NBA 2012: Defense vs. Position – ALL GUARDS

rg misc defense vs position

Tool Description

This page shows the defensive stats for each team against each position on the court. The stats below show points, rebounds, assists etc. for each NBA defense against the Point Guard, Shooting Guard, Small Forward, Power Forward and Center Position. Our NBA Cheat Sheet takes these statistics to the next level by showing you which starters (based on most recent starting player information) are matching up against the Top and Bottom 5 defenses against their position for every day of the week.

Legend

G – Games Played
FPA/GM – Fantasy Points Allowed per Game (to respective Position)
FPA/GM Calculation – Pts=1, Reb=1, Ast=1, Stl=2, Blk=2, TO= -1

NOTE: All Guards includes the opponent backcourt statistics i.e. Point Guards and Shooting Guards combined

SEASON STATS LAST 10 GAMES STATS
POINT GUARDS POINT GUARDS
SHOOTING GUARDS SHOOTING GUARDS
SMALL FORWARDS SMALL FORWARDS
POWER FORWARDS POWER FORWARDS
CENTERS CENTERS
ALL GUARDS ALL GUARDS
ALL BIG MEN ALL BIG MEN
ALL POSITIONS ALL POSITIONS

Team Defenses vs. ALL GUARDS

Rank is in ascending order, meaning that #1 is the toughest team against a given position and #30 is the easiest team against that position

NOTE: Table is sortable. Just click the header of each column to sort!

RANK TEAM POS GP PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FG% 3P% FPPGA
30 L.A.Lakers GRD 80 44 10.6 14.7 3.7 0.8 5.5 43.4% 35.4% 72.8
29 Sacramento GRD 79 43.2 10.4 15.3 3.6 1.1 6.6 45.1% 37.8% 71.7
28 Houston GRD 79 43.1 10 14 4 0.9 6.5 42.5% 36.8% 70.4
27 Charlotte GRD 80 41.4 10.9 14.8 3.3 1.4 6.1 43.4% 38.3% 70.4
26 Dallas GRD 79 42.9 10.6 13.6 4 0.8 6.4 42.6% 35.4% 70.3
25 Minnesota GRD 80 43.8 10.6 13.5 3.5 0.9 6.9 43.8% 37.6% 69.8
24 Cleveland GRD 79 42.2 10.3 14 3.7 1.1 6.4 45.2% 36.2% 69.7
23 Portland GRD 79 40.8 10.4 14.2 3.9 0.8 5.6 43.5% 34.6% 69.2
22 Orlando GRD 80 40.4 10.3 14.4 3.6 0.8 5 44.0% 35.8% 68.9
21 Golden State GRD 80 41.9 9.7 13.8 3.8 0.6 5.9 41.2% 36.8% 68.3
20 Detroit GRD 80 40.8 9.8 13.8 4.2 0.8 6.2 43.6% 37.2% 68.2
19 New Orleans GRD 80 39.5 9.8 14.7 3.9 0.8 5.8 44.5% 36.8% 67.6
18 Atlanta GRD 80 40.9 10.6 13.6 3.6 0.8 6.6 42.6% 37.4% 67.3
17 Utah GRD 80 42.8 9.1 12.8 3.6 0.8 6.3 45.2% 37.4% 67.2
16 Toronto GRD 79 40.7 10.5 13.4 3.5 1 6.6 43.1% 36.6% 67.0
15 Phoenix GRD 80 40.5 9.7 14.4 4 0.7 7.2 44.4% 38.8% 66.8
14 Denver GRD 79 41.1 9.6 13.4 3.5 1.3 7 41.9% 37.4% 66.7
13 San Antonio GRD 79 41.4 9.5 13.2 3.6 0.7 6.2 42.7% 36.4% 66.5
12 Washington GRD 80 41.6 9.9 12.8 3.5 0.5 6.1 43.0% 34.7% 66.2
11 Philadelphia GRD 79 39.5 10.5 13.7 3.4 0.8 5.9 44.0% 35.8% 66.2
10 Indiana GRD 79 40.8 9.9 12.2 3.4 1 6.1 41.3% 34.6% 65.6
9 Milwaukee GRD 80 40.6 9.5 13.5 3.8 0.8 7.4 42.8% 35.9% 65.4
8 Brooklyn GRD 79 39.5 9.8 13 3.5 0.7 5.8 43.5% 38.1% 64.9
7 New York GRD 79 43.2 10.6 11.2 2.5 0.6 6.3 44.3% 36.8% 64.9
6 Oklahoma City GRD 80 39.7 9.4 13.2 3.6 0.6 6.5 40.7% 35.3% 64.2
5 Boston GRD 80 39.2 10.1 12.1 3.6 1 6.7 41.0% 34.7% 63.9
4 Chicago GRD 79 38.6 9.4 11.6 3 0.9 5.8 41.9% 34.3% 61.6
3 L.A.Clippers GRD 80 39.6 8.9 12.6 3.2 0.6 7.2 41.7% 36.7% 61.5
2 Miami GRD 79 37.9 9.1 12.2 4 0.5 7.4 40.3% 34.4% 60.8
1 Memphis GRD 80 37.6 9.7 11.9 3.1 0.8 6.7 40.5% 33.6% 60.3

About the Author