K $3.5K 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-10-03 @ MIN $4.9K $3.5K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2023-09-30 vs. TB $4.8K $3.6K 2 3 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2023-09-29 vs. TB $4.6K $3.6K 21 27.6 0 4 1.25 3 0 0 0 1 0.75 2 5 0 0 0 2 3 0.8 0 0.5 1 2.05 0
2023-09-28 vs. NYY $4.8K $3.6K 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 3 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2023-09-27 vs. NYY $4.8K $3.6K 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-26 vs. NYY $5K $3.6K 2 3 0 3 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-09-24 @ TB $5K $3.6K 28 37.4 0 5 1.6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 2 2 0.4 2 1.2 0 2 0
2023-09-23 @ TB $5K $3.6K 14 18.7 0 3 0.67 2 0 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.8 1 0 2 1.47 0
2023-09-22 @ TB $4.8K $3.6K 6 9.2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 2 0.4 0
2023-09-21 @ NYY $5K $3.6K 2 3.5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
2023-09-20 @ NYY $4.9K $3.4K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-19 @ NYY $5.1K $3.3K 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-17 vs. BOS $5.1K $3.6K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-09-16 vs. BOS $5.2K $3.4K 25 33.9 0 3 1.67 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 6 0 0 1 1 2 0.83 1 1 3 2.5 1
2023-09-15 vs. BOS $5.1K $3.4K 21 28.7 0 4 1.25 2 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 3 0.75 0 1.75 0
2023-09-14 vs. TEX $5.1K $3.4K 16 22.2 0 4 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 2 0.75 0 1.25 0
2023-09-13 vs. TEX $5K $3.5K 3 3 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.67 0
2023-09-12 vs. TEX $5.2K $3.5K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-11 vs. TEX $5.2K $3.5K 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-10 vs. KC $5.2K $3.5K 6 9.2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 2 0.5 0
2023-09-09 vs. KC $5.3K $3.5K 8 9.2 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2023-09-08 vs. KC $5.4K $3.5K 11 16.2 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.25 2 0.25 0 0.75 0
2023-09-06 @ OAK $5.2K $3.5K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-09-05 @ OAK $5.1K $3.5K 5 6 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 1
2023-09-04 @ OAK $5K $3.3K 10 12 0 3 0.67 2 0 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.8 0 0 2 1.47 0
2023-09-03 @ COL $9.8K $4K 25 34.4 0 3 1.67 2 0 1 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.8 2 1 1 2.47 0
2023-09-02 @ COL $5.5K $3.8K 2 3 0 4 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2023-09-01 @ COL $5.5K $3.8K 7 9.5 0 6 0.33 1 1 0 0 0 0.2 1 6 0 0 0 1 0 0.17 1 0.17 0 0.5 0
2023-08-30 vs. WSH $5K $3.3K 10 12.2 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-08-29 vs. WSH $5.2K $3.3K 5 6.5 0 5 0.2 1 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 1 0 0 0.4 0
2023-08-28 vs. WSH $5.1K $3.1K 11 16.2 0 5 0.4 1 0 0 0 0 0.2 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.2 2 0.2 0 0.6 0
2023-08-27 vs. CLE $5.2K $3.2K 16 22.2 0 5 0.8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.2 2 0.6 0 1 0
2023-08-26 vs. CLE $9.2K $3.2K 5 6.2 0 5 0.2 1 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2023-08-25 vs. CLE $5.2K $3.2K 17 21.7 0 4 1.25 2 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 1 0.75 0 1.75 0
2023-08-24 @ BAL $5.1K $3.2K 5 6.5 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 0 0 0.5 0
2023-08-23 @ BAL $5.2K $3.2K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-08-22 @ BAL $5K $3.2K 13 15.2 0 5 0.8 3 0 0 1 2 0.6 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.6 0 0.2 0 1.4 0
2023-08-20 @ CIN $5.3K $3.3K 7 9.2 0 2 0.5 1 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0.67 0 0 1 1.17 0
2023-08-19 @ CIN $9.4K $3.2K 5 6 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2023-08-18 @ CIN $9.6K $3.3K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 0
2023-08-16 vs. PHI $5.2K $3.3K 7 9 0 2 0.5 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.75 0 0 2 1.25 0
2023-08-15 vs. PHI $5.1K $3.3K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-08-13 vs. CHC $5.2K $3.3K 12 16.2 0 5 0.4 2 0 0 0 2 0.4 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 2 0 0 0.8 0
2023-08-12 vs. CHC $5.2K $3.2K 5 6.5 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 0 0 0.5 0
2023-08-11 vs. CHC $5.1K $3.2K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-10 @ CLE $5.3K $3.2K 7 9 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.4 0 0.25 1 0.9 0
2023-08-09 @ CLE $5K $3.2K 6 6 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 1 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2023-08-08 @ CLE $5.1K $3.2K 6 6 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2023-08-07 @ CLE $5.1K $3.4K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2023-08-05 @ BOS $5.1K $3.3K 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-08-04 @ BOS $5.1K $3.4K 21 28.2 0 5 1.2 2 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 5 0 0 1 2 1 0.4 2 0.8 0 1.6 0
2023-08-03 vs. BAL $5.4K $3.4K 5 6.5 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 0 0 0.5 0
2023-08-02 vs. BAL $5.1K $3.4K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-08-01 vs. BAL $5.5K $3.4K 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-07-31 vs. BAL $5.3K $3.6K 4 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 2 0.5 0
2023-07-30 vs. LAA $9.4K $3.7K 10 12.5 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 1 0 1 1.1 0
2023-07-29 vs. LAA $5.3K $3.7K 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 1
2023-07-28 vs. LAA $5.1K $3.7K 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 1
2023-07-26 @ LAD $5.1K $3.6K 10 12.4 0 5 0.4 2 1 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0.4 0 0 0 0.8 0
2023-07-25 @ LAD $5.5K $3.6K 9 12.2 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.6 0 0 2 0.93 0
2023-07-24 @ LAD $5K $3.6K 5 6.5 0 6 0.17 1 3 0 0 1 0.33 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0.17 1 0 0 0.33 0
2023-07-23 @ SEA $5.4K $3.5K 16 22.2 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 2 0.75 0 1.25 0
2023-07-22 @ SEA $5K $3.5K 21 27.9 0 5 1.2 2 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 5 0 0 1 2 2 0.4 1 0.8 0 1.6 0
2023-07-21 @ SEA $5.1K $3.5K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-07-20 vs. SD $5.1K $3.5K 18 24.7 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.75 1 1.5 2 2.75 0
2023-07-19 vs. SD $5.4K $3.5K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-07-18 vs. SD $5.1K $3.5K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-16 vs. ARI $5K $3.5K 9 12.7 1 3 0.67 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.25 1 0.33 0 0.92 0
2023-07-15 vs. ARI $4.7K $3.5K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-07-14 vs. ARI $5.2K $3.7K 19 24.9 0 5 1 2 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.4 1 0.6 0 1.4 0
2023-07-11 vs. NL -- -- 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-09 @ DET $5K $3.7K 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-07-08 @ DET $5K $3.7K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-07 @ DET $4.8K $3.7K 12 15.9 0 5 0.4 2 0 0 0 2 0.4 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0.4 1 0 0 0.8 0
2023-07-06 @ CHW $5K -- 12 16 0 5 0.6 2 1 0 1 1 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.4 2 0.2 0 1 0
2023-07-06 @ CHW -- $3.7K 7 9.7 0 5 0.2 1 3 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 1 0 0 0.4 0
2023-07-04 @ CHW $5K $3.5K 21 28.4 0 4 1.25 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 1 1 2 0.5 2 0.75 0 1.75 0
2023-07-02 vs. BOS $5.1K $3.5K 7 9 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-07-01 vs. BOS $5.3K $3.5K 9 12.7 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 1 0 1 0.65 0
2023-06-30 vs. BOS $5.2K $3.5K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-06-29 vs. SF $5.2K $3.5K 18 25.2 0 2 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 1 0.67 2 1.5 0 2.67 0
2023-06-28 vs. SF $5.4K $3.5K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 2 0 0 0 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2023-06-27 vs. SF $5.6K $3.5K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-06-25 vs. OAK $5.5K $3.4K 14 18.9 0 5 0.6 2 0 0 0 1 0.4 1 5 0 0 0 1 2 0.4 1 0.2 0 1 0
2023-06-24 vs. OAK $5.3K $3K 25 34.7 0 3 1.67 2 0 1 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.8 3 1 1 2.47 0
2023-06-23 vs. OAK $5.4K $3K 23 31.7 0 4 1.5 2 2 0 0 0 1 1 4 0 0 1 2 1 0.5 3 1 0 2 0
2023-06-21 @ MIA $5.6K $3K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-06-20 @ MIA $4.8K $3.3K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 1 0 0.25 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2023-06-19 @ MIA $5.5K $3.3K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-06-18 @ TEX $5.2K $3.3K 5 6 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2023-06-17 @ TEX $5.2K $3.3K 10 12.5 0 3 0.67 2 0 0 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.75 1 0 1 1.42 0
2023-06-16 @ TEX $5.1K $3.3K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-06-15 @ BAL $5.2K $3.3K 6 6 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2023-06-14 @ BAL $5.1K $3.4K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 0
2023-06-13 @ BAL $5.2K $3.4K 5 6.5 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 1 0 0 0.67 0
2023-06-11 vs. MIN $5.2K $3.5K 10 12.7 0 5 0.4 2 0 0 0 2 0.4 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 1 0 0 0.8 0
2023-06-10 vs. MIN $5.1K $3.5K 5 6.5 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 0 0 0.5 0
2023-06-09 vs. MIN $5.2K $3.6K 4 6 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 2 0.4 1
2023-06-08 vs. HOU $5.2K $3.6K 5 6 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2023-06-07 vs. HOU $5.3K $3.6K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-06-06 vs. HOU $5.1K $3.6K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-06-05 vs. HOU $5.4K $3.6K 7 9.5 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.75 0
2023-06-04 @ NYM $5.5K $3.5K 21 27.9 0 4 1.25 2 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.6 1 0.75 1 1.85 0
2023-06-03 @ NYM $5.5K $3.5K 14 18.5 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 1 0 0.25 1 5 0 1 0 1 0 0.4 1 0.25 1 0.9 0
2023-06-02 @ NYM $5.3K $3.5K 5 6 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2023-06-01 vs. MIL $5.4K $3.4K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-05-31 vs. MIL $5.1K $3.7K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-30 vs. MIL $5.4K $3.8K 13 15.7 0 5 0.6 3 1 0 0 3 0.75 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.6 1 0 0 1.2 0
2023-05-28 @ MIN $5.3K $3.8K 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-27 @ MIN $5.6K $3.8K 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2023-05-26 @ MIN $5.4K $3.8K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-25 @ TB $5.5K $3.8K 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2023-05-24 @ TB $5.4K $3.6K 7 9.5 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 1 0 1 0.83 0
2023-05-23 @ TB $5.5K $3.6K 30 42.2 0 6 1 3 1 0 0 2 0.5 0 6 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 6 0.5 0 1.5 0
2023-05-22 @ TB $5.4K $3.6K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2023-05-21 vs. BAL $5.5K $3.7K 0 0 0 5 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-05-20 vs. BAL $5.7K $3.7K 2 3 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2023-05-19 vs. BAL $5.5K $3.7K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-05-18 vs. NYY $5.4K $3.7K 2 3.5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
2023-05-16 vs. NYY $5.7K $3.8K 5 6.5 0 4 0.25 1 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 0 0 0.5 0
2023-05-15 vs. NYY $5.8K $3.8K 7 9.5 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 1 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.75 0
2023-05-14 vs. ATL $5.8K $3.8K 12 16.2 0 5 0.4 2 1 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 2 0 0 0.8 0
2023-05-13 vs. ATL $6.2K $3.7K 11 15.7 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 0
2023-05-12 vs. ATL -- -- 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2023-05-10 @ PHI $6.2K $4.1K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2023-05-09 @ PHI $6.2K $4.1K 6 9 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 0 0 2 0.6 0
2023-05-05 @ PIT $6.1K $4K 5 6.5 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 0 0 0.5 0
2023-05-04 @ BOS $9.6K $3.9K 21 28.2 0 5 1.2 2 2 0 0 0 0.5 1 5 0 0 1 2 1 0.4 2 0.8 0 1.6 0
2023-05-03 @ BOS $6.2K $3.9K 17 21.7 0 4 1.25 2 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 1 0.75 0 1.75 0
2023-05-02 @ BOS $6K $4.2K 12 16.2 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 2 0 0 1 0
2023-05-01 @ BOS $6.1K $4.3K 5 6 0 5 0.4 1 1 0 0 0 0.25 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.2 0 0.2 0 0.6 0
2023-04-30 vs. SEA $5.8K $4.3K 6 9.2 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 0 2 0.33 0
2023-04-29 vs. SEA $6.1K $4.2K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2023-04-28 vs. SEA $6K $4K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2023-04-26 vs. CHW $6K $4K 16 22.2 0 5 0.8 2 0 0 1 0 0.4 2 5 0 0 0 2 1 0.4 2 0.4 0 1.2 0
2023-04-25 vs. CHW $5.7K $4K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2023-04-24 vs. CHW $5.7K $3.9K 10 12.2 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 2 1 0.25 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2023-04-23 @ NYY $5.6K $3.9K 16 22.2 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 2 0.75 0 1.25 0
2023-04-22 @ NYY $5.5K $3.6K 7 9 0 3 0.67 1 0 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 0 0.33 1 1.17 0
2023-04-21 @ NYY $5.7K $3.7K 23 31.4 0 4 1.25 2 0 1 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.6 2 0.75 0 1.85 0
2023-04-19 @ HOU $5.6K $3.7K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-18 @ HOU $5.5K $3.8K 14 18.7 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 1 0.75 0 1.25 0
2023-04-17 @ HOU $5.8K $3.8K 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-16 vs. TB $5.7K $3.9K 7 9.5 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 1 0 1 0.83 0
2023-04-15 vs. TB $5.8K $3.9K 5 6 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2023-04-14 vs. TB $5.8K $3.9K 5 6.2 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2023-04-13 vs. DET $5.7K $3.9K 7 9.5 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 1 0 1 0.83 0
2023-04-12 vs. DET $5.8K $3.9K 12 15.4 0 3 0.67 2 0 0 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 0 0 2 0.75 0 0 1 1.42 0
2023-04-11 vs. DET $5.7K $3.9K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-09 @ LAA $5.6K $3.9K 12 15.4 0 5 0.4 2 0 1 0 2 0.4 0 6 0 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 0 0 0.9 0
2023-04-08 @ LAA $5.7K $3.9K 11 12.2 0 5 0.6 3 1 0 0 3 0.75 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.6 0 0 0 1.2 0
2023-04-07 @ LAA $5.5K $3.9K 8 9.2 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2023-04-06 @ KC $5.5K $3.9K 22 27.9 0 5 1.2 3 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.6 1 0.6 0 1.8 0
2023-04-05 @ KC $27 $3.9K 22 27.9 0 4 1.5 3 0 0 1 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 1 1 2 0.75 1 0.75 0 2.25 0
2023-04-04 @ KC $5.4K $4K 5 6 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2023-04-03 @ KC $5.1K $4K 12 15.5 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0.4 1 0 1 0.65 0
2023-04-02 @ STL $5.4K $4K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2023-04-01 @ STL $5.2K $4K 8 12.2 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.6 0 0 3 0.6 0
2023-03-30 @ STL -- -- 14 19.5 1 4 0.5 2 0 1 0 2 0.4 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 3 0 0 1 0
2023-03-28 @ PHI -- -- 7 9.2 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 2 0
2023-03-27 vs. PHI -- -- 2 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.5 0
2023-03-25 vs. DET -- -- 6 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.75 0 0 3 0.75 0
2023-03-24 vs. PHI -- -- 5 6.2 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 0 0 0.67 0
2023-03-22 vs. BAL -- -- 3 3 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 0 0.67 0
2023-03-20 @ DET -- -- 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-03-18 vs. NYY -- -- 14 18.7 0 3 1.33 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 1 0.33 1 1 0 1.67 0
2023-03-17 vs. PHI -- -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023-03-17 @ PHI -- -- 2 3.5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
2023-03-15 vs. PIT -- -- 5 6.5 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 1 0 0 0.67 0
2023-03-03 vs. TB -- -- 5 6.5 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0
2023-03-02 vs. PIT -- -- 4 6.2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 0 1 0.33 0
2023-02-28 vs. DET -- -- 2 3 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 1 0.33 0
2023-02-28 @ PHI -- -- 2 3 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.33 0 0 1 0.33 0
2023-02-26 vs. NYY -- -- 16 22.2 0 3 1.33 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 1 0.33 2 1 0 1.67 0
2023-02-25 @ PIT -- -- 16 22.2 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 2 1.5 0 2.5 0
2022-10-08 vs. SEA $5.2K $4.2K 9 12.7 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 1 0 1 0.65 1
2022-10-07 vs. SEA $5K $4.1K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-10-05 @ BAL $5.7K $3 10 12.2 0 4 0.5 2 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.6 0 0 1 1.1 0
2022-10-04 @ BAL -- -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-10-03 @ BAL $5.8K $4K 16 21.7 0 3 1.33 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 1.83 0
2022-10-02 vs. BOS $5.5K $4K 4 6.2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2022-10-01 vs. BOS $5.6K $3.9K 7 9.5 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.75 0
2022-09-30 vs. BOS $5.5K $3.8K 16 22.2 0 5 0.8 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.2 2 0.6 0 1 0
2022-09-28 vs. NYY $5.5K $3.9K 2 3.5 1 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
2022-09-27 vs. NYY $5.7K $3.9K 5 6.5 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 0 0 0.5 0
2022-09-26 vs. NYY $6.1K $3.9K 10 12.7 0 5 0.4 2 0 0 0 2 0.4 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 1 0 0 0.8 0
2022-09-25 @ TB $5.3K $4.1K 5 6.5 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 1 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 1 0 0 0.4 0
2022-09-24 @ TB $6.1K $4.1K 2 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2022-09-23 @ TB $5.3K $4.1K 5 6.5 0 5 0.2 1 4 0 0 1 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 1 0 0 0.4 0
2022-09-22 @ TB $5.2K $3.9K 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2022-09-21 @ PHI $5.4K $3.9K 18 25.7 0 5 0.8 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.2 3 0.6 0 1 0
2022-09-20 @ PHI $5.2K $3.9K 5 6.2 0 6 0.17 1 1 0 0 1 0.2 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 0.17 0 0 0 0.33 0
2022-09-18 vs. BAL $5.3K $3.9K 23 30.7 0 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 0.5 1 5 0 0 1 2 1 0.8 1 1.33 2 2.8 0
2022-09-17 vs. BAL $5.7K $3.9K 8 9.2 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2022-09-16 vs. BAL $5.3K $3.9K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-09-15 vs. TB $5.3K $3.8K 8 9 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-09-14 vs. TB $5.4K $3.8K 16 22.2 0 4 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 2 0.75 0 1.25 0
2022-09-13 vs. TB $5.6K -- 7 9.2 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2022-09-13 vs. TB $5.7K $3.8K 5 6.2 0 5 0.2 1 2 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2022-09-12 vs. TB $5.8K $3.8K 8 9 0 4 0.75 2 2 0 0 1 1 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 0 0.25 0 1.25 0
2022-09-11 @ TEX $5.6K $3.8K 8 9 0 5 0.6 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.4 0 0.2 0 1 0
2022-09-10 @ TEX $5.7K $4K 7 9.2 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 1 1 0.25 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 0 1 0.53 0
2022-09-09 @ TEX $5.7K $4K 10 12.2 0 4 0.75 2 1 0 0 1 0.67 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 0 0.25 0 1.25 0
2022-09-07 @ BAL $6.1K $4.1K 5 6.5 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 1 0 0 0.4 0
2022-09-06 @ BAL $6K $4.1K 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-09-05 @ BAL -- -- 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-09-05 @ BAL $5.9K $4.1K 15 18.5 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0.6 1 0 1 1.1 1
2022-09-04 @ PIT $9.8K $4.1K 7 9.2 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-09-03 @ PIT $6K $4.2K 4 6.2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2022-09-02 @ PIT $6K $4.1K 10 12 0 4 0.25 1 2 1 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 0 0.65 0
2022-08-31 vs. CHC $5.9K $4K 10 12.2 0 4 0.75 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 0 0.25 0 1.25 0
2022-08-30 vs. CHC $5.8K $4K 22 28.2 0 4 1.5 3 0 0 0 2 0.67 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.75 2 0.75 0 2.25 0
2022-08-29 vs. CHC $5.8K $4.1K 5 6 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 0
2022-08-28 vs. LAA $5.7K $4.1K 2 3.2 0 5 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-27 vs. LAA $5.9K $3.9K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2022-08-26 vs. LAA $5.7K $3.9K 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 2 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2022-08-25 @ BOS $5.6K $4K 14 19.2 0 5 0.4 2 1 0 0 2 0.5 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 2 0 1 0.9 0
2022-08-24 @ BOS $5.7K $4K 7 9.5 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 1 0 1 0.65 0
2022-08-23 @ BOS $5.8K $4.1K 10 12 0 5 0.8 2 0 0 0 0 0.4 2 5 0 0 0 2 0 0.4 0 0.4 0 1.2 0
2022-08-21 @ NYY $6.1K $4.2K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-20 @ NYY $6.1K $4.1K 6 6 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2022-08-19 @ NYY $6K $4.1K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2022-08-18 @ NYY $5.9K $4K 22 32.1 0 5 0.8 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 3 0.2 3 0.6 0 1 0
2022-08-17 vs. BAL $6.1K $3.9K 2 3.2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-16 vs. BAL $5.9K $3.9K 19 25.2 0 4 1.25 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 2 0.75 0 1.75 0
2022-08-15 vs. BAL $6K $4K 16 21.7 0 4 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.4 1 0.75 1 1.4 0
2022-08-14 vs. CLE $5.7K $3.9K 2 3.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
2022-08-13 vs. CLE $5.8K $4.3K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2022-08-12 vs. CLE $5.8K $4.3K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 1 0 0.25 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2022-08-10 @ BAL -- -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-08-09 @ BAL $6K $4.4K 5 6.2 0 5 0.2 1 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2022-08-08 @ BAL $6.2K $4.3K 3 3 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2022-08-07 @ MIN $6K $4.1K 5 6 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 1 0.65 1
2022-08-06 @ MIN $5.3K $4.1K 8 9.2 0 5 0.4 2 1 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 0 0.8 0
2022-08-05 @ MIN $5.5K $4.1K 21 28.2 0 4 1.25 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.6 2 0.75 1 1.85 0
2022-08-04 @ MIN $5.2K $4.1K 23 31.7 0 5 1.2 2 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 5 0 0 1 2 1 0.4 3 0.8 0 1.6 0
2022-08-03 @ TB $5.5K $4K 8 9 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-08-02 @ TB $5.2K $4K 15 18.2 0 4 0.75 2 1 0 0 1 0.67 1 4 0 1 0 1 1 0.5 0 0.25 0 1.25 0
2022-07-31 vs. DET $10.8K $4K 11 15.7 0 3 0.67 1 1 0 0 0 0.5 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 1 0.33 1 1.17 0
2022-07-30 vs. DET $5.4K $4K 16 21.4 0 2 0.5 1 0 1 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 1 0 0 2 0.75 0 0 1 1.25 0
2022-07-29 vs. DET $5.6K $4K 5 6 0 3 0.33 1 1 0 0 1 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2022-07-28 vs. DET $5.4K $4K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2022-07-27 vs. STL $5.2K $3.9K 15 18.2 0 4 0.75 2 1 0 0 1 0.67 1 4 0 1 0 1 1 0.5 0 0.25 0 1.25 0
2022-07-26 vs. STL $5.1K $3.9K 16 22.2 0 5 0.8 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.2 2 0.6 0 1 0
2022-07-24 @ BOS $5K $3.8K 18 21.7 0 5 1 4 0 0 0 3 0.8 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.8 1 0.2 0 1.8 0
2022-07-23 @ BOS $5K $3.6K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-07-22 @ BOS $5K $3.6K 18 25.4 0 4 0.75 2 1 0 0 1 0.67 1 5 0 0 0 1 2 0.6 2 0.25 1 1.35 0
2022-07-17 vs. KC $10K $3.8K 10 12.4 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
2022-07-16 vs. KC $5.2K $3.8K 17 21.7 0 4 1 3 0 0 0 2 0.75 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.8 1 0.25 1 1.8 0
2022-07-15 vs. KC $5K $3.8K 5 6.2 0 5 0.2 1 0 0 1 1 0.2 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2022-07-14 vs. KC $4.9K $3.8K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-07-13 vs. PHI $4.7K $3.8K 16 22.2 1 3 1.33 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 2 1 0 1.58 0
2022-07-12 vs. PHI $4.8K $3.9K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 3 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-07-10 @ SEA $4.8K $4K 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-07-09 @ SEA $4.9K $4.2K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-07-08 @ SEA $5.2K $4.2K 10 12.2 0 5 0.6 2 1 0 0 1 0.5 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.4 0 0.2 0 1 0
2022-07-07 @ SEA $4.8K $4.3K 8 9.5 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 1 2 0.5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 1 0 0 1 0
2022-07-06 @ OAK $5K $4.4K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-07-05 @ OAK $5.2K $4.4K 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-07-04 @ OAK $5.3K $4.1K 7 9.2 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2022-07-03 vs. TB $5.7K $4.1K 15 19 0 5 0.8 3 1 0 0 2 0.75 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0.6 2 0.2 0 1.4 0
2022-07-02 vs. TB $5.2K -- 14 18.7 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 1 0.75 0 1.25 0
2022-07-02 vs. TB $5.4K $4.2K 5 6.5 0 4 0.25 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 0 0 0.5 0
2022-07-01 vs. TB $5.4K $4.2K 13 19.7 0 5 0.4 1 0 0 0 0 0.2 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.2 3 0.2 0 0.6 0
2022-06-30 vs. TB $5.1K $4.1K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-06-29 vs. BOS $5.3K $4.1K 0 0 0 5 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-06-28 vs. BOS $5.7K $4.1K 12 15.7 0 4 0.5 2 0 0 0 2 0.5 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.6 1 0 1 1.1 0
2022-06-27 vs. BOS $5.6K $4.1K 16 22.2 0 4 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 2 0.75 0 1.25 0
2022-06-26 @ MIL $6K $4.1K 9 12.2 0 2 0.5 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.75 0 0 2 1.25 0
2022-06-25 @ MIL $6.1K $3.7K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-06-24 @ MIL $5.8K $3.7K 12 15.7 0 5 0.6 2 0 0 0 1 0.4 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.4 1 0.2 0 1 0
2022-06-22 @ CWS $5.5K $3.7K 5 6.2 0 5 0.2 1 1 0 0 1 0.25 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 0 0.4 0
2022-06-21 @ CWS $5.6K $3.7K 11 15.5 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 6 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 1 0.25 2 1 0
2022-06-20 @ CWS $5.8K $3.7K 6 9.2 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 0 2 0.5 0
2022-06-19 vs. NYY $5.5K $3.9K 25 34.4 0 3 1.67 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.8 2 1 2 2.47 0
2022-06-18 vs. NYY $5.5K $4.2K 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-06-17 vs. NYY $5.6K $4.2K 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0
2022-06-16 vs. BAL $5.5K $3.8K 5 6 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0.25 0 0.25 0 0.75 0
2022-06-15 vs. BAL $5.5K $3.8K 29 37.6 0 5 1.4 4 1 0 0 3 1 0 5 0 0 1 1 3 0.8 2 0.6 0 2.2 0
2022-06-14 vs. BAL $5.4K $3.8K 7 9 0 3 0.33 1 0 1 0 1 0.33 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 0 0 1 0.93 0
2022-06-13 vs. BAL $5.5K $3.9K 26 34.9 0 5 1.2 3 1 0 0 2 0.67 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 0.6 3 0.6 0 1.8 0
2022-06-12 @ DET $5.6K $4K 19 25.2 0 5 1 2 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.4 2 0.6 0 1.4 0
2022-06-11 @ DET $5.7K $4K 3 3 0 4 0.25 1 1 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.5 0
2022-06-10 @ DET $5.4K $4K 14 18.9 0 5 0.6 2 0 0 0 1 0.4 1 5 0 0 0 1 2 0.4 1 0.2 0 1 0
2022-06-08 @ KC $14.1K $8K 2 3.5 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
2022-06-07 @ KC $4.7K $4.2K 4 6.2 0 4 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 0 0 1 0.2 0
2022-06-06 @ KC $4.9K $4.2K 16 21.7 0 3 1.33 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 1.83 0
2022-06-05 vs. MIN $4.5K $3.9K 5 6 0 3 0.33 1 0 0 0 1 0.33 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 0.83 0
2022-06-04 vs. MIN $14.4K $8K 16 22.2 0 5 0.8 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.2 2 0.6 0 1 0
2022-06-03 vs. MIN $4.3K $3.6K 14 18.7 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 1 0.75 0 1.25 0
2022-06-02 vs. CWS $4.3K $3.6K 9 12.2 0 4 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0.33 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.4 0 0.25 1 0.9 0
2022-06-01 vs. CWS $4.6K $3.6K 19 25.2 0 5 1 2 2 0 0 1 0.5 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 0.4 2 0.6 0 1.4 0
2022-05-31 vs. CWS $4.6K $3.7K 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-05-29 @ LAA $4.8K $3.7K 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1
2022-05-28 @ LAA $4.8K $3.6K 11 15.7 0 4 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.25 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0.4 1 0.25 1 0.9 0
2022-05-27 @ LAA $5.1K $3.6K 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022-05-26 @ LAA $5.2K $3.5K 14 18.7 0 4 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0.25 1 0.75 0 1.25 0

Vladimir Guerrero Jr. Daily Fantasy News, Rankings, Projections

Vladimir Guerrero Jr. scratched Wednesday

Vladimir Guerrero Jr. scratched Wednesday

Vladimir Guerrero Jr. (wrist) scratched Saturday.

Vladimir Guerrero Jr. (wrist) scratched Saturday.

The Strongly Rated Middle of the Pack Offense Than Could Win a GPP

It’s a bit of a surprise that none of the three offenses above four and a half runs really stand out in terms of ownership projections on DraftKings, but perhaps a lot of players will consider paying up for two pitchers and paying down for Wrigley bats, which may be why the Cubs currently project to be the most popular stack (projections are fluid and updated throughout the day), though not by much of a margin over the Padres, Astros and Cardinals. All three of those stacks jump the Cubs on FanDuel, where it makes a bit more sense that players would try to stack a top offense with just one pitcher. The Padres are also projected to smash the slate most often, though again, it’s a narrow margin between them and the Cardinals and even the Blue Jays and Astros close behind them. The top projected value stack on either site is the Cubs and that’s where we see the most separation, though the Reds project strongly in this category on DraftKings as well.

The three top rated stacks on either site are currently the Padres, Blue Jays and Cardinals in different orders. The only one of the three without a team run total above four and a half runs, the Blue Jays (4.02) are likely to face the piggyback combination of Tyler Wells and Dean Kremer. Wells hasn’t thrown a major league pitch since July and faced only eight A-ball batters in his lone rehab start. He can’t possibly stick around for more than two to three innings, though Kremer could cover the next five or six, if that’s the route they choose to go, making this a tricky situation and perhaps one players will choose to avoid. After all they are far from the worst pitchers on the board and the Blue Jays have a modest team run total in the middle of the board in a park that diminishes RH power now. It makes a ton of sense that this offense could go overlooked and win a GPP for somebody. Danny Jansen is the only batter in the projected lineup below a 114 wRC+ vs RHP this season. Lourdes Gurriel Jr. is the only one below a .150 ISO.

The Only Offense Projecting Multiple Top 10 Bats on Both Sites

On a Tuesday night slate that includes the full 30 teams (or 28 on FanDuel), but is also loaded with top end pitching, we find two teams with 5.25 implied runs lines (both at Coors) topping the board. The Blue Jays (5.06) are the only other team exceeding or reaching a five run team total with seven more at four and a half or higher. Without either of the Coors offenses running away on a closely bunched board, this should be interesting. The results from the standpoint of batter projections (PlateIQ projections are updated throughout the day and subject to change), is that only a single team boasts multiple hitters among the top 10 tonight and it’s not a Coors offense. Despite a 13.5 K% (5.6 K-BB%) the Red Sox just keep running Josh Winckowski out there because they seemingly have no choice. He’s somehow allowed 10.1% Barrels/BBE, despite a 50.5 GB%. Essentially, one-fifth of his non-ground ball contact have been barrels. His 5.19 ERA is not that far above estimators ranging from a 4.62 xFIP to a 5.22 FIP. The projected Toronto lineup is entirely right-handed tonight and batters from that side have a .343 wOBA, but .316 xwOBA against Winckowski this season. In a hitter friendly environment like Fenway, that’s more than enough for this offense. Vladimir Guerrero Jr. (145 wRC+, .229 ISO vs RHP this season) and George Springer (142 wRC+, .223 ISO) are top projected bats tonight, but the first seven in tonight’s projected lineup all exceed a 105 wRC+ vs RHP this season. The largest problem here is that this is the riskiest game on the slate from a weather perspective. A delay won’t change things much, but a dreaded PPD could have a massive effect on the entire slate, separating Coors bats further from the rest of the board.

A pair of Phillies feature as top 10 projected bats only on FanDuel tonight against Nick Lodolo, who is actually one of the more expensive pitchers on the board. The young prospect has flashed signs of greatness, but hasn’t put it all together at the big league level yet. While he’s one of the few pitchers in the league that can call Philadelphia a park upgrade, it’s still a positive run environment and very power friendly and Lodolo has had his issues with RHBs (.368 wOBA, .323 xwOBA). However, it’s a LHB (.304 wOBA, .256 xwOBA), who projects best against him. Kyle Schwarber has been nearly as dangerous against same-handed pitching (104 wRC+, .221 ISO), while Rhys Hoskins has really punished southpaws (179 wRC+, .303 ISO).

Aaron Judge (200 wRC+, .360 ISO) homered off Max Scherzer last night and is the top projected bat on the board against Taijuan Walker (RHBs .274 wOBA, .314 xwOBA), who left his last start early due to a back issue. A single Coors bat from each team project among the top 10 tonight, both from the left side. Corey Seager (121 wRC+, .189 ISO) is in a great spot against German Marquez (LHBs .359 wOBA, .345 xwOBA), while Dane Dunning sizeable splits (LHBs .369 wOBA, .346 xwOBA) should help him against a predominantly right-handed lineup, but not against Charlie Blackmon (90 wRC+, .200 ISO).

A Reverse Platoon Split Could Mean Trouble Against This Powerful Offense

On a 13 game Tuesday night slate that features a lot of expensive arms facing some of the top offenses in the league and few very positive run environments on the board, only the Toronto Blue Jays exceed a five run team total and barely so (5.07). Six more offense are at four and a half implied runs or higher. Vladimir Guerrero Jr. (140 wRC+, .223 ISO vs RHP this year) is the top projected bat on the board with Alejando Kirk (141 wRC+, .158 ISO) just outside the top five. The Toronto Blue Jays are the only offense tonight to feature multiple top 10 projected bats. The Orioles have limited Dean Kremer to less than 90 pitches in each of his last five starts, a conservation effort they’ve begun practicing with all of their young pitchers late in the year. Over his last seven starts, he’s shut out the Angels and Pirates over five and 6.1 innings, but at least three runs in fewer than six innings in each of the other five. With just an 18.5 K%, his only asset has been a 5.7 BB%, though with just six of 17 barrels (8.6%) leaving the yard, all non-FIP estimators are more than half a run above his 3.69 ERA. Like Bradish yesterday, Kremer has also exhibited a reverse platoon split that will likely hurt him here. RHBs have a .354 wOBA and .361 xwOBA against him this season. The only drawback is if Kremer only lasts two trips through the lineup, the Baltimore pen has been one of the best in the league (3.09 xFIP, 2.87 SIERA last 30 days).

While Willson Contreras (162 wRC+, .356 ISO vs LHP this year) is the only top of the board projecting Cub, you really have to consider attacking Patrick Corbin with an entirely right-handed projected lineup (.397 wOBA, .391 xwOBA vs Corbin this year). He has failed to strike out a single batter in two of his last three starts (Dodgers & Phillies) and has allowed 31 runs over his last 21.2 innings with seven home runs on 10 barrels (10.9%). Season estimators range from a 4.14 xFIP to a 6.17 xERA. While all are quite a bit lower than his 7.02 ERA (.384 BABIP, 61.7 LOB%, 17.1 HR/FB), none of it is any good. Patrick Wisdom (143 wRC+, .267 ISO), Seiya Suzuki (102 wRC+, .205 ISO) and Ian Happ (144 wRC+, .151 ISO) have shown some life against southpaws as well.

Garrett Hill has a 1.3 K-BB% and 10.5% Barrels/BBE through seven starts. His 4.66 ERA is more than a run below all estimators. Jose Ramirez (159 wRC+, .279 ISO) is the only top projecting Cleveland bat, but Hill has actually been much worse against RHBs (.369 wOBA, .412 xwOBA) than LHBs (.287 wOBA, .334 xwOBA). Oscar Gonzalez (130 wRC+, .167 ISO) has been the top performing Cleveland RHB against RHP.

Paul Goldschmidt (269 wRC+, .383 ISO vs LHP this season) is the only top 10 projecting Cardinal tonight. It’s a firmly negative run environment, but the Cardinals have smashed LHP (125 wRC+, 19.3 K%) and Kyle Freeland has just a 16.4 K%, while allowing 9.1% Barrels/BBE. Forget Coors, that won’t play well in any park. Despite just 13 of 37 barrels leaving the yard, his 4.84 ERA is within one-third of a run of all estimators. RHBs have a .328 wOBA and .325 xwOBA against him. Tyler O’Neill (124 wRC+, .151 ISO) sneaks inside the top 10 on DraftKings, though Nolan Arenado (179 wRC+, .429 ISO), Albert Pujols (183 wRC+, .312 ISO) and Dylan Carlson (153 wRC+ .214 ISO) have smashed LHP too.

Large Reverse Platoon Split Could Be Problematic for Tonight's Matchup

On a 10 game slate that doesn’t include Coors, Cincinnati or many very positive run environments at all, not a single offense exceeds five implied runs, though the Blue Jays (4.96) and Twins (4.96) come in just under with the Yankees and Giants also above four and a half run team totals. The result is that we don’t really find PlateIQ batter projections (which are fluid and subject to change) dominated by any particular lineup.

The Twins do project the most top 10 batters tonight (three on DraftKings, two on FanDuel). Kris Bubic still has a 5.02 ERA with all estimators above four and a half, which really illustrates how poorly his season started because over his last five starts, he’s allowed 12 runs (eight earned) over 31.2 innings (2.27 ERA/3.65 FIP/3.96 xFIP) with a 13.3 K-BB%. However, he’s also allowed nine barrels (9.8%) over this span with just three turning into home runs. That’s actually a bit higher than his season rate (9.0% Barrels/BBE, 45.1% 95+ mph EV), though we also have to note that he’s been having his recent success against offenses that have crushed LHP this year (White Sox, Yankees, Red Sox, Blue Jays). He gets another tough one here. Despite their 103 wRC+ and 20.4 K% vs LHP, only three batters in their projected lineup exceed a 99 wRC+ or .131 ISO vs LHP this season, so the books may be over-valuing the Twins here, but if you’re going to stack Twins, be sure to include the three batters the projections like the most: Byron Buxton (171 wRC+, .380 ISO), Carlos Correa (144 wRC+, .183 ISO) and Luis Arraez (90 wRC+), though Jose Miranda (129 wRC+, .256 ISO) has hit LHP well too. RHBs have a .312 wOBA and .334 xwOBA against Bubic this year, while LHBs are above .400, which explains Arraez’s healthy projection.

The Blue Jays are the only other offense to feature multiple top 10 projected bats in their matchup against Kyle Bradish, who’s 14.1 K-BB% is fine. He’s both struck out and walked batters at a near league average pace, but 13 of his 19 barrels (10.2%) have left the yard with a 91.1 mph EV overall. The new dimensions in Baltimore haven’t helped him much, as 10 of those home runs have been surrendered at home. After completing six innings in two of his first three starts, he hasn’t done so in any of his last 10. A 6.42 ERA is more than two runs above contact neutral estimators, but his FIP and xERA exceed five. Incredibly problematic for this matchup, RHBs have torched Bradish (.435 wOBA, .394 xwOBA). Vladimir Guerrero Jr. (138 wRC+ .218 ISO vs RHP this season) and Alejandro Kirk (141 wRC+, .158 ISO) are top of both top five projected bats tonight.

Aaron Judge (183 wRC+, .387 ISO vs LHP this year) is the top projected bat on the board against Jalen Beeks and Ryan Yarbrough (RHBs .380 wOBA, .365 xwOBA this season), but is not joined by any other Yankees among the top 10 tonight, though Gleyber Torres (155 wRC+, .320 ISO) and Jose Trevino (195 wRC+, .342 ISO) have hammed LHP as well.

The Stack Projected to be More Popular than the Mets Tonight

On just a seven game slate with the Mets almost a full run ahead of the rest of the board, it may be a bit of a surprise that they don’t reach 20% projected stacking ownership (although projections are fluid and updated throughout the day). In fact, they’re not even the stack projected for the highest ownership right on FanDuel currently. That honor belongs to the Blue Jays, although there isn’t much separation in terms of Own% between the two on either site. The Mets do smash the slate in around 20% of simulations, which is around 25 to 33% more often than the Blue Jays. While the Nationals are the top projected value stack against the volatile Keegan Thompson (more strikeouts than walks in only half of his 14 starts), their projected DraftKings Value% not only doubles that of the second best projected value DK stack (Oakland), but also their own board topping FanDuel projected Value%. To find out which stacks project as the best pivots from the Mets or Blue Jays, check out today’s PlateIQ Live Blog.

This Pitcher's Reverse Split Could Mean Trouble Against Powerhouse Offense

Last night, the top two offenses on the board in terms of team run totals (Dodgers & Brewers) mustered a combined single run. While the pitching is much stronger at the top of the board tonight, Coors is back on the slate, hosting the top two offenses on the board at 5.5 implied runs each with three more teams above the five run mark and five additional teams (for a total of 10) exceeding four and a half run team totals. Are you ready for the mind-blower? Tim Anderson (103 wRC+, .089 ISO vs RHP this year) is the only Coors bat among the top 10 projections tonight and only on DraftKings. The Dodgers (5.29 team run total) are back at the top tonight with Freddie Freeman (170 wRC+, .230 ISO) the top projected bat on the board against the talented (32.7 K% L4 starts), but still very barrel prone (12%) Josiah Gray (LHBs .403 wOBA, .385 xwOBA this year). RHBs haven’t had as much success against him (.272 wOBA, .288 xwOBA), but Mookie Betts (130 wRC+, .250 ISO) is a top five projected bat as well.

The Toronto Blue Jays should have a trio of top projected bats in their lineup against Andre Pallante, a contact prone, extreme ground ball pitcher. Since transitioning to a starting role, he’s recorded just a 15.2 K% (6.8 K-BB%) with a 64.1 GB%. He’s allowed six home runs, but just five barrels (3.4%). His season estimators run a bit higher than his 3.34 ERA, ranging from a 3.75 xFIP to a 4.49 DRA with an 82.6 LOB%. The Blue Jays are tied for the top implied run line outside Coors tonight (5.44) and Pallante has exhibited a reverse split (.365 wOBA, .328 xwOBA, though still with a 61.2 GB%), which is bad news for him in Toronto. Vladimir Guerrero Jr. (132 wRC+, .213 ISO), George Springer (132 wRC+, 230 ISO) and Alejandro Kirk (159 wRC+, .178 ISO) all project near the top of the board tonight. Despite Boston with a 5.42 run team total as well, no other offense features multiple top 10 projected bats tonight.

The Surprising Stack with the Top Smash%

With more than half the board above four and a half implied runs, but a couple of offenses somewhat separating from the rest of the board above five, current projections (which are fluid and updated throughout the day) suggest there’s no clear consensus where players will turn on either a nine or 10 game slate. The two Los Angeles teams are the only stacks above a 10% ownership projection on FanDuel right now with both featuring top of the board bats, alongside lower priced values. DraftKings projections suggest players may opt to favor Arizona stacks slightly more than any other (but it’s close) with some cheap bats atop the projected lineup against Austin Gomber, who has struggled, as each of his secondary pitches (slider, changeup, curveball) have declined in velocity and whiff rate this year. The Smash% column is where the biggest surprise comes from because the Blue Jays win early simulations with a rate around 15% against Marco Gonzales in Seattle, despite a 4.64 run team total that merely places them in the middle of the board tonight. Never the less, both Vladimir Guerrero Jr. (154 wRC+, .253 ISO vs LHP since LY) and George Springer (130 wRC+, .224 ISO) project as top of the board bats against a pitcher who’s .243 BABIP and 84.1 LOB% are almost sure to regress heavily. On either site, the Diamondbacks currently project as the overwhelming top value stack. The currently projected lineup only features two bats above $3K on either site for a team with a 4.75 implied run line. How will Arizona’s high projected ownership affect their team rating and which stack projects a better Leverage Rating than Toronto? Check out today’s PlateIQ Live Blog to find out.

Pair of Teammates Among Top Projected Bats for Third Consecutive Day

Yesterday may have been one of the most hitter friendly slates of the season up until that point, but Wednesday night’s nine game slate blows it out of the water with no fewer than four offenses reaching six implied runs, due to Coors and Wrigley winds again, while four more have team run totals exceeding 5.25 and one more above four and a half. Two pairs of teammates project as top 10 bats on both sites tonight, coming from the two highest run totals on the board. WIllson Contreras (two home runs last night, 171 wRC+, .337 ISO vs LHP since 2021) is the second best projected bat on the board and Patrick Wisdom (126 wRC+, .273 ISO) is seventh, while both are also top 10 projected values on FanDuel (Wisdom is on DraftKings as well). Ryan Weathers struggled enough in his rookie season (10.5 K-BB%, 8.4% Barrels/BBE) over 94.2 innings that the Padres have declined to bring him back to the big leagues up until this point in the 2022 season. Still a decently regarded prospect (45+ FV Fangraphs), Weathers has produced just a 5.0 K-BB% over 54.1 AAA innings this year, which doesn’t exactly merit the promotion. Projection systems generate an ERA and estimators around five and RHBs had a .367 wOBA (.347 xwOBA) against him last year. Add in that the hitting conditions are expected to be superior to yesterday at Wrigley and he may wish he had stayed at AAA.

For the third consecutive day this week, both Vladimir Guerrero Jr. (158 wRC+, .257 ISO) and George Springer (161 wRC+, .265 ISO) project as top of the board bats against vulnerable Baltimore pitching. Tonight’s victim is Bruce Zimmermann. After correcting a self-proclaimed issue with tipping pitches, he allowed seven runs to the Royals, striking out two or fewer for the fifth time in six starts. Excellent control (4.2 BB%) still affords him a double digit K-BB% with just a 16.6 K%, but combining that with 13.5% Barrels/BBE generates a 6.44 xERA. RHBs have a .364 wOBA (.390 xwOBA) against him since last year and that’s incredibly troubling against an offense than has the ability to line up entirely right-handed.

In addition, a pair or Rockies (6.0 team total) project as top 10 bats on FanDuel, while a pair of Dodgers (5.28) also do so on DraftKings with minor differences in scoring. Connor Joe (133 wRC+, .182 ISO vs LHP since 2021) and C.J. Cron (128 wRC+, .164 ISO) take aim at Konnor Pilkington at Coors. In a starting role, he has struck out 20 of 85 batters with an impressive 13.3 SwStr%, but with problems all over the rest of his profile, including 13 walks and six barrels (11.8%). In a small sample, RHBs have a .303 wOBA, but .366 xwOBA against him. Another Coors bat, Jose Ramirez (129 wRC+, .237 ISO) is the top projected bat on the board by the way. Mookie Betts (138 wRC+, .231 ISO) and Trea Turner (175 wRC+, .276 ISO) take aim at BABIP wizard Reid Detmers (.194), whom RHBs still have a .324 wOBA and .340 xwOBA against in his career.